Re: Browser traffic interception/inspection

2024-07-08 Thread Lee
Hi, On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 10:31 PM Max Nikulin wrote: > > On 08/07/2024 04:42, Lee wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 11:02 AM Max Nikulin wrote: > >> On 01/07/2024 13:57, Lee wrote: > >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842292 > [...] > >> Is libnss built with logging suppor

Re: Browser traffic interception/inspection

2024-07-07 Thread Max Nikulin
On 08/07/2024 04:42, Lee wrote: On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 11:02 AM Max Nikulin wrote: On 01/07/2024 13:57, Lee wrote: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842292 [...] Is libnss built with logging support ABI compatible with the variant in Debian repositories? (Or can it be patc

Re: Browser traffic interception/inspection

2024-07-07 Thread Lee
Hi, On Mon, Jul 1, 2024 at 11:02 AM Max Nikulin wrote: > > On 01/07/2024 13:57, Lee wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 11:30 AM Max Nikulin wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 4:13 PM Lee wrote: > >> set SSLKEYLOGFILE=C:\Users\Lee\AppData\Local\Temp\FF-SSLkeys.txt > >> start C:\"Program

Re: Browser traffic interception/inspection

2024-07-01 Thread Max Nikulin
On 01/07/2024 13:57, Lee wrote: On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 11:30 AM Max Nikulin wrote: On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 4:13 PM Lee wrote: set SSLKEYLOGFILE=C:\Users\Lee\AppData\Local\Temp\FF-SSLkeys.txt start C:\"Program Files\Firefox\Firefox.exe" This looks like the Debian bug report https://bugs.de

Re: Browser traffic interception/inspection

2024-06-30 Thread Lee
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 11:30 AM Max Nikulin wrote: > > On 30/06/2024 12:56, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > >>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 4:13 PM Lee wrote: > set SSLKEYLOGFILE=C:\Users\Lee\AppData\Local\Temp\FF-SSLkeys.txt > start C:\"Program Files\Firefox\Firefox.exe" > [...] > > Browsers do not

Re: Browser traffic interception/inspection (was: how2 format a flash drive)

2024-06-30 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 9:46 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 9:35 PM Lee wrote: > >[...] > > ... which is the downside of free software. Technically, yes, I'm > > free to build the software with whatever I want enabled, with whatever > > changes I want added/deleted. > > I

Re: Browser traffic interception/inspection (was: how2 format a flash drive)

2024-06-30 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 9:35 PM Lee wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 4:45 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 4:13 PM Lee wrote: > > > > > > [...] Debian firefox does NOT allow one to do > > > TLS intercept - ie. this does not work: > > > C:\UTIL>cat firefox-tlsdecode.bat >

Re: Browser traffic interception/inspection (was: how2 format a flash drive)

2024-06-30 Thread Lee
Hi, On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 4:45 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 4:13 PM Lee wrote: > > > > [...] Debian firefox does NOT allow one to do > > TLS intercept - ie. this does not work: > > C:\UTIL>cat firefox-tlsdecode.bat > > set SSLKEYLOGFILE=C:\Users\Lee\AppData\Local\Temp\FF-

Re: Browser traffic interception/inspection

2024-06-30 Thread Max Nikulin
On 30/06/2024 12:56, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 4:13 PM Lee wrote: set SSLKEYLOGFILE=C:\Users\Lee\AppData\Local\Temp\FF-SSLkeys.txt start C:\"Program Files\Firefox\Firefox.exe" [...] Browsers do not support the passive capture/replay that OP wants. Lee, may you, please, sp

Re: Browser traffic interception/inspection

2024-06-29 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 9:37 PM Max Nikulin wrote: > > On 30/06/2024 03:45, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 4:13 PM Lee wrote: > >> > >> [...] Debian firefox does NOT allow one to do > >> TLS intercept - ie. this does not work: > >> C:\UTIL>cat firefox-tlsdecode.bat > >> set SSLK

Re: Browser traffic interception/inspection

2024-06-29 Thread Max Nikulin
On 30/06/2024 03:45, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 4:13 PM Lee wrote: [...] Debian firefox does NOT allow one to do TLS intercept - ie. this does not work: C:\UTIL>cat firefox-tlsdecode.bat set SSLKEYLOGFILE=C:\Users\Lee\AppData\Local\Temp\FF-SSLkeys.txt start C:\"Program Files\

Re: Browser usage; was "Re: firefox > Preferences > When Firefox starts."

2019-04-23 Thread Reco
Hi. On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:33:45AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, April 23, 2019 03:31:24 AM Curt wrote: > > It's possible to modify the User-Agent header string in Firefox and pose > > as a mobile browser (not necessarily an infallible maneuver). > > > > https://addon

Re: Browser usage; was "Re: firefox > Preferences > When Firefox starts."

2019-04-23 Thread rhkramer
On Tuesday, April 23, 2019 03:31:24 AM Curt wrote: > It's possible to modify the User-Agent header string in Firefox and pose > as a mobile browser (not necessarily an infallible maneuver). > > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/uaswitcher/ Do you or anyone else have an example header

Re: Browser usage; was "Re: firefox > Preferences > When Firefox starts."

2019-04-23 Thread Curt
On 2019-04-22, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > > A mobile site can be accessible to firefox on a desktop and can be > more efficient than the desktop site. Eg. > https://www.envisionfinancial.ca/m/ > vs. > https://www.envisionfinancial.ca/Personal/ > > Can debian imitate a mobile system to a server?

Re: Browser Flakiness under Jessie -- Why?

2016-07-07 Thread Haines Brown
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 02:33:48PM +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: > Since you used iceweasel/firefox over several releases, it may be a > problem with your profile folder which probably is located in your > HOME folder in ~/.mozilla . Because I found my iceweasel had crashed just as I read this

Re: Browser Flakiness under Jessie -- Why?

2016-07-07 Thread Jörg-Volker Peetz
Since you used iceweasel/firefox over several releases, it may be a problem with your profile folder which probably is located in your HOME folder in ~/.mozilla . So first thing to try is a new profile. For that purpose terminate the browser. Make sure, from a terminal, no hidden processes are sti

Re: Browser Flakiness under Jessie -- Why?

2016-07-06 Thread John Hasler
Lisi writes: > If he doesn't want it he can just delete it then - but thank you for > the information. I had noticed that it sometimes happened, but hadn't > realised that it never happened, and is in fact a policy. Those files under HOME are not part of the package distributed by Debian. They a

Re: Browser Flakiness under Jessie -- Why?

2016-07-06 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Wednesday 06 July 2016 16:36:56 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > * Lisi Reisz [2016-07-06 16:12 +0100]: > > [...] > > > Or, if you don't care about your configuration files, purge firefox-esr > > in the first place. > > That won't purge $HOME/.mozilla/firefox/.default. > Debian's package installatio

Re: Browser Flakiness under Jessie -- Why?

2016-07-06 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Lisi Reisz [2016-07-06 16:12 +0100]: [...] > Or, if you don't care about your configuration files, purge firefox-esr in > the > first place. That won't purge $HOME/.mozilla/firefox/.default. Debian's package installation never touches $HOME! Elimar -- From The Collaborative International

Re: Browser Flakiness under Jessie -- Why?

2016-07-06 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Wednesday 06 July 2016 15:24:35 Alan McConnell wrote: > > Jessie has moved to FireFox -- have you tried that? > >       Yes.  I have replaced the   iceweasel   that jessie > installed with    firefox-esr .  It doesn't open At All, unless > I run  'firefox-esr --version' or

Re: Browser Flakiness under Jessie -- Why?

2016-07-06 Thread Alan McConnell
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 12:14:33AM +, Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > Do others have this problem? Is it part of the general unreliability of > > jessie? > > > > Thoughts, and possible assistance, appreciated. > > > > Alan > > This won't be anything to do with your internet connection. That error >

Re: Browser Flakiness under Jessie -- Why?

2016-07-05 Thread Mark Fletcher
On Wed, 6 Jul 2016 at 05:30, Alan McConnell wrote: > Assembled Wisdom! > > Using jessie, all the GUI browsers seem to be extremely flakey. > With iceweasel, I get, much too often "Well, This is Embarrassing". > With chromium, I get, much too often "Aw, Snap!". I use lynx to > read some newspaper

Re: Browser with weak ciphers in testing ?

2015-07-26 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 20:03:59 +0200 Erwan David wrote: > To access some appliances/devices whose https console only knows weak > ciphers (but on a protected network), I need a browser accepting those > weak ciphers (less I go to each device with a serial cable to enable the > clear connectio

Re: Browser with weak ciphers in testing ?

2015-07-26 Thread Petter Adsen
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015 20:03:59 +0200 Erwan David wrote: > To access some appliances/devices whose https console only knows weak > ciphers (but on a protected network), I need a browser accepting those > weak ciphers (less I go to each device with a serial cable to enable the > clear connection). >

Re: Browser font size selection for printer -- SOLVED, but I'd llike to understand.

2014-11-04 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 03:02:03 +, Hendrik Boom wrote: > I cannot get chrome or chromium (or Iceweaasel either) to print a web > page in a twelve-point font on my laser printer. It insists on using a > font that's about twice the size. Well, let me apologize for even posting that question. I g

Re: browser-plugin-libreoffice in wheezy

2013-09-07 Thread recoverym4n
Hi On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:46:09 +0200 François Patte wrote: > Bonjour, > > How to install browser-plugin-libreoffice in wheezy: I get this message: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > browser-plugin-libreoffice : Depends: uno-libs3 (>= 4.1.0~alpha) but > 3.5.4+dfsg2-0+deb7u2 i

Re: browser oddities

2007-11-17 Thread Ólafur Jens Sigurðsson
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 08:20:49AM +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote: > Change the user-agent string from Iceweasel to Firefox (You can find it in > about:config, search for useragent. Hi, I am using Epiphany and see the same thing as the original poster, that is, there is no arrow to fill out the s

Re: browser oddities

2007-11-16 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Nov 16, 2007 7:12 AM, Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote: > > Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > >> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 08:20:49 +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote: > 2. Flash image obscuring text. > --- > I've recently started see

Re: browser oddities

2007-11-16 Thread Marc Shapiro
Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote: Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 08:20:49 +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote: 2. Flash image obscuring text. --- I've recently started seeing web pages using flash, in which some flash image obscures text. In once case, there wa

Re: browser oddities

2007-11-16 Thread Raj Kiran Grandhi
Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 08:20:49 +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote: 2. Flash image obscuring text. --- I've recently started seeing web pages using flash, in which some flash image obscures text. In once case, there was a navigation bar overlappi

Re: browser oddities

2007-11-16 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 08:20:49 +0530, Raj Kiran Grandhi wrote: > >> 2. Flash image obscuring text. >> --- >> I've recently started seeing web pages using flash, in which some flash >> image obscures text. In once case, there was a navigation bar >> overlapping the pages

Re: browser oddities

2007-11-15 Thread Raj Kiran Grandhi
David Zelinsky wrote: I'm having a couple of different problems with my web browser. I haven't been able to find any mention of solutions, so any help or pointers would be welcome. 1. Missing "hide left bar" arrow in Google maps. - In google maps,

Re: browser oddities

2007-11-15 Thread dzpost
Raj Kiran Grandhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Zelinsky wrote: > > I'm having a couple of different problems with my web browser. > > I haven't been able to find any mention of solutions, so any help > > or pointers would be welcome. > > 1. Missing "hide left bar" arrow in Google maps. > >

Re: browser confusions

2007-09-04 Thread Bhasker C V
Thanks all, I downloaded iceape-browser_1.0.10~pre070720-0etch3_i386.deb and installed it manually ( i did not want to upgrade whole of my system). Now iceape shows 1.0.9 version. On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 06:28 -0500, Mumia W.. wrote: > On 09/04/2007 04:36 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote: > > On Tue, 04

Re: browser confusions

2007-09-04 Thread Mumia W..
On 09/04/2007 04:36 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote: On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 03:49:47 -0500 "Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Iceweasel is up to date. A more recent iceweasel is available from security.debian.org: Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Re: browser confusions

2007-09-04 Thread Liam O'Toole
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 03:49:47 -0500 "Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 09/04/2007 02:22 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: [...] > > firefox: > > Mozilla Iceweasel 2.0.0.3, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2007 mozilla.org > > > > Iceweasel is up to date. A more recent iceweasel is available from security.de

Re: browser confusions

2007-09-04 Thread Mumia W..
On 09/04/2007 03:03 AM, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mumia W.. wrote: [snip] Iceape and Firefox are split-offs from Mozilla. So long as you update your system regularly, Iceape will be the most secure. firefox is rebranded as iceweasel on debian.

Re: browser confusions

2007-09-04 Thread Mumia W..
On 09/04/2007 02:22 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: Hi, On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 02:02 -0500, Mumia W.. wrote: On 09/04/2007 01:28 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: All, There are multiple browsers in my system (Etch). Icescape firefox mozilla but what is the difference between these ? I can see that these a

Re: browser confusions

2007-09-04 Thread Johannes Wiedersich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mumia W.. wrote: [snip] > Iceape and Firefox are split-offs from Mozilla. So long as you update > your system regularly, Iceape will be the most secure. firefox is rebranded as iceweasel on debian. How do you come to the conclusion that firefox/icew

Re: browser confusions

2007-09-04 Thread Bhasker C V
Hi, On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 02:02 -0500, Mumia W.. wrote: > On 09/04/2007 01:28 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: > > All, > > > > There are multiple browsers in my system (Etch). > > Icescape > > firefox > > mozilla > > > > but what is the difference between these ? I can see that these are > > sharing

Re: browser confusions

2007-09-04 Thread Mumia W..
On 09/04/2007 01:28 AM, Bhasker C V wrote: All, There are multiple browsers in my system (Etch). Icescape firefox mozilla but what is the difference between these ? I can see that these are sharing the information between each other (bookmarks etc.,) I am using opera for all my norma

Re: browser display of accented characters

2007-08-22 Thread Nyizsnyik Ferenc
On 22 Aug 2007 06:29:48 -0400 Haines Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not sure when this problem came up, but perhaps when I upgraded to > etch. Put simply, my browsers no longer can display accented > characters. > > For example, I create a little test file with a and u umlaut and e > ecu

Re: browser display of accented characters

2007-08-22 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 12:43:05PM -0400, Haines Brown wrote: > > And then you _may_ need to tell the browser to use UTF-8 > > Thanks, Doug, that fixed the problem, although I still don't > understand why. If the browser is set to display ISO-8859-1, that > character set (and I suppose the defau

Re: browser display of accented characters

2007-08-22 Thread Haines Brown
"Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 01:38:59PM +0300, Juha Tuuna wrote: > > On Wednesday, 22. August 2007 13:29, Haines Brown wrote: > > > I'm not sure when this problem came up, but perhaps when I upgraded to > > > etch. Put simply, my browsers no longer can d

Re: browser display of accented characters

2007-08-22 Thread Haines Brown
Juha Tuuna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wednesday, 22. August 2007 13:29, Haines Brown wrote: > > I'm not sure when this problem came up, but perhaps when I upgraded to > > etch. Put simply, my browsers no longer can display accented > > characters. > Looks like a UTF-8 problem. ä etc are UT

Re: browser display of accented characters

2007-08-22 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 01:38:59PM +0300, Juha Tuuna wrote: > On Wednesday, 22. August 2007 13:29, Haines Brown wrote: > > I'm not sure when this problem came up, but perhaps when I upgraded to > > etch. Put simply, my browsers no longer can display accented > > characters. > > > > For example, I c

Re: browser display of accented characters

2007-08-22 Thread Juha Tuuna
On Wednesday, 22. August 2007 13:29, Haines Brown wrote: > I'm not sure when this problem came up, but perhaps when I upgraded to > etch. Put simply, my browsers no longer can display accented > characters. > > For example, I create a little test file with a and u umlaut and e > ecute: > > This i

Re: Browser link

2007-08-11 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 19:48:01 +1200, Jeff wrote: > Magnus Therning wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 19:06:45 +1200, Jeff wrote: >> >>> When i click on a web link in an email it opens the page in Epiphany >>> and not Iceweasel which i have set up as my prefered browser.(in >>> preferences) Ca

Re: Browser link

2007-08-11 Thread Jeff
Kent West wrote: Jeff wrote: Magnus Therning wrote: On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 19:06:45 +1200, Jeff wrote: When i click on a web link in an email it opens the page in Epiphany and not Iceweasel which i have set up as my prefered browser.(in preferences) Can someone tell me how to make the webpa

Re: Browser link

2007-08-11 Thread Kent West
Jeff wrote: Magnus Therning wrote: On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 19:06:45 +1200, Jeff wrote: When i click on a web link in an email it opens the page in Epiphany and not Iceweasel which i have set up as my prefered browser.(in preferences) Can someone tell me how to make the webpages from an email

Re: Browser link

2007-08-11 Thread Jeff
Magnus Therning wrote: On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 19:06:45 +1200, Jeff wrote: When i click on a web link in an email it opens the page in Epiphany and not Iceweasel which i have set up as my prefered browser.(in preferences) Can someone tell me how to make the webpages from an email link open in

Re: Browser link

2007-08-11 Thread Magnus Therning
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 19:06:45 +1200, Jeff wrote: >When i click on a web link in an email it opens the page in Epiphany >and not Iceweasel which i have set up as my prefered browser.(in >preferences) Can someone tell me how to make the webpages from an email >link open in Iceweasel. You probably

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-22 Thread s. keeling
Ken Heard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > > Why not treat the problem, not the symptoms, and insist on only visiting > > websites that respect your choice of software in the first place, and/or > > let companies that don't know why you won't be doing business with them > > again or

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-22 Thread s. keeling
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ken Heard wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to > gmane.linux.debian.user: > > > I would certainly like to see such and identification capability in > > Iceweasel.  What are the possibilities? > > Why not treat the problem, not the symptoms, and ins

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-22 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:41:38 +0100 Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Celejar wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:15:30 +0100 > > Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> Celejar

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-21 Thread Wayne Topa
Andrew Sackville-West([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 01:41:30PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote: > > > Maybe I'll just start using the Sid or Etch partitions and forget > > about testing, for awhile. > > you do know that etch and testing are still the same thing, r

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-21 Thread Joe Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Celejar wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:15:30 +0100 > Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Celejar wrote: >>> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:54:29 +0100 >>> Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-21 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:15:30 +0100 Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Celejar wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:54:29 +0100 > > Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > >> Personally, I've found that some websites will block

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-21 Thread Joe Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Celejar wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:54:29 +0100 > Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [snip] > >> Personally, I've found that some websites will block me because of my >> location, and that's something I cannot change. Unfortunately my ISP >

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-21 Thread Celejar
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:54:29 +0100 Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > Personally, I've found that some websites will block me because of my > location, and that's something I cannot change. Unfortunately my ISP > identifies me as being here. Perhaps I need to look into anonymizers. >

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-21 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 01:41:30PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote: > Maybe I'll just start using the Sid or Etch partitions and forget > about testing, for awhile. you do know that etch and testing are still the same thing, right? A signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-21 Thread Joe Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wayne Topa wrote: [snip] >> Hopefully the transition is complete enough that we won't run into >> things like losing our profiles or having 2 tabs open when we click on >> something. >> >> These issues are fixed in iceweasel_2.0.0.2+dfsg-3; I'm >> cu

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-21 Thread Wayne Topa
Joe Hart([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Wayne Topa wrote: > > Joe Hart([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > > <> Hint Joe > > << snip more >> > > I just sa

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-21 Thread Joe Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Allen wrote: > Joe Hart wrote: > >> I think we've been through the whole iceweasel == || != firefox issue >> before. I understand the reasoning behind the name change, and I >> understand both sides of the issue. What I don't understand is w

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-21 Thread Stephen Allen
Joe Hart wrote: > I think we've been through the whole iceweasel == || != firefox issue > before. I understand the reasoning behind the name change, and I > understand both sides of the issue. What I don't understand is why it > has to have such a large impact on us, the users. Probably because

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-21 Thread Joe Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sven Arvidsson wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 14:38 +0100, Joe Hart wrote: >>> After all the claims that Iceweasel=Firefox with just a name change. >>> I never had those problems with Firefox. > [...] >> After all the problems I have been having with I

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-21 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 14:38 +0100, Joe Hart wrote: > > After all the claims that Iceweasel=Firefox with just a name change. > > I never had those problems with Firefox. [...] > After all the problems I have been having with IceWeasel, I have started > using Konqeror more and more. Unfortunately, s

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-21 Thread Joe Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wayne Topa wrote: > Joe Hart([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> > <> Hint Joe > >> It is interesting though. It seems that the change from Firefox to >> Iceweasel caused a lot more pro

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-21 Thread Wayne Topa
Joe Hart([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > <> Hint Joe > > It is interesting though. It seems that the change from Firefox to > Iceweasel caused a lot more problems than some people think. By that do you mean I am not the only one

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-21 Thread Joe Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Pobega wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 08:07:33AM +0100, Joe Hart wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Mihira Fernando wrote: >>> Ken Heard wrote: Not only was I able to to have full access to the site from Kon

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-21 Thread Michael Pobega
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 08:07:33AM +0100, Joe Hart wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mihira Fernando wrote: > > Ken Heard wrote: > >> Not only was I able to to have full access to the site from Konqueror > >> but not Iceweasel, but it also accepted my user id and passwor

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-20 Thread Joe Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mihira Fernando wrote: > Ken Heard wrote: >> Not only was I able to to have full access to the site from Konqueror >> but not Iceweasel, but it also accepted my user id and password and >> gave me access to all the personal information thereon. Althou

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-20 Thread Stephen Allen
Ken Heard wrote: > However, I have just discovered that *now* I *can* access this site > using Iceweasel with the "Default" option of the User Agent Switcher > extension selected. The only reason I can think of why it works now but > did not before was because in the meantime I had closed Iceweas

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-20 Thread Ken Heard
Paul Johnson wrote: Why not treat the problem, not the symptoms, and insist on only visiting websites that respect your choice of software in the first place, and/or let companies that don't know why you won't be doing business with them again or anytime in the forseeable future. I agree wit

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-20 Thread Ken Heard
Mihira Fernando wrote: From Joe's observations its safe to assume that site is using browser identification in its scripts so its probably looking only for IE and Netscape/Firefox identifiers and all others getting the 'Access Denied' page. On the "Internet & Network">"Web Browser">"Browser

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-20 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/20/07 04:32, Ken Heard wrote: > Joe Hart wrote: > >> Can you tell us which website this is that is giving you problems so we >> can test it? >> >> Personally, I've found that some websites will block me because of my >> location, and that's some

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-20 Thread Stephen Allen
Ken Heard wrote: > Unfortunately too many webmasters design their pages to cater to one > widely used browser which has yet to conform to the W3C standard. > Opening such sites usually brings a window warning that the user's > browser detected by the site will not deliver all the functionality of

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-20 Thread Mihira Fernando
Ken Heard wrote: Not only was I able to to have full access to the site from Konqueror but not Iceweasel, but it also accepted my user id and password and gave me access to all the personal information thereon. Although the plan is a Canadian plan, I was able to access the site from Thailand,

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-20 Thread Paul Johnson
Ken Heard wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to gmane.linux.debian.user: > I would certainly like to see such and identification capability in > Iceweasel.  What are the possibilities? Why not treat the problem, not the symptoms, and insist on only visiting websites that respect your cho

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-20 Thread Ken Heard
Not only was I able to to have full access to the site from Konqueror but not Iceweasel, but it also accepted my user id and password and gave me access to all the personal information thereon. Although the plan is a Canadian plan, I was able to access the site from Thailand, where I now am.

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-20 Thread Joe Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mihira Fernando wrote: > Joe Hart wrote: >> Perfect example of a site that blocks me. >> >> I hit the first link with IceWeasel and I get the second. Just like >> you, but if I hit it with Konqueror, I get this: >> >> http://www2.sunlife.ca/member/ind

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-20 Thread Mihira Fernando
Joe Hart wrote: Perfect example of a site that blocks me. I hit the first link with IceWeasel and I get the second. Just like you, but if I hit it with Konqueror, I get this: http://www2.sunlife.ca/member/index_notallow_eng.html I wonder why that is? Perhaps because I am not in Canada, and i

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-20 Thread Joe Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ken Heard wrote: > Joe Hart wrote: > >> Can you tell us which website this is that is giving you problems so we >> can test it? >> >> Personally, I've found that some websites will block me because of my >> location, and that's something I cannot chan

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-20 Thread Ken Heard
Joe Hart wrote: Can you tell us which website this is that is giving you problems so we can test it? Personally, I've found that some websites will block me because of my location, and that's something I cannot change. Unfortunately my ISP identifies me as being here. Perhaps I need to look i

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-20 Thread Joe Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ken Heard wrote: > Greg Folkert wrote: >> On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 09:52 +0700, Ken Heard wrote: >> [snip] >>> I would certainly like to see such and identification capability in >>> Iceweasel. What are the possibilities? >> >> http://chrispederick.com/w

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-19 Thread Ken Heard
Greg Folkert wrote: On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 09:52 +0700, Ken Heard wrote: [snip] I would certainly like to see such and identification capability in Iceweasel. What are the possibilities? http://chrispederick.com/work/useragentswitcher/ That is the one you are looking for. Thanks for the tip

Re: Browser identification to websites

2007-03-19 Thread Greg Folkert
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 09:52 +0700, Ken Heard wrote: [snip] > > I would certainly like to see such and identification capability in > Iceweasel. What are the possibilities? http://chrispederick.com/work/useragentswitcher/ That is the one you are looking for. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell'

Re: browser woes

2006-04-23 Thread Leonid Grinberg
Are you using the Debian packages or the Mozilla-provided ones (I assume the former, since you mentioned that you do all of the updates every morning)? Yes, try moving the .mozilla directory to a temporary directory to ignore it (or create a new user and try it with that account). Did you install

Re: browser woes

2006-04-23 Thread Chris
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 10:19 -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote: > mozilla-firefox: crashes at every attempt to save anything. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=359214 -- Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: browser woes

2006-04-23 Thread Liam O'Toole
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 10:19:33 -0400 Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mozilla-firefox: crashes at every attempt to save anything. > > mozilla-browser: works fine immediately after restarting gnome > but if I need to restart the browser the 'File' menu disappears, > nothing that would be in

Re: Browser stopped displaying European characters

2005-11-14 Thread Daniel Nilsson
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 11:20:37PM -0500, Haines Brown wrote: > I'm running Galeon and Firefox browsers under debian/sarge. I believe > they were displaying European accented characters (but I'm not sure) > until I realized that locale hadn't been properly configured and redid > the configuration.

Re: Browser helper applications

2005-06-20 Thread Joachim Fahnenmueller
Hi Ben On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 10:42:37AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I am running Debian sarge with the Gnome desktop and would > like to change the helper application associated with real > audio files. There is nowhere to specify mime types in the > preferences of Epiphany or

Re: Browser helper applications

2005-06-19 Thread mulvihill
Kent West a écrit : > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Hello, > > > >I am running Debian sarge with the Gnome desktop and would > >like to change the helper application associated with real > >audio files. There is nowhere to specify mime types in the > >preferences of Epiphany or Firefox (there is

Re: Browser helper applications

2005-06-19 Thread Kent West
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hello, > >I am running Debian sarge with the Gnome desktop and would >like to change the helper application associated with real >audio files. There is nowhere to specify mime types in the >preferences of Epiphany or Firefox (there is in Mozilla but >the list is empty so

Re: Browser problems

2004-10-19 Thread jwyman
1) Firstly, Mozilla-Firefox never worked in the user account. 2) In x-term, the following script manifests, autoselected local: en-US Xlib: connection to " :0.0" refused by server Xlib: XDM authorization key matches an existing client (firefox-bin:1697): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display I hope t

Re: Re: browser problem

2004-10-19 Thread jwyman
1) Firstly, Mozilla-Firefox never worked in the user account. 2) In x-term, the following script manifests, autoselected local: en-US Xlib: connection to " :0.0" refused by server Xlib: XDM authorization key matches an existing client (firefox-bin:1697): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display I hope t

Re: browser problem

2004-10-19 Thread David Dorward
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:44:05 -0400, jwyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > my mozilla browser will not come up when i am logged in as user...it > will only work when i am logged on as root...how would i fix > this?browsing the net as root is not exactly a good > idealolany comments?tha

Re: browser problem

2004-10-19 Thread jwyman
my mozilla browser will not come up when i am logged in as user...it will only work when i am logged on as root...how would i fix this?browsing the net as root is not exactly a good idealolany comments?thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "uns

Re: Browser Crashes

2004-10-07 Thread Wim De Smet
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 23:15:08 +1000, Jonathan Wheelhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > For the last couple of weeks, my kids and I have all experienced > browser crashes on various sites. > > We use any one of firefox, mozilla or galeon. > > I've just crashed all 3 browsers on this URL,

Re: Browser Crashes

2004-10-06 Thread Carl Fink
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 07:41:22AM +1000, Jonathan Wheelhouse wrote: > I had included a strace in the original message; I will include it > here again. Sorry about that. > I don't really understand what's going on. It seems to reading > XErrorDB - that file does exist. I speculate that you

  1   2   >