On Sat, 6 Apr 2024, Simon Hollenbach wrote:
Hi,
I have not found a mistake in your considerations about "sane"
component inter-dependency.
However, package dependencies are declared upon a package with a
suitable version, whether this package can be set-up on a bespoke
target system remains to
Hi,
I have not found a mistake in your considerations about "sane"
component inter-dependency.
However, package dependencies are declared upon a package with a
suitable version, whether this package can be set-up on a bespoke
target system remains to be determined by APT when the package is
insta
On 30/03/2024 22:54, Tim Woodall wrote:
I'm unclear whether backports is allowed to depend on -updates
You have not mentioned bookworm-security.
contrib : non-free non-free-firmware main
non-free : non-free-firmware main
non-free-firmware :
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, Michael Stone wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:39:56PM +0300, Reco wrote:
No, I got you first time. Rather it's my response deviated elsewhere.
I see nothing in those three packages that would qualify as "xyzzy".
Alternatives? No. Mime types registration? No.
About the onl
On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 20:49:08 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Brian wrote:
> > I am still wondering what use it is to "check for the existence of
> > that LDOSUBSCRIBER value of X-Spam-Status e-mail header *before*
> > replying to e-mail". How does it affect the actions one takes?
>
> As
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 10:05:30PM +0300, Reco wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 02:45:29PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 09:17:21PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:54:17PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > I don't agree that responding to a troll will lead to a
On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 14:45:29 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 09:17:21PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:54:17PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > > I don't agree that responding to a troll will lead to a beneficial
> > > outcome.
> >
> > You're entitled to
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 02:45:29PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 09:17:21PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:54:17PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > > I don't agree that responding to a troll will lead to a beneficial
> > > outcome.
> >
> > You're entitled
Michael Stone writes:
> Are there any real users with valid use cases for which this as an
> issue?
"I told it to remove xyzzy and it removed all of Gnome!" (or some other
metapackage) is a common complaint.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 21:17:21 +0300, Reco wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:54:17PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:39:56PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > > No, I got you first time. Rather it's my response deviated elsewhere.
> > >
> > > I see nothing in those three package
Hi,
Brian wrote:
> I am still wondering what use it is to "check for the existence of
> that LDOSUBSCRIBER value of X-Spam-Status e-mail header *before*
> replying to e-mail". How does it affect the actions one takes?
As said, i use it as guideline whether to add a Cc: for the thread starter.
If
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 09:17:21PM +0300, Reco wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:54:17PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
I don't agree that responding to a troll will lead to a beneficial outcome.
You're entitled to your option, of course.
For context, the most recent message from that account s
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:54:17PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:39:56PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > No, I got you first time. Rather it's my response deviated elsewhere.
> >
> > I see nothing in those three packages that would qualify as "xyzzy".
> > Alternatives? No. Mime t
Hi.
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 06:34:20PM +0200, Linux-Fan wrote:
> Citing from that:
> | 6.7.10. Best practices for meta-packages
> | A meta-package is a mostly empty package that makes it easy to install a
> | coherent set of packages that can evolve over time. It achieves this by
> | depen
On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 10:56:30 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 16:03:21 (+0300), Reco wrote:
[...]
> > Please show a e-mail from the list subscriber that does not have
> > aforementioned attribute, then we'll have something to talk about.
>
> Dead easy. Just configure your em
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:39:56PM +0300, Reco wrote:
No, I got you first time. Rather it's my response deviated elsewhere.
I see nothing in those three packages that would qualify as "xyzzy".
Alternatives? No. Mime types registration? No.
About the only common thing about all three packages is
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 10:56:30AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 16:03:21 (+0300), Reco wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:32:59PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > > On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 14:59:31 +0300, Reco wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:50:28PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > >
John Hasler writes:
Reco writes:
> The parent thread shows that at least some of the users are
> confused by metapackages.
I think that most users are totally ignorant of the nature or even the
existence of metapackages. As far as they are concerned the Lxqt
package *is* Lxqt and there is no w
Reco writes:
> The parent thread shows that at least some of the users are
> confused by metapackages.
I think that most users are totally ignorant of the nature or even the
existence of metapackages. As far as they are concerned the Lxqt
package *is* Lxqt and there is no way to get Lxqt other th
On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 16:03:21 (+0300), Reco wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:32:59PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 14:59:31 +0300, Reco wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:50:28PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > > > On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 14:11:15 +0300, Reco wrote:
> > > > > On Mon,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Reco wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:08:04PM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
>> Reco wrote:
I don't think anything needs to be done here -- the whole idea of
(meta)packages is that you give up some choice for the benefits of not
having t
On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 16:03:21 +0300, Reco wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:32:59PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 14:59:31 +0300, Reco wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:50:28PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > > > On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 14:11:15 +0300, Reco wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:08:04PM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 11:56:33AM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
> >> > 3) Synaptic did not provide a user a meaningful choice.
> >> > [...]
> >> > I'm n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 11:56:33AM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
>> > 3) Synaptic did not provide a user a meaningful choice.
>> > [...]
>> > I'm not saying that Synaptic should be transformed to aptitude (which is
>> > famous
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:32:59PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 14:59:31 +0300, Reco wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:50:28PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > > On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 14:11:15 +0300, Reco wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 11:39:05AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> >
On 2019-10-07, Reco wrote:
>
> 1) Call me old-fashioned, but posters' personalities should not matter
> here, at this list.
I don't see what is old-fashioned about your opinion here. I would think
it were the gentilities of polite discourse that have become outmoded
(as demonstrated finely by the
On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 14:59:31 +0300, Reco wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:50:28PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 14:11:15 +0300, Reco wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 11:39:05AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > > > On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 11:28:03 +0300, Reco wrote:
> > > >
> >
Hi.
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 11:56:33AM -, Dan Purgert wrote:
> > 3) Synaptic did not provide a user a meaningful choice.
> > [...]
> > I'm not saying that Synaptic should be transformed to aptitude (which is
> > famous for its multi-choice resolver), we have one aptitude already,
> > p
On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 13:53:43 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Reco wrote:
[...]
> Brian wrote:
> > The non-existence of LDOSUBSCRIBER in a mails's headers says nothing
> > definite about whether the poster is subscribed to the list or reads
> > list mails.
>
> To my best knowledge, "X
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Reco wrote:
> Hello, list.
>
> It may seem a thread hijacking (and may be it is), but I feel that the
> discussion of OP's problem has taken a wrong turn. Consider this a my
> attempt to put in on a right track ☺.
>
> So I've been reading this
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:50:28PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 14:11:15 +0300, Reco wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 11:39:05AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > > On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 11:28:03 +0300, Reco wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > PS Just a friendly reminder. Please chec
Hi,
Reco wrote:
> > 1) Call me old-fashioned, but posters' personalities should not matter
> > here, at this list. [...]
> > The language OP is using could definitely use some improvement indeed,
It would serve the general issue of constructive discussion.
> > discussing OP's personality just b
On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 14:11:15 +0300, Reco wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 11:39:05AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 11:28:03 +0300, Reco wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > PS Just a friendly reminder. Please check for the existence of that
> > > LDOSUBSCRIBER value of X-Spam-Status
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 11:39:05AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 11:28:03 +0300, Reco wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > PS Just a friendly reminder. Please check for the existence of that
> > LDOSUBSCRIBER value of X-Spam-Status e-mail header *before* replying to
> > e-mail. Unless, of course
On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 11:28:03 +0300, Reco wrote:
[...]
> PS Just a friendly reminder. Please check for the existence of that
> LDOSUBSCRIBER value of X-Spam-Status e-mail header *before* replying to
> e-mail. Unless, of course, you intention is *not* to reply to OP but
> have your reply visible
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 11:28:03AM +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hello, list.
>
> It may seem a thread hijacking (and may be it is) [...]
I don't feel so. Thanks for this post.
Cheers
-- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello, list.
It may seem a thread hijacking (and may be it is), but I feel that the
discussion of OP's problem has taken a wrong turn. Consider this a my
attempt to put in on a right track ☺.
So I've been reading this thread, and it got me thinking. I know, it's a
somewhat strange confess
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 05:56:22PM -0400, e Lpe wrote:
> Ok, thanks for the lesson.
> I made a mistake. I apologize.
> I din't saw how as changed Debian distribution and community since 2002.
> It's so far...
> Forget this thread, or mail, call it as you want.
> I will found a solution by myself.
>
On Friday 28 October 2016 22:56:22 e Lpe wrote:
> Ok, thanks for the lesson.
> I made a mistake. I apologize.
> I din't saw how as changed Debian distribution and community since 2002.
> It's so far...
> Forget this thread, or mail, call it as you want.
> I will found a solution by myself.
>
> And
Ok, thanks for the lesson.
I made a mistake. I apologize.
I din't saw how as changed Debian distribution and community since 2002.
It's so far...
Forget this thread, or mail, call it as you want.
I will found a solution by myself.
And thanks to people try to help.
End off.
2016-10-28 14:31 GMT-0
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 07:19:47PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> 4. There is a way to get your error mesaages in English but I have
>forgotten how. Someone will be along in a while to explain how it
>is done.
If you're working from a command shell, you can do:
export LC_ALL=C
and then the rest o
I did not respond to your post because it seemed like too much trouble
to get information from you. Fortunately for you Lisi (bless her heart)
did not ignore it.
e Lpe, you are now going to get a lecture. Sit back and enjoy it. :)
--
" What have you tried?"
nothing yet. The missings dependencies are here : http://dpaste.com/2BVN1S6
I think i can dowload it from debian website and install tem with dpkg but
I affraid to brake my system
2016-10-28 10:53 GMT-04:00 Lisi Reisz :
> On Friday 28 October 2016 02:13:44 e Lpe wrote:
>
On Friday 28 October 2016 02:13:44 e Lpe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> all is in the title.
> I can't install Lightworks on Jessie.
>
> What is the right way to install it ?
What have you tried?
Lisi
On 03/24/2008 03:53 PM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> I apologize for taking so long to get back to you.
No Problem :-)
> I asked whether you were running etch because the unstable/testing
> version of mediawiki doesn't have dependencies that would pull in the
> stuff you're talking about. I've ta
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 07:38:36PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> I have here VDS with minimal Debian installation. Why Debian wish to
> install me Firefox, Gnome/GTK+ components, X11 components, Latex, Sound
> server, portmap, quite enough libraries etc.
I ap
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 09:45:29PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle wrote:
> On 03/23/2008 08:49 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > It is usual for upstream developers not to support the debian packages.
> > If you have troubles you should contact the maintainer/file a bug.
>
> Generally or for web applicat
On 03/23/2008 08:49 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> It is usual for upstream developers not to support the debian packages.
> If you have troubles you should contact the maintainer/file a bug.
Generally or for web applications? Why?
cheers
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 02:28:40PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle wrote:
> On 03/21/2008 09:20 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > I don't think so. Run 'aptitude keep-all', 'aptitude update' and retry.
> > Do you get the same thing? I'm guessing you tried to install some task
> > and aptitude still remembe
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 02:33:49PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle wrote:
> I posted the same topic on Mediawiki admins mailinglist. A Mediawiki
> developer[0] told that the Debian package is unsupported third-party and
> they receive a lot of complaints about it.
It is usual for upstream developers not
I posted the same topic on Mediawiki admins mailinglist. A Mediawiki
developer[0] told that the Debian package is unsupported third-party and
they receive a lot of complaints about it.
So will install myself. The only downside that I need to care myself
about security patches.
cheers
Simon
[0] h
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 02:28:40PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle wrote:
> On 03/21/2008 09:20 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > I don't think so. Run 'aptitude keep-all', 'aptitude update' and retry.
> > Do you get the same thing? I'm guessing you tried to install some task
> > and aptitude still remembe
On 03/21/2008 09:20 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> I don't think so. Run 'aptitude keep-all', 'aptitude update' and retry.
> Do you get the same thing? I'm guessing you tried to install some task
> and aptitude still remembers it.
Hi Andrei
No success.
Need to get 257MB/262MB of archives. After u
On 03/21/2008 10:20 PM, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Which version of Debian are you running? etch?
Yes I am running Etch.
> What do you get if you add "-D" to the aptitude install line?
Sorry for such a long Copypasta.
# aptitude -D install mediawiki mediawiki-extensions
Reading package lists.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 07:38:36PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> I have here VDS with minimal Debian installation. Why Debian wish to
> install me Firefox, Gnome/GTK+ components, X11 components, Latex, Sound
> server, portmap, quite enough libraries etc.
Whic
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 07:38:36PM +0100, Simon Jolle sjolle wrote:
> Hi Debian users
>
> I have here VDS with minimal Debian installation. Why Debian wish to
> install me Firefox, Gnome/GTK+ components, X11 components, Latex, Sound
> server, portmap, quite enough libraries etc.
>
> Does MediaWik
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:14:34 -0400
Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems like this bug is already reported
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=380757
Aloha,
Thanks for posting the info. I guess it'll be fixed soon.
--
"Infinite Love Is The Only Truth, Everythi
On Monday 04 September 2006 06:50, Dimitar Vukman wrote:
> Aloha,
>
> Here's the situation. I want openoffice from testing or unstable, it
> wants to remove adesklets and I can't install adeskleds because of deps.
>
> What to do? Force it?
Seems like this bug is already reported
http://bugs.debia
> results in nothing. Am I missing something here?
>
> raju
It's not in testing, it's in sarge and sid. But the same question
remains. Adesklets and openoffice from ustable need different versions
of python, adesklets (<< 2.4) && openoffice pn python ( python-uno:
Depends: python (>= 2.4) ).
ht
> What is this adesklets software that you are talking about? On my
> Etch machine
>
> $apt-cache search adesklets
>
> results in nothing. Am I missing something here?
[04:43 PM Mon Sep [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~
$ apt-cache search adesklets
adesklets - interactive Imlib2 console for the X Window Syst
On Monday 04 September 2006 06:50, Dimitar Vukman wrote:
> Aloha,
>
> Here's the situation. I want openoffice from testing or unstable, it
> wants to remove adesklets and I can't install adeskleds because of deps.
>
> What to do? Force it?
>
What is this adesklets software that you are talking abo
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 04:16:46PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Magnus Therning wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:43:12PM -0500, Ek Zindagoi wrote:
> >
> >>Hi:
> >>I am creating a package in Debian and have some questions about
> >>specifying dependencies in the control file.
> >>The Dep
Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:43:12PM -0500, Ek Zindagoi wrote:
>
>>Hi:
>>I am creating a package in Debian and have some questions about
>>specifying dependencies in the control file.
>>The Dependencies make up five of the fields in a control file: Depends,
>>Enhances, Pre-D
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:43:12PM -0500, Ek Zindagoi wrote:
>Hi:
> I am creating a package in Debian and have some questions about
>specifying dependencies in the control file.
> The Dependencies make up five of the fields in a control file: Depends,
>Enhances, Pre-Depends, Recommends, and Suggest
Ek Zindagoi wrote:
> Hi:
> I am creating a package in Debian and have some questions about
> specifying dependencies in the control file.
> The Dependencies make up five of the fields in a control file: Depends,
> Enhances, Pre-Depends, Recommends, and Suggests. But all the these
> fields accept
On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 00:27 -0400, Bryan Donlan wrote:
> On 9/20/05, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi, can anyone help me with this dependencies? I can't freaking upgrade.
> >
> > This is Sid, just did apt-get update and need to update my system a bit.
> >
> > Any idea?
On 9/20/05, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, can anyone help me with this dependencies? I can't freaking upgrade.
>
> This is Sid, just did apt-get update and need to update my system a bit.
>
> Any idea?
>
[snip]
> debian:~# apt-get -f install
> Reading package lists...
Umar Draz wrote:
hi dear members!
i have question about dependencies. I want to install qmail thats
why i need courier-imap and courier-imap-ssl. when i want to install
courier-imap i face dependcey of exim but i don't want to install exim.
so, remove exim if you don't want it to.
there's sev
Lourens replying to Kenneth Jacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a slow Internet connection at home. :-(
>
> I can't yet use apt-zip since my home 'ppp' link still doesn't work
> (non-"8 bit clean" issues) thus prohibiting me from updating the apt
> database via the net. :-(
>
>
aj> You can:
aj>
aj> - Copy the files in /var/lib/apt/lists from the office machine as well
aj> - Use apt-move on the office machine to move the downloaded files into a
aj> hierarchy that you can add to your sources.list on your home computer,
aj> e.g. using apt-cdrom
aj> - Read t
Hello
Kenneth Jacker (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I have a slow Internet connection at home. :-(
>
> I can't yet use apt-zip since my home 'ppp' link still doesn't work
> (non-"8 bit clean" issues) thus prohibiting me from updating the apt
> database via the net. :-(
>
>
> So, in order to
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 11:52:56AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> I don't understand. There's no package called libxrender1.1 in any
> Debian distribution, and no mention of it in any other package's
> dependencies. Where are you getting it from?
Hmm. From
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/mirror/mirrors.evi
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 11:52:56AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 06:12:11AM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> I don't understand. There's no package called libxrender1.1 in any
> Debian distribution, and no mention of it in any other package's
> dependencies. Where are you getting it
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 06:12:11AM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:50:53PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> > And now you see why all that other stuff had to be removed. It depends on
> > libxrender1, and you're trying to install libxrender1.1...
>
> So libxrender1.1 isn't backwar
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:50:53PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> And now you see why all that other stuff had to be removed. It depends on
> libxrender1, and you're trying to install libxrender1.1...
So libxrender1.1 isn't backward-compatible and you can't have both
installed?
> It's doing exactl
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:41:43PM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> I'm trying to install the newest avidemux (2.0.20) on my Testing system.
> Since Christian Marillat hasn't built a .deb of it, I have to build it.
> Can't be installed because it depends on libxrender1.1, which isn't going to
> be ins
Incoming from Carl Fink:
> I'm trying to install the newest avidemux (2.0.20) on my Testing system.
> Since Christian Marillat hasn't built a .deb of it, I have to build it.
You can save yourself a lot of time with "apt-get --dry-run install
avidemux". That tells me there's mountains of stuff th
on Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:43:06PM +0100, Chris Wilcox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently involved in a Debian-distro based project which aims to
> create an Internet caching product for schools which would hopefully take
> the form of a Debian install CD which would install
Dave Selby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a ham v90 winmodem .. I tracked down the driver for it which is
> Intel-V92ham-451 It installs with ...
>
> make clean
> make ham
> make install
When you 'make ham', how does it find your actual kernel source? You
almost certainly need unpacked ker
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Joachim Trinkwitz wrote:
> > postfix was designed from the beginning with security in mind. And it's
> > easier to configure than sendmail or qmail.
>
> Periodically I begin to believe in such statements only to after the
> installation each time find myself desperately searc
jpb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> postfix was designed from the beginning with security in mind. And it's
> easier to configure than sendmail or qmail.
Periodically I begin to believe in such statements only to after the
installation each time find myself desperately searching up and down
the do
On 12-Jun-2000 Chris Mason wrote:
> I'm trying to install postfix and remove exim, I am having a problem because
> "apt-get remove exim" fails because there are dependent programs. I don't
> care, I would like to force the removal and then install postfix but even
> "apt-get -f remove exim" fails.
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 02:33:41PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> I'm trying to install postfix and remove exim, I am having a problem because
> "apt-get remove exim" fails because there are dependent programs. I don't
> care, I would like to force the removal and then install postfix but even
> "apt
Sven Burgener wrote:
>
> >I had no problems ditching exim and installing postfix a few months
> ago.
>
> What advantages / plus-points does postfix have over exim?
> I have only been using exim for a week now. Ran sendmail before, but as
> I wasn't able to configure it to my (simple) needs, I swi
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Chris Mason wrote:
> When I try to run dselect, it wants to uninstall packages that I have
> installed myself, so that won't do.
You should try to fix that problem. But do run dselect update first, to make
sure apt and dselect agree in the package available file... (also, mak
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Sven Burgener wrote:
> >I had no problems ditching exim and installing postfix a few months
> ago.
>
> What advantages / plus-points does postfix have over exim?
Secure design, using chroot jails (even in Debian's default installation),
only the postfix 'master' daemon runs a
2000 2:48 PM
To: Henrique M Holschuh; Debian-User
Subject: Re: dependencies rpoblem
>I had no problems ditching exim and installing postfix a few months
ago.
What advantages / plus-points does postfix have over exim?
I have only been using exim for a week now. Ran sendmail before, but as
>I had no problems ditching exim and installing postfix a few months
ago.
What advantages / plus-points does postfix have over exim?
I have only been using exim for a week now. Ran sendmail before, but as
I wasn't able to configure it to my (simple) needs, I switched to exim.
TIA
Sven
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Chris Mason wrote:
> I'm trying to install postfix and remove exim, I am having a problem because
> "apt-get remove exim" fails because there are dependent programs. I don't
> care, I would like to force the removal and then install postfix but even
> "apt-get -f remove exim"
y, June 26, 1999 3:05 PM
To: Brendon Baumgartner
Subject: Re: dependencies
Brendon Baumgartner wrote:
>
> I don't get any error messages. When i'm using dselect and it does
"checking
> dependencies" it gets stuck. It just sits there and does nothing. I did an
> upgr
>> "MM" == Matthew McFarlane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> I'm getting these errors... yet I have these files in /lib/
MM> failed dependencies:
MM> ld-linux.so.2 is needed by XFree86_3DFX-SVGA-3.3.3-4
MM> libc.so.6 is needed by XFree86_3DFX-SVGA-3.3.3-4
[...]
You don't use Debian, right? This
*- On 20 Apr, Branden Robinson wrote about "Re: dependencies"
> On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 10:00:58AM -0500, Brian Servis wrote:
>> #!/bin/sh
>> # findlibpkg: Find the libs that a executable depends on and what
>> # package they are in.
>> #
>&
On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 10:00:58AM -0500, Brian Servis wrote:
> #!/bin/sh
> # findlibpkg: Find the libs that a executable depends on and what
> # package they are in.
> #
> # usage: findlibpkg
>
> LIST=`ldd $1 | cut -d" " -f3`
> for i in $LIST ; do
> zgrep "`echo $i | sed -e
*- On 20 Apr, ktb wrote about "dependencies"
> A few weeks ago someone posted a command that showed the dependencies of
> a program. I must have inadvertently deleted it and can't find it in
> the archives. Anyway I would like to know how to reveal what libs a
> program uses or needs and once I f
In my excitement over just how useful the apropos command is, I forgot
to include the following in my previous posting:
To find package which owns :
dpkg -S
I guess this may not work if you don't have the package installed yet,
which is when it would be most useful. I guess the only way
ldd
list the dynamic libraries which the binary executable requires.
A really good tip for finding out what the name of a command is (which I
stumbled across in the Debian Users Manual) is:
apropos
which lists appropriate man page titles with a brief overview. eg:
$ apropos libr
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 08:20:22AM -0500, ktb wrote:
> A few weeks ago someone posted a command that showed the dependencies of
> a program. I must have inadvertently deleted it and can't find it in
> the archives. Anyway I would like to know how to reveal what libs a
> program uses or needs
On Sun, 23 Aug 1998, Alan Su wrote:
: is there anyway to permanently override the "suggests" form of
: dependency in dselect? i have a system on which i want xbase
: installed, but not an xserver. every time i run dselect, it insists
: on changing the status of xserver-vga16, xfntbase75, and
98 matches
Mail list logo
