On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Bob Holtzman <hol...@cox.net> wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 01:47:50PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: >> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:06 PM, basti <mailingl...@unix-solution.de> wrote: >> > Actually I get some spam from "84.19.164.45"but this ip is not blocked >> > at the moment. >> >> >> Forward the message including all headers to the abuse contact for the >> IP address. >> >> You can look this up using whois. >> >> whois 84.19.164.45 => >> >> % Abuse contact for '84.19.164.32 - 84.19.164.63' is 'ab...@keyweb.de' > > I would think that that's a good way of getting a *bunch* of people > pissed off when the entire block is blacklisted. Better to filter the ip > at your mail client.
What? No, you misunderstand. I'm saying: Send an _e-mail_ to the abuse contact point for the IP address block owner. Don't simply blacklist. Well, feel free to add the IP address in question to a local blacklist, but if you can't be arsed to notify the netblock owner, don't expect anything to happen with the problem. -- Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAEffzkw-bD0Q2RfMS7w3K7VBMc2WPAN8MVZ+jZX532198k=q...@mail.gmail.com
