Goeman Stefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GS> For historical reasons I still like to use emacs_20.6 and I am
GS> just experimenting with xemacs. The problem is that for some
GS> global settings both programs make use of the file .emacs. I find
GS> this not so convenient and I would like emacs_20.
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, last night while running lynx I clicked on a .gif link and
> low-and-behold, the image appeared! So apparently lynx can handle some
> types of graphics. All this time when I was asking for a graphical
> console-based web browser because lynx can't h
0600 (CST)
> > From: Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "/G=BUREAU/S=DISTRIBUTEUR/DD.HPMEXT1=BUREAU
> DISTRIBUTEUR$/TTETIV$/01"@desk.thomson-csf.com
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > Debian User List
> > Subject: Re: emacs & xemacs
&g
DISTRIBUTEUR$/TTETIV$/01"@desk.thomson-csf.com
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> Debian User List
> Subject: Re: emacs & xemacs
> Resent-Date: 10 Dec 1998 05:12:37 -
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
>
> Near a
Near as I can tell, this was sent to me but not to the list. Anyone out
there who can translate it for me? Thanks!
On 10 Dec 1998 /G=BUREAU/S=DISTRIBUTEUR/DD.HPMEXT1=BUREAU
DISTRIBUTEUR$/TTETIV$/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Votre message n'a pas pu ?tre distribue ? :
> Franck Fl LEGALL / TTETI
At 10:08 AM 12/9/1998 -0800, you wrote:
>Kent West wrote:
>>
>> Ever since I started with Linux I've wanted a console-based graphical web
>> browser, but kept running into a brick wall. Then I read that emacs could
>
>Uh, isn't "console-based graphical " an oxymoron? How could
>your ever expect t
On Wed Dec 9, 1998, Keith Beattie wrote:
> Kent West wrote:
> >
> > Ever since I started with Linux I've wanted a console-based graphical web
> > browser, but kept running into a brick wall. Then I read that emacs could
>
> Uh, isn't "console-based graphical " an oxymoron? How could
> your ever
Kent West wrote:
>
> Ever since I started with Linux I've wanted a console-based graphical web
> browser, but kept running into a brick wall. Then I read that emacs could
Uh, isn't "console-based graphical " an oxymoron? How could
your ever expect to see graphics on a text-only display? (Unless
On Wed, 9 Dec 1998, Shao Zhang wrote:
> Hi all,
> By the way, can I use emacs to display the image(i.e. like
> netscape, not lynx)??
>
>
> Thanks...
>
> Shao
Ever since I started with Linux I've wanted a console-based graphical web
browser, but kept running into a brick wall. Th
I didn't received the original message yet, so I answer to the
followup of Alexander.
>> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 20:04:47 -0500
>> From: the lone gunman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Matt Garman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: Debian/GNU User's List
>> Subject: emacs/xemacs conflict?
>> Resent-Date
Hi...
XEmacs also has a console mode with which you can replace GNU Emacs. I'm
not sure that it's exactly the same, but it does work and is good.
Alex
On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, the lone gunman wrote:
> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 20:04:47 -0500
> From: the lone gunman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Matt
On Mon, Apr 13, 1998 at 07:16:15AM -0700, Richard Sevenich wrote:
> It appears that to pursue sgml in a free environment, authoring tools
> are restricted to psgml via emacs or xemacs. Is there a preference with
> respect to psgml? Further, is there a general preference in the selection
> of xemacs
12 matches
Mail list logo
