-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 11:12:00PM +1200, Richard Hector wrote: > This is a DSL _router_, not a bridge - it's just another internal network, > so the ISP has nothing to do with it. Assuming of course the router is doing > NAT, like mine does.
Oh? Did he say router? If he did, mybad, I overlooked it seeing the larger issue at hand. Anyrate, if it's a DSL router, why bother with the Linux box doing the routing? Seems moot, then. If it's just your standard DSL bridge (marketroids call it a modem) like I assumed, then what I said originally applies. - -- .''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+4fe5J5vLSqVpK2kRAk/jAJ9VXccZBvg1fUJT8h6XM2+g6CP96wCfc2JH e6OJ8tUn2JYf0F9CY3G9hCM= =JeHL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
