On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Steven Jan Springl wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 July 2008 16:41, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We just did an upgrade on one of our etch servers. It installed a bunch
> > of new updates including a kernel-image 2.6.18-6-k7. This computer is
> > running th
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 16:41, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We just did an upgrade on one of our etch servers. It installed a bunch
> of new updates including a kernel-image 2.6.18-6-k7. This computer is
> running the Shorewall Firewall. Everything seemed to be working OK til
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 09:20:55PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 09:01:56PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >
> > The concern is that if something goes wrong with the upgrade, you may be
> > forced to do a reinstall. When I tried updating one of my boxes,
> > some
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 06:23:16PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 03:17:03PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 04:11:19PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 12:26:18PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > >
> > > > So why is
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 09:01:56PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
>
> The concern is that if something goes wrong with the upgrade, you may be
> forced to do a reinstall. When I tried updating one of my boxes,
> something bad happened while dpkg was installing libc6 which left the
> whole syst
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 06:23:16PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 03:17:03PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 04:11:19PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 12:26:18PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> > >
> > > Also, have yo
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 03:17:03PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 04:11:19PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 12:26:18PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> >
> > > So why is hotplug removed? Does udev replace it?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > Also, have you
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 04:11:19PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 12:26:18PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
>
> > So why is hotplug removed? Does udev replace it?
>
> Yes.
>
> Also, have you read the release notes so you know where the bears are
> at?
No. Which relea
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 12:26:18PM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote:
> So why is hotplug removed? Does udev replace it?
Yes.
Also, have you read the release notes so you know where the bears are
at?
Doug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
I had something similiar (on 2.6.8) when I deleted the /initrd directory.
Put the directory back back and booted up successfully.
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:37:54PM +0200, Bob Vloon wrote:
> Hi Aurelio,
>
> > pivot_root: No such file or directory
>
> I suppose this is the problem - but when l
Hi Aurelio,
> pivot_root: No such file or directory
I suppose this is the problem - but when looking at your additional info I
see that you've figured out that as well :)
However, if you're sure that hda5 is your root.. Are you using SATA disks?
That suggests using sdaX, as you did.
I would try
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 07:44:23AM +, Aurelio Turco wrote:
> Dear debian-user,
>
> I am trying to upgrade the kernel from 2.4 to 2.6.
> I installed the kernel-image-2.6-686 package (which depends on
> kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686), but it failed to boot,
> with messages as follows:
[..]
> ide: As
Greetings,
On the matter of updating the 2.4.27 kernel on the intel 386
architecture, to apply the fixes for DSA10181-1 (CVE-2005-0449). Which
of the current files in
security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/k/kernel-image-2.4.27-i386
should one download to apply the fix ? Is this th
Tomas Brandysky wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I noticed there is a new kernel image available for debian sarge.
I am currently using this kernel:
kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386 2.4.27-10sarge1
when I try to:
apt-get update; apt-get upgrade
I get just:
0 upgraded,
All right, seems I can go either way with this, guess the next time I
have a reason to shutdown, I'll reboot with a different kernel, install
and reboot (almost sounds as inconvenient as a M$ product we all know
and hate!)
Again, thanks all to answered for the wisdom and advice.
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 04:28:42AM +, Ramsay D. Seielstad wrote:
>
> Greetings all, seems the kernel-images have recently been updated
> and I'm not sure how to proceed. I'm running an IBM dual xeon 2.4 ghz
> system on the stock kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp with no problems.
>
> Now kernel
On (25/03/06 04:28), Ramsay D. Seielstad wrote:
> Greetings all, seems the kernel-images have recently been updated and
> I'm not sure how to proceed. I'm running an IBM dual xeon 2.4 ghz
> system on the stock kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp with no problems.
>
> Now kernel-image-2.6.8-3-686-s
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 04:28 +, Ramsay D. Seielstad wrote:
>Greetings all, seems the kernel-images have recently been updated and
> I'm not sure how to proceed. I'm running an IBM dual xeon 2.4 ghz
> system on the stock kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp with no problems.
>
>Now kernel-ima
Never mind, it worked. :D
-Original Message-
From: Rabbie Zalaf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 7:52 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-386 & kernel-source-2.6.8
Hi All,
I have recompiled my kernel to include the vserver source a
On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:03:51 +0200, Robert Waldner writes:
>2.6.8:
>parport: PnPBIOS parport detected.
>parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778), irq 7, dma 3
> [PCSPP,TRISTATE,COMPAT,ECP,DMA]
>parport0: Legacy device
>lp0: using parport0 (interrupt-driven).
FWIW, I toyed around with the opti
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:42:58 CDT, Matt Zagrabelny writes:
>first step, as you guessed it, is getting
>$ cat /etc/passwd > /dev/lp0
>to work.
Yep, that's why I explicitly mentioned that even that didn't work
(though I usually use /etc/issue.net ;) ).
>are you using udev? have you checked dmesg?
> Any hints on what hoops I have to jump through to get printing to
> cooperate again with 2.6.8-2-k7 very much appreciated? google and
> linuxprinting.org aren't much help in that regard (at least not that
> I could find).
first step, as you guessed it, is getting
$ cat /etc/passwd > /dev/lp
On 8/10/05, kamaraju kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi allWhen compiling kernels using make-kpkg, Is there any difference between'fakeroot make-kpkg kernel_image' and 'fakeroot make-kpkg kernel-image'?I read the manual of make-kpkg, but could not find the difference. Some
online documentatio
Mary & Mark Pinderski & Johnso wrote:
>Any ideas on what happened? I've checked the
>kernel-image 2.6.11 doc files "changelog.Debian.gz"
>and "Debian.src.changelog.gz", but I didn't see
>anything related to the Zaurus or to usbnet.
>
>
I just wanted to add that you should look at the changelog f
Mary & Mark Pinderski & Johnso wrote:
>I ran dmesg to a file, plugged in the Zaurus, then ran
>dmesg again. This is what diff showed (without the "<"
>">" characters).
># dmesg
>usb 4-1.1: new full speed USB device using ehci_hcd
>and address 3
>usb 4-1.1: khubd timed out on ep0in
>usb 4-1.1: dev
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 14:37:37 +, Pedro M (Morphix User)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is the big problem. Knoppix is not Debian and a Kernel update is
> not easy (think you have to use Ext3 filesystem in the kernel).
>
> I would like an easy way to update hard disk installed kernel in Knopp
Eddy Jacob escribió:
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 14:43:07 -0700, Justin Guerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But I don't want to compile the kernel. What I don't understand is,
why the package I downloaded from debian sarge, causes that error? Is
it really because of the file system driver not compiled int
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 14:43:07 -0700, Justin Guerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > But I don't want to compile the kernel. What I don't understand is,
> > > > why the package I downloaded from debian sarge, causes that error? Is
> > > > it really because of the file system driver not compiled int
On Saturday 06 November 2004 02:35, Eddy Jacob wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 16:49:23 -0700, Justin Guerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 November 2004 20:11, Eddy Jacob wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I'm running debian, sarge. I installed the OS from Knoppix 3.4. I
> > > want
Thanks for the boot options Justin,
Yes I did run lilo, and I use initrd, as you can see from lilo.conf
parts that I pasted into my first email.
On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 16:49:23 -0700, Justin Guerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 04 November 2004 20:11, Eddy Jacob wrote:
>
>
> > Hi every
On Thursday 04 November 2004 20:11, Eddy Jacob wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm running debian, sarge. I installed the OS from Knoppix 3.4. I want
> to use kernel 2.6.8, but I've got a problem on booting
> kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686. I got this:
>
> Kernal panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-
> For the 2.4.27 kernel there are a variety of
> sub-releases, such as kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686 that
> match up with header packages.
>
> Where is the source that these are compiled from?
> There is only a generic kernel-source-2.4.27 package
> available. And if I am interested in using the sour
Hello
Eric Dickner (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> For the 2.4.27 kernel there are a variety of
> sub-releases, such as kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686 that
> match up with header packages.
>
> Where is the source that these are compiled from?
> There is only a generic kernel-source-2.4.27 package
> av
On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 01:25:00AM +0100, robin wrote:
> Eric Dickner wrote:
>
> >And how can I tell if I have a plain i686 machine or
> >an i686-smc one?
> >
> Do you mean smp? If so its symmtric multi-processing ie dual processor,
> quad processor
Something to note: If you have one processor,
Eric Dickner wrote:
And how can I tell if I have a plain i686 machine or
an i686-smc one?
Thanks,
ejd
___
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
Do you mean smp? If so its symmtric multi-processing ie dual p
Em Fri, 27 Aug 2004 03:10:08 +0200, Lance Hoffmeyer escreveu:
> mplayer will play vorbis files but ogg123 will not.
> I don't get sound from realplay.
Error messages would be nice if any were generated.
> Looks like maybe I need a config file or something?? Where is it?
> What do I need
On 2004-04-04 20:44:59 -0700, Jean-Michel wrote:
> The various package lists contain kernel(2.6)-images for all sorts
> of architectures except ppc. Why ? It would be nice to have an
> apt-get(table) 2.6 kernel.
You should read the debian-powerpc list...
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 12:58:37PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
| On Sunday 14 March 2004 11:46, NoÃl KÃthe wrote:
| > Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Gordon Farquharson um 21:19:
| > > I have installed the testing (Sarge) kernel package
| > > (kernel-image-2.6.3-1). Using this kernel, XFree86 is unab
Hi Noel
Thanks very much for the reply. It was mousedev that wasn't being loaded.
Gordon
NoÃl KÃthe wrote:
Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Gordon Farquharson um 21:19:
I have installed the testing (Sarge) kernel package
(kernel-image-2.6.3-1). Using this kernel, XFree86 is unable to find a
cor
On Sunday 14 March 2004 11:46, Noèl Köthe wrote:
> Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Gordon Farquharson um 21:19:
> > I have installed the testing (Sarge) kernel package
> > (kernel-image-2.6.3-1). Using this kernel, XFree86 is unable to find a
> > core pointer (my PS/2 mouse). I suspect this is becaus
Am Di, den 09.03.2004 schrieb Gordon Farquharson um 21:19:
> I have installed the testing (Sarge) kernel package
> (kernel-image-2.6.3-1). Using this kernel, XFree86 is unable to find a
> core pointer (my PS/2 mouse). I suspect this is because there isn't a
> handler associated for the mouse de
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 11:00, Gordon Farquharson wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have installed the Testing kernel package (kernel-image-2.6.3-1). With
> this kernel, XFree86 is unable to find a core pointer (my PS/2 mouse). I
> suspect this is because there isn't a handler associated for the mouse
> device i
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:00:10AM -0500, Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have installed the Testing kernel package (kernel-image-2.6.3-1). With
> this kernel, XFree86 is unable to find a core pointer (my PS/2 mouse). I
> suspect this is because there isn't a handler associated
Hello Pedro!
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:12:36AM +, Pedro M. wrote:
> Florian Ernst escribió:
> >This exists already for kernel patchlevels, just as mentioned above.
> >
> >You want to extend this to minor and major kernel versions, which I
> >think is risky and a misfeature.
> >
> minor+minor+
Florian Ernst escribió:
Hello Pedro!
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 11:49:47PM +, Pedro M. wrote:
Florian Ernst escribió:
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache search kernel-image-2.4- | wc -l
|7
Not that much, at least in my eyes. YMMV.
try apt-cache search kernel-image* ;)
Yes, cert
Hello Pedro!
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 11:49:47PM +, Pedro M. wrote:
> Florian Ernst escribió:
> >|[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache search kernel-image-2.4- | wc -l
> >|7
> >
> >Not that much, at least in my eyes. YMMV.
> >
> try apt-cache search kernel-image* ;)
Yes, certainly, but that's someth
Florian Ernst escribió:
Hello Pedro!
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 05:32:44PM +, Pedro M. wrote:
Florian Ernst escribió:
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 12:04:34PM +, Pedro M. wrote:
I suggest create the module kernel-image.last
To upgrade the kernel to the last version.
In apt-get ins
Hello Pedro!
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 05:32:44PM +, Pedro M. wrote:
> Florian Ernst escribió:
> >On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 12:04:34PM +, Pedro M. wrote:
> >>I suggest create the module kernel-image.last
> >>
> >>To upgrade the kernel to the last version.
> >>
> >>In apt-get install -kernel la
Florian Ernst escribió:
Hello Pedro!
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 12:04:34PM +, Pedro M. wrote:
I suggest create the module kernel-image.last
To upgrade the kernel to the last version.
In apt-get install -kernel last
|$ apt-cache show kernel-image-2.4-386
|[...]
|Description: Linux kerne
Hello Pedro!
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 12:04:34PM +, Pedro M. wrote:
> I suggest create the module kernel-image.last
>
> To upgrade the kernel to the last version.
>
> In apt-get install -kernel last
|$ apt-cache show kernel-image-2.4-386
|[...]
|Description: Linux kernel image for version 2.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 12:13:04AM +, Pigeon wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 05:21:33PM +0100, Chris Searle wrote:
> > Trying to apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686
> > I get the following:
> > Setting up kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686 (2.4.24-1) ...
> > error reading /lib/modules/2.4.24-
> "Pigeon" == Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Setting up kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686 (2.4.24-1) ... error
>> reading /lib/modules/2.4.24-1-686/build :No such file or
>> directory Deleting /lib/modules/2.4.24-1-686/build
Pigeon> There was another post today from someone t
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 05:21:33PM +0100, Chris Searle wrote:
> Trying to apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686
>
>
> I get the following:
>
> Setting up kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686 (2.4.24-1) ...
> error reading /lib/modules/2.4.24-1-686/build :No such file or directory
> Deleting /lib/module
> "Russell" == Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Russell> Well to put it a simple way your current kernel, is I
Russell> believe the Debian kernel bf2.4.18 which is not a Intrd
Russell> image kernel. The new kernel you installed most likely is
Thanks - but it turned out to be a
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 05:21:33PM +0100, Chris Searle wrote:
> Trying to apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686
>
>
> I get the following:
>
> Setting up kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686 (2.4.24-1) ...
> error reading /lib/modules/2.4.24-1-686/build :No such file or directory
> Deleting /lib/module
> Setting up kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686 (2.4.24-1) ...
> error reading /lib/modules/2.4.24-1-686/build :No such file or directory
> Deleting /lib/modules/2.4.24-1-686/build
Turned out to be disk space on /.
--
Chris Searle
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
Hello
Sven Heinicke (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> $ apt-cache search kernel-image 2.4.18 686
> kernel-image-2.4.18-686 - Linux kernel image 2.4.18 on
> PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/PIV. kernel-image-2.4.18-686-smp - Linux kernel
> image 2.4.18 on PPro/Celeron/PII/PIII/PIV SMP.
> kernel-image-2.4.18-1-6
Chris Knoblock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all, wondering if anyone can help me with this one.
> running unstable and trying to install
> kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 is giving me an error
>
> ldd: /lib/ld.linux.so.2 exited with unknown exit code
> (139)
>
> Failed to create initrd image.
>
> c
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 15:59, Chris Knoblock wrote:
> --- Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 13:46, Chris Knoblock wrote:
> > > hi all, wondering if anyone can help me with this
> > one.
> > > running unstable and trying to install
> > > kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 is gi
cramfsprogs is already installed. no other warnings
except for editing the lilo.conf for initrd.
--- Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 13:46, Chris Knoblock wrote:
> > hi all, wondering if anyone can help me with this
> one.
> > running unstable and trying to install
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 13:46, Chris Knoblock wrote:
> hi all, wondering if anyone can help me with this one.
> running unstable and trying to install
> kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 is giving me an error
>
> ldd: /lib/ld.linux.so.2 exited with unknown exit code
> (139)
>
> Failed to create initrd imag
Here is what i type and output word for word:
apt-get -u install kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 is already the newest
version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not
upgraded.
1 not fully installed or
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 12:46, Chris Knoblock wrote:
> hi all, wondering if anyone can help me with this one.
> running unstable and trying to install
> kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 is giving me an error
>
> ldd: /lib/ld.linux.so.2 exited with unknown exit code
> (139)
>
> Failed to create initrd imag
Hello
Emil Hägerlund (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> one simple (?) question...
>
> I'm doing a new "stable" install on a AMD server
> (SCSI and IDE disks) and can't figure out
> what the difference is between the kernel-image-
> 2.4.18-k7 and 2.4.18-1-k7 packages?
>
> Why theese two variants?
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:54:43AM -0500, Stuart Johnston wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> >But if you look at the 2.4.20 kernels in woody-proposed-updates you
> >will find a precompiled kernel that does have CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G
> >enabled.
>
> I'm not familiar with woody-proposed-updates. Does it imply
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:20:10AM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Be aware that there are some _nasty_ bugs in the 2.4 kernel's with
> high IO load machines with more than 1GB of memory. I have 4
> machines in production with 4GB RAM, dual CPU, and 320GB to 1.4TB
> RAIDs, and performance was _horr
Stuart Johnston said on Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:54:43AM -0500:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> >Stuart Johnston wrote:
> >
> >>I have a couple of systems I am trying to setup as production servers
> >>using Debian stable. They have dual P3s and 2GB RAM.
> >
> >
> >Should work very nicely.
> >
>
> So far t
Bob Proulx wrote:
Stuart Johnston wrote:
I have a couple of systems I am trying to setup as production servers
using Debian stable. They have dual P3s and 2GB RAM.
Should work very nicely.
So far they seem a little slower than had I hoped (particularly the RAID
5). But then they have been r
Stuart Johnston wrote:
> I have a couple of systems I am trying to setup as production servers
> using Debian stable. They have dual P3s and 2GB RAM.
Should work very nicely.
> It looks like the standard kernel images in Debian stable do not support
> the 2GB of RAM.
The 2.4.18 kernel in wood
Richard Lyons wrote:
> Andreas Janssen wrote:
> > apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-686
> Well, that was easy. Don't know what to say: I expect things to go
> wrong.
The only thing that usually "goes wrong" here is that the
bootstrapping kernel has a lot of device drivers compiled in while in
t
On 03-08-03 21:09 +0200, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> Richard Lyons (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> > It seems, after _huge_ help from Andrew McGuinness and others, that I
> > am going to have to change from the bf2.4 flavour to
> > kernel-image-2.4.18-686. Now, I am scared of messing with kernels
> >
On Sunday 03 August 2003 20:09, Andreas Janssen wrote:
[...]
> apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-686
[...]
> If you use lilo, it will already have a section "LinuxOLD"
> additionally to "Linux", so simply rerunning lilo after installing
[...]
Well, that was easy. Don't know what to say: I e
On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 20:40:08 +0200, Richard Lyons wrote:
> It seems, after _huge_ help from Andrew McGuinness and others, that I
> am going to have to change from the bf2.4 flavour to
> kernel-image-2.4.18-686. Now, I am scared of messing with kernels
> anyway, and new to apt as well. I don'
Hello
Richard Lyons (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> It seems, after _huge_ help from Andrew McGuinness and others, that I
> am going to have to change from the bf2.4 flavour to
> kernel-image-2.4.18-686. Now, I am scared of messing with kernels
> anyway, and new to apt as well. I don't see in t
Well, a little over a year after I posted the question, I found
the solution to my question. TeXlive contains a readlink program
which was earlier in the path that /bin/readlink. That's it. I
exited dselect, changed the path in the shell, and reran the
installation. The same thing happened with
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 2:52 pm, Leo Spalteholz wrote:
> On July 22, 2003 12:33 pm, Chris Anderson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:37, Christopher Swingley wrote:
> > > Leo,
> > >
> > > * Leo Spalteholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-Jul-22 07:42 AKDT]:
> > > > Anyone have experience wrt the reliabi
On July 22, 2003 06:13 pm, Marino Fernandez wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2003 2:52 pm, Leo Spalteholz wrote:
> > On July 22, 2003 12:33 pm, Chris Anderson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:37, Christopher Swingley wrote:
> > > > Leo,
> > > >
> > > > * Leo Spalteholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-Jul
On July 22, 2003 12:33 pm, Chris Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:37, Christopher Swingley wrote:
> > Leo,
> >
> > * Leo Spalteholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-Jul-22 07:42 AKDT]:
> > > Anyone have experience wrt the reliability of this test kernel?
> >
> > I've been running 2.6.0-test1 (cu
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:37, Christopher Swingley wrote:
> Leo,
>
> * Leo Spalteholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-Jul-22 07:42 AKDT]:
> > Anyone have experience wrt the reliability of this test kernel?
>
> I've been running 2.6.0-test1 (custom compiled by me for my hardware)
> for 8 days on my work
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 08:42:38AM -0700, Leo Spalteholz wrote:
> If I install the 2.6.0 test kernel can it be added to grub just like
> any other kernel image so I can boot back into my 2.4.20 kernel if it
> turns out not to work?
Yes.
> Anyone have experience wrt the reliability of
> this te
Leo,
* Leo Spalteholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-Jul-22 07:42 AKDT]:
> Anyone have experience wrt the reliability of this test kernel?
I've been running 2.6.0-test1 (custom compiled by me for my hardware)
for 8 days on my workstation. It does a fair amount of http / php /
mysql stuff, as well a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 04:36:29PM +0100, tt tt wrote:
> Which kernel image (2.4.20) should I be using for a amd xp 1900+
> processor? Am i best using the one of the i686 k7 ones?
i686 and k7 are ambiguous subarchitectures. One or the other. You
wan
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 04:36:29PM +0100, tt tt wrote:
> Which kernel image (2.4.20) should I be using for a amd xp 1900+
> processor? Am i best using the one of the i686 k7 ones?
k7
--
Jamin W. Collins
Linux is not The Answer. Yes is the answer. Linux is The Question. - Neo
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:10:38AM -0500, Fraser Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 03:28, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > > >That's due to the fact that this kernel is precompiled in the package,
> > > >and
> > > >2.95.4 was the version used by the maintainer.
> > > >
> > >
> > > But shouldn't it be
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 03:28, Rob Weir wrote:
> > >That's due to the fact that this kernel is precompiled in the package,
> > >and
> > >2.95.4 was the version used by the maintainer.
> > >
> >
> > But shouldn't it be compiled with gcc 3.2?
>
> Well, ideally, but it was built on (presumably) Herb
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:22:50PM +0200, Mpiktas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I understand the default compiler for sid is gcc 3.2. Today I
> installed kernel-image-2.4.20-k7 from sid and cat /proc/version shows
>
> Linux version 2.4.20-k7 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.4 20011002
> (Debi
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:23:48PM +0200, Mpiktas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> As far as I understand the default compiler for sid is gcc 3.2.
> >Today I
> >> installed kernel-image-2.4.20-k7 from sid and cat /proc/version
> >shows
> >>
> >> Linux version 2.4.20-k7 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.4
>
Hi,
> As far as I understand the default compiler for sid is gcc 3.2.
Today I
> installed kernel-image-2.4.20-k7 from sid and cat /proc/version
shows
>
> Linux version 2.4.20-k7 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.4
20011002
> (Debian prerelease)) #1 Tue Jan 14 00:29:06 EST 2003
That's due to th
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Mpiktas wrote:
> As far as I understand the default compiler for sid is gcc 3.2. Today I
> installed kernel-image-2.4.20-k7 from sid and cat /proc/version shows
>
> Linux version 2.4.20-k7 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.95.4 20011002
> (Debian prerelease)) #1 Tue Jan 14 00:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 01:43:34AM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> > request_module[block-major-3]: Root fs not mounted
>
> Hmm. Did it not warn you during the installation to add a line for
> initrd to your lilo.conf? While I haven't seen that (I saw the warning :-),
> it looks like a likely sympt
You might have an old version of initrd-tools and/or your file
/etc/mkinitrd/modules does not contain the filesystem modules you need.
In my case I have ext2 and ext3 in there (each on a separate line).
After modifying the file you have to run
mkinitrd -o /boot/initrd.img-2.4.20-586tsc-test /lib
Just a hunch..
The kernel image probably doesn't contain support for your filesystem type.
I've had similar with ext3 or Reiser partitions and forgetting to compile it
into the kernel.
Hope this helps,
Colin Ellis
Solution City Ltd
http://www.solution-city.com
-Original Message-
From:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 12:54:45PM +0100, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
>
> I just tried to install the kernel-image-2.4.18 on woody.
> When I reboot my machine I get:
>
> request_module[block-major-3]: Root fs not mounted
Hmm. Did it not warn you during the installation to add a line for
initrd to your
Hi Folks..
Solved the problem. Since I don't know if anyone else has had thios,
here's what I did.
1/ apt-get --purge remove
2/ vi /etc/mkinitrd/scripts/e2fsprogs, change the -n to a -z
3/ apt-get install
works just fine..
//Anders//
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 09:44, Anders Holm wrote:
> Hi folk
There was long thread of this topic on debian-dev recently.
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 11:12:11PM -0400, Tom Allison wrote:
> Does anyone know if these kernel images for i86 architecture support
> the ext3 file system?
I think you are talking -i386 type kaernel-image package
> If so, is it in the
"Tom" == Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> Does anyone know if these kernel images for i86 architecture
Tom> support the ext3 file system?
I know that 2.4.18-k7, 2.4.18-686, and 2.4.18-586tsc certainly do,
I know this from experience.
Tom> If so, is it in the kernel or
Davi Leal wrote:
> My original installation, which I have upgraded, is from a woody CD-ROM
> with 2.2.20 kernel. I am running now a 2.4.18 kernel compiled from source
> (make xconfig dep bzImage modules modules_install + lilo). Note that I do
> not use-compile initrd ramdisk support on it. Why my
On Sun, 2002-03-17 at 10:03, Davi Leal wrote:
> Installing the kernel-image-2.4.18-686 package I get:
>
>
> You are attempting to install an initrd kernel image (version 2.4.18-686)
> This will not work unless you have configured your boot loader to use
> initrd.
> As a reminder, in order to conf
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 08:03:51PM +0100, Davi Leal wrote:
> Installing the kernel-image-2.4.18-686 package I get:
> My original installation, which I have upgraded, is from a woody CD-ROM with
> 2.2.20 kernel. I am running now a 2.4.18 kernel compiled from source (make
> xconfig dep bzImage modu
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 03:11:04AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> can anybody tell me how to change my screen size on console without compiling
> a new kernel?
If kernel is compiled properly, set parameter in /etc/lilo.conf.
vga=ask
See details in "man lilo.conf"
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
