On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 02:27:06PM +, Jan Andrzej wrote:
> > Some intruder broke in (cracked in) debian 2.0
> > system.
>
> Why weren't you using a version that's still actively maintained with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 02:27:06PM +, Jan Andrzej wrote:
> Some intruder broke in (cracked in) debian 2.0
> system.
Why weren't you using a version that's still actively maintained with
security updates in the first place?
- --
.''`. Baloo
Hi...
On 20.03.2003 15:27:06 Jan Andrzej wrote:
> Some intruder broke in (cracked in) debian 2.0
> system.
> Now I can use it but I cannot shut down the system
> (when I type shutdown -h now or shutdown -r now I get
> the following message: (bad, not nice word) While
> hacking kernel...
> and the
At 02:27 PM 3/20/2003 +, Jan Andrzej wrote:
Some intruder broke in (cracked in) debian 2.0
system.
Now I can use it but I cannot shut down the system
(when I type shutdown -h now or shutdown -r now I get
the following message: (bad, not nice word) While
hacking kernel...
and the system is not
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 15:27, Jan Andrzej wrote:
> Some intruder broke in (cracked in) debian 2.0
> system.
> Now I can use it but I cannot shut down the system
> (when I type shutdown -h now or shutdown -r now I get
> the following message: (bad, not nice word) While
> hacking kernel...
> and the
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 15:27, Jan Andrzej wrote:
> Some intruder broke in (cracked in) debian 2.0
> system.
I recomment you do a clean re-install of debian 3.0 (yes 3.0, not 2.0)
and try and keep that up to date on security patches.
2.0 has been unmaintained for a very long time.
> I can use dse
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 03:42:46PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am realy urgend need the some old packages from the old debian 2.0
> distribution. But I had it not found on your ftp-server and the mirrors.
> Where can I dowload it ?
archive.debian.org is currently down, but you can find a m
> "Suresh" == Suresh Kumar R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Suresh> Hi, I installed debian 2.0 successfully with tetex. When I
Suresh> compile a package with seminar package used, it says
Suresh> seminar.cls not found. But I have installed the tetex-src
Suresh> package and seminar
"Suresh Kumar.R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed debian 2.0 successfully with tetex. When I compile a package
> with seminar package used, it says seminar.cls not found. But I have
> installed the tetex-src package and seminar.cls is there in the system.
>
> So, what to do?
Probably yo
I have been having the same problem... the system often hangs right before
this process (not showing it), often so long that i get impatient and just
power my system down and boot back up, it seems to only hang momentarily
every other time i boot... I don't have any PCI slots (it's an old 486 DX2),
On Wed, Nov 17, 1999 at 05:25:02PM +, Suresh Kumar.R wrote:
> Sometimes it boots up well. I have installed only the base system and
> netwoking code (NIS and Automount)
>
> Sometimes the boot process hangs with the following error message:
>
> qlogicisp: PCI bios not present
>
> eata_dma :
You probably want to use the multiple cd option. Your CD-Rom is most likely
/dev/cdrom or /dev/hdb for ATAPI or /dev/scd0 for SCSI. I would recommend the
KDE desktop manager, as you will probably find it very familiar and there is
alot of good documentation built in to it. I'm not sure if it automa
Make sure you have lp module unloaded. Use lsmod to list them.
To remove rmmod. Also, make sure the kernel has lp services as
a module. If lp shows up in lsmod then your ok as far as the kernel
is concerned. Just remove lp with rmmod.
Then the new zip drive use a new driver! It is imm.o, not ppa
The other thing you can do if you arn't ready for 2.2.x yet is to unload
the lp module.
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 06 Apr 1999q, Darius Quenum wrote:
> > Hi Anthony,
> >
> > I tried to install an Iomega ZIP 100 on parallel port of my computer but it
> > doesn' work. My comp
On 06 Apr 1999q, Darius Quenum wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> I tried to install an Iomega ZIP 100 on parallel port of my computer but it
> doesn' work. My computer is a Pentium 120 running Linux Debian 2.0. When I
> use the command : insmod ppa, I get this error message :
> get the message "init_module
I am running a 4M RAM/40M HDD i386 setup with DGL 2.1, and do not use
dselect because it segfaults way too much - using dpkg alone works just
fine if I don't try to do too much in one run.
(try adding this to your /etc/profile: alias dpkg='dpkg --smallmem').
Have you tried to get a handle on how
On Fri, 19 Mar 1999, Hartmut Schmude wrote:
> Recently I tried to install DEBIAN 2.0 -kernel 2.0.34 - on an
> old 386 machine with the following configuration:
>
> mainbord 386 with CT 82C206 / 301 / 302 Chipset
> no copro
> ISA bus only
> 8 Meg memory
> Adaptec 1542 C
> 2 SCSI Disks with 240 M a
Yes, you can install version 2.0r1 and then upgrade it to 2.0r4 or even to 2.1
(in some week hopefully) via ftp or http.
Bye,
Giuseppe
Michael Phillips wrote:
[...]
> bucks. I was wondering, if I got that and installed it, what would the
> difference be in that and R4, which is apparently the mo
> hdd: IRQ probe failed (0)
> hdd: IRQ probe failed (0)
> hdd: Toshiba CD ROM XM-6102D ATAPI CDROM DRIVE
> hdd: IRQ probe failed (0)
> ide0 at 0x160-0x1fg, 0x36 on irq 14
> ide1 at 0x170-0x177, 0x376 on irq 15
>
> If I then try to mount -r -t iso9660 /dev/hdd /mnt/cdrom my
> system hangs in the L
On Wed, 11 Nov 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 2) I tried to setup X with XF86setup and xf86config, but when I launch X I
> get some fast writings and a black screen and the system hangs up (I reset
> it with ctrl-alt-del).
> I have a ATI Rage II+ SVGA video card with 2MB memory.
> Under RH 5.1 X
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 02:38:03PM +0100, J.Miguel Signes wrote:
> The system is an Intel Pentium, at 90 MHz, with 24 MB RAM.
> There is an Adaptec AIC-7850 Host SCSI Adapter (BIOS v1.11) at
Have you tried using the special disk images for that SCSI adapter?
http://master.debian.org/~doko/
At 09:29 PM 10/1/98 -0400, Rahul Sood wrote:
>2 weeks ago I ordered the Debian 2.0 CD from Linux System Labs in
>Michigan, US, and included a $50 contribution to Debian with my payment.
>I haven't heard from them since, and their web site, www.lsl.com is down.
>Has anyone bought from lsl recently
Their site is up again...
Rahul Sood wrote:
> 2 weeks ago I ordered the Debian 2.0 CD from Linux System Labs in
> Michigan, US, and included a $50 contribution to Debian with my payment.
> I haven't heard from them since, and their web site, www.lsl.com is down.
> Has anyone bought from lsl recen
On Thu, 1 Oct 1998, Rahul Sood wrote:
> 2 weeks ago I ordered the Debian 2.0 CD from Linux System Labs in
> Michigan, US, and included a $50 contribution to Debian with my payment.
> I haven't heard from them since, and their web site, www.lsl.com is down.
> Has anyone bought from lsl recently?
On Mon, 28 Sep 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Another option might be the "dpkg-multicd" method written by Heiko
> Schlittermann; it's available from
> ftp://ftp.datom.de/pub/people/heiko/debian/
>
> Unfortunately, the .deb doesn't have a copyright file, and the source for
> 0.5 (the 0.7 source'
On Mon, Sep 28, 1998 at 01:19:51PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: On Mon, Sep 28, 1998 at 12:14:12PM +, D.L.WHITELEY wrote:
: > I have the CheapBytes 4 CD set. I was wondering if there is a clean
: > way of maintaining the dselect package list on my machine while also
: > installing stuff o
On Mon, Sep 28, 1998 at 12:14:12PM +, D.L.WHITELEY wrote:
> I have the CheapBytes 4 CD set. I was wondering if there is a clean
> way of maintaining the dselect package list on my machine while also
> installing stuff of the extra CDs.
Another option might be the "dpkg-multicd" method written
On Mon, Sep 28, 1998 at 12:14:12PM +, D.L.WHITELEY wrote:
> I have the CheapBytes 4 CD set. I was wondering if there is a clean
> way of maintaining the dselect package list on my machine while also
> installing stuff of the extra CDs.
The way I'd do this would be
- dpkg --clear-available
- f
If you are transfering those to disk from dos/windows, you need to use
the rawrite utility (rawrite writes information to a disk without regard
to the format - hence overwriting the file system info that reduces a
14.4 to a 13.8) Rawrite is available from the same dir that you
downloaded your bins
At 11:59 AM 9/17/1998 -0700, you wrote:
>
>
>I am trying to copy the debian 2.0 linux files into a floppy
>so I can install from Floppy diskettes.
>I downloaded the files from:
>
>ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/disks-i386/2.0.10_1998-07-
>21/
>
>
>I noticed to copy some of these file
>> "SS" == Shane S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SS> I noticed to copy some of these files like: resc1440.bin, base14-?.bin,
SS> these files are greater than 145k. The size of a formated 1.44 floppy
SS> is
SS> 145k. How can you fit these files into a floppy for a floppy
SS> installation?
In the
*- Shane S. wrote about "Debian 2.0 disks-i386"
|
|
| I am trying to copy the debian 2.0 linux files into a floppy
| so I can install from Floppy diskettes.
| I downloaded the files from:
|
| ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/disks-i386/2.0.10_1998-07-
| 21/
|
|
| I noticed to copy
Hi,
Nathan wrote:
>I don't believe Linux SMP code supports dual 486 processors (due to the
>lack of standards for such machines). Pentium and above
>multi-processor systems are supported.
According to the Parallel Processing HOWTO, parallel processing is
supported on 486DX, but not on 486SX.
PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 11:31 AM
> To: Shane S.
> Cc: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
> Subject: Re: debian 2.0 install
>
>
> On Wed, 16 Sep 1998, Shane S. wrote:
>
> :
> :
> :
> : I just downloaded debian 2.0 l
On Wed, 16 Sep 1998, Shane S. wrote:
:
: Thanks for the response.
:
: So do you think I should forget about recompiling the kernel
: and just install it as if there is 1 processor?
I don't know anything about Wyse hardware, but you could always try it.
--
Nathan Norman
MidcoNet 410 South
-user@lists.debian.org'
Subject: Re: debian 2.0 install
On Wed, 16 Sep 1998, Shane S. wrote:
:
:
:
: I just downloaded debian 2.0 linux and I want to install it
: on a SMP Wyse7000i machine. This machine has 2 486 processor.
: After reading the documentation, I have a question.
: After d
On Wed, 16 Sep 1998, Shane S. wrote:
:
:
:
: I just downloaded debian 2.0 linux and I want to install it
: on a SMP Wyse7000i machine. This machine has 2 486 processor.
: After reading the documentation, I have a question.
: After downloading, do I install debian 2.0 first, and
: then r
On Wed, Sep 16, 1998 at 12:51:46PM +, Ken Westerback wrote:
> I have a working ppp connection, using PAP, available through pon or
> wmppp as evidenced by the console messages:
[logs and config files snipped]
> Can anyone tell me what the problem might be?
Sounds like you need to add the
Ken Westerback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a working ppp connection, using PAP, available through pon or
> wmppp as evidenced by the console messages:
> When I try to enable diald by filling out the diald.options files as
> follows:
>
> fifo /etc/diald/diald.ctl
> mode ppp
> connect "/u
> My question(s): Has anyone else purchased
> the Cheaper Bytes CD's? And is the version being
> distributed by Cheaper Bytes the same in layout
> etc as that which DebIan have on the net?
The non-free, contrib and non-US sections are on a different CD from
the main distribution---that's the
>
> Recently picked up a copy of Debian 2.0 from
> CheaperBytes discount place, 4 cdrom set.
>
> My question(s): Has anyone else purchased
> the Cheaper Bytes CD's? And is the version being
> distributed by Cheaper Bytes the same in layout
> etc as that which DebIan have on the net?
I have t
> I've just read some postings complaining that their systems crash too
> often with debian 2.0
>
> Is debian 2.0 stable or should I stick with 1.3? The machine serves
> e-mail and web services for about 300 people...
pick:~$ w
8:43am up 79 days, 12:09, 1 user, load average: 0.0
Here is some more info from syslog, it seems like everything is loaded fine,
and then one of these hits:
Sep 5 21:11:36 ankle kernel: 3c589_release(0x0027cce4)
But it loads back up immediately after it finishes unloading.
And still, the machine goes for long periods of successful network activ
On Sun, 6 Sep 1998, Pere Camps wrote:
: Hi!
:
: I've just read some postings complaining that their systems crash too
: often with debian 2.0
:
: Is debian 2.0 stable or should I stick with 1.3? The machine serves
: e-mail and web services for about 300 people...
10+ systems he
I am a first time installer of Debian Linux 2.0 with Win 98 on the
computer.
What to I enter when on the installation program so I can get Emacs, X
etc. when installing from
the Binary i386 CD I read:
Insert the CD Rom with the block device name:
I enter:
/dev/hda3, (have tried /dev/h
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Pere Camps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi!
>
> I've just read some postings complaining that their systems crash too
>often with debian 2.0
I think they have a library problem, or a ld.so problem. Don't know what
causes this though.
> Is debian 2.0 stab
> BOB'S MAIL wrote:
>
> I am a first time installer of Debian Linux 2.0 with Win 98 on the
> computer.
>
> What to I enter when on the installation program so I can get Emacs, X
> etc. when installing from the Binary i386 CD I read:
>
> Insert the CD Rom with the block device name:
>
> I e
On 2 Sep 1998, Gilbert Laycock wrote:
> I had a (rather brief) look at the site
> http://www-vt.uni-paderborn.de/~kukuk/linux/nisplus.html
> (mentioned in /usr/doc/libc6-doc/FAQ), and I get the impression from
> there that a patched version of a newer (non-stable) version of glibc2
> is required
Hi,
Many thanks to those who replied.
Now downloaded and first impressions favourable.
Roland
--
Roland Hinkley A Debian Linux Site
Gloucestershire
UK
*-Roland Hinkley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| KDEbase depends on qt1g and the debian readme says to look on www.troll.
| The pre-compiled version there appears to be only the rpm version of qt. I
| downloaded this anyway and converted it with alien but of course this only
| supplied qt. I then fooled dp
Eric Fain writes:
> Does everyone else use last? It occurs to me that maybe people who don't
> have a lot of users on their systems might not have tried last since
> upgrading to hamm.
Actually, I've never tried it before (two users). Seems to work fine,
though.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
lept since
then. Anybody remember?
jim
--
From: Eric Fain[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 1998 3:14 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: The recipient's address is unknown.
Subject: Re: Debian 2.0 last, wtmp broken
Unfortunately, repeatin
Unfortunately, repeating the procedure described in autoup.sh has not been
successful.
Your operation of last doesn't sound right to me, unless you have last
aliased to something. In my case however, logging in as root does not
give me any more entries than before (zero).
Does everyone else use
It sounds as if you did changing over of wtmp and utmp correctly. I however
did
not. I actually touched wtmp and copied /dev/null to utmp before I rebooted my
newly install hamm for the first time. This gave me garbage for last. So I
redid
the steps pointed out by the upgrade FAQ, and rebo
Try the resc1440tecra.bin disk instead, that fixed a similar problem on my
thinkpad 560e.
On Mon, Aug 24, 1998 at 12:46:20PM +0300, Boris D. Beletsky wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 11:40:59 +0200
> From: Remo Badii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL P
On Tue, 18 Aug 1998, Greg Vence wrote:
> What happened to the FAQ-O-MATIC? Did it die?
No. It still exists, but is nowhere mentioned on debian.org (the main
pages --- i.e. there is no link to fom under support).
You can still reach it at:
http://www.XY.debian.org/fom/1.html
XY = your favorite
What happened to the FAQ-O-MATIC? Did it die?
Jens Ritter wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> This is a rather crude and quick hammered FAQ list for the DEBIAN GNU/Linux
> System.
>
> Version: Tue Aug 18 13:00:00 CEST 1998
>
> (C) 1998 Jens Ritter.
> You may want to apply o
From: Michael Tempsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 13 Aug , Sean Peterson wrote:
> > I have downloaded the 2.0 images from 4 different servers now
> > (from 3 different machines in case it was mine causing my
> > problem...)
Blah blah blah
> > Can anyone tell me what the <> is goi
On Mon, 03 Aug 1998 08:50:29 -0500, you wrote:
>Robert Lyonnais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I just finished installing Debian 2.0. I used to have RedHat 5.1 but I
>> figured it was time to try something new :-).
>
>> To make a long story short, I can no longer use Netscape 4.5. When
>> attemptin
Robert Lyonnais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just finished installing Debian 2.0. I used to have RedHat 5.1 but I
> figured it was time to try something new :-).
> To make a long story short, I can no longer use Netscape 4.5. When
> attempting to start this beast, I now receive the error "can't
Oops, make that Netscape 4.05.
Cheers,
Robert
On Mon, 03 Aug 1998 13:00:21 + (GMT), you wrote:
>I just finished installing Debian 2.0. I used to have RedHat 5.1 but I
>figured it was time to try something new :-).
>
>To make a long story short, I can no longer use Netscape 4.5. When
>attemp
On Sun, 2 Aug 1998, Keith wrote:
> I am trying to upgrade to Debian 2.0 via ftp. I ran the autoup.sh
> script and everything was fine. Then I fired up dselect to update
> all my packages. That is where everything fell apart.
> I selected all the packages in dselect that I wanted but it errored
>
On Thu, 23 Jul 1998, Ian Keith Setford wrote:
> Yo-
>
> >From the oceans of code emerges Debian 2.0! And it is good! Come forward
> my brothers (and sisters) and embrace this glorious gift. Take forth this
> gift and sow it's seed for it will reign eternal.
Ahhh... yes Brother! CD images! and
Yes, it's official alrighty ;)
check http://www.netgod.net/ for more info.
/Frock
> -Original Message-
> From: Curt E. Spann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23. juli 1998 15:33
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Debian 2.0 Release later today!
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Thursday, July 23, 1998 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: Debian 2.0 Release later today!
>Yo-
>
>>From the oceans of code emerges Debian 2.0! And it is good! Come forward
>my brothers (and sisters) and embrace this glorious g
Yo-
>From the oceans of code emerges Debian 2.0! And it is good! Come forward
my brothers (and sisters) and embrace this glorious gift. Take forth this
gift and sow it's seed for it will reign eternal.
Brother Ian.
(p.s. Can you tell I'm excited?)
_
Thanks for the reply... I believe that I am using the latest version
of libc6, so I guess it is still broken. Here is the output from
"dpkg --list":
ii libc6 2.0.7r-5 The GNU C library version 2
ii libc6-dev 2.0.7r-5 The GNU C library version 2
These are the latest
I have found the error in my config files which caused the dialups. I had
the NS line as
local. IN SOA gate hostmaster.local. (
1998070408
3600
900
1209600
43200 )
@ IN NS gate.
which should have read
local. IN SOA gate hostmaster.local. (
1998070408
3600
900
1209600
"Steve Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Can anyone help me to stop this unnecessary Internet traffic?, and the
>unwanted dials.
If you want to send me TCPdumps of the hex in the packets, I can break
them down to see exactly what is going out.
>
>==
>/var/named/10.1
On Sat, 11 Jul 1998, Steve Ball wrote:
> Requests for Internet addresses and names outside my domain are looked
> up on Internet DNS servers and correctly returned. Reverse lookups for
> addresses on my local domain are properly resolved and no Internet
> lookup is performed. Forward local dns loo
On Sun, May 24, 1998 at 01:02:43PM +0200, Wolfgang Gernot Bauer wrote:
> Im looking for the Debian2.0 upgrade-FAQ. Does anyone know where it is?
Attached to email.
> Btw. Is upgrading better than reinstalling?
Unless you have a reason to reinstall, ie I plan to reinstall at some point
so I can
Hi Craig,
thanx for the prompt reply.
Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 1998, Wolfgang Gernot Bauer wrote:
> > Im looking for the Debian2.0 upgrade-FAQ. Does anyone know where it is?
>
> if you are referring to the HOWTO, then you can get it from my autoup
> site.
>
> http://debian
On Sun, 24 May 1998, Wolfgang Gernot Bauer wrote:
> Im looking for the Debian2.0 upgrade-FAQ. Does anyone know where it is?
if you are referring to the HOWTO, then you can get it from my autoup
site.
http://debian.vicnet.net.au/autoup/
or
http://taz.net.au/autoup/
i don't know
you knowsince I have started using linux...I think my system as crashed
probably about 6 times give or take...
most all fo them were hardware!
Once I had exactly the problem you describe...my system was running...
doing "its thing" and power went out (while I wasn't home) then came on again
2 d
At 10:58 AM 4/30/98 -0400, you wrote:
>
>I hate crashes/...had one too many myself
>
I did want to clear one thing up. It wasn't Debian that crashed. I had
a
power off/on that caused the crash. Apparently, sendmail was delivering a
message right in the middle of the power spike and to
> The question I have is looking at the /binary-i386 Disk section, there
> all
> the files and 2 I am not sure about. This is resc1440tecra.bin and
> drv1440tecra.bin. What exactly is the "tecra"? Do I need it for installing
> Debian 2.0? I checked the list archives and couldn't find anythin
The Tecra files are for the Toshiba Tecra series of laptops. I'm not really
sure what is the difference between them and thee standard boot disks.
You don't need to do a clean install. I just downloaded the hamm base
packages and used dpkg to upgrade. Look at
http://www.gate.net/~storm/FAQ/libc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Carroll Kong wrote:
> [...]
> Although it still says Debian 1.3 on the outside...once again, no big
> deal to fix. /etc/issue and /etc/issue.net, right?
Yes, but these files are "conffiles".
dpkg should have asked you about keeping them
On Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 06:39:30PM -0400, Carroll Kong wrote:
> Although it still says Debian 1.3 on the outside...
/etc/debian_version
Thanks,
Marcus
--
"Rhubarb is no Egyptian god."Debian GNU/Linuxfinger brinkmd@
Marcus Brinkmann http://www.debian.orgmas
> A get a mixed bag from this a lot of people say Debian 2.0 is stable
>and fine to upgrade from 1.3. Then.. there are people who say that Debian 2.0
>breaks applications. I am willing to upgrade again... but these are my
>concerns.
>
>last time i did it.. all went well. but X was kille
On Tue, 17 Mar 1998, Wolfgang Gernot Bauer wrote:
> where can I find the Debian 2.0-installdisks? Those in
> /debian/hamm/main/disks-386 are labled 1.3
I'm pretty sure you were just looking at some outdated docs. The
basecont.txt shows what is on the disk and the
ii libc6 2.0.7pr
On Sat, 7 Mar 1998, Carroll Kong wrote:
> Fails to startup... says.. "cannot solved unresolved symbols
> X_global_lock
> XUnlockMutex_fn
> XlockMutex_fn
It looks like your X server is trying to use a new library, when it
expects an old one. There are a couple possible causes:
1. You have n
On Sun, 8 Mar 1998, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
> I didn't see any mention of downloading the latest "hamm" version of libc5
> _BEFORE_ you run the script. All that was mentioned was doing a clean
> install of 1.3.1 and then running the script.
>
> I haven't done this yet but have been reading up on
I didn't see any mention of downloading the latest "hamm" version of libc5
_BEFORE_ you run the script. All that was mentioned was doing a clean
install of 1.3.1 and then running the script.
I haven't done this yet but have been reading up on it and following the
discussion on the devel list
Carroll Kong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wow... this thing really is unstable. I got about 6 or so packages that
> said that dependency errors were floating around... sigh. Well, no big deal,
> right? I did what you guys said, got it installed via ftp some packages
> failed, no big deal.
Fails to startup... says.. "cannot solved unresolved symbols
X_global_lock
XUnlockMutex_fn
XlockMutex_fn
I am seriously considering nuking the partition and starting over. Or... should
I ... consider Red Hat instead?
Carroll Kong
On Sat, 7 Mar 1998, George Bonser wrote:
>
>
> If some pack
On Fri, 9 Jan 1998, Mike Garfias wrote:
> Any idea when 2.0 will be out? I'm tempted to start playing with the
> unstable release, but was hoping to avoid that. I'm just sick of
> having to download and compile all the packages that available for
> glibc (which I don't have).
2.0 will be releas
On Wed, Jan 07, 1998 at 10:46:20PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > When is the release of Debian 2.0 spected?
> > The best answer I can give you is "whenever we're done putting it
> > together" ... it looks like we'll be doing a code freeze within about
> > month, so sometime shortly therea
On Wed, 7 Jan 1998, Will Lowe wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jan 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi, this is a information i can't find in www.debian.org
> It really is a FAQ. We should probably add it to the site.
>
> > When is the release of Debian 2.0 spected?
> The best answer I can give you is "w
On Wed, 7 Jan 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, this is a information i can't find in www.debian.org
It really is a FAQ. We should probably add it to the site.
> When is the release of Debian 2.0 spected?
The best answer I can give you is "whenever we're done putting it
together" ... it looks
> On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Timothy Phan wrote:
> >
> > I think this question has been asked before and I'd like to bring
> > it up again since it been a while.
> >
> > Is there a set day for the Debian 2.0 (or the next release after 1.3.1)?
If your machine isn't a critical production one
On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Timothy Phan wrote:
>
> I think this question has been asked before and I'd like to bring
> it up again since it been a while.
>
> Is there a set day for the Debian 2.0 (or the next release after 1.3.1)?
When it's ready. Not before.
> Where can I find the status of
On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Timothy Phan wrote:
> Hi Y'all,
>
> I think this question has been asked before and I'd like to bring
> it up again since it been a while.
>
> Is there a set day for the Debian 2.0 (or the next release after 1.3.1)?
No. Debian doesn't set release dates in advance. If
On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, joost witteveen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, alex khalil wrote:
> >
> > > When will Debian 2.0 be available?
> >
> > "When it is ready"
>
> And, to give a little more feeling about when that may be:
> We're converting all packages to libc6. I My guess is that we're
> abo
joost witteveen wrote:
> And, to give a little more feeling about when that may be:
> We're converting all packages to libc6. I My guess is that we're
> about half-way
Good guess. To be specific (I updated my available file this morning):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp>grep ^Depends: /var/lib/dpkg/availa
> On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, alex khalil wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > When will Debian 2.0 be available?
>
> "When it is ready"
And, to give a little more feeling about when that may be:
We're converting all packages to libc6. I My guess is that we're
about half-way, with most of the difficult package
On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, alex khalil wrote:
> Hello
>
> When will Debian 2.0 be available?
"When it is ready"
craig
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
97 matches
Mail list logo
