Am 02.10.2023 um 13:16:24 Uhr schrieb Richmond:
> I received a segmentation fault from chromium. Would it be logged
> anywhere?
Install gdb and run it with that to get more information.
On 2017-05-09, Bob McGowan wrote:
>>
> I just tried the OP's command line and got the following error:
>
> $ top -b1 -hc
> procps-ng 3.3.12
> Usage:
> top -hv | -bcHiOSs -d secs -n max -u|U user -p pid(s) -o field -w [cols]
>
> I can say with assurance that I have not manually installed anythi
On 05/08/2017 03:28 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:46:13AM +0200, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> > On 05/08/2017 11:19 AM, Valentin Bajrami wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> There is a segmentation fault when top is used as follow
> >>
> >> top -b1 -hc
> >>
> >> I think the args are no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:46:13AM +0200, Peter Ludikovsky wrote:
> On 05/08/2017 11:19 AM, Valentin Bajrami wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is a segmentation fault when top is used as follow
> >
> > top -b1 -hc
> >
> > I think the args are not parsed
On 05/08/2017 11:19 AM, Valentin Bajrami wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a segmentation fault when top is used as follow
>
> top -b1 -hc
>
> I think the args are not parsed properly. The version used is:
> procps-ng version 3.3.10
>
> --
> Met vriendelijke groet,
>
> Valentin Bajrami
There's no p
Hi,
Christian Hödl wrote:
> [...] vlc [...]
> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> #0 0x7f1726489743 in av_freep () from
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libavutil.so.54
> [...] xine [...]
> Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
> #0 0x7f79cd291107 in __GI
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Paul E Condon
wrote:
> On 20110413_202225, Javier Vasquez wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Don J wrote:
>> > For a week or more, I've been having problems with iceape and a few
>> > other programs. As far as I can see, they get a segmentation fault
>> >
On 20110413_202225, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Don J wrote:
> > For a week or more, I've been having problems with iceape and a few
> > other programs. As far as I can see, they get a segmentation fault
> > and just disappear. From the debugging and back traces that
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Don J wrote:
> For a week or more, I've been having problems with iceape and a few
> other programs. As far as I can see, they get a segmentation fault
> and just disappear. From the debugging and back traces that I've
> done, it appears that I may be missing or
lee schreef:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 08:45:02AM +0200, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
>
>> My quake3 copy is running fine with the 64-bit nvidia drivers.
Without having the 32bit compatibility libraries installed? I have
quake4 and don't know about quake3, but all games that aren't 64bit
>
> today I updated my testing installation. Now the 32bit part of the
> NVIDIA drivers doesn't work anymore
I don't have 64bit strong hardware but it sounds like the problem I have after
a Linux Kernel is upgraded.
For Squeeze/Sid I'm showing: 2.6.30-2 (686)
After the upgrade I can expect the '
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 08:45:02AM +0200, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> >> >> My quake3 copy is running fine with the 64-bit nvidia drivers.
> > >
> > > Without having the 32bit compatibility libraries installed? I have
> > > quake4 and don't know about quake3, but all games that aren't 64bit
> > > see
lee schreef:
> > On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 01:36:58PM +0200, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
>> >> lee schreef:
>>> >>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:00:52PM -0700, David Fox wrote:
More to the point, since you have an amd64 system, why bother with
ia32 components? I don't recall any need for
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:46 PM, lee wrote:
> Then there would need to be only two packages: vdpau for those who
> need it, and the rest (which could suggest vdpau which could tell you
> which cards can use it).
Doing that would probably not be possible, given the nature of this
particular compon
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 07:57:52AM -0700, David Fox wrote:
> I think I meant that you didn't need ia32 for nvidia. You'll of course
> need it for things that aren't available as 64-bit executables, or not
> available as source. Over here, that is a pretty short list, since I'm
> not into games muc
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 01:36:58PM +0200, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> lee schreef:
> >On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:00:52PM -0700, David Fox wrote:
> >>More to the point, since you have an amd64 system, why bother with
> >>ia32 components? I don't recall any need for ia32 for nvidia.
> >
> >Where do you
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 08:01:47AM -0700, David Fox wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:46 PM, lee wrote:
> >
> > Link where? :) I have a 9800GT.
>
> Oops, I forgot the link.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VDPAU
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:46 PM, lee wrote:
>
> Link where? :) I have a 9800GT.
Oops, I forgot the link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VDPAU
> Unfortunately, there's no roll-back option in aptitude ... or is
> there? If there was, there won't be any need to decide between stable,
That would be
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:33 PM, lee wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:00:52PM -0700, David Fox wrote:
>
>> More to the point, since you have an amd64 system, why bother with
>> ia32 components? I don't recall any need for ia32 for nvidia.
>
> Where do you get a 64bit version of X3? Or X2? Quake?
lee schreef:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:00:52PM -0700, David Fox wrote:
More to the point, since you have an amd64 system, why bother with
ia32 components? I don't recall any need for ia32 for nvidia.
Where do you get a 64bit version of X3? Or X2? Quake? Doom? Tribal
Trouble? And so on ...
My
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:13:57PM -0700, David Fox wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:59 PM, lee wrote:
> >
> > And nvidia-kernel-common:
> >
> >
> > "This package contains files shared between NVIDIA module packages."
>
> Common refers essentially to support files., You should install the
> pack
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:00:52PM -0700, David Fox wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:27 AM, lee wrote:
>
> > cat:/home/lee# /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1
> > Segmentation fault
> > cat:/home/lee#
>
> You can't "run" a library directly.
Oh. I thought you could --- some time ago, I wa
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 6:59 PM, lee wrote:
>
> And nvidia-kernel-common:
>
>
> "This package contains files shared between NVIDIA module packages."
Common refers essentially to support files., You should install the
package, but it's not dependent on the driver or the version of the
kernel.
> nv
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:27 AM, lee wrote:
> cat:/home/lee# /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1
> Segmentation fault
> cat:/home/lee#
You can't "run" a library directly.
More to the point, since you have an amd64 system, why bother with
ia32 components? I don't recall any need for ia32 for
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:45:58AM +0200, thveillon.debian wrote:
> I currently have 185.18.36-2 from Sid installed, my package list look like :
>
> aptitude search ~S~i~nnvidia
>
> i nvidia-glx
> i nvidia-glx-ia32
> i nvidia-kernel-2.6.31.2-vanilla64 << this is the kernel module built
> w
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:45:58AM +0200, thveillon.debian wrote:
> I currently have 185.18.36-2 from Sid installed, my package list look like :
>
> aptitude search ~S~i~nnvidia
>
> i nvidia-glx
> i nvidia-glx-ia32
> i nvidia-kernel-2.6.31.2-vanilla64 << this is the kernel module built
>
lee a wrote :
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:17:53AM +0200, thveillon.debian wrote:
>> lee a wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 07:41:47PM +0200, thveillon.debian wrote:
>>>
> cat:/home/lee# /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1
> Segmentation fault
> cat:/home/lee#
the ia32-libs
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:17:53AM +0200, thveillon.debian wrote:
> lee a wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 07:41:47PM +0200, thveillon.debian wrote:
> >
> >>> cat:/home/lee# /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1
> >>> Segmentation fault
> >>> cat:/home/lee#
> >> the ia32-libs got seriously re
lee a wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 07:41:47PM +0200, thveillon.debian wrote:
>
>>> cat:/home/lee# /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1
>>> Segmentation fault
>>> cat:/home/lee#
>> the ia32-libs got seriously reworked has I understand, you can use the
>> Sid version of nvidia's packages, an
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 07:41:47PM +0200, thveillon.debian wrote:
> > cat:/home/lee# /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/libGLcore.so.1
> > Segmentation fault
> > cat:/home/lee#
>
> the ia32-libs got seriously reworked has I understand, you can use the
> Sid version of nvidia's packages, and install the "D
lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today I updated my testing installation. Now the 32bit part of the
> NVIDIA drivers doesn't work anymore: The installer says it cannot find
> the libraries that are supposed to be in
> /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib/. However, the libraries are there, but when
> I try to run them, I
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:44:42PM -0700, Bill Wohler was
heard to say:
> You hit the nail on the head. I ran memtest86+. The original block of
> memory came out clean. The new Mushkin memory had thousands of errors.
> Never seen that before.
>
> Wonder if that was related to the earlier issues
Bill Wohler writes:
> Daniel Burrows writes:
>
>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 09:48:37PM -0700, Bill Wohler was
>> heard to say:
>>> Bill Wohler writes:
>>>
>>> > After making the following changes to pull in sid's bluez 4.0 package in
>>> > a lenny system, I'm now getting segmentation faults wh
Bill Wohler wrote:
Daniel Burrows writes:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 09:48:37PM -0700, Bill Wohler was
heard to say:
Bill Wohler writes:
After making the following changes to pull in sid's bluez 4.0 package in
a lenny system, I'm now getting segmentation faults when I run dpkg and
aptitude.
Daniel Burrows writes:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 09:48:37PM -0700, Bill Wohler was
> heard to say:
>> Bill Wohler writes:
>>
>> > After making the following changes to pull in sid's bluez 4.0 package in
>> > a lenny system, I'm now getting segmentation faults when I run dpkg and
>> > aptitude
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 09:48:37PM -0700, Bill Wohler was
heard to say:
> Bill Wohler writes:
>
> > After making the following changes to pull in sid's bluez 4.0 package in
> > a lenny system, I'm now getting segmentation faults when I run dpkg and
> > aptitude. Any thoughts on how to recover f
> pob...@fuzzydev.org writes:
>
>>> Bill Wohler writes:
>>>
>>> I found I was able to run "apt-get -f install" twice and be able to
>>> use aptitude to perform package maintenance again.
>>>
>>> However, now I'm finding that Emacs and Firefox (Iceweasel) die with
>>> segmentation faults at random
pob...@fuzzydev.org writes:
>> Bill Wohler writes:
>>
>> I found I was able to run "apt-get -f install" twice and be able to
>> use aptitude to perform package maintenance again.
>>
>> However, now I'm finding that Emacs and Firefox (Iceweasel) die with
>> segmentation faults at random times. Won
> Bill Wohler writes:
>
> I found I was able to run "apt-get -f install" twice and be able to
> use aptitude to perform package maintenance again.
>
> However, now I'm finding that Emacs and Firefox (Iceweasel) die with
> segmentation faults at random times. Wonder if I'll get this email
> away...
Bill Wohler writes:
> After making the following changes to pull in sid's bluez 4.0 package in
> a lenny system, I'm now getting segmentation faults when I run dpkg and
> aptitude. Any thoughts on how to recover from this?
I found I was able to run "apt-get -f install" twice and be able to
use a
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 18:26:25 -0500, Jacques Dery (de...@inforco.com) wrote:
> Thank you for the suggestion but the problem still exists.
>
> Here is the output
>
> de...@gontran:/var/cache/apt$ sudo rm pkgcache.bin
>
> de...@gontran:/var/cache/apt$ ls -ails
> total 12
Thank you for the suggestion but the problem still exists.
Here is the output
de...@gontran:/var/cache/apt$ sudo rm pkgcache.bin
de...@gontran:/var/cache/apt$ ls -ails
total 12
160066 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2009-03-02 18:13 .
160006 4 drwxr-xr-x 10 root root 4096
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 11:29:30AM -0500, Jacques Dery was
heard to say:
> I tried running apt-get update and aptitude from the commandline with
> the same result. I looked at the man page. I tried a few commands
> without result. I am weary going further because I am playing with root
> and r
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 13:39:12 -0500, chris dunn wrote:
> Running scanimage -L as root (su) yields the correct answer and identifies my
> scanner.
>
> Running scanimage -L as user yields "Segmentation fault" only.
>
> Does anyone have a suggestion as to why this might be, and how I can identif
H.S. wrote:
Hi,
While reading the Slashdot news on the pirates bay, I noticed that when
I click on this link:
http://thepiratebay.org/legal.php
it starts to load but before finishing Mozilla browser crashed. The
message on the std out is "segmentation fault". The above link is on
this page:
ht
For me it didn't crash
On 12/20/05, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While reading the Slashdot news on the pirates bay, I noticed that when
> I click on this link:
> http://thepiratebay.org/legal.php
>
> it starts to load but before finishing Mozilla browser crashed. The
> message on t
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 05:26:44PM -0400, Marty wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I installed a copy of debian from the netinstall cd about 2 weeks ago. the
> >installation works fine but once I get the base system on and try to do
> >any apt-get commands every packet I try to download gives the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed a copy of debian from the netinstall cd about 2 weeks ago. the
installation works fine but once I get the base system on and try to do
any apt-get commands every packet I try to download gives the error
"segmentation fault" and then goes back to prompt. I've t
On 4/30/05, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Anyway, I recommend you reinstall Sarge from scratch, using the
> > netinst ISO image. Since Sarge isn't released yet, doing an upgrade
> > may not work w
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 23:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > I am seeing the "segmentation fault" message as the startup scripts
> > race by. Cannot retrieve it by dmesg afterwards. It is apparently
> > (hopefully) harmless. Anybody else getting this. I have the most
> > recent 2.6.8-4 kernel i
Hello
David Baron (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I am seeing the "segmentation fault" message as the startup scripts
> race by. Cannot retrieve it by dmesg afterwards. It is apparently
> (hopefully) harmless. Anybody else getting this. I have the most
> recent 2.6.8-4 kernel image off Sid.
Activ
oops, apologies for the mis-reply. Got my lists mixed up.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 10:21:59 -0500, Kanipe, Kent
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had a bunch of problems like this and it was related to a combination
> of OS, and compiler version. What setup are you built for?
Red Hat ES 3.0., kernel 2.4.21-15.EL
gcc version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-3
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 01:05:52AM -0400, Marek Pawinski wrote:
> [root:~]mkdir bak
> [root:~]mkdir bak/var
> [root:~]mkdir bak/var/cache
> [root:~]mkdir bak/var/cache/apt
> [root:~]mkdir bak/var/cache/apt/bin
You should be able to do this in one command:
[root:~]mkdir -p b
ognen wrote:
I have had this problem many times, and it was not due to faulty
hardware but rather a software issue with me (well it was partially
hardware, it would corrupt the database creating the segmentation
fault). There was a way of fixing it, i think you had to delete some
files ala
I have had this problem many times, and it was not due to faulty
hardware but rather a software issue with me (well it was partially
hardware, it would corrupt the database creating the segmentation
fault). There was a way of fixing it, i think you had to delete some
files alas i cannot re
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:30:33 +0200
Hans du Plooy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 08 January 2004 00:05, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra
> wrote:
> > > I try to run it on the laptop I get a segmentation fault. What does
> > > that mean, and what sorts of things might cause it?
> >
On Thursday 08 January 2004 00:05, Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corcete Dutra
wrote:
> > I try to run it on the laptop I get a segmentation fault. What does
> > that mean, and what sorts of things might cause it?
> This is a but, plain and simple. It means that the program tried to
> access some prot
Em Qua, 2004-01-07 Ãs 12:55, Fred Richards escreveu:
> I've installed a package on a PC, and then the same on a laptop. When
> I try to run it on the laptop I get a segmentation fault. What does
> that mean, and what sorts of things might cause it?
This is a but, plain and simple. It me
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:55:11PM +, Fred Richards wrote:
> I've installed a package on a PC, and then the same on a laptop. When
> I try to run it on the laptop I get a segmentation fault. What does
> that mean, and what sorts of things might cause it?
It's almost impossible to answer that
Wayne -
> I am running xephem 3.5-2, from testing (I think), and it runs fine.
> Suggest you use the CD for the Win version and just get the deb
> package.
This was a good suggestion, though I have the UNIX CD. :) CD version
still works fine on my old laptop, which runs Slackware 8.1.
What I d
Glenn Becker([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Hi -
>
> I can't pinpoint *exactly* when this problem began. I'm running testing
> (sarge) with a few unstable packages thrown in.
>
> Anyway, I installed the commercial/CD package of the XEphem astronomy
> program some months ago and h
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 10:38:52AM +0100, rdiaz wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> A few days ago I installed Woody (after a couple of years of suse).
> Everything seems fine, but I am having a problem with Kmail (4:2.1.1-7).
> It crashes as soon as I try to include an attachement (segmentation
> fault, s
Rafe B. wrote:
I just tried to upgrade my "potato" box with
XFree86 from "unstable." Bad idea?
Not the best.
This yields Segmentation Fault when I run XF86Setup.
So my questions are:
1. Was it dumb to install XF86 4.1 on
top of a 2.2r3 base (kernel 2.2.18pre21) ?
Yes, if you mean
I just tried to upgrade my "potato" box with
XFree86 from "unstable." Bad idea?
Yes!
This yields Segmentation Fault when I run XF86Setup.
Mildly chaotic "update" process, since I was
a bit confused about the Deb packages to get.
I started with:
xfree86-common
x-window-system-core
xse
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 11:54:17PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> adding /usr/man to manpath
> /usr/share/man is already in the manpath
> /usr/X11R6/man is already in the manpath
> /usr/local/man is already in the manpath
> -
[segfault]
Hmm. The next thing man normally does
> Hi Raffaele,
>
> If you tell me the version number of the man-db package you have
> installed, I'll try to debug this.
>
> Thanks,
I have version 2.3.20-6 of man-db installed.
cheers,
Raffaele
--
Raffaele Sandrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For encrypted Mail get my Public Key from "search.keyserver
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 11:54:17PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> On Monday 29 October 2001 20:38, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > $ strace man foo
>
> Hi again,
>
> here the output of "strace man ls"
[...]
> and here the output of "man -d ls"
Hi Raffaele,
If you tell me the version number of
On Monday 29 October 2001 20:38, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:36:17PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini ([EMAIL
> PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can't use man anymore. On every manpage i get a segmentation fault.
> > Im using the 2.4.13-ac4 kernel.
> > any hints?
>
> $ str
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:36:17PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't use man anymore. On every manpage i get a segmentation fault.
What version of man-db? Post the end of an strace (as Karsten said) as
well as the output of 'man -d '.
--
Colin Watson
on Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:36:17PM +0100, Raffaele Sandrini ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't use man anymore. On every manpage i get a segmentation fault.
> Im using the 2.4.13-ac4 kernel.
> any hints?
$ strace man foo
Post the last hundred or so lines of output. *Not* the who
> Hi,
>
> This is my first time to meet this message and don't know why.
> The story is.
> This afternoon, I tried to install ssh3 for higher security.
> Follow standard step:
> configure
> make
> make install
>
> everything was fine, no error message showed on the screen.
> But, I can not conn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Dear members,
> Here is something I have not been really been able to understand .. SEGME
>NTATION
>FAULT .
> Please tell m:
>1)What exactly is segmentation fault ?
>2)When does it occur ?
>3)How Do you Solve it ?
It means that a program has tried t
Okay, after I closed gimp and run apt-get install gphoto again,
the installation succeeded. Thanks for your attention.
Regards,
--Wen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wen> When I try to install gphoto by apt-get from unstable, I got the following
wen> error message and finally the installation failed. Could s
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 12:11:50AM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > using 2.1r5 (stable).
> > first item installed after base is XFree86 3.3.6 glibc21 version.
> >
> i'm not sure, but isn't slink glibc 2.0?
Yes, it is. If the original poster has his information right, that's
probably the prob
Johann Spies wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 11:12:00AM -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote:
>
> > Debian 2.1 doesn't use glibc 2.1.2. Think it uses 2.0.7 and there are
> > some incompatibilities. You'll either need to recompile the program for
> > Debian 2.1 systems, or upgrade them to potato. Pr
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 11:12:00AM -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote:
> Debian 2.1 doesn't use glibc 2.1.2. Think it uses 2.0.7 and there are
> some incompatibilities. You'll either need to recompile the program for
> Debian 2.1 systems, or upgrade them to potato. Probably easier to
> recompile if y
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 02:17:15PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a set of applications which have been ported to Linux. The
> code was compiled and linked on a SuSe system running glibc 2.1.2.
> This was found to run on earlier SuSe installations and also on Red
> Hat.
>
> When an
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:20:38PM +0200, Smith, Martin wrote:
> I installed XFree86 and when I execute startx I get:
>
> /usr/bin/X11/startx: line 74: 141 Segmentation faultxinit $clientargs
> -- $serverargs
>
> Also get "segmentation fault" when I try to run XF86Setup. Any ideas what
>
On Tue, May 02, 2000 at 03:45:21AM +0200, Pocsaji Miklós wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got a problem with 'su': when I want to change to root, I type in a
> correct password & I get a 'Segmentation fault' message. I am almost a
> beginner in the Linux world, so I am fully confused.
>
A segmentation fa
; in>>m>>n>>it>>LT>>EQ>>GT; This
will change again as I hand off the interface to the client terminal
David
- Original Message -
From: Eric G . Miller
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2000 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2
On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 11:08:21PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 11:43:25 -0800, "davidturetsky"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was crying out from somewhere about: Re:
> Segmentation fault
> davidturetsky> I believe this is the code
>> tha
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 11:43:25 -0800, "davidturetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
crying out from somewhere
about: Re: Segmentation fault
davidturetsky> I believe this is the code that was getting me into trouble, but
it could be
davidturetsky> elsewhere
davidturetsky>
davidturetsky wrote:
>
> I believe this is the code that was getting me into trouble, but it could be
> elsewhere
>
> fscanf (file, "%s", Title);
This one may get you into trouble if the Title array is not large enough
to hold the string.
> fscanf (file, "%d %d %d %d %d %d", &m, &n, &
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 11:43:25AM -0800, davidturetsky wrote:
>
> Thanks, dancer. BTW, what's wrong with your code sample? I can see this is
> going to be daunting!
It dies when it tries to fclose the NULL pointer (fopen returns NULL
when it fails). free causes no trouble since it does nothing w
David
- Original Message -
From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2000 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2000 03:45:55 -0800, "davidturetsky"
<[EMAIL PR
On Sun, 13 Feb 2000 03:45:55 -0800, "davidturetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
crying out from somewhere
about: Re: Segmentation fault
davidturetsky> It looks as though I was running into problems when trying to
scan an input
davidturetsky> file using c notation which is le
convert my work to Linux/gcc/x/ppp... and why some gentle assists from the
list are so useful in helping me get started
David
- Original Message -
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2000 2:54 AM
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault
> [EMAIL PROTECTE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (davidturetsky) wrote:
>I see from further investigation that gcc wants me to be more actively
>concerned with memory management than was required under Visual C, and I was
>logging on to apologize for bothering the list. I posted because this code
>ran cleanly under Visual C, so
west release.
I've posted this to their developers
Is there a separate users group for gcc?
David
- Original Message -
From: Peter Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: davidturetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2000 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault
On 13-Feb-2000, davidturetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am executing a Linear Program program I wrote and compiled. It
> terminates without generating output (but creates the output file)
> with a "Segmentation fault"
>
A segmentation fault occurs when you attempt to access memory that you
ar
On Sun, 13 Feb 2000, davidturetsky wrote:
davidt >I am executing a Linear Program program I wrote and compiled. It
terminates without generating output (but creates the output file) with a
"Segmentation fault"
davidt >
davidt >I'm trying to convert programs to run under g++ which I previously
d
If it were reproduceable (maybe you should ask someone else to reproduce
it -- not me though as I'm not running potato) I would suck and install
the latest deb and report a bug if the seg-fault is still there...
*- On 2 Jan, Rik Burt wrote about "Segmentation Fault"
> I have the slink version of debian installed an a second hard drive and it
> was working quite well. At the start of December I recompiled the kernel as
> I had added a SCSI device to my system and as the kernel was compiling I got
> an err
thanks a lot
i have changed some bios options (5 seconds delay, extended CHS, 8
sectors/block, fast
access disabled)
now the hd works fine
(it is a 6.4 gb hd on a 1993 motherborad :=)) )
thanks for all
aphro wrote:
> soudns like a seirous library problem, only time i've seen that is when
> lib
soudns like a seirous library problem, only time i've seen that is when
libc was royally screwed, a reinstall may be in order here.
nate
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]--
Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/
Firetrail Internet
"daniel.w.yang" wrote:
>
> I can give a guess of what might happen. Normally, you will receive this
> error message "Segmentation fault" when application could not allocate
> memory properly. It might be caused by using the wrong version of library
> files. pls check the compatibility of your ftp
I can give a guess of what might happen. Normally, you will receive this
error message "Segmentation fault" when application could not allocate
memory properly. It might be caused by using the wrong version of library
files. pls check the compatibility of your ftp with 2.2 kernel.
Daniel Yang
---
I hope somebody has an idea on what to do with my system. I am at a lost on
what to
do except to remove and re-install the packages which have the bad programs in.
I get
major warnings against doing this by dselect so I am holding off until I can
get some
more information on the implementation
Thanks - owing to a series of hw related probs I reinstalled and all works
now.
Patrick
- Original Message -
From: Shao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Patrick Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, 17 July 1999 9:25
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault - apt-get again
> What
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
