Eduardo M KALINOWSKI:
> On ter, 06 nov 2018, Finariu Florin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Somebody can help me with some information about why I can not see the
> > Raid0 created in bios?
> > I have a motherboard EPC602D8A with 2 chipsets: Intel C602 (Sata 2 x 4,
> > Sata 3 x 2) and Marvell SE9172 (Sata 3 x
On ter, 06 nov 2018, Finariu Florin wrote:
Hi,
Somebody can help me with some information about why I can not see
the Raid0 created in bios?
I have a motherboard EPC602D8A with 2 chipsets: Intel C602 (Sata 2 x
4, Sata 3 x 2) and Marvell SE9172 (Sata 3 x 2). I create in BIOS a
Raid0 on Marv
На 2018-11-06 15:49, Finariu Florin написа:
Hi,
Somebody can help me with some information about why I can not see the
Raid0 created in bios?
I have a motherboard EPC602D8A with 2 chipsets: Intel C602 (Sata 2 x
4, Sata 3 x 2) and Marvell SE9172 (Sata 3 x 2). I create in BIOS a
Raid0 on Marvel and
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 01:49:32PM +, Finariu Florin wrote:
> Hi,
>Somebody can help me with some information about why I can not see the
>Raid0 created in bios?
>I have a motherboard EPC602D8A with 2 chipsets: Intel C602 (Sata 2 x 4,
>Sata 3 x 2) and Marvell SE9172 (Sata 3
creating now the rescue DVDs. Windows 7 takes 5 DVDs!!!
Best,
Dan
You need to use the Windows Disk Manager to shrink the windows partition
because both the actual partition and the file system need to be
adjusted. After doing this, you should check the partition for errors.
Only then should you
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Frank Otto wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> the good news is that I can confirm that it is possibly to run Linux
> on a VAIO SVZ13, using the original Intel-RAID0 and without destroying
> the pre-installed Windows. The bad news is that the way I did it is
> probably not easy
Hi Dan,
the good news is that I can confirm that it is possibly to run Linux
on a VAIO SVZ13, using the original Intel-RAID0 and without destroying
the pre-installed Windows. The bad news is that the way I did it is
probably not easy to follow for everyone, and it might require some luck
(i.e. us
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Dan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I bought a Vaio Z. It has 2 hard drives of 128 and they are setup with
> a fake RAID 0 " Intel Rapid Storage Technology " . That makes a RAID 0
> of 256Gb.
>
> I have no experience with RAIDs and I am trying
Raleigh Guevarra wrote:
> We're trying to make a RAID 0 with four 150Gb each of volumes but we
> are getting this error [...] on Amazon EC2
> # mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level 0 --metadata=1.1 --raid-devices 4 /dev/sdl
> /dev/sdm /dev/sdn /dev/sdo
> mdadm: /dev/sdl app
also sprach Raleigh Guevarra [2009.05.01.1224 +0200]:
> # mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level 0 --metadata=1.1 --raid-devices 4 /dev/sdl
> /dev/sdm /dev/sdn /dev/sdo
what type of device are those? which driver provides them?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft Related projects:
: :' : proud Debi
Hi,
We're trying to make a RAID 0 with four 150Gb each of volumes but we are
getting this error: /dev/sdl /dev/sdm /dev/sdn /dev/sdo onn Amazon EC2
Linux MyServer 2.6.16.33-xenU #2 SMP Wed Aug 15 17:27:36 SAST 2007 x86_64
GNU/Linux
# mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level 0 --metadat
Am 2006-04-14 13:00:20, schrieb Michael Schurter:
> Michael Schurter wrote:
> >I've never worked with SATA RAID's in Debian (or Linux in general), so
> >I'm sorry if this is a stupid question.
>
> Let me rephrase: how do I setup SATA RAID 0 in Debian?
Simply
Michael Schurter wrote:
> listrcv wrote:
> > Michael Schurter wrote:
> >
> The drives were setup on an old motherboard that died, and I
can't
> seem to find a way to get the crappy Windows SATA RAID utility
to
> recognize the drives as an existing RAID array.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yo
listrcv wrote:
Michael Schurter wrote:
The drives were setup on an old motherboard that died, and I can't
seem to find a way to get the crappy Windows SATA RAID utility to
recognize the drives as an existing RAID array.
Your screwed unless you can find a board that has the same IDE
control
Michael Schurter wrote:
The drives were setup on an old motherboard that died, and I can't
seem to find a way to get the crappy Windows SATA RAID utility to
recognize the drives as an existing RAID array.
Your screwed unless you can find a board that has the same IDE
controller on it
Actu
listrcv wrote:
Michael Schurter wrote:
The drives were setup on an old motherboard that died, and I can't
seem to find a way to get the crappy Windows SATA RAID utility to
recognize the drives as an existing RAID array.
Your screwed unless you can find a board that has the same IDE
controll
Michael Schurter wrote:
The drives were setup on an old motherboard that died, and I can't seem
to find a way to get the crappy Windows SATA RAID utility to recognize
the drives as an existing RAID array.
Your screwed unless you can find a board that has the same IDE
controller on it because
From: Michael Schurter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
chris roddy wrote:
Michael Schurter wrote:
Let me rephrase: how do I setup SATA RAID 0 in Debian?
Were these set up using a hardware RAID controller? You may need to plug
them into a controller of the exact same model to get to the data. The
o
From: Michael Schurter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michael Schurter wrote:
I've never worked with SATA RAID's in Debian (or Linux in general), so I'm
sorry if this is a stupid question.
Let me rephrase: how do I setup SATA RAID 0 in Debian?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
chris roddy wrote:
Michael Schurter wrote:
Let me rephrase: how do I setup SATA RAID 0 in Debian?
Were these set up using a hardware RAID controller? You may need to plug
them into a controller of the exact same model to get to the data. The
on-disk format is frequently not interchangeable
Michael Schurter wrote:
> Michael Schurter wrote:
>> I've never worked with SATA RAID's in Debian (or Linux in general),
>> so I'm sorry if this is a stupid question.
>
> Let me rephrase: how do I setup SATA RAID 0 in Debian?
Were these set up using a hardw
Michael Schurter wrote:
I've never worked with SATA RAID's in Debian (or Linux in general), so
I'm sorry if this is a stupid question.
Let me rephrase: how do I setup SATA RAID 0 in Debian?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
I've never worked with SATA RAID's in Debian (or Linux in general), so
I'm sorry if this is a stupid question.
I have 2 striped (RAID 0) 80 GB SATA drives that were setup in Windows
XP that I want to mount (read-only) in Debian to copy the data.
The drives were setup on an
Peter,
thanks, I actually did use that guide to do the set-up, and it was
very helpful. the problem I have is how do I move from having either
a RAID0 or RAID1 to having BOTH.
I have the four disks broken up into two RAID0 arrays of two disks
each. what I want to do now is have the two
On Monday 20 February 2006 16:47, Morgan Reed wrote:
> Fresh install of Debian 3.1 on a box with 4 SCSI 18.2 GB HD. SCSI
> card is a non-RAID adaptec card.
>
> I am trying to set up the 4 drives as 2 RAID0 of 36 Gig each mirrored
> (RAID1)
>
> Morgan
Hello Morgan,
Have a look at
What is the partition ID of the RAID0?
David
On Monday 20 February 2006 08:47 am, Morgan Reed wrote:
> Fresh install of Debian 3.1 on a box with 4 SCSI 18.2 GB HD. SCSI
> card is a non-RAID adaptec card.
>
> I am trying to set up the 4 drives as 2 RAID0 of 36 Gig each mirrored
> (RAID1)
>
Fresh install of Debian 3.1 on a box with 4 SCSI 18.2 GB HD. SCSI
card is a non-RAID adaptec card.
I am trying to set up the 4 drives as 2 RAID0 of 36 Gig each mirrored
(RAID1)
So far, I am able to get the two 36 GB RAID0 partitions set up, but
then when I try to create another MD, it sa
Hello all,
I have a Server that I have updated several things as of late. I upgraded
the debian version to Sarge. I have built a new kernel version 2.6.8. I
have upgraded the mother board and processor (Asus K8N - Sempron 3100+).
Anyway I kept the old (3 years) Adaptec Model:2400A SCSI Raid 0
But I think I will need the RAID from the mobo because I also need windows for gameing. Am I right?On 12/17/05, Chris Boot <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Andras Lorincz wrote:> Hi,>> I have an asus a7n8x-xe mobo and I thought to buy two SATA hard drives
> to set them up to work
Andras Lorincz wrote:
Hi,
I have an asus a7n8x-xe mobo and I thought to buy two SATA hard drives
to set them up to work in RAID 0. Is RAID supported for this chipset
because I don't want to buy the hard drives in vain? If yes, could
someone point me a howto because I never had any exper
TA hard drives
> to set them up to work in RAID 0. Is RAID supported for this chipset
> because I don't want to buy the hard drives in vain? If yes, could
> someone point me a howto because I never had any experience with RAID.
> Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have an asus a7n8x-xe mobo and I thought to buy two SATA hard drives
to set them up to work in RAID 0. Is RAID supported for this chipset
because I don't want to buy the hard drives in vain? If yes, could
someone point me a howto because I never had any experience with RAID.
Thanks.
Did you set your partitions to type 'fd' and put the raid in your fstab ?
> -Original Message-
> From: TAC Forums [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 October 2005 2:01pm
> To: Debian Users
> Subject: Raid 0 array
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> We have a Deb
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, TAC Forums wrote:
> Well, i did the following
>
> mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=0 --raid-devices=5 /dev/hda3
> /dev/hdb1 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1
with level 0, it means that if any of your 5 disks, is bad,
than you lose all your data on all drives ( unless you know
On 10/10/05, Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TAC Forums wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We have a Debian 3.1 Sarge Stable running on a backup server.
> >
> > The server has 5 Harddisks, two IDE and Three SCSI.
> > When we manually form the RAID array with the mdadm command , do an
> > mkfs.e
On 10/10/05, Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi ya tac
>
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Antony Gelberg wrote:
>
> > TAC Forums wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > We have a Debian 3.1 Sarge Stable running on a backup server.
> > >
> > > The server has 5 Harddisks, two IDE and Three SCSI.
> > > When w
hi ya tac
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> TAC Forums wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We have a Debian 3.1 Sarge Stable running on a backup server.
> >
> > The server has 5 Harddisks, two IDE and Three SCSI.
> > When we manually form the RAID array with the mdadm command , do an
> > mkf
Hi All,
We have a Debian 3.1 Sarge Stable running on a backup server.
The server has 5 Harddisks, two IDE and Three SCSI.
When we manually form the RAID array with the mdadm command , do an
mkfs.ext3 on the array and then mount the array ( /dev/md0) on /backup
every thing is fine.
But when a res
I have the next hardware
2 x sata 160 gb (raid 0)(chipset nforce4 CK804)
In the install process, when the system is installing the kernel-image
apears the next error
/usr/sbin/mkinitrd: device /dev/part3 is not a block device
Failed to create initrd image.
dpkg: error processing kernel-image
I have the next hardware
2 x sata 160 gb (raid 0)(chipset nforce4 CK804)
In the install process, when the system is installing the kernel-image
apears the next error
/usr/sbin/mkinitrd: device /dev/part3 is not a block device
Failed to create initrd image.
dpkg: error processing kernel-image
om the description of your system, however, this
> >wouldn't appear to be a problem.
whether hw or sw raid is faster would depend on your test setup
and your software you use
"test sw" is not the same as real world applications doing its normal
workload w/ random "do
system.
As for the boot loader issue, I'm not sure how a large BIOS is a
solution unless you can get your boot loader to use your BIOS which
I've never heard of. Unless you are using a true hardware controller,
I'm not sure where/how your boot loader will be read with no other
d
loader to use your BIOS which
I've never heard of. Unless you are using a true hardware controller,
I'm not sure where/how your boot loader will be read with no other
disks other than the RAID 0'ed disks.
Best wishes,
Paul
->>In response to your message<<-
--receiv
I shall explain my choises. I really want to buy a RAID 0 (striping)
controller, because my current harddisk is the bottleneck in my current
system. I have a dual XP-M 2800+ with 1Gbit NIC and 1GB memory. I have
read enough about RAID 0. I really want it! I know that it is not safe,
but I can
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 22:53:39 +0200, Niels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to buy a Promise Fasttrack TX2 plus RAID 0 controller with two
> SATA hard disks. The controller is a software controller. I want no
> other hard disks than these two in my PC. Can I bo
rdware
RAID'ing using Promise FastTrak--can be done on kernel 2.6 (I
refer to this later).
Alvin who also responded to this thread questioned your use/definition
of RAID 0 but I am fairly certain this is good ol' fashion mirroring as
it appears you are thinking of it as and as I know I a
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Niels wrote:
> I want to buy a Promise Fasttrack TX2 plus RAID 0 controller with two
> SATA hard disks. The controller is a software controller. I want no
> other hard disks than these two in my PC. Can I boot of this setup with
> the 2.6 kernel?
yes...
>
Hi,
I want to buy a Promise Fasttrack TX2 plus RAID 0 controller with two
SATA hard disks. The controller is a software controller. I want no
other hard disks than these two in my PC. Can I boot of this setup with
the 2.6 kernel? Is it possible to put Windows XP and Debian Linux on the
same
dn't find anything really
> relevant. If I missed something, thanks to give me the link.
>
> Here is my question : I have a motherboard P4C800-E-DLX with the ICH5-R
> chipset from intel. I have 2 SATA harddrives (80G Maxtor) mounted as raid 0
> using the ICH5-R (not the promise ch
ed as raid 0
using the ICH5-R (not the promise chipset). I would like to install debian
from scratch on them.
I didn't find any kernel/install that includes the needed SATA + Raid
drivers. Do they exist ? If so, were ?
I am quite desappointed not being able to install debian on my PC s
Hi Everyboby,
I want to setup a files server under Debian Woody
3.0R1. I built an hardware Raid 0+1 array with my Adaptec 1200A RAID
controller thanks to the BIOS utility. I have 4 80 Go Western Digital hard disk
drives and one 20Go HDD where I install my Woody.
When i install the bf2.4
hi ya Jorge
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, nate wrote:
> Jorge Gomez said:
> > Hi, I have an Abit KG7 RAID mb with an hpt370 chip onboard and a RAID 0
hpt370 is a known problem controller...
- none of the onboard raid actually works right.
supported "hardware raid" ch
Jorge Gomez said:
> Hi, I have an Abit KG7 RAID mb with an hpt370 chip onboard and a RAID 0
> array. A few weeks ago, I've installed Debian 3.0 with disks bf2.4 and
> it worked with problems. The most important of this problems was that it
> was appearing that me
Hi, I have an Abit KG7 RAID mb with an hpt370 chip onboard and a RAID 0
array. A few weeks ago, I've installed Debian 3.0 with disks bf2.4 and it
worked with problems. The most important of this problems was that it was
appearing that message continously :
hde: dma_intr: error
also sprach Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.24.1654 +0200]:
> SCSI device sda: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB)
> SCSI device sdb: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB)
>
> Is this correct? Since I'm setting this up as Raid0, shouldn't sda and
> sdb be half that size at 898
Kevin Coyner said:
>
> SCSI device sda: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB)
> SCSI device sdb: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB)
>
> Is this correct? Since I'm setting this up as Raid0, shouldn't sda and
> sdb be half that size at 8984MB each? Or is it typical of Raid0 to
> report
>> Is this correct? Since I'm setting this up as Raid0, shouldn't sda and
>> sdb be half that size at 8984MB each? Or is it typical of Raid0 to
>> report the combined size of the two drives it uses for striping?
Speaking of hardware RAID, I've set up a RAID-1 (mirroring) array on my
server. Eve
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:02:41AM -0700, nate wrote..
> Kevin Coyner said:
>
> > SCSI device sda: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB)
> > SCSI device sdb: 35094528 512-byte hdwr sectors (17968 MB)
> >
> > Is this correct? Since I'm setting this up as Raid0, shouldn't sda and
> > sdb
I'm trying to setup a Raid0 using a SCSI LSI Raid controller card and
four 9G SCSI drives. The intent is to have two drives (sda and sdb),
both of which use Raid0. During POST I can get into the controller bios
and set it up for Raid0. I then continue on with the normal boot
process, which yie
de.org/chipsets.html
( note that nobody really is hardware raid )
- true test... setup your raid1 (mirroring) system...
- pull a disk out ...and see if it still works
at least raid1...
- testing raid 0 (striping) .. harder to test ...
write a 2GB file to a single dis
ide2=0xdc00,0xe000 ide3=0xe400,0xe800
(depending on the number of drives etc.).
I'm by no means an expert on these matters, but you could let me know if
you run into problems with it.
At 16:56 07/03/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Hi, i wonder if Raid 0 will work under Debian
2.2r5
The
wonder if Raid 0 will work under Debian 2.2r5
The Raid controller is a: High Point HPT372, it's built into my Abit KR7A
*Is* a drive actually missing? Can fdisk see partition tables on all
your stripes? If you really lost one of your stripes, then by the laws
of RAID 0 you just lost your whole set. I only use RAID 0 on expendable
stuff.
BTW, it's been my experience that if there are persistent superblocks
pr
Well, I wasn't as careful as I should have been (read: no backups of old config
files for reference) out of habit, and it's finally got me into big trouble.
I have a four disk RAID-0 array holding a couple years worth of /home and also
backups of /var and /mp3 (which are both gone from
Some body know one Raid 0 & 1 card Udma 66
working with linux???
65 matches
Mail list logo
