In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Holger Rauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi Miquel! > >On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > >> Also ext2 and ext3 support 64-bit filesizes just fine and have done >> so for years. They are very stable filesystems, while reiser is >> experimental. Reiser can be unstable (I've seen filesystems go >> up in smoke) and it *especially* has problems with being exported >> over the network. My advice: do not use reiserfs. > >What makes you think ext3 is not experimental? reiserfs exists for a >longer time compared to ext3. If you say that reiserfs *can* be unstable >it also means that there are some stable releases out there. I haven't had >any problems with reiserfs.
I'm just stating what my experience is. Make of it what you wish. Mike.
