On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 06:12:11AM -0500, Carl Fink wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:50:53PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > > And now you see why all that other stuff had to be removed. It depends on > > libxrender1, and you're trying to install libxrender1.1... > > So libxrender1.1 isn't backward-compatible and you can't have both > installed? > > > It's doing exactly what you told it to do. Since you asked for a single > > package install, apt assumes you know exactly what you're doing. > > Sure, I knew that. I just thought that long chain of dependencies and the > inconsistent state of Testing was funny.
I don't understand. There's no package called libxrender1.1 in any Debian distribution, and no mention of it in any other package's dependencies. Where are you getting it from? -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
