In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Holger Rauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi Miquel!
>
>On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>
>> Also ext2 and ext3 support 64-bit filesizes just fine and have done
>> so for years. They are very stable filesystems, while reiser is
>> experimental. Rei
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> oh well, she's not coming back anyway it seems. better that way i
> guess.
>
> she'd be the kinda person though to spread bad words about debian
> now... and i hate that.
It sounded, though, as she was frustrated by her current problem.
Considering
On Wednesday 16 January 2002 02:33 pm, martin f krafft wrote:
> she'd be the kinda person though to spread bad words about debian now...
> and i hate that.
i wouldn't worry about it, since she'll probably go about that the same way
and run out of an audience really fast.
also sprach John Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2230 +0100]:
> >cassandra: you are welcome to come back to the forum and ask your
> >questions in a reasonable form and manner. if we aren't offended by you,
> >we are more than happy to do our best at helping you!
>
> I'm guessing she has
>
>that being said, and acknowledging that we aren't really nice now
>either,
>
>cassandra: you are welcome to come back to the forum and ask your
>questions in a reasonable form and manner. if we aren't offended by you,
>we are more than happy to do our best at helping you!
I'm guessing she hasn'
also sprach ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.1939 +0100]:
> > for this particular user, i'd consider it all but threatening. it would
> > be a relief!
>
> poor cassandra is at that threshold point of conceding that she herself is
> the source of her own ignorance. who knows? maybe she'll make
On Wednesday 16 January 2002 09:48 am, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach The Doctor What <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.1711 +0100]:
> > 4) Threatening (Switch your server to Windows, I really don't care,
> >just make sure you pay Microsoft)
>
> for this particular user, i'd consider it all
also sprach The Doctor What <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.1711 +0100]:
> 4) Threatening (Switch your server to Windows, I really don't care,
>just make sure you pay Microsoft)
for this particular user, i'd consider it all but threatening. it would
be a relief!
--
martin; (gree
* Cassandra Lynette Ludwig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020115 21:54]:
> partion as ext2 cannot handle large files.
It can and does.
> > Is your fileserver on Windows? If that is the case you will have a
> > problem since Windows filesystems suffer the 2GB limit, as far as I know
> > (maybe recent NTFS
also sprach Emil Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.1607 +0100]:
> You _could_ use e.g. google to search for some file splitter running
> under windows. Actually you could also try this link:
>
> http://www.freebyte.com/hjsplit/
>
> but since you assume all men are evil/stupid you pr
> > I cannot split the video data into multiple files - this is not text it is
> > compressed DVI data. If you do not know the file format, do not suggest
> > options like this.
>
> Sure you can. Once you've got the (DVI?) data into a large file, use a
> file splitter (dd would do it on Linux,
also sprach Cassandra Lynette Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.0438
+0100]:
> (A side note - the mailer that is used here seems to cause problems in
> outlook express... I can hear the screams from here, but I don't
> always have time to switch between all four hundred email folders on
> my
also sprach Cassandra Lynette Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.0442
+0100]:
> Did you read the initial message? For those who have not read it, or
> are unable to read english here is it detailed (I hate having to do
> this for men all the time *sigh*)
quite a statement, hey! yes, i did re
Hi Miquel!
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> Also ext2 and ext3 support 64-bit filesizes just fine and have done
> so for years. They are very stable filesystems, while reiser is
> experimental. Reiser can be unstable (I've seen filesystems go
> up in smoke) and it *especially*
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
William T Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Upgrading your kernel to 2.4 and using ReiserFS will give you the 64-bit
>filesystem, but your libc may not be compiled to support large files.
Also ext2 and ext3 support 64-bit filesizes just fine and have done
so for
Someone mentioned sending the files via HTTP. Is it possible to set up
an Apache WebServer with mod_dav (WebDAV) running on it? If your
Windows machine has "Web Folders" (see
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q195851 ) it
might be possible to put the dav directory (and sub-dir
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 07:38:07PM -0800, Cassandra Lynette Ludwig wrote:
> My files are on the windows machine, I want to put them on my linux server
> on a reiserfs partition as Linux cannot handle larger than 2gb files on an
> ext2 filesystem.
Large files should work just fine on ext2 - the f
Cassandra Lynette Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did you read the initial message? For those who have not read it, or are
> unable to read english here is it detailed (I hate having to do this for
> men all the time *sigh*)
>
> Machine with files - Windows 98 Workstation
Nowhere in your
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 07:43:29PM -0800, Cassandra Ludwig wrote:
> I haven't tried Coda... I will try it, when I can figure out how to set it
> up on the server :-)
>
> But I just found (through a quick test, just to see) that if I use smbclient
> from the server, I can grab the file off the wind
William T Wilson wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Cassandra Lynette Ludwig wrote:
[snip]
one of them is running Linux, but you don't even say that clearly.
If I were as sexist as you I would say that women cannot write clearly
because they expect men to read their minds.
So. how long have y
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Cassandra Lynette Ludwig wrote:
> Obviously you didn't read the message, I had said I had upgraded to
> 2.4.17 to get reiserfs as ext2 cannot handle such large files.
I was only going to flame you once but this message deserves two.
> I cannot split the video data into multi
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Cassandra Lynette Ludwig wrote:
> Did you read the initial message? For those who have not read it, or
> are unable to read english here is it detailed (I hate having to do
> this for men all the time *sigh*)
Yes, I read it carefully. Nowhere in the message do you say which
If you had explained it this lucidly and succinctly the 1st time, we
wouldn't have been so confused.
Cassandra Lynette Ludwig wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, William T Wilson wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Cassandra Ludwig wrote:
Now I have tried dumping via NFS (using windows NFS systems
*shudde
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 07:42:59PM -0800, Cassandra Lynette Ludwig wrote (0.40):
> I cannot split the video data into multiple files - this is not text it is
> compressed DVI data. If you do not know the file format, do not suggest
> options like this.
Sure you can. Once you've got the (DVI?)
>
>Don't annoy me anymore with messages as un thought out as this. It feels
>like the sort of responses I used to get from the Redhat technical support
>team.
>
>Regards,
> Cassandra
The difference being this is a volunteer list and RH tech support is paid.
So maybe you should try being
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, William T Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Cassandra Ludwig wrote:
>
> > Now I have tried dumping via NFS (using windows NFS systems
> > *shudder*), ftp, and even samba, but all of these drop dead at the 2gb
> > limit. Samba refuses to even try sending the file.
>
> I a
nt: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: Large file sizes (2+Gb)
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 06:59:19PM -0800, Cassandra Ludwig wrote:
> > Now I have tried dumping via NFS (using windows NFS systems *shudder*),
ftp,
> > and even samba, but all of these drop dead at the 2gb li
(A side note - the mailer that is used here seems to cause problems in
outlook express... I can hear the screams from here, but I don't always
have time to switch between all four hundred email folders on my system to
check for new mail).
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, martin f krafft wrote:
> also spra
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Cassandra Ludwig wrote:
> Now I have tried dumping via NFS (using windows NFS systems
> *shudder*), ftp, and even samba, but all of these drop dead at the 2gb
> limit. Samba refuses to even try sending the file.
I am not entirely sure which system is running which OS. If th
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:08:01AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Cassandra Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.0359 +0100]:
> > This is where I hit a problem. The ext2 filesystem happens to have a 2Gb
> > limit for filesizes, so first problem hit there. Then after upgrading the
>
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 06:59:19PM -0800, Cassandra Ludwig wrote:
> Now I have tried dumping via NFS (using windows NFS systems *shudder*), ftp,
> and even samba, but all of these drop dead at the 2gb limit. Samba refuses
> to even try sending the file.
That's not so good Have you tried using
also sprach Cassandra Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.0359 +0100]:
> This is where I hit a problem. The ext2 filesystem happens to have a 2Gb
> limit for filesizes, so first problem hit there. Then after upgrading the
> kernel in the server to a 2.4 kernel (2.4.17) I changed the storage
>
32 matches
Mail list logo
