On Fri 22 Jun 2012 at 12:10:24 +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Brian:
> >
> > At this stage you might ask youself whether the time and frustration
> > involved in upgrading from something which is pre-Lenny is really worth
> > it. Is there any practical reason why you should not do a new Squeeze
>
Brian:
>
> At this stage you might ask youself whether the time and frustration
> involved in upgrading from something which is pre-Lenny is really worth
> it. Is there any practical reason why you should not do a new Squeeze
> install?
ACK. It looks like the OP (inadvertantly?) tried to do somet
On Fri 22 Jun 2012 at 14:36:42 +0530, Joy Sankar Sengupta wrote:
> The outpur is given bellow:-
>
> client:/home/student# apt-get install dpkg
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Done
> You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these:
> The following packages
The outpur is given bellow:-
client:/home/student# apt-get install dpkg
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
dpkg: PreDepends: libc6 (>= 2.6) but 2.3.6.ds1-13etch
On 22/06/12 08:51, Joy Sankar Sengupta wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Brian wrote:
On Thu 21 Jun 2012 at 11:34:06 +, Joy Sankar Sengupta wrote:
I think it is working now.But still getting some error while installing
downloaded updates.
dpkg: regarding .../ncurses-base_5.7+2010
I have done both upgrade and dist-upgrade and got the same type of
error.For dist-upgrade, the error is :-" Errors were encountered while
processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc-bin_2.11.3-3_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)"
The output of "dpkg -l | grep dpkg":-
On Thu 21 Jun 2012 at 11:34:06 +, Joy Sankar Sengupta wrote:
> I think it is working now.But still getting some error while installing
> downloaded updates.
>
> dpkg: regarding .../ncurses-base_5.7+20100313-5_all.deb containing
> ncurses-base:
> package uses Breaks; not supported in this dpkg
I think it is working now.But still getting some error while installing
downloaded updates.
dpkg: regarding .../ncurses-base_5.7+20100313-5_all.deb containing
ncurses-base:
package uses Breaks; not supported in this dpkg
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/ncurses-base_5.7+20100313-5_al
On Thu 21 Jun 2012 at 16:06:53 +0530, Joy Sankar Sengupta wrote:
> Now I am getting the following error after executing "apt-get update":
> Reading package lists... Done
> W: GPG error: http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze Release: The following
> signatures couldn't be verified because the public key
Now I am getting the following error after executing "apt-get update":
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://ftp.us.debian.org squeeze Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available:
NO_PUBKEY AED4B06F473041FA
W: You may want to run apt-g
On Thu 21 Jun 2012 at 08:00:40 +, Joy Sankar Sengupta wrote:
> After changing the sourcelist by the following:
> ftp.de.debian.org_debian_dists_etch_main_binary-i386_Packages)
> ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_etch_contrib_binary-i386_Packages)
> ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_etch_main_binary
After changing the sourcelist by the following:
ftp.de.debian.org_debian_dists_etch_main_binary-i386_Packages)
ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_etch_contrib_binary-i386_Packages)
ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_etch_main_binary-i386_Packages)
ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_etch_non-free_binary-i386_P
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Brian wrote:
>
> You could also post the contents of your /etc/apt/sources.list.
>From reading the errors, his sources.list points to sarge, etch, *and*
lenny, none of which are provided on the main servers these days.
>From parsing the output he's pointing to the
On Tue 19 Jun 2012 at 12:14:06 +, Joy Sankar Sengupta wrote:
> I have done everything you have suggested.now the resolv.conf file showing
> the nameserver.I have add the signature.asc as a key file in software
> source.But I am getting same error error.Please suggest some thing.
[Lots of snip
I have done everything you have suggested.now the resolv.conf file showing
the nameserver.I have add the signature.asc as a key file in software
source.But I am getting same error error.Please suggest some thing.
Best Regards,
Joysankar Sengupta
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Jochen Spieker w
Joy Sankar Sengupta:
>
> After applying any command like "apt-get install/update/upgrade" I am
> getting following error:
-- snip
> W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Just do as suggested and run 'apt-get update
On 06/14/2012 09:33 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Alberto Fuentes wrote:
Joy Sankar Sengupta wrote:
After executing the command I got the following output:-
# generated by NetworkManager, do not edit!
I dont know if you suffer from other problems/bugs as others said,
but your main problem is that you
Alberto Fuentes wrote:
> Joy Sankar Sengupta wrote:
> >After executing the command I got the following output:-
> ># generated by NetworkManager, do not edit!
>
> I dont know if you suffer from other problems/bugs as others said,
> but your main problem is that you dont have a DNS server set in yo
After executing the command ( cat /etc/resolv.conf ) I got the following
output:-
# generated by NetworkManager, do not edit!
Best Regards,
Joysankar Sengupta
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Alberto Fuentes wrote:
> Please, answer to the list. You only emailed me :)
>
> I dont know if you suf
Please, answer to the list. You only emailed me :)
I dont know if you suffer from other problems/bugs as others said, but
your main problem is that you dont have a DNS server set in your
computer as seen in your empty /etc/resolv.conf and your previous error
>Err http://http.us.debian.org etc
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:26:23 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 13:56 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> You want to upgrade your current Debian system or your GNOME version?
>
> I suspect Debian, not GNOME 2 to the last GNOME 2.
Then he'll do the best by installing Squeeze because Lenny
Re: Up-gradation problem with gnome 2.14
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:17:47 +0100
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=431410
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:55:09 +0530, Joy Sankar Sengupta wrote:
(please, no html messages, thanks...)
> I want to upgrade my machine which has gnome 2.14 version to latest
> version.
You want to upgrade your current Debian system or your GNOME version?
The former can be possible (with some "buts
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 01:00:54PM BST, Joy Sankar Sengupta wrote:
> E: Dynamic MMap ran out of room
> E: Error occurred while processing libzeroc-ice34-dbg (NewVersion1)
> E: Problem with MergeList
> /var/lib/apt/lists/http.us.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_
> main_binary-i386_Packages
> E: The packa
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 17:30 +0530, Joy Sankar Sengupta wrote:
> client:/home/student# apt-get update
> Err http://http.us.debian.org etch Release.gpg
> Could not resolve 'http.us.debian.org'
Since Firefox is able to reach http://http.us.debian.org/
here and ping http.us.debian.org returned
"PIN
cat /etc/resolv.conf ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd8904d.6050...@qindel.com
>From Desktop->Administrator->Update manager I have launched the update
manager window.After few seconds the window is disappeared.
>From console I am getting following errors:
student@client:~$ su
Password:
client:/home/student# apt-get update
Err http://http.us.debian.org etch Release.gpg
Coul
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 16:55 +0530, Joy Sankar Sengupta wrote:
> Its getting some error while upgrading
What information might be missing to get useful replies ;)?
If the error messages should be to large for an email please use
http://paste.debian.net/ , http://pastebin.com/ or similar.
Hth :p,
28 matches
Mail list logo
