Re: Spamhaus Blacklist

2014-05-23 Thread Joe
On Fri, 23 May 2014 09:15:07 -0400 Jerry Stuckle wrote: > On 5/23/2014 3:02 AM, Joe wrote: > > On Thu, 22 May 2014 18:38:37 -0500 > > John Hasler wrote: > > > >> Joe writes: > >>> But you normally only get one spam at a time from one ISP, which > >>> suggests they do spot the problem themselves

Re: Spamhaus Blacklist

2014-05-23 Thread Jerry Stuckle
On 5/23/2014 3:02 AM, Joe wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 18:38:37 -0500 John Hasler wrote: Joe writes: But you normally only get one spam at a time from one ISP, which suggests they do spot the problem themselves fairly quickly... It suggests that the spammers are quite sophisticated in their u

Re: Spamhaus Blacklist

2014-05-23 Thread Joe
On Thu, 22 May 2014 18:38:37 -0500 John Hasler wrote: > Joe writes: > > But you normally only get one spam at a time from one ISP, which > > suggests they do spot the problem themselves fairly quickly... > > It suggests that the spammers are quite sophisticated in their use of > their bots. The

Re: Spamhaus Blacklist

2014-05-22 Thread Jerry Stuckle
On 5/22/2014 4:15 PM, Bob Holtzman wrote: On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 01:47:50PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:06 PM, basti wrote: Actually I get some spam from "84.19.164.45"but this ip is not blocked at the moment. Forward the message including all headers to the ab

Re: Spamhaus Blacklist

2014-05-22 Thread John Hasler
Joe writes: > But you normally only get one spam at a time from one ISP, which > suggests they do spot the problem themselves fairly quickly... It suggests that the spammers are quite sophisticated in their use of their bots. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Re: Spamhaus Blacklist

2014-05-22 Thread Joe
On Thu, 22 May 2014 22:27:28 +0200 Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: > > I'm saying: > > Send an _e-mail_ to the abuse contact point for the IP address block > owner. > > Don't simply blacklist. Well, feel free to add the IP address in > question to a local blacklist, but if you can't be arsed to notify

Re: Spamhaus Blacklist

2014-05-22 Thread Jan Ingvoldstad
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Bob Holtzman wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 01:47:50PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: >> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:06 PM, basti wrote: >> > Actually I get some spam from "84.19.164.45"but this ip is not blocked >> > at the moment. >> >> >> Forward the message i

Re: Spamhaus Blacklist

2014-05-22 Thread Bob Holtzman
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 01:47:50PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:06 PM, basti wrote: > > Actually I get some spam from "84.19.164.45"but this ip is not blocked > > at the moment. > > > Forward the message including all headers to the abuse contact for the > IP addres

Re: Spamhaus Blacklist

2014-05-22 Thread Mr. Queue
On 5/22/2014 6:16 AM, Henning Follmann wrote: > I thought that this is handled via ACLs. And not by Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/537e0915.

Re: Spamhaus Blacklist

2014-05-22 Thread Jan Ingvoldstad
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:06 PM, basti wrote: > Actually I get some spam from "84.19.164.45"but this ip is not blocked > at the moment. Forward the message including all headers to the abuse contact for the IP address. You can look this up using whois. whois 84.19.164.45 => ... % Abuse cont

Re: Spamhaus Blacklist

2014-05-22 Thread Henning Follmann
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:44:49PM +0200, basti wrote: > Hello, > I use the spamhaus blacklist for exim (CHECK_RCPT_IP_DNSBLS). > > First of all what are the differences between CHECK_RCPT_IP_DNSBLS and > CHECK_RCPT_DOMAIN_DNSBLS ?? > > Make it sense to use both? if yes can I also use zen.spamhau