What have I managed to inadvertantly change?
Now, whenever an application opens a new window it opens under all
current windows so I have to right-click the gnome panel and select
'on top' and then click to maximize it.
New windows used to always open on top. Why would anyone want th
On Monday 21 August 2006 10:32, Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:49:12AM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Monday 21 August 2006 08:01, Stephen wrote:
> > > If it were closed source, then implementations of it wouldn't be
> > > allowed to exist such as MING, the various op
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:47:12PM -0400 or thereabouts, Carl Fink wrote:
>
> In fact, the standard is not open.
>
> See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWF#Licensing.
>
> In any case, "Flash" (which is a program) is not open-source, any more than
> Acrobat is just because PDF is, in fact, open.
A
* Jacob S ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:32:49 -0400
> Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:49:12AM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson
> > wrote:
> > > On Monday 21 August 2006 08:01, Stephen w
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:19:57PM -0500 or thereabouts, Jacob S wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:32:49 -0400
> Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:49:12AM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:19:57PM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:32:49 -0400
> Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:49:12AM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson
> > wrote:
> > > On Monday 21 August 2006 08:01, Stephen wrote:
> >
> > > > If it were cl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:32:49 -0400
Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:49:12AM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson
> wrote:
> > On Monday 21 August 2006 08:01, Stephen wrote:
>
> > > If it were closed source, then implement
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:49:12AM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Monday 21 August 2006 08:01, Stephen wrote:
> > If it were closed source, then implementations of it wouldn't be allowed
> > to exist such as MING, the various open source players, and editors.
> The "standard" itse
On Monday 21 August 2006 08:01, Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:04:13AM -0400 or thereabouts, Carl Fink wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 08:43:04AM -0400, Stephen wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:29:33PM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson
wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 20 August 200
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:27:06PM +0100 or thereabouts, George Borisov wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
> >
> > Adobe Flash Player is closed source, but there are other Flash Players.
> > The specification is open source.
>
> True, but none of these players (AFAIK) support Flash 8/9
> formats. (BTW, if t
Stephen wrote:
>
> We should be rejoicing in the fact, that Adobe is now going to
> be supporting Linux actively in terms of Flash, and Flex.
Erm... woot? *waves a little flag*
--
George Borisov
DXSolutions Ltd
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Stephen wrote:
>
> Adobe Flash Player is closed source, but there are other Flash Players.
> The specification is open source.
True, but none of these players (AFAIK) support Flash 8/9
formats. (BTW, if they do then please let me know, as I am
getting fed up of the, increasingly more common, "upg
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:04:13AM -0400 or thereabouts, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 08:43:04AM -0400, Stephen wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:29:33PM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > On Sunday 20 August 2006 14:44, Derek wrote:
> > > > If more people complain,ma
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 03:27:52PM +0100 or thereabouts, George Borisov wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
> >
> > Paul, Flash is not closed source.
>
> While some of Paul's post was unnecessarily harsh, he was quite
> correct on this point.
>
> Adobe Flash Player _is_ closed source, as far as I know.
Ado
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 02:44:07PM -0700 or thereabouts, Derek wrote:
> If more people complain,maybe they will release it sooner.
No they won't -- It's actively being worked on NOW. Some things just
take time. We should be rejoicing in the fact, that Adobe is now going to
be supporting Linux acti
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:04:13AM -0400 or thereabouts, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 08:43:04AM -0400, Stephen wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:29:33PM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > On Sunday 20 August 2006 14:44, Derek wrote:
> > > > If more people complain,ma
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 08:43:04AM -0400, Stephen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:29:33PM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 August 2006 14:44, Derek wrote:
> > > If more people complain,maybe they will release it sooner.
> >
> > I doubt it, but if you really want promo
Stephen wrote:
>
> Paul, Flash is not closed source.
While some of Paul's post was unnecessarily harsh, he was quite
correct on this point.
Adobe Flash Player _is_ closed source, as far as I know.
Best regards,
--
George Borisov
DXSolutions Ltd
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:29:33PM -0700 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday 20 August 2006 14:44, Derek wrote:
> > If more people complain,maybe they will release it sooner.
>
> I doubt it, but if you really want promote closed source software, go ahead
> and keep whining. :o)
Paul
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 05:29:33PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sunday 20 August 2006 14:44, Derek wrote:
> > If more people complain,maybe they will release it sooner.
>
> I doubt it, but if you really want promote closed source software, go ahead
> and keep whining. :o)
Does anyone know wh
What is your problem paul?I am not promoting it,or whining.Quit being a assOn 8/20/06, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:On Sunday 20 August 2006 14:44, Derek wrote:> If more people complain,maybe they will release it sooner.
I doubt it, but if you really want promote closed source software,
On Sunday 20 August 2006 14:44, Derek wrote:
> If more people complain,maybe they will release it sooner.
I doubt it, but if you really want promote closed source software, go ahead
and keep whining. :o)
--
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpyko5MVk2B6.pgp
If more people complain,maybe they will release it sooner.
On Sunday 20 August 2006 08:18, gustavo halperin wrote:
> Carl Fink wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:46:05AM +0300, gustavo halperin wrote:
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> It's not new that windows do every think in order to make harder our
> >> life, do you know something about a new version of Macromed
On Saturday 19 August 2006 15:46, gustavo halperin wrote:
> Hello
>
> It's not new that windows do every think in order to make harder our
> life, do you know something about a new version of Macromedia only for
> windows??
Adobe tends to release on Windows first and play catchup with other platf
Carl Fink wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:46:05AM +0300, gustavo halperin wrote:
Hello
It's not new that windows do every think in order to make harder our
life, do you know something about a new version of Macromedia only for
windows??
Macromedia was a company that doesn't exist
On 08/19/2006, gustavo halperin wrote:
> I currently have a latest version of Macromedia but in the page
> "www.metacafe.com" I can't see the videos, the page say that I need
> download the latest version of Macromedia, but I have it. Did you
> know this problem? Can you see videos from "www.metaca
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:46:05AM +0300, gustavo halperin wrote:
> Hello
>
> It's not new that windows do every think in order to make harder our
> life, do you know something about a new version of Macromedia only for
> windows??
Macromedia was a company that doesn't exist any more. (Bought
Hello
It's not new that windows do every think in order to make harder our
life, do you know something about a new version of Macromedia only for
windows??
I currently have a latest version of Macromedia but in the page
"www.metacafe.com" I can't see the videos, the page say that I need
do
The same problem, very annoying :)
В Втр, 11/04/2006 в 13:14 -0400, Victor Munoz пишет:
> Hello.
>
> I'm having an annoying problem with Gnome after a recent upgrade in sid
> (last week). If I launch an application from gnome-terminal, the window
> appears hidden by gnome-terminal, and does not g
Hello.
I'm having an annoying problem with Gnome after a recent upgrade in sid
(last week). If I launch an application from gnome-terminal, the window
appears hidden by gnome-terminal, and does not get focus, unless I click on
it. This is not the case if I launch it from the panel.
Also, the new
Hi,
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:06:11 -0500 , Scott Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to add a new entry to the Session Types menu in kdm. Everything I
> could find says either edit the SessionTypes entry in kdmrc or add a session
> through the KDE Control Panel. My login configuration appl
Paul Johnson wrote:
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Scott Thompson wrote:
I want to add a new entry to the Session Types menu in kdm. Everything I
could find says either edit the SessionTypes entry in kdmrc or add a session
through the KDE Control Panel. My login configuration apple
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 23:06, Scott Thompson wrote:
> I want to add a new entry to the Session Types menu in kdm. Everything I
> could find says either edit the SessionTypes entry in kdmrc or add a
> session through the KDE Control Panel. My login configuration applet in
> control panel does n
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Scott Thompson wrote:
>
>>I want to add a new entry to the Session Types menu in kdm. Everything I
>>could find says either edit the SessionTypes entry in kdmrc or add a session
>>through the KDE Control Panel. My login configuration applet in control
>>pa
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:06:11 -0500
Scott Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I want to add a new entry to the Session Types menu in kdm. Everything
> I could find says either edit the SessionTypes entry in kdmrc or add a
> session through the KDE Control Panel. My login configuration applet i
> -Original Message-
> From: Kent West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 11:24 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: How to add new Windows Manager to KDM?
>
>
> Scott Thompson wrote:
>
> >I want to add a
Scott Thompson wrote:
I want to add a new entry to the Session Types menu in kdm. Everything I
could find says either edit the SessionTypes entry in kdmrc or add a session
through the KDE Control Panel. My login configuration applet in control
panel does not have a place to add a new session and
I want to add a new entry to the Session Types menu in kdm. Everything I
could find says either edit the SessionTypes entry in kdmrc or add a session
through the KDE Control Panel. My login configuration applet in control
panel does not have a place to add a new session and the only kdmrc file
th
Hi,
I've recently switched from slink to potato and installed my fav. irc
client bitchx plus screen of course. But I have a problem with them. I
can't create new windows with /window create command. All I get is:
-:- Opening new screen...
-:- The screen is now dead.
child signaled wit
On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 05:05:33PM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote
> - Forwarded message from Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 17:02:36 -0400
> From: Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject
- Forwarded message from Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 17:02:36 -0400
From: Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: New windows
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-as
Paul Seelig wrote:
>
> There is the common misconception coined by the very term "Linux
> community", that the Linux users are a somewhat homogeneous crowd and
> you simply fell for that. The Linux crowd is IMHO by far the most
> heterogeneous bunch of computer users imageinable and this refelect
On 22 Jun 1999, Wayne Topa wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: New windows
> Date: Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 08:35:44AM +0100
>
> In reply to:Anthony Campbell
>
> > Could some Windowmaker enthusiast tell me what else is needed please?
> >
> > Anthony
> Anthon
Subject: Re: New windows
Date: Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 08:35:44AM +0100
In reply to:Anthony Campbell
Quoting Anthony Campbell([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On 22 Jun 1999, Revenant wrote:
> > Well, this seems like the ideal opportunity for me to advertise my
> > ignorance
On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Revenant wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Christian Dysthe wrote:
> > > Instead I am again presented with the taskbar and popup menus that hasn't
> > > really changed for years. Is this to conquer new users, or is it becuase
> > > Linux
> > > users "secretly" have missed the l
Christian Dysthe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> After a while I found Windowmaker, and set up a desktop with several handy
> dock
> apps. A refreshingly approach to a personal desktop environment. Also,
> Windowmaker looks good! So different from MS, and yet very easy to configure
> and use.
>
> Then
And nobody mentioned the best thing that happened to mankind since sliced
bread: the Tab WM!!! I set up aliases for the programs I need in .bashrc
('net for netscape, 'wp' for WP8, 'sound' for the sound apps, etc. Just
open a window, type the alias and off you go. Simplify thy life. -- Hans
On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Tim Nicholas wrote:
> actually while i use and like WindowMaker i think that the look and feel of
> win9x is the best thing that M$ ever did. Which may not be saying much but
> still the L&F is alot better than the underlyeing crap that they write.
> > Hi
snip> > I came fro
On 22-Jun-99 Revenant wrote:
> Well, this seems like the ideal opportunity for me to advertise my
> ignorance:
>
> What exactly is the difference between a window manager and a desktop
> environment?
>
I am also ignorant regarding this. I just know I am perfectly happy with
Windowmaker. So if
On 22 Jun 1999, Revenant wrote:
> Well, this seems like the ideal opportunity for me to advertise my
> ignorance:
>
> What exactly is the difference between a window manager and a desktop
> environment?
>
> Thanx.
>
> BTW, I second the opinion re: Windowmaker. It's intuitive and easy
> to use,
actually while i use and like WindowMaker i think that the look and feel of
win9x is the best thing that M$ ever did. Which may not be saying much but
still the L&F is alot better than the underlyeing crap that they write.
Like i said i use WM and like it but the problems of windows does not rea
Well, this seems like the ideal opportunity for me to advertise my
ignorance:
What exactly is the difference between a window manager and a desktop
environment?
Thanx.
BTW, I second the opinion re: Windowmaker. It's intuitive and easy
to use, it looks funky (and probably will look funkier when
Oooo, dangerous ground... Hopefully this doesn't spark a holy war ;)
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, Christian Dysthe wrote:
> After a while I found Windowmaker, and set up a desktop with several
> handy dock apps. A refreshingly approach to a personal desktop
> environment. Also, Windowmaker looks good! So
Hi,
I came from MS Windows to Linux a few months ago. I was tired of crashes and
all that, and I had the feeling I could do better GUI-wise also.
After a while I found Windowmaker, and set up a desktop with several handy dock
apps. A refreshingly approach to a personal desktop environment. Also,
55 matches
Mail list logo
