On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Jason Price wrote:
>
> I am currently running a stable distribution of debian, but want to get
> Perl 5.6 installed. I noticed it is not in the stable distribution.
> What would be the safest/best/easiest way to get it installed? I'm a
> pretty new linux user, so be ge
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 12:31:23PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 12:11:13PM -0400, Jason Price wrote:
> > I am currently running a stable distribution of debian, but want to get
> > Perl 5.6 installed. I noticed it is not in the stable distribution.
> > What would be the
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 12:11:13PM -0400, Jason Price wrote:
> I am currently running a stable distribution of debian, but want to get
> Perl 5.6 installed. I noticed it is not in the stable distribution.
> What would be the safest/best/easiest way to get it installed? I'm a
> pretty new linu
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 12:37:47PM +0200, Iwan Mouwen wrote:
> If you're going to upgrade libc remember to keep a backup of:
> - the original packages (libc6, libc6-dev, libdb2)
> (in general: a backup of every package that you upgrade)
wouldn't an apt-get install --reinstall with potato sou
> If you need to upgrade your libc6 you have to do
> it at first. Otherwise you can't use tools like dpkg. It's very angry
> if this will happens. So note: You need always a working perl, dpkg
> needs it.
If you're going to upgrade libc remember to keep a backup of:
- the original packages (libc
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:43:32AM +0200, Timeboy wrote:
> I use perl5.6 on potato! My mailclient CSCMail is wirtten in perl and
> works fine!
>
> But be careful by upgrading the required packages. And you could need to
> upgrade your libc6. I upgradet to glibc2.2.4 to use kernel 2.4.4 with
> tool
On Tue, 22 May 2001 11:20:06 +0200, Martin Würtele wrote:
> ** hi,
> **
> ** anyone tried to set up perl 5.6 on potato? it seems as it is the first
> perl
> ** that replaces all others instead of adding itself as /usr/bin/perl5.6.
> **
> ** any troubles i might face or does it install fin
Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 03:39:49PM +1100, Matthew Dalton wrote:
> >
> > The alternatives system probably takes care of it. /usr/bin/perl is
> > probably a symlink to /etc/alternatives/perl, which is in turn a symlink
> > to
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 03:39:49PM +1100, Matthew Dalton wrote:
> mike polniak wrote:
> >
> > Arcady Genkin wrote:
> > > I'd like to install Perl 5.6, without upgrading potato's default
> > > 5.005. Do you think that if I installed Perl 5.6 under /usr/local and
> > > renamed the executable to per
mike polniak wrote:
>
> Arcady Genkin wrote:
> > I'd like to install Perl 5.6, without upgrading potato's default
> > 5.005. Do you think that if I installed Perl 5.6 under /usr/local and
> > renamed the executable to perl-5.6 for instance there would be any
> > issues with using it or it interfe
Arcady Genkin wrote:
> I'd like to install Perl 5.6, without upgrading potato's default
> 5.005. Do you think that if I installed Perl 5.6 under /usr/local and
> renamed the executable to perl-5.6 for instance there would be any
> issues with using it or it interfering with Debian's vital utilitie
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 05:06:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi there
>
> where can I get perl 5.6 debian packages?
>
check out http://www.daft.com/pub/debian/experimental
for perl 5.6 packages
A list of inofficial APT-sources can be found at
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/de
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi there
>
> where can I get perl 5.6 debian packages?
>
www.activestate.com
They are not Debian policy compliant (install into /usr/local) and will
not satisfy dependencies for other Debian packages which require perl but
otherwise work well
13 matches
Mail list logo
