On 8/30/2013 12:04 AM, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:25:31AM -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
The problem with changing upstream code is it is not a one-shot
deal. Changes must be investigated and applied every time a new
version comes out, which means someone has to keep track o
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:25:31AM -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
> The problem with changing upstream code is it is not a one-shot
> deal. Changes must be investigated and applied every time a new
> version comes out, which means someone has to keep track of the
> changes which were done, and see
Does the daemon allow dropping privileges? If not, then it will bot be able to
bind to a port below 1024.
This option does not seem to be available in dhcpd
Cheers
Iain
Andrew Wood wrote:
>On 28/08/13 01:13, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>
>> Reading through the bug report, it looks like upstream di
On 8/29/2013 8:24 AM, Andrew Wood wrote:
On 28/08/13 01:13, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
Reading through the bug report, it looks like upstream didn't accept
it. Debian stays as close as possible to upstream, for good reason.
I agree its good to keep things as close as possible to upstream, but
unles
On 28/08/13 01:13, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
Reading through the bug report, it looks like upstream didn't accept
it. Debian stays as close as possible to upstream, for good reason.
I agree its good to keep things as close as possible to upstream, but
unless upstream can present some compelling ar
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 08:13:43PM -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 8/27/2013 5:26 PM, Andrew Wood wrote:
> >Why does dhcpd (installed from isc-dhcp-server package in WHeezy) run as
> >root not a less privileged user?
> >
> >The only reference to this subject I can find is this bug report first
> >
On 8/27/2013 5:26 PM, Andrew Wood wrote:
Why does dhcpd (installed from isc-dhcp-server package in WHeezy) run as
root not a less privileged user?
The only reference to this subject I can find is this bug report first
filed in 2005 and seemingly still not fixed...
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
--- b...@iguanasuicide.net wrote:
From: "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: urp...@linuxwaves.com
Subject: Re: dhcpd tftp boot server configuration
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 12:36:20 -0600
In <20110225224107.36ea4...@resin06.mta.everyone.net>, urp
In <20110225224107.36ea4...@resin06.mta.everyone.net>, urpion urpion wrote:
>Hello! I need
[...]
>declaration?here's what I got in
>/etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf## Sample
>configuration file for ISC dhcpd for
>Debian### The
I can't understand you through the HTML. Also, it is against list policy to
post
Steve Kemp wrote:
On Wed May 27, 2009 at 21:21:07 +0200, pch0317 wrote:
Can I use two "range" entry in dhcpd.conf?
What happened when you tried it?
or can I use two "range" in "pool" bracket?
What happened when you tried it?
Seriously the time it takes to test this
On Wed May 27, 2009 at 21:21:07 +0200, pch0317 wrote:
> Can I use two "range" entry in dhcpd.conf?
What happened when you tried it?
> or can I use two "range" in "pool" bracket?
What happened when you tried it?
Seriously the time it takes to test this
has got to be less than the time it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/20/08 10:39, Forsaken wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:17:16 -0400
> Forsaken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nevermind, I'm just being retarded. Here's the guilty culprit right
> here:
>
>> subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>> r
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:17:16 -0400
Forsaken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nevermind, I'm just being retarded. Here's the guilty culprit right
here:
> subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> range 192.168.2.100 192.168.3.200;
Looked over it ten times and didn't see it until *after* I sp
Forsaken wrote:
> This is what my dhcpd.conf looks like:
>
> ddns-update-style none;
> option domain-name "boo.local";
> option domain-name-servers 192.168.3.7,192.168.1.1;
> default-lease-time 600;
> max-lease-time 7200;
> log-facility local7;
> subnet 192.168.3.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 04:18:39PM -0700, Clarence W. Robison wrote:
Content-Description: Mail message body
> On 26 Jul 2007 at 16:05, Clarence W. Robison wrote:
>
> > I have an entry in my dhcp3 dhcpd.conf which says that host xyz with
> > certain MAC address should receive a fixed ip address. Th
Clarence W. Robison([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
Content-Description: Mail message body
> On 26 Jul 2007 at 16:05, Clarence W. Robison wrote:
>
> > I have an entry in my dhcp3 dhcpd.conf which says that host xyz with
> > certain MAC address should receive a fixed ip address. The se
On 26 Jul 2007 at 16:05, Clarence W. Robison wrote:
> I have an entry in my dhcp3 dhcpd.conf which says that host xyz with
> certain MAC address should receive a fixed ip address. The server does
> not respect that entry and gives the IP address to another host with a
> different MAC address. I do
On Monday 10 May 2004 09:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was just wondering if there is any way to know all the IP addresses
> curently assigned by my dhcpd server (with associated MAC addresses)?
If you are using the ISC dhcpd server, try the
file /var/lib/dhcp/dhcpd.leases. Note that some of
Thanks. I'll give it a try.
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Adam Aube wrote:
> On Monday 16 February 2004 07:57 pm, Peter Quackenbush wrote:
> > First, I'm not sure if this is the correct mailing list.
>
> Since your question is a general DHCP client question, this list is the
> right place.
>
> > Is there
On Monday 16 February 2004 08:45 pm, Brett Carrington wrote:
> The problem is that it requires configuration on EVERY SINGLE cluster
> machine. It's not really optimal if you want a real netboot kind of
> cluster. The OP is trying to do something DHCP wasn't designed to do.
Yes, it does require co
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 08:38:53PM -0500, Adam Aube wrote:
> On Monday 16 February 2004 07:57 pm, Peter Quackenbush wrote:
> > First, I'm not sure if this is the correct mailing list.
>
> Since your question is a general DHCP client question, this list is the
> right place.
>
> > Is there some c
On Monday 16 February 2004 07:57 pm, Peter Quackenbush wrote:
> First, I'm not sure if this is the correct mailing list.
Since your question is a general DHCP client question, this list is the
right place.
> Is there some configuration I can give to the dhcp clients to tell them
> which dhcp ser
On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 05:40:50PM -0800, Johannes Graumann wrote:
> Please let me know if you spot anything in the configs below.
I am not sure about those - but have you set the necessary kernel
options? that means you should have compiled the kernel with
capabilites for dhcp. Unfortunately, I
On 15 Jan 2004, Ryan Mackay wrote:
> 192.168.0.20 is not a subnet, i think what you are after is 192.168.0.0
> --
> Cheers,
> rinmak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
Thanks to you and Jacob for the advice. I find I don't need dhcp after
all for the moment, which is a relief, but I'll keep your replies fo
192.168.0.20 is not a subnet, i think what you are after is 192.168.0.0
--
Cheers,
rinmak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:49:33 +
Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My /etc/dhcpd.conf is as follows:
>
>
> # dhcpd.conf
> #
> subnet 192.168.0.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 {}
> -
>
> This produces the following error
As it turns out, there was a typo in the firewall rules... the traffic
in question was indeed legit. D'oh!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:27:33PM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> I don't know about the particulars but this is from man dhcpd.conf:
>"The bootp keyword
>
> allow bootp;
> deny bootp;
>
>The bootp flag is used to tell dhcpd whether or not to respond to bootp
>
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 03:53:29PM -0600, Greg Norris wrote:
> It appears that sasami is trying to send bootp packets to one of the
> internal boxes. As far as I can see, tho, dhcpd is configured for dhcp
> only... I've included my dhcpd.conf below. Do I need to do something
> special to turn off
Kent West wrote:
Kent West wrote:
Kent West wrote:
Kent West wrote:
When I boot the client pc ("bi-12x"), it gets the IP address
150.252.217.49 from my dhcpd/tftp server, as indicated by the BIOS's
PXE messages. But then, instead of finding the pxelinux.0 file on my
dhcpd/tftp server, it find
Kent West wrote:
Kent West wrote:
Kent West wrote:
When I boot the client pc ("bi-12x"), it gets the IP address
150.252.217.49 from my dhcpd/tftp server, as indicated by the BIOS's PXE
messages. But then, instead of finding the pxelinux.0 file on my
dhcpd/tftp server, it finds the campus's cen
Kent West wrote:
Kent West wrote:
When I boot the client pc ("bi-19x"), it gets the IP address
150.252.x.y from my dhcpd/tftp server, as indicated by the BIOS's PXE
messages. But then, instead of finding the pxelinux.0 file on my
dhcpd/tftp server, it finds the campus's central RIS server inst
Kent West wrote:
When I boot the client pc ("bi-19x"), it gets the IP address
150.252.x.y from my dhcpd/tftp server, as indicated by the BIOS's PXE
messages. But then, instead of finding the pxelinux.0 file on my
dhcpd/tftp server, it finds the campus's central RIS server instead.
How do I get
Kent West wrote:
Albert Dengg wrote:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 10:38:34 -0600
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do I get my client to get my tftp offering instead of the RIS
offering? BTW, the RIS server is on a different network segment.
you can simply add "next-server yourserver;" to your
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 15:26:40 -0600,
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 10:38:34 -0600,
> > Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> >> fixed-address 150.252.x.y; # x & y to protect the innocent
>
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 10:38:34 -0600,
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
fixed-address 150.252.x.y; # x & y to protect the innocent
..said Kent posting from 128.51. ;-)
Ssh-h-h! That's a secret!
I've always wondered if it was of any worth to not publish full I
Albert Dengg wrote:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 10:38:34 -0600
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do I get my client to get my tftp offering instead of the RIS
offering? BTW, the RIS server is on a different network segment.
you can simply add "next-server yourserver;" to your dhcpd.conf, either
fo
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 10:38:34 -0600,
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm trying to put together a proof-of-concept thin-client Debian
> computer lab at my university.
>
> Here at the university, we have a centralized RIS (Remote Imaging
> Server? Microsoft
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 10:38:34 -0600
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> host bi-19x {
>hardware ethernet 00:03:47:16:e2:58;
>fixed-address 150.252.x.y; # x & y to protect the innocent
>filename "/lts/2.4.22-ltsp-1/pxelinux.0";
> }
>
> When I boot the client pc ("bi-19x"), it get
* Bill Moseley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021229 21:58]:
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Dave Sherohman wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 10:44:02AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > >
> > > Running a few dhcp clients ends up generating a lot of DHCPREQUEST
> > > messages. I'm not clear how to set the interval
On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 10:44:02AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> >
> > Running a few dhcp clients ends up generating a lot of DHCPREQUEST
> > messages. I'm not clear how to set the interval that the client sends
> > those requests. I looked at man dh
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 10:44:02AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
>
> Running a few dhcp clients ends up generating a lot of DHCPREQUEST
> messages. I'm not clear how to set the interval that the client sends
> those requests. I looked at man dhclient.conf but didn't see the
> setting. I tried set
Gerald V. Livingston II, 2002-Dec-29 13:54 -0600:
> Jeff said:
>
> > Bill Moseley, 2002-Dec-29 10:44 -0800:
> >>
> >> In my server I've got
> >>
> >> default-lease-time 600;
> >>
> >> but the DHCPREQEST messages are sent from the client every five
> >> minutes so
>
> > The default lease time is
Jeff said:
> Bill Moseley, 2002-Dec-29 10:44 -0800:
>>
>> In my server I've got
>>
>> default-lease-time 600;
>>
>> but the DHCPREQEST messages are sent from the client every five
>> minutes so
> The default lease time is in seconds, so 600 is 5 minutes. That's why
> the clients make a new req
Bill Moseley, 2002-Dec-29 10:44 -0800:
>
> Running a few dhcp clients ends up generating a lot of DHCPREQUEST
> messages. I'm not clear how to set the interval that the client sends
> those requests. I looked at man dhclient.conf but didn't see the
> setting. I tried setting a "retry" but that
At 04:05 PM 11/22/02 -0800, Jeff wrote:
>Yeah, I saw that, but I don't what "SIGUSR1" is let alone how to send
>one. Perhaps you can shed some light on that for me?
man kill
kill -USR1
--
Bill Moseley
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
Bill Moseley, 2002-Nov-22 14:15 -0800:
> At 11:07 AM 11/22/02 -0800, Jeff wrote:
>
> (regarding dnsmasq)
>
> >I was just wondering if there's a way to view the cache. I couldn't
> >find anything in the man page. Is it possible?
>
> I didn't try it but the man pages says:
>
>When it receiv
At 11:07 AM 11/22/02 -0800, Jeff wrote:
(regarding dnsmasq)
>I was just wondering if there's a way to view the cache. I couldn't
>find anything in the man page. Is it possible?
I didn't try it but the man pages says:
When it receives a SIGUSR1, dnsmasq writes cache statistics to the sys-
Jeff, 2002-Nov-22 10:25 -0800:
> Bill Moseley, 2002-Nov-22 09:06 -0800:
> > >I made one change to the
> > >/etc/init.d/dnsmasq script to make it listen only on eth1 upon
> > >startup. Quick and easy!
> >
> > I think you should be editing
> >/etc/default/dnsmasq
>
> Oops! You're right. I ju
Bill Moseley, 2002-Nov-22 09:06 -0800:
> >I made one change to the
> >/etc/init.d/dnsmasq script to make it listen only on eth1 upon
> >startup. Quick and easy!
>
> I think you should be editing
>/etc/default/dnsmasq
Oops! You're right. I just put that change here and also uncommented
the
At 06:02 AM 11/22/02 -0800, Jeff wrote:
>I can vouch for dnsmasq. I just installed it based on this email. I
>have a cable-modem connected to eth0 and eth1 goes to a hub and
>several PC's that are NAT'd.
Yep, I'm using it too. Seems fine, although not sure why not just use Bind
(except that dns
Bill Moseley, 2002-Nov-20 20:21 -0800:
> At 08:41 PM 11/20/02 -0600, David Bell wrote:
> >On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 17:57, Bill Moseley wrote:
> >> 2) if the ppp-reported name server changes how do I update the "option
> >> domain-name-servers" in my /etc/dhcpd.conf file automatically?
> >
> >I would r
At 08:41 PM 11/20/02 -0600, David Bell wrote:
>On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 17:57, Bill Moseley wrote:
>> 2) if the ppp-reported name server changes how do I update the "option
>> domain-name-servers" in my /etc/dhcpd.conf file automatically?
>
>I would recommend running a caching DNS server on this box,
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 17:57, Bill Moseley wrote:
> 2) if the ppp-reported name server changes how do I update the "option
> domain-name-servers" in my /etc/dhcpd.conf file automatically?
I would recommend running a caching DNS server on this box, since it
will be used to service a LAN. This way,
On 14-Mar-2002 Rick Pasotto wrote:
> When I try to start dhcpd I get the following in daemon.log:
>
> Mar 14 10:27:30 tc dhcpd-2.2.x: socket: Protocol not available - make
> sure CONFIG_PACKET and CONFIG_FILTER are defined in your kernel
> configuration!
> Mar 14 10:27:30 tc dhcpd-2.2.x: exiting.
On 09-Mar-2002 Charlie Grosvenor wrote:
> hi
> My machine has three network cards in it each attached to a different
> network. I am trying to use dhcpd to provide ip addresses to machines on two
> of the networks but don't want it to provide ip addresses to the third
> network. I have but sub
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 11:04:19AM -0800, Stonelx scribbled...
> Do you know where your dhcp server is broadcasting?
> For ex, it may not be broadcasting on your eth1 (192.168.1.1)
> In the past, I have gone into /etc/init.d/dhcp and
> specified which nics to run my dhcp server on.
> --exec /u
A good way to debug this situation is to monitor syslog on the dhcp
server as it gives a lot of details concerning leases it appropriates
to clients. This way you can see who is talking to whom.
Next on the list is tcpdump.
Elizabeth
Do you know where your dhcp server is broadcasting?
For ex, it may not be broadcasting on your eth1 (192.168.1.1)
In the past, I have gone into /etc/init.d/dhcp and
specified which nics to run my dhcp server on.
--exec /usr/sbin/dhcp eth1 eth2
hth,
Mike
Quoting Jason Majors <[EMAIL PROTECTE
martin f krafft, 2001-Nov-30 11:21 +0100:
> so i have a dhcp zone with refresh time 3 hours over here for one of
> the subnets. usually i plug into that subnet once in the evening and
> once in the morning, but every time i get assigned a different ip
> address. there are no other leases being give
> "Bill" == Bill Vinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bill> I determined what my problem was. I was using vinson.home as my
Bill> domain as I don't own a real one. When I switched it to
Bill> vinson.com it started working. It seems pump requires a real dns
Bill> name.
Probably a pump issue. I u
I determined what my problem was. I was using vinson.home as my domain
as I don't own a real one. When I switched it to vinson.com it started
working. It seems pump requires a real dns name.
Bill
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Ron Golan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 09:26:42PM +0200, Guy Geens wrote
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 09:26:42PM +0200, Guy Geens wrote:
> > "Bill" == Bill Vinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Bill> I am having problems with dhcpd and pump. I run dhcpd on another
> Bill> system to manage my home net's IPs, but I can't get the
> Bill> domainsearch list to be populated
> "Bill" == Bill Vinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bill> I am having problems with dhcpd and pump. I run dhcpd on another
Bill> system to manage my home net's IPs, but I can't get the
Bill> domainsearch list to be populated in /etc/resolv.conf. When I
Bill> obtain a lease with pump, it change
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 09:44:00AM +0100, Martin Würtele wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have a problem with the dhcpd:
> nt clients get a correct ip address, the name servers, the subnet mask and
> everything but the default gateway
>
> my dhcpd.conf as follows:
> opition domain-name "office.factline.com";
>
Dave Slotter wrote:
[snip]
> I don't know if I'm running slink or potato or whatever,
>
>
[snip]
//
cat /etc/debian_version
(2.1 = slink)
(2.2 = potato)
hth.
bentley taylor.
//
Dave Slotter wrote:
>
> I'm a bit confused by all of this, because dhcp-0.70 is supposed to
> only
> work with 2.0.x kernels, which you have, and 1.3.18 is supposed to
> only
> work with 2.2.x kernels. Maybe they changed the way 2.0.36 works?
> (from
> previous
I'm a bit confused by all of this, because dhcp-0.70 is supposed to only
work with 2.0.x kernels, which you have, and 1.3.18 is supposed to only
work with 2.2.x kernels. Maybe they changed the way 2.0.36 works? (from
previous 2.0.x kernels.)
Well, I have been havin
Dave Slotter wrote:
>
> While I am a newbie in regards to the naming conventions of Debian, I
> have been using it for about a year now with excellent success. I
> have had so much success that I upgraded from my 486 "learning box"
> to a dual Celeron motherboard (ABIT BP6), 30 gig disk, 10BASE-T
Mark Hannon wrote:
> I am having major trouble getting dhcpd and slink to work. (Details of
> system
> below). I can start the dhcp up, but I never see any dhcp activity in the
> system
> logs and can't obtain an IP address for my Win98 laptop. Any suggestions
> as to what I can try? [I have alr
I moved from slink's default 2.0.36 to 2.2.1 (yes, I know).
dhcp-client-beta turns out to work properly.
--- "Shevin, Avraham (A.N.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What kernel are you upgrading from and to? You may need to use
> dhcpcd-sv
> instead of the stock dhcpcd. An strace might be instruct
What kernel are you upgrading from and to? You may need to use dhcpcd-sv
instead of the stock dhcpcd. An strace might be instructive.
Avi Shevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Brian McGroarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 1999 10:34 AM
To: debian-user@l
Hi again guys end girls
I have found an answer to my problem. I should have checked the dhcp mailing
list archive before, but ... Well; Sorry to have posted the wrong list.
In fact, I forgot to mention my dhcp server gives static addresses following
the MAC address of the PC's. And at this time,
>
> Hello.
>
> I cannot figure how to use the dhcpd client. Any tips ?
>
Make sure you installed dhcpcd and NOT dhcpd. dhcpd is for servers giving out
IPs, dhcpcd is for clients.
If you are running a 2.2.x kernel (or late 2.1.x) get dhcpcd-sv from potato.
74 matches
Mail list logo
