On Mon,11.Aug.08, 10:37:58, Shachar Or wrote:
> On Monday 11 August 2008 10:26, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Sun,10.Aug.08, 20:33:29, tyler wrote:
> > > > If your router knows DNS then it might be enough to enable the
> > > > 'send host-name' directive in /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf (with the
> > > >
On Monday 11 August 2008 10:26, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sun,10.Aug.08, 20:33:29, tyler wrote:
> > > If your router knows DNS then it might be enough to enable the
> > > 'send host-name' directive in /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf (with the
> > > correct value of course).
> >
> > Well, that got the rou
On Sun,10.Aug.08, 20:33:29, tyler wrote:
> > If your router knows DNS then it might be enough to enable the
> > 'send host-name' directive in /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf (with the correct
> > value of course).
> >
>
> Well, that got the router to recognize the hostname, but not the
> domainname.
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu,07.Aug.08, 11:13:56, tyler wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> My router is a Siemens Speedstream 6520 and I'm running Lenny on both
>> machines. Access to the internet is fine for both machines. When my wife
>> connects to the same router via wireless from he
On Thu,07.Aug.08, 11:13:56, tyler wrote:
[...]
> My router is a Siemens Speedstream 6520 and I'm running Lenny on both
> machines. Access to the internet is fine for both machines. When my wife
> connects to the same router via wireless from her laptop (running XP) it
> shows up on the router pag
tyler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When apache is configured to listen to all addresses, I can browse
> webpages on the desktop from the laptop by entering the IP address
> (192.168.2.11), but not the name (etch.mynetwork). On the desktop I can
> ssh to the desktop (ie., ssh to itself) with ssh e
"Stackpole, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> -Original Message-
>>
>> When apache is configured to listen to all addresses, I can browse
>> webpages on the desktop from the laptop by entering the IP address
>> (192.168.2.11), but not the name (etch.mynetwork). On the desktop I
> can
> -Original Message-
> Subject: home network problem - router is smarter than me
>
> Hi,
>
> What follows is a very naive question regarding home networking. Any
> tips, even a pointer the most appropriate documentation, would be very
> helpful.
>
> I'd like to setup my desktop as a back
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 07:46:20PM +0100, P?l Cs?nyi wrote:
>
> I have a Cable Modem connection to my ISP.
>
> my ISP
>|
> Cable Modem connection to my ISP
>|
> PC box-1 firewall/gateway
> =
> |
Pál Csányi wrote:
Hello!
I have a Cable Modem connection to my ISP.
my ISP
|
Cable Modem connection to my ISP
|
PC box-1 firewall/gateway
=
| |
LAN DMZ
|
At 03:40 PM 6/12/2005, Craig Russell wrote:
Phil wrote:
The linux server running file and printer sharing for windows, Apple and
linux clients does not get the internet in KDE.
I get an IP address and subnet mask info, and RX & TX packet flow when I
issue a ifconfig command on eth0 (th
Phil wrote:
The linux server running file and printer sharing for windows, Apple
and linux clients does not get the internet in KDE.
I get an IP address and subnet mask info, and RX & TX packet flow
when I issue a ifconfig command on eth0 (the only NIC)
I can ping all local machines, th
Phil wrote:
The linux server running file and printer sharing for windows, Apple
and linux clients does not get the internet in KDE.
I get an IP address and subnet mask info, and RX & TX packet flow
when I issue a ifconfig command on eth0 (the only NIC)
I can ping all local machines,
* Vin Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004 Dec 17 06:52 -0600]:
> What is a good setup for two machines, Desktop P3 650 256MB RAM +
> Laptop 2.6MHz 512 RAM ?
>
> The laptop is almost just to my liking, sid running a custom compiled
> 2.6.9. I have an internal winmodem in the laptop, which works. All I
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 07:46:50AM +0300, Vin Jacob wrote:
> What is a good setup for two machines, Desktop P3 650 256MB RAM +
> Laptop 2.6MHz 512 RAM ?
>
> The laptop is almost just to my liking, sid running a custom compiled
> 2.6.9. I have an internal winmodem in the laptop, which works. All I
Paul Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 06:19:02PM -0500, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
Mmmm, what if I have two machines that are on the same LAN segment,
having a conversation of interest, but I want to run my sniffer from,
say, a Linux server on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 06:19:02PM -0500, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> Mmmm, what if I have two machines that are on the same LAN segment,
> having a conversation of interest, but I want to run my sniffer from,
> say, a Linux server on the same segment?
Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 11:43:40AM -0500, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
>
>>I take minor issue with this blanket statement: a switch doesn't really
>>gain you anything unless you're getting enough traffic for collisions,
>>and takes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 11:43:40AM -0500, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> I take minor issue with this blanket statement: a switch doesn't really
> gain you anything unless you're getting enough traffic for collisions,
> and takes away your ability to monitor
Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
> [1] Switch would be better.
>
I take minor issue with this blanket statement: a switch doesn't really
gain you anything unless you're getting enough traffic for collisions,
and takes away your ability to monitor everything (tcpdump, ethereal)
that's going on from one p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 11:12:00PM +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
> This is a DSL _router_, not a bridge - it's just another internal network,
> so the ISP has nothing to do with it. Assuming of course the router is doing
> NAT, like mine does.
Oh? Did
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:47:38AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 04:45:18PM +0200, Kosta Porotchkin wrote:
> >eth0: 10.0.0.150/24 connected to ADSL modem/router (10.0.0.138)
>
> Is eth0 really 10.0.0.150? If so, your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 04:45:18PM +0200, Kosta Porotchkin wrote:
> First Windows workstation: 192.168.1.2/16, gw 192.168.1.1
> Second Windows workstation 192.168.2.2/16, gw 192.168.2.1
> Linux server/NAT firewall/gateway running Debian Woody 3.0:
>
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 04:45:18PM +0200, Kosta Porotchkin wrote:
> Hello, experts!
> My feeling that I have a simple problem, which I cannot solve alone.
> Would appreciate any help from community.
>
> I have a 3-computer network at home:
> First Windows workstation: 192.168.1.2/16, gw 192.168.1.
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 08:58:10PM +0200, Balazs Javor wrote:
> - Right now I'm using the exim/fetchmail/procmail/mutt combo for my mail.
> And I'm quite happy with the result.
> If I move to the other Linux box as my primary workstation, the question
> arises where to receive the mail to?
>
On Sunday 30 June 2002 18:29, Mark Roach wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 21:06, Neal Lippman wrote:
> > In terms of email: I use kde on my linux workstation, and the rest of my
> > family uses outlook or outlook express on their windows boxen. I use an
> > smtp server on my website (outside my lan)
On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 21:06, Neal Lippman wrote:
> In terms of email: I use kde on my linux workstation, and the rest of my
> family uses outlook or outlook express on their windows boxen. I use an smtp
> server on my website (outside my lan) to accumulate email, and then d/l it
> into kmail via
Neal Lippman wrote:
.
> I use nfs for access from linux systems because that just seems to make more
> sense, even though I could, in theory, access them via smbfs and smb as well.
> I am not sure how the permissions would be handled in that situation, since
> smb shares don't exactly mimic,
I have a similar setup, with a older Mandrake system that I have turned into
a fileserver, and my new debian system that I use as a workstation.
The server has a minimal amount of diskspace allocated for /, /boot, /usr,
/var, /tmp, and a large /home partition.
The /home partition is shared via
I have a similar setup.
I have an old system running Redhat acting as server.
I use a Debian system as my desktop, and it acts as
the internet gateway.
I have a couple windows systems on the internal
network.
I use samba to allow file sharing with the windows
systems, and have a samba configure
Success!
I finally got ftp to work between Debian and the mac-osx. The problem
was that the ip address I assigned the mac wasn't the same block.
Thanks for all the advice. (and I sure feel stupid)
But I was still puzzled as to why netatalk wouldn't work; I couldn't
mount at all. So I plugged in
At 1023072193s since epoch (06/03/02 00:43:13 -0400 UTC), Richard Otte wrote:
> but I'm thinking the problem may be with my
> /etc/network/interfaces file. It reads:
>iface lo inet loopback
>iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.1.50
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> ne
> /etc/network/interfaces file. It reads:
>iface lo inet loopback
>iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.1.50
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> network 192.168.1.0
> broadcast 192.168.1.255
> Does this look correct? I'm not sure if I need to do anything to have
Thanks for all the useful suggestions, but I'm still having problems
getting things to work. I installed netatalk, and the Mac can see my
machine, but cannot connect to it (it gives the error: files are already
mounted locally). I then tried to ftp to the Mac, which had file
sharing on and should
On Sun, 02 Jun 2002 18:29:25 -0700, craigw wrote:
>As far as printing, I have a question of my own:
>Connected to the OS X machine is a Lexmark Z22, which has drivers for
>Windoze, Mac Classic, and Mac OS X, but no Linux last time I checked.
>Is there any hope of using it from the Linux box?
see
On Sun Jun 02, 2002 at 01:55:13PM -0400, Jason Healy wrote:
> At 1023018658s since epoch (06/02/02 09:50:58 -0400 UTC), Richard Otte wrote:
> > At home my kid has a Mac running osx and we'd also have a switch. We'd
> > like to connect it to my Debian machine in such a way that we could
> > transf
At 1023018658s since epoch (06/02/02 09:50:58 -0400 UTC), Richard Otte wrote:
> At home my kid has a Mac running osx and we'd also have a switch. We'd
> like to connect it to my Debian machine in such a way that we could
> transfer files between the machines.
Since OS X is just Unix underneath,
First, you need to install netatalk on the Linux box. It is set up to
handle printing, too, though I haven't gotten it working with my setup
(Mac laptop that I use for work), mostly due to sheer laziness. You
will have to put a home subdirectory for your son on the Linux box.
Good luck
Cam
*
On 2002.06.02 09:50 Richard Otte wrote:
At home my kid has a Mac running osx and we'd also have a switch.
We'd
like to connect it to my Debian machine in such a way that we could
transfer files between the machines. We also have a postscript
printer
connected to the switch, and we both use the
On Sat, 11 May 2002, Shawn Lamson wrote:
> and eth1 is 10.x.x.x and the client machine is turned on once every
> couple days for people to access the internet when they want, it is
> also on 10.x.x.x ... now the problem.
> Frequently when the client fires up it is not able to connect to the
> host
Shawn Lamson wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> I have two Debian machines linked on ethernet "straight thru" cable.
> The host machine is up 24/7 and has a aDSL connection on eth0 w/
> 192.x.x.x
> and eth1 is 10.x.x.x and the client machine is turned on once every
> couple days for people to access the interne
Shawn Lamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Issuing ifconfig eth1 down and then ifconfig eth1 up on the host
> seems to resolve the problem. However I am not usually around when
> people want to get online and i dont want them fiddling with the
> host - that is the whole idea of having the client.
Shawn Lamson, 2002-Jan-27 11:54 -0800:
> I went back and they did the crossover wiring for me, now i get a green
> light on both ends... still cant ping though... and i thought that was
> it! I am going to reboot now and see if that affects anything...
> currently have eth0 as 10.10.10.2 and 10.10
On Sunday 27 January 2002 11:54 am, Shawn Lamson wrote:
[snip]
>
> I went back and they did the crossover wiring for me, now i get a green
> light on both ends... still cant ping though... and i thought that was
> it! I am going to reboot now and see if that affects anything...
> currently have et
--- ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 27 January 2002 03:23 am, Shawn Lamson wrote:
> > Hi all -
> > its that time again (debian mailing list help!)
> > I set up a second box, with Caldera OL 3.1 and a 3com 3c509b card
> in
> > it.
> > with adsl i can use it to go online fine...
> > i hav
On Sunday 27 January 2002 03:23 am, Shawn Lamson wrote:
> Hi all -
> its that time again (debian mailing list help!)
> I set up a second box, with Caldera OL 3.1 and a 3com 3c509b card in
> it.
> with adsl i can use it to go online fine...
> i have 2 NetGear FA 310 cards in my debian box... i can u
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 05:53:09AM -0800, Jeff wrote:
> Shawn Lamson, 2002-Jan-27 05:53 -0800:
> > You have to be kiddin' me; i spent $25 on a 35' cable, and stood there
> > while they made it and tested it... i figured that the cable from NIC
> > to aDSL modem must be crossover too, since the long
Shawn Lamson, 2002-Jan-27 05:53 -0800:
> You have to be kiddin' me; i spent $25 on a 35' cable, and stood there
> while they made it and tested it... i figured that the cable from NIC
> to aDSL modem must be crossover too, since the long (35 footer)
> performed the same function when i hooked up ei
--- Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Lamson, 2002-Jan-27 03:23 -0800:
> > of course, i always had "matching" addresses (on the same network).
> > but i dont get a green light on the cards, and i cant ping!
> > I re-emphasize that i can connect to the DSL modem with any of the
> > cards/cabl
Shawn Lamson, 2002-Jan-27 03:23 -0800:
> of course, i always had "matching" addresses (on the same network).
> but i dont get a green light on the cards, and i cant ping!
> I re-emphasize that i can connect to the DSL modem with any of the
> cards/cables...
Hmm, it appears to me that you are not u
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 11:25:51AM -0700, D. Hoyem wrote:
| D-Man
| Sorry for grabing you email address from the Debian
| users list, but I have been on the mailing list from
Not really a problem, but sending your questions to the list provides
a wider audience and you are likely to get a lot of
> What I want to do is use a Debian box for a firewall and
> access to the internet for a win98 machine. The
> Debian box will also be a BOT in one of the chat rooms
> on Chatnet. Is there some documentation on setting up
> the Network that I can read to do this?
You'll want to setup packet filt
Hi Don...
A good place to start might be here:
www.linuxdoc.org
ipmasq is probably what you want
check out the how to's and stuff...
If you run into trouble the list will be happy
to help :)
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "D-Man" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 01:05:55PM -0700, Mike Egglestone wrote:
> Hi Don...
>
> A good place to start might be here:
>
> www.linuxdoc.org
almost everything is documented there.
if yuo can find what you're looking for. :)
> ipmasq is probably what you want
definitely.
apt-get ins
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> D-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What do I need to [build a home ethernet network] (other than NICs and
> > cable, of course)? What is the difference between a hub and switch?
>
> You don't need a hub or switch if you implement an ethernet with co
D-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do I need to [build a home ethernet network] (other than NICs and
> cable, of course)? What is the difference between a hub and switch?
You don't need a hub or switch if you implement an ethernet with coax cables.
Otoh, a coax
network is limited to a bandw
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, John Griffiths wrote:
> >i thought 10baseT only allowed 10Mbs connections, even between 100Mbs
> >capable cards.
> >
> >also, i bought a 4 port D-link switch for 25 plus shipping. at that price,
> >you might as well buy the switch. the resale value is better. :)
> >
>
> a
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Daniel Freedman wrote:
> If you don't want to get down-and-dirty with configuring IP-masg with
> two-NIC's on one box to serve as internet gateway, you can buy a combo
If you're going to have your Linux system online anyway, you may as well
let it do the masquerading. It's n
>
> jason
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "William T Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "D-Man" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 6:33 PM
> Subject: Re: home network
>
>
>
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001, Jason Majors wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:44:11PM -0500, William T Wilson scribbled...
> The second way is a much better choice for a couple other reasons. It's much
> more secure. The only box on my network that somebody can see is my gateway.
> And it doesn't have an
: "William T Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "D-Man" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: home network
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, D-Man wrote:
>
> > I am planning on building an ethernet netowrk at home. What do I need
Jason Majors wrote:
> Check out pricewatch.com (do a search for "isa nic"). I think the ISA ones
> are all 10Mbps, so make sure you get a dual-speed hub/switch. I suggest one
> with the NE2000 chip. I've had quite a few ne2k based cards and know that the
> Linux driver is excellent for it.
If I'm
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:44:11PM -0500, William T Wilson scribbled...
> One thing I forgot to mention clearly in my other post is that you *do*
> need a box to proxy the traffic of the others on the Internet, regardless
> of whether you use a hub or a box-of-NIC's.
>
> If you have an analog mode
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Jason Majors wrote:
> You could run a box with lots of ip masquerading to emulate a hub, but
> that's like swatting flies with a hammer. Just get a hub. It's
> cheaper, uses less power, and allows your boxes to see each other more
> easily.
Actually in such a case you would w
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, D-Man wrote:
> I am planning on building an ethernet netowrk at home. What do I need
> to do it (other than NICs and cable, of course)? What is the
NICs and cable :}
> difference between a hub and switch? Any recommended brands/models?
A switch routes each packet only to
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:07:48PM -0500, D-Man scribbled...
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 04:46:18PM -0700, Jason Majors wrote:
> | Check out the net-3 howto.
>
> Ok, thanks. linuxdoc.org I assume.
>
> | You'll want to get a hub. I believe that the difference between a
> | hub and switch is that (a
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 04:46:18PM -0700, Jason Majors wrote:
| Check out the net-3 howto.
Ok, thanks. linuxdoc.org I assume.
| You'll want to get a hub. I believe that the difference between a
| hub and switch is that (assuming both are 100Mbps), the hub can
| allow a maximum of 100Mbps of traf
>i thought 10baseT only allowed 10Mbs connections, even between 100Mbs
>capable cards.
>
>also, i bought a 4 port D-link switch for 25 plus shipping. at that price,
>you might as well buy the switch. the resale value is better. :)
>
a good base 100 hub will also do base 10 but check b4 u buy.
On Tue 27 Mar 01, 4:46 PM, Jason Majors said:
> Check out the net-3 howto.
> You'll want to get a hub. I believe that the difference between a hub and
> switch
> is that (assuming both are 100Mbps), the hub can allow a maximum of 100Mbps of
> traffic (so two machines trying to transfer files fro
Check out the net-3 howto.
You'll want to get a hub. I believe that the difference between a hub and switch
is that (assuming both are 100Mbps), the hub can allow a maximum of 100Mbps of
traffic (so two machines trying to transfer files from a server would get 50Mbps
at most), and a switch allows 1
>I am planning on building an ethernet netowrk at home. What do I need
>to do it (other than NICs and cable, of course)? What is the
>difference between a hub and switch? Any recommended brands/models?
>Do I really need a hub/switch or can I use an old box with a lot of
>NICs instead? Is there
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 06:24:26PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> right. here's my setup:
> mac 192.168.1.100
> mac2 192.168.1.101
> mac3 192.168.1.102
> win 192.168.1.200
> all pointing to '192.168.1.1' (as above) for their gateway
> (aka default
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 03:37:54PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 12:01:25AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 10:35:33PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
> > > Is that the only file that needs to be changed? How do I determine
> > > the IP, netmask, and gateway for e
At 04:38 PM 12/29/00 -0600, Pascal Hos wrote:
On Friday 29 December 2000 04:37 pm, JD Kitch wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 12:01:25AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 10:35:33PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
> > > Is that the only file that needs to be changed? How do I
> > > d
On Friday 29 December 2000 04:37 pm, JD Kitch wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 12:01:25AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 10:35:33PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
> > > Is that the only file that needs to be changed? How do I
> > > determine the IP, netmask, and gateway for eth1,
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 12:01:25AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 10:35:33PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
> > Is that the only file that needs to be changed? How do I determine
> > the IP, netmask, and gateway for eth1, and then for the internal
> > machine?
> i use 192.168.*.* fo
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 10:35:33PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 06:39:46PM -0800, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> > I have a similar setup to yours and edited /etc/network/interfaces to
> > add the address, netmask and broadcast address for my second ethernet
> > card. After doing this ru
Hi,
I am not expert but I do not think there is special tool for
/etc/network. I am sure you may install one of graphical
configuration tool like linuxconf but understanding what they
really doing may be beyond our needs.
Everthing in /etc are user configurable, I think. Though I keep
all or
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 06:39:46PM -0800, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 07:22:23PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
> > I've been running Debian Potato\Progeny for some time now, with a
> > single nic attached to cable modem. I'm also running an ipchains
> > firewall. I have added a second n
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 07:22:23PM -0700, JD Kitch wrote:
> I've been running Debian Potato\Progeny for some time now, with a
> single nic attached to cable modem. I'm also running an ipchains
> firewall. I have added a second nic, which I would like to connect
> the wife's windows machine to, an
Thanks for all of the pointers. I'll start playing with it and see if I can
get it to
work.
Andy
will trillich wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 05:31:28PM +0100, Simon Hales wrote:
>
> > To allow your LAN to use the Internet, the box with the PPP connection
> > must perform "IP Masquerading", w
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 05:31:28PM +0100, Simon Hales wrote:
> To allow your LAN to use the Internet, the box with the PPP connection
> must perform "IP Masquerading", which will pass packets from machines on
> the LAN to the Internet, through the PPP link, and will make it appear
> that these pac
On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Andrew D Dixon wrote:
>Hi all,
>I'm currently running potato on my desktop machine and I'd like to
>configure it so that I can share it's ppp connection with my laptop over
>an ethernet connection. Anybody have any advice on how I should set
>this up?
Hi
I also have a Debia
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 01:55:24AM +0200, Andrew D Dixon wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm currently running potato on my desktop machine and I'd like to
> configure it so that I can share it's ppp connection with my laptop over
> an ethernet connection. Anybody have any advice on how I should set
> this up?
ll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Jaron Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> >Subject: Re: @home network
> >Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 22:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Received: from [216.234.231.6] by hotmail.com (3.
ebian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: @home network
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 22:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from [216.234.231.6] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
MHotMailBB54F38400A9D820F3B9D8EAE706054D0; Fri Aug 04 22:39:16 2000
Received: (qmail 15039 invoked by uid 38); 5 Aug 2
The third number in each of the addresses below should be 1, not 10. Sorry
about the typos.
> ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.10.0/24 -d ! 192.168.10.0/24 -j MASQ
>
> Configure the machines A, B and C with their gateway set to 192.168.10.1 and
> setup their DNS, and your should be set.
I just got an @home cablemodem last weekend and I've been running ipmasq for
quite some time over a normal dialup. The short answer is that you can
connect as many computers through your service as you like, using only one
IP address, and you don't really need two ethernet cards in any of the
comp
Jaron Abbott wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm wondering if anybody can help me figure out how to connect two computers
> to one net connection (@home network). The computer I want to add is a
> Debian box (potato), the currently connected computer is a Windoze box. I'd
> like to be able to run stuff l
I did this at work for a while. I ran VMware with Win98 as the guest OS on a
Celeron 466 with lots of ram, (somebody else was using this system), and
displayed it to my measly memory-strapped Pentium 166. It worked quite well,
except it wouldn't let me do full screen VMWare.
On 15-Mar-2000 Brad w
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 09:18:44PM -0600, rich wrote:
> total network newbie here,
>
> I recently acquired a 486dx-33 with 1.4gb hard drive that i want to use
> as an x-terminal to connect to my pentium-200 (which runs potato). Is
> potato appropriate for a 486? I have an old cd of bo that I thoug
rich wrote:
>
> total network newbie here,
>
> I recently acquired a 486dx-33 with 1.4gb hard drive that i want to use
> as an x-terminal to connect to my pentium-200 (which runs potato). Is
> potato appropriate for a 486? I have an old cd of bo that I thought
> would work on the 486, but would I
Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Debian
From: Marshal Kar-Cheung Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 15 Mar 2000 00:44:30 -0500
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.5
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-Lis
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 09:18:44PM -0600, rich wrote:
>
> BTW, is it really even feasible to use a 486 to run X programs like
> wordperfect and Netscape off of my pentium?
i'm just throwing my $0.02 in here, because it seems like other posters
are missing something (of course, it could be just me
> "rich" == rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> total network newbie here, I recently acquired a 486dx-33 with
> 1.4gb hard drive that i want to use as an x-terminal to connect
> to my pentium-200 (which runs potato). Is potato appropriate for
> a 486? I have an old cd of bo th
At 09:18 PM 3/14/00 -0600, rich wrote:
>I recently acquired a 486dx-33 with 1.4gb hard drive that i want to use
>as an x-terminal to connect to my pentium-200 (which runs potato). Is
>potato appropriate for a 486? I have an old cd of bo that I thought
>would work on the 486, but would I be able to
I don't see why it would make any difference. You can use your old
hardware as firewall/router/server, but don't run X clients on it. Being
an X terminal is all it will be able to do as far as running X.
Jesus Duran writes:
>
> Greetings all,
>
>
> i'll try to keep this as short was possible
> i need someone to point me somewhere where i can find info on
> networking.such as setup and protocols, hardware etc...
Have you ever heard of the NAG? Network administrators guide written
by Ola
On Sun, 14 Jun 1998, Cormac McGuinness wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone give me a concise description of how to set up a home-network
> of a linux machine (with modem) and Windows 95 machine, so that the
> Windows 95 machine can access the internet through the PPP connection
> of the linux machine (st
99 matches
Mail list logo
