Jonas Hedman wrote:
> On 19-02-28 11:53, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Jonas Hedman wrote:
> >
> > from the frequently useful archlinux wiki:
> >
> >
> > ! Xresources file
> >
> > URxvt*inheritPixmap: true
> > URxvt*transparent: true
> > ! URxvt*shading: 0 to 99 darkens, 101 to 200 lightens
> > U
On 19-02-28 11:53, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Jonas Hedman wrote:
>
> from the frequently useful archlinux wiki:
>
>
> ! Xresources file
>
> URxvt*inheritPixmap: true
> URxvt*transparent: true
> ! URxvt*shading: 0 to 99 darkens, 101 to 200 lightens
> URxvt*shading: 110
>
> Using the URxvt*backgr
Jonas Hedman wrote:
> Just a small update on this problem.
>
> On my laptop, if I comment the line
> URxvt*tintColor: green
> in my .Xresources and run xrdb ~/.Xresources then the transparency works
> if and only if the shading is set to 100. Any value gives me a white bg.
>
> This tells me
Just a small update on this problem.
On my laptop, if I comment the line
URxvt*tintColor: green
in my .Xresources and run xrdb ~/.Xresources then the transparency works
if and only if the shading is set to 100. Any value gives me a white bg.
This tells me nothing but someone more knowledgabl
On 19-02-26 22:38, dekkz...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> which version of compton are you using on each machine?
>
I don't use any compositor on any of the machines due to it being a
little too resource intensive for my taste. Maybe I misunderstood things
but according to
https://ctkarch.org/documentati
On 02/26/2019, Jonas Hedman wrote:
Hi debian-user list
I have a kind of weird problem. I'm trying to get fake transparency to
work in urxvt on my x200.
I have two computers. I think they are pretty much identically configured
with respect to installed packages, configuration files etc (on debia
On Sb, 17 aug 13, 19:42:19, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 04:36:03PM -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> > Doing apt-get --purge remove
> > doesn't work in these situations.
>
> Oops, I actually meant to say apt-get --purge autoremove, not remove.
It seems this hasn't been addressed: l
On 8/18/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 16:36 -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 06:10:52PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> > IIRC there's a command that can fake, that an unmet dependency is
>> > fulfilled. I already searched for apt, dpkg, aptitude regarding to
On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 00:37 +0100, "Karl E. Jørgensen" wrote:
> Are you implying that pulseaudio is badly designed? Just
> curios; I have no intention of re-igniting the pulseaudio debates I've
> seen on the mailing lists and forums in the past...
Without discussing the source code, the way pulse
On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 16:36 -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 06:10:52PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > IIRC there's a command that can fake, that an unmet dependency is
> > fulfilled. I already searched for apt, dpkg, aptitude regarding to this
> > subject, but had no success.
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 04:36:03PM -0700, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> Doing apt-get --purge remove
> doesn't work in these situations.
Oops, I actually meant to say apt-get --purge autoremove, not remove.
Greg
--
web site: http://www.gregn.net
gpg public key: http://www.gregn.net/pubkey.asc
skype:
Gregory Nowak writes:
> For example, installing linux-image-686-pae also installs
> linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae.
Which implies that linux-image-686-pae depends on
linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae.
> However, removing linux-image-686-pae doesn't also remove
> linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae.
Why should it
Hi
On 17/08/13 18:42, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 17:40 +0100, "Karl E. Jørgensen" wrote:
>> Technically, a dummy package is never "needed"
> Hi Karl,
>
> I disagree, in the past years I build a pulseaudio package because it
> was needed. Now I need to fake that pulseaudio and gvfs
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 06:10:52PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> IIRC there's a command that can fake, that an unmet dependency is
> fulfilled. I already searched for apt, dpkg, aptitude regarding to this
> subject, but had no success.
>
> Am I mistake, is a dummy package needed?
I have a question
On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 12:29 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Dom writes:
> > I'm not sure if there is anything that can directly bypass
> > dependencies.
>
> "dpkg --force-depends " will. Don't use it.
AFAIK this does not fulfil the dependency, it will cause an inconsistent
system, since it doesn't
On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 17:40 +0100, "Karl E. Jørgensen" wrote:
> Technically, a dummy package is never "needed"
Hi Karl,
I disagree, in the past years I build a pulseaudio package because it
was needed. Now I need to fake that pulseaudio and gvfs are installed,
because Debian and Ubuntu follow ups
Dom writes:
> I'm not sure if there is anything that can directly bypass
> dependencies.
"dpkg --force-depends " will. Don't use it.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On 17/08/13 17:10, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Hi :)
IIRC there's a command that can fake, that an unmet dependency is
fulfilled. I already searched for apt, dpkg, aptitude regarding to this
subject, but had no success.
Am I mistake, is a dummy package needed?
I'm not sure if there is anything that
Hi
On 17/08/13 17:10, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> IIRC there's a command that can fake, that an unmet dependency is
> fulfilled. I already searched for apt, dpkg, aptitude regarding to this
> subject, but had no success.
>
> Am I mistake, is a dummy package needed?
Well... not a command per se
On 2013-08-17 18:10 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> IIRC there's a command that can fake, that an unmet dependency is
> fulfilled. I already searched for apt, dpkg, aptitude regarding to this
> subject, but had no success.
With dpkg you can --force-depends, but then apt will not be happy about
the s
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:00:45AM +0200, T wrote:
> Hi
>
> I remember there is a tool that allows me to build a fake package which
> contains nothing but package info to satisfy dependencies from other
> packages. What it is?
>
> For example, I never use package Y, but (stupid) package X insist
Cher Tiscalinaute,
L'adresse à partir de laquelle vous nous écrivez ne nous permet pas de vous identifier.
Il vous suffit d'utiliser votre boîte aux lettres Tiscali pour nous réitérer votre
demande. Vous pouvez y accéder sur le lien
http://login.tiscali.fr/default.php
Si toute fois vous étiez d
Hello --
Thanks for writing in to the Math Forum! This automatic response
confirms that we've received your message.
At the bottom of this note, please find a few questions that people
commonly send to the Forum, along with our standard responses.
We sincerely hope that you find the answer to
unsubscribe remove
Attention humans, this address does not exist.
If you are a human please go to the site to find our correct contact information.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[English version follows Dutch text]
DIT IS EEN GEAUTOMATISEERD ANTWOORD
Dank u voor het inlichten van <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Wij bevestigen hierbij
dat uw email is ontvangen. Merk op dat het goed mogelijk is dat u geen
persoonlijk antwoord van ons ontvangt, maar alle meldinge
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 12:50:45AM +, Hugh Saunders wrote:
> hello i am using kernel 2.4.20-686u1205-p2-a
> and am trying to load linux-wlan-ng modules
> these modules were compiled for 2.4.20-pre11-486u1027-sus
> would it be possible to alter the version on these modules?
Maybe...but the ke
Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:58:27PM -0600, ZephyrQ wrote:
> > Thank you, the moving the .REAL command fixed it. I was able to
> > configure my printer
>
> Do take up Joey's kind offer of help though, since it sounds like your
> installation screwed up pretty severly...
H
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:58:27PM -0600, ZephyrQ wrote:
> Thank you, the moving the .REAL command fixed it. I was able to
> configure my printer
Do take up Joey's kind offer of help though, since it sounds like your
installation screwed up pretty severly...
> Now I have to start
Thank you, the moving the .REAL command fixed it. I was able to
configure my printer
Now I have to start tracking down little problems...like my audio and
upgrading the kernal so I can use the latest nvidia drivers...
On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 14:05, Joey Hess wrote:
ZephyrQ wrote:
> >I try to run that command, but get an error:
> >
> > Warning: Fake start-stop-daemon called, doing nothing
It sounds to me like you got a debian system installed that has the fake
start-stop-daemon command used by debootstrap when bootstrapping the
system. That is supposed to b
--- ZephyrQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just installed Debian this past weekend, but I seem to have
> quite
> a few problems getting things to run right. The common thread seems
> to
> be the following:
>
> >I try to run that command, but get an error:
> >
> > Warning: Fake start-s
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 05:28, Tom Badran wrote:
> I have a usb mouse that works nicely on my thinkpad. However, as it is a
> laptop i dont always have it plugged in. If i start X (4.2.1) with the mouse
> plugged in, it works fine, and i can unplug it and plug it in again and all
> works perfectl
also sprach Nicos Gollan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.06.09.1807 +0200]:
> Is there any way to make the package management think a certain package
> was installed?
look at the "equivs" package.
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> ma
I found the following line in ~/.galeon/mozilla/galeon/prefs.js:
user_pref("general.useragent.override",
"Mozilla/5.0 Galeon/0.12.4 (Linux i686) Gecko/20011019");
Looks like you might be able to change this by hand.
--
Eric C. Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
"Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hey guys. How does this work?
>
>lupus:~# apt-get install latex
>Reading Package Lists... Done
>Building Dependency Tree... Done
>Note, selecting tetex-bin instead of latex
>
>I don't see a package called latex in the cache, but apt-get knew
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> Hey guys. How does this work?
>
> lupus:~# apt-get install latex
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Note, selecting tetex-bin instead of latex
>
> I don't see a package called latex in the cache, but apt-get
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 06:56:18PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Oct 29 21:36:30 hostname dhcpd-2.2.x: BOOTREQUEST from
00:00:79:58:97:27 via eth0 (non-rfc1048)
^
This is the MAC of the card. I would recommend to find the system,
which has this card (ifconfig) and then look at the c
equivs
Em Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 10:04:58PM +0100, Jonas Steverud escreveu:
> I downloaded WP8 for some months ago and the idea struck my earlier
> tonight that it would be a good idea to build a fake package for WP8
> that depended on those packages WP8 depends on (whatever those are,
> I've forgo
* "Gregory" == Gregory T Norris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gregory> I haven't used it myself, but I believe that the package name
Gregory> is equivs.
Gregory> On Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 10:04:58PM +0100, Jonas Steverud wrote:
>>
>> I downloaded WP8 for some months ago and the idea struck my earlier
I haven't used it myself, but I believe that the package name is
equivs.
On Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 10:04:58PM +0100, Jonas Steverud wrote:
>
> I downloaded WP8 for some months ago and the idea struck my earlier
> tonight that it would be a good idea to build a fake package for WP8
> that depended o
40 matches
Mail list logo
