On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 02:52:22 + (UTC)
Long Wind wrote:
> i want a small app that show cpu temperaturewhich package shall i
> install?Thanks!
>
psensor if you want a graph and/or remote
the packages are:
psensor is 63 kB,
psensor-common is 43 kB and
psensor-server is 110 kB
On Wednesday 08 July 2020 22:52:22 Long Wind wrote:
> i want a small app that show cpu temperaturewhich package shall i
> install?Thanks!
gkrellm and helpers. Small, still shows everything.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and
Thank Charles!
xsensors seems best for me
On Thursday, July 9, 2020, 12:10:27 AM EDT, Charles Curley
wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 02:52:22 + (UTC)
Long Wind wrote:
> i want a small app that show cpu temperaturewhich package shall i
> install?Thanks!
>
Your desktop may have a sui
On [4], 2020-07-09 at 02:52 +, Long Wind wrote:
> i want a small app that show cpu temperature
> which package shall i install?
> Thanks!
>
conky, as a background of desktop. not only cpu informaiton. Here is my
configuration file[1].
[1]https://github.com/bestucan/conky
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 02:52:22 + (UTC)
Long Wind wrote:
> i want a small app that show cpu temperaturewhich package shall i
> install?Thanks!
>
Your desktop may have a suitable addon. For XFCE, xfce4-sensors-plugin.
Otherwise, run
apt-cache search sensors
and see if any of that gives you ide
On 2020-07-08 19:52, Long Wind wrote:
i want a small app that show cpu temperaturewhich package shall i
install?Thanks!
I use Xfce with the CPU Frequency Monitor, CPU Graph, and Sensor panel
plug-ins.
David
Long Wind writes:
> i want a small app that show cpu temperature
> which package shall i install?
> Thanks!
I've been using gkrellm to show quite a bit of system information
(including temperatures) for years and years now.
On 28 December 2017 at 18:14, deloptes wrote:
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13
> > cooler.
>
> I'm just wondering if you used the correct switch for the cpu fan - what is
> your mother board?
>
> also from the gentoo link
On 28 December 2017 at 18:14, deloptes wrote:
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13
> > cooler.
>
> I'm just wondering if you used the correct switch for the cpu fan - what is
> your mother board?
>
> also from the gentoo link
On 28 December 2017 at 18:30, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 28 December 2017 at 18:14, deloptes wrote:
>
>> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>>
>> > I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer
>> 13
>> > cooler.
>>
>> I'm just wondering if
On 28 December 2017 at 18:14, deloptes wrote:
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13
> > cooler.
>
> I'm just wondering if you used the correct switch for the cpu fan - what is
> your mother board?
>
This is an interesting ide
Michael Fothergill wrote:
> I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13
> cooler.
I'm just wondering if you used the correct switch for the cpu fan - what is
your mother board?
also from the gentoo link
$ grep CONFIG_SENSORS_FAM15H_POWER /boot/config-4.12.10
CONFIG
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
is odd because coretemp is set as a module option in the config
> file:
> >
> > CONFIG_SENSORS_CORETEMP=m
> >
> > Comments appreciared
>
> Well, it *should* work with a standard Debian kernel and applicable
> hardware.
>
If you look here:
https://askubuntu.com
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
>
>
> This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option in the config file:
>
> CONFIG_SENSORS_CORETEMP=m
>
> Commen
T1211=m
> CONFIG_SENSORS_VT8231=m
> CONFIG_SENSORS_W83781D=m
> CONFIG_SENSORS_W83791D=m
> CONFIG_SENSORS_W83792D=m
> CONFIG_SENSORS_W83793=m
> CONFIG_SENSORS_W83795=m
> # CONFIG_SENSORS_W83795_FANCTRL is not set
> CONFIG_SENSORS_W83L785TS=m
> CONFIG_SENSORS_W83L7
that the kernel is configured with the module m setting
consistently not the internal y setting so debian does not use the built in
option by default here it would seem
- see discussion here
https://www.linux.com/learn/intro-to-linux/2017/9/advanced-lm-sensors-tips-and-tricks-linux-0
so modifying
I have 3 case fans in the box here but lm-sensors only sees two of them
apparently as well as not seeing the cpu fan.
Funny stuff.
Regards
MF
On 28 December 2017 at 11:50, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Folks,
>
> I am running stretch on an
Dear Folks,
I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13
cooler.
I installed lm-sensors and ran the /etc module update command.
The output looks like this:
root@bong:/home/mikef# sensors
asus-isa-
Adapter: ISA adapter
cpu_fan:0 RPM
k10temp-pci-00c3
我在x200上面安装了 debian sid，风扇一直在全速运转，想要实现根据温度来调
节转速。
参考了http://www.linuxidc.com/Linux/2009-02/18270.htm
这篇文章提到lm-sensors，于是到官方网站（http://www.lm- sensors.org/wiki
/iwizard/Detection）
按照教程设置，最后加载模 块不能成功。
下面是我的操作过程，有知 道的，帮我看看。
PS：1.像这样 的问题应该在哪里的邮件列表去问呢?
2 有哪位朋友也在 thinkpad上面安装了debian之类的linux系
On Fri, 31 May 2013, Francois Gouget wrote:
>
> So I'm trying to get net-snmp to return lm_sensors data so I can monitor
> the temperature and fan speed of my PC. But currently it won't return
> any data:
>
> $ snmpwalk -v2c -c public localhost lmSensors
> LM-S
So I'm trying to get net-snmp to return lm_sensors data so I can monitor
the temperature and fan speed of my PC. But currently it won't return
any data:
$ snmpwalk -v2c -c public localhost lmSensors
LM-SENSORS-MIB::lmSensors = No more variables left in this MIB View
(It is past
Darac Marjal writes:
> It might be, for those motherboards that don't report any
> information, that they simply don't have the sensors.
It shows system and CPU temperature, fan speeds and other things in the
BIOS, and the RAID controller now shows me the temperature of the
attached disks which
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:13:08AM +0200, lee wrote:
> Darac Marjal writes:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:14:29PM +0200, lee wrote:
> >>
[cut]
> >
> > (This is a summary of my searching the web for "ACPI: resource
> > f71882fg")
>
> Yeah I've found the same results, and they don't tell me if
Darac Marjal writes:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:14:29PM +0200, lee wrote:
>>
>> [ 12.509295] f71882fg: Found f71889fg chip at 0x600, revision 21
>> [ 12.509364] ACPI: resource f71882fg [io 0x0600-0x0607] conflicts with
>> ACPI region HMOR [io 0x605-0x606]
>> [ 12.509372] ACPI: If an AC
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:14:29PM +0200, lee wrote:
>
> [ 12.509295] f71882fg: Found f71889fg chip at 0x600, revision 21
> [ 12.509364] ACPI: resource f71882fg [io 0x0600-0x0607] conflicts with
> ACPI region HMOR [io 0x605-0x606]
> [ 12.509372] ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for thi
[ 12.509295] f71882fg: Found f71889fg chip at 0x600, revision 21
[ 12.509364] ACPI: resource f71882fg [io 0x0600-0x0607] conflicts with ACPI
region HMOR [io 0x605-0x606]
[ 12.509372] ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should
use it instead of the native driver
Is
Brian McKee wrote:
On 18-Apr-08, at 1:22 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:
I want to monitor the harddisk temperature since I/O task in my system
is very high and usually heatsup the harddisk.
I get two different values viz. one from lm-sensors and other from
smartctl
smartctl gives me very large
On 18-Apr-08, at 1:22 PM, Bhasker C V wrote:
I want to monitor the harddisk temperature since I/O task in my
system
is very high and usually heatsup the harddisk.
I get two different values viz. one from lm-sensors and other from
smartctl
smartctl gives me very large values like the one
Hi all,
I want to monitor the harddisk temperature since I/O task in my system
is very high and usually heatsup the harddisk.
I get two different values viz. one from lm-sensors and other from
smartctl
smartctl gives me very large values like the one below showing 148
whereas hddtemp or the
t.
>>
>> when I try e.g.
>> apt-get install nmap
>>
>> i get following:
>
> [ snip: signs of an incomplete XFree86 to X.Org transition ]
>
>> Preparing to replace lm-sensors 1:2.10.1-3 (using .../lm-
>> sensors_1%3a2.10.1-3_i386.deb) ...
>
gt;
> i get following:
[ snip: signs of an incomplete XFree86 to X.Org transition ]
> Preparing to replace lm-sensors 1:2.10.1-3 (using .../lm-
> sensors_1%3a2.10.1-3_i386.deb) ...
> Unpacking replacement lm-sensors ...
> /etc/modutils/0keep: line 9: keep: command not found
&
fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/24.6MB of archives.
After unpacking 8937kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
pressing Y
i get at the end:
(Reading database ... 110426 files and directories currently
installed.)
Preparing to replace lm-sensors 1:2.10.1-3 (using ..
On April 4, 2007 10:39:31 am Siju George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While Installing lm-sensors package on my Etch using
>
> 2.6.18-4-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Mar 26 11:36:53 CEST 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> kernel. I got the following message
>
> ==
Hi,
While Installing lm-sensors package on my Etch using
2.6.18-4-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Mar 26 11:36:53 CEST 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
kernel. I got the following message
==
To make the sensors modules behave correctly, add these lines to
return value), while
> rdmsr_on_cpu/wrmsr_on_cpu does not. Coretemp needs the return value to
> work properly.
I reviewed Rudolf Marek's patches a few days ago and my first comment
was along these lines:
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2007-March/019169.html
I do inde
Adam Hardy wrote:
> I don't understand how that is connected with udev though. Presumably
> running alsaconf set up the udev rule that tells udev to make a device
> for alsa?
>From the manpage:
Alsaconf will write a module-init-tools (or modutils) snippet which can be
then used by module-init-t
John O'Hagan on 16/04/06 14:55, wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 06:24 pm, Adam Hardy wrote:
Hmm. I have installed all the appropriate alsa packages I could find in
synaptic, but I don't have the command alsaconfig on my system.
Where does it come from?
The command you're after is alsaconf.
Gre
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 06:24 pm, Adam Hardy wrote:
>
> Hmm. I have installed all the appropriate alsa packages I could find in
> synaptic, but I don't have the command alsaconfig on my system.
>
> Where does it come from?
>
The command you're after is alsaconf.
HTH,
John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 09:24:48 +0100
Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felipe Sateler on 15/04/06 22:30, wrote:
> > Adam Hardy wrote:
> >> I have been researching the issues. It looks like the appropriate
> >> drivers have not been created - for instance, the following paths are
> >> empty or
Felipe Sateler on 15/04/06 22:30, wrote:
Adam Hardy wrote:
I have been researching the issues. It looks like the appropriate
drivers have not been created - for instance, the following paths are
empty or non-existent:
/sys/bus/i2c/devices
/proc/sys/dev/sensors
/proc/acpi/thermal
Seems like you
Adam Hardy wrote:
> I have been researching the issues. It looks like the appropriate
> drivers have not been created - for instance, the following paths are
> empty or non-existent:
>
> /sys/bus/i2c/devices
> /proc/sys/dev/sensors
> /proc/acpi/thermal
Seems like you are not loading the modules yo
I upgraded my debian testing 2.6.16 udev so that I could use the latest
hotsynch software for my new phone, but the operation has brought down
my hardware monitoring and my sound driver.
In gkrellm, the CPU temps & voltages are no longer available.
When I launch KDE, it tells me the sound driv
On 26.03.06 15:57, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Sarge just updated the lm-sensors library.
>
> That's a bind because I modified that library to support my mobo, which
> has an unsupported sensor chip.
sorry, security updates fixes only security problems, they do NOT add any
func
Hi,
Sarge just updated the lm-sensors library.
That's a bind because I modified that library to support my mobo, which
has an unsupported sensor chip.
This has probably been told many times, but where can I find out what
the update consists in?
Thanks!
H
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Just upgraded an old P3 machine to a new Athlon 3500 on an Asus
motherboard (sarge).
sensors-detect advised to install the modules
i2c-isa
it87
Now - sensors gives the following (as does sensord):
it87-isa-0d00
Adapter: ISA adapter
VCore 1: +1.44 V (min = +1.42 V, max = +1.57 V) ALARM
V
On 9/15/05, wim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanx for your help...I compiled a new kernel 2.6.13 and it is working now... strange...How to get, config while using sarge?-- L.V.Gandhi
http://lvgandhi.tripod.com/linux user No.205042
Thanx for your help...
I compiled a new kernel 2.6.13 and it is working now... strange...
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 09:16:56AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> wim wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm trying to get lm-sensors working on my PII 400Mhz
> >The motherboard is an A
wim wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get lm-sensors working on my PII 400Mhz
The motherboard is an Asus AX6BC
Why don't you just add
gl518sm
i2c-isa
to /etc/modules and reboot?
H
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2005/9/13, wim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I'm also trying to insert the module for the GL518SM Chipset, but tha's
> failing. Could this be a bug in the driver?
>
> slayer:~# insmod /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-686/kernel/drivers/i2c/chips/gl518sm.ko
> insmod: error inserting
> '/lib/modules/2.6.8-2-686/ke
Hi,
I'm trying to get lm-sensors working on my PII 400Mhz
The motherboard is an Asus AX6BC
This is the output of sensors-detect:
slayer:~# sensors-detect
This program will help you determine which I2C/SMBus modules you need to
load to use lm_sensors most effectively. You need to have i2
Johannes Graumann wrote:
Hello,
I recently got lm-sensors to play along with my stock unstable 2.6.8
kernel. Now I'm looking for a daemon which utilizes the information read
from the Mobo. I have found two which do what I want (shutting down at
certain threshold values):
1) sentinelle
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 03:12:52PM -0700, Johannes Graumann wrote:
> I recently got lm-sensors to play along with my stock unstable 2.6.8
> kernel. Now I'm looking for a daemon which utilizes the information read
> from the Mobo. I have found two which do what I want (shutting dow
Hello,
I recently got lm-sensors to play along with my stock unstable 2.6.8
kernel. Now I'm looking for a daemon which utilizes the information read
from the Mobo. I have found two which do what I want (shutting down at
certain threshold values):
1) sentinelle (http://denis.corbin.fr
Hi!
[ sorry for the cross-post, but both lists seem relevant ]
I have an Intel SE7501BR2 server motherboard, and using lm-sensors
2.6.3-5+ only detects successfully four chips like this: (using eeprom
driver)
* Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at 0580' (Non-I2C SMBus adapter)
Busdriver `i2c
On 07-06-2004 18:01, Chris Metzler wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:27:01 +0200
"Michal R. Hoffmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have problem with making debs of kernel modules: i2c and lm-sensors.
I've downloaded sources of lm_sensors 2.8.6 (tar.gz), not the
source.deb, can i
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:27:01 +0200
"Michal R. Hoffmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have problem with making debs of kernel modules: i2c and lm-sensors.
> I've downloaded sources of lm_sensors 2.8.6 (tar.gz), not the
> source.deb, can it be the reason?
>
hello,
I have problem with making debs of kernel modules: i2c and lm-sensors.
I've downloaded sources of lm_sensors 2.8.6 (tar.gz), not the source.deb,
can it be the reason?
I've unpacked sources into /usr/src/modules/aaa
(aaa = module)
when I try
$ cd /usr/src/linux
$ su
# make-kpkg
Hi Everybody!
Does anybody have luck to get a HP VL420 working with lm-sensors?
I've compiled kernel with lm-sensors support
(kernel-patch-2.4-lm-sensors package version 2.8.6-3), but only eeprom
module is working. I can modprobe maxilife module, but it doesn't appear
in sens
hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
Alex Lorca wrote:
A note on the jpeg images: the jumps in temperature occur because I turn
an external fan on/off. That makes a huge difference in CPU temps. It
was noted in this list a while ago: best is to maintain positive
pressure inside the case with a fan: you keep
Alex Lorca wrote:
hi all
i'm trying to install lm-sensors in a debian woody 2.4.25
i made:
- apt-get lm-sensors-source i2c-source
- unpack and make-kpkg modules-image
- install the .debs
- run sensors-detect and detected the following:
# 2C adapter drivers
# modprobe unknown adapter Ph
hi all
i'm trying to install lm-sensors in a debian woody 2.4.25
i made:
- apt-get lm-sensors-source i2c-source
- unpack and make-kpkg modules-image
- install the .debs
- run sensors-detect and detected the following:
# 2C adapter drivers
# modprobe unknown adapter Philips Parallel port ad
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 15:04:21 -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
[snip]
Nano, I don't know anything about compiling the 2.6 kernel, I'm sticking
with 2.4 series for now. The only problem I had with compiling the
lmsensors modules was that there were two author-related macros which
needed fixing for the stri
> The first thing you should do is run sensors-detect to determine which
> modules you'll need.
>
> You'll have to install lm-sensors-source and compile the modules for your
> kernel.
I think I'm having problems because I'm having problems with modules in
gener
it works great, especially with gkrellm. Try this for
starters:
http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/cvs/lm_sensors2/doc/lm_sensors-FAQ.html
The first thing you should do is run sensors-detect to determine which
modules you'll need.
You'll have to install lm-sensors-source and compile the modu
ibsensors2 - Library to read temperature/voltage/fan sensors
lm-sensors-source - Kernel drivers to read temperature/voltage/fan sensors (source)
eep24c - read and write serial I2C eeprom devices
gdesklets - an advanced architecture for desktop applets
gdesklets-data - displays and sensors for gdesklets
kse
"C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any one got any advice how to get lmsensors working on a 2.4.21-5-k7
> kernel?
My best advice is to build your kernel from source, disable anything
and everything i2c-related in the kernel source, and then install the
lm-sensors-source a
Any one got any advice how to get lmsensors working on a 2.4.21-5-k7 kernel?
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:45:17 +1000,
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Manuel Bilderbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> So, I took my older (Woody-beta) installation cd and booted with
> >> "rescue root=/dev/hda6". Also, this didn't work out: again a ker
Manuel Bilderbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So, I took my older (Woody-beta) installation cd and booted with "rescue
>> root=/dev/hda6". Also, this didn't work out: again a kernel panic,
>> because it can't mount the root fs... This time there was some error
>> about "unsupported optional
Manuel Bilderbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A couple of days ago, I installed these packages from sid:
> lm-sensors-2.4.21-4-k7 2.8.0-1
> i2c-2.4.21-4-k7 2.8.0-1
>
> I have done this before many times, to save myself the trouble of
> compiling these kernel modul
Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
OK, but I still have the LinuxOLD entry in my LILO menu. Since I'm
running stock kernels, this should be starting my previous kernel
anytime. So, I chose the option, and it booted until it had to mount the
root fs. There I got a kernel panic: can't mount root fs. (No cle
Hello all,
A couple of days ago, I installed these packages from sid:
lm-sensors-2.4.21-4-k7 2.8.0-1
i2c-2.4.21-4-k7 2.8.0-1
I have done this before many times, to save myself the trouble of
compiling these kernel modules myself. I'm running a testing system with
the 2.4.21-4-k7 stock k
How to enable beep whe a lm-sensors alarm is fired ?
Debian 3.0r1 i686, lm-sensors as module
sensors output :
via686a-isa-6000
Adapter: ISA adapter
Algorithm: ISA algorithm
CPU core: +1.55 V (min = +1.17 V, max = +1.79 V)
+2.5V: +2.42 V (min = +2.24 V, max = +2.74 V)
I/O: +3.25
Menno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> fakeroot debian/rules kdist_image \
> >> KSRC=/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.4.18-1-686 \
> >> KVERS=2.4.18-1-686 KDREV=2.4.18-11
>
> > This ignores the kernel-source package you
> > installed entirely, incidentally.
> > But if it works, that's good to hear.
>> fakeroot debian/rules kdist_image \
>> KSRC=/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.4.18-1-686 \
>> KVERS=2.4.18-1-686 KDREV=2.4.18-11
> This ignores the kernel-source package you
> installed entirely, incidentally.
> But if it works, that's good to hear.
But somehow it is depending on this. I got the followi
Do it again when kernel 2.4.18-14 is
> released?
Yes, sadly, and yes.
> Or, will this be easier in the next release of Debian (as in unstable?).
I'm making a somewhat vague effort to provide precompiled kernel
modules in unstable, but it's tricky keeping up with the current
kernels.
like this:
make-kpkg --revision number kernel_image
make-kpkg modules_image
But it keeps complaining about version numbers and dependencies not being
correct when I try to install the .deb file make-kpkg is producing (only
installing the lm-sensors-..-.deb).
I suspect that I have to chage somethin
"no-spam" == no-spam writes:
no-spam> Should I compile it from the lm-sensors-source package?
no-spam> What is the easiest way to do this?
It's been two years, but I downloaded the lm-sensors-source package
and built it following the instructions that came
Menno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Until recently I have used the packages:
> kernel-image-2.4.18-686 2.4.18-5
> lm-sensors-2.4.18-686 2.6.3-5+2.4.18-5
> (from http://people.debian.org/~blade/misc/modules-i386/2.4.18-686/ )
> lm-sensors
Hello
Menno (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Until recently I have used the packages:
> kernel-image-2.4.18-686 2.4.18-5
> lm-sensors-2.4.18-686 2.6.3-5+2.4.18-5
> (from http://people.debian.org/~blade/misc/modules-i386/2.4.18-686/ )
> lm-sensors
Hi there!
you may use 'apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-686' and you'll install
all the needed packages.
Regards
Menno wrote:
Hi,
Until recently I have used the packages:
kernel-image-2.4.18-686 2.4.18-5
lm-sensors-2.4.18-6862.6.3-5+2.4.18-5
(from http://pe
Hi,
Until recently I have used the packages:
kernel-image-2.4.18-686 2.4.18-5
lm-sensors-2.4.18-686 2.6.3-5+2.4.18-5
(from http://people.debian.org/~blade/misc/modules-i386/2.4.18-686/ )
lm-sensors 2.6.3-5
libsensors1 2.6.3-5
sensord
"Tit \"Black\" Petric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> im running latest sid (regularely updated), and i installed lm-sensors just
> now. the sensors-detect report that i should load "i2c-viapro" which is
> quite right, but that module doesnt exist und
im running latest sid (regularely updated), and i installed lm-sensors just
now. the sensors-detect report that i should load "i2c-viapro" which is
quite right, but that module doesnt exist under the installed kernel.
is there any way to get the i2c-viapro module without installing ker
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Once you've scoped out the lm-sensors situation, go here for hints on
> building that kernel with kernel-package:
>
> http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html
>
> Kevin
I eventally got bored enough to test out wh
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Troy Arnold wrote:
> > Two:
> >
> > Is this ASUS P4B533 supported by the i2c/lmsensors found in Sid?
>
> As the README says, lm-sensors doesn't support /motherboards/, it supports
> /chips/. To find out for sure you'd need to look in your
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:21:15 -0500 (EST)
Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked for various howto's, but they all assume you're running prebuilt
> kernels, unfortunately.
Once you've scoped out the lm-sensors situation, go here for hints on
building that
Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How are you supposed to install the lm-sensors-source when you compile
> your own kernels. the resulting file from make-kpkg modules_install
> depends on kernel-image-2.4.20. I just --force-depends'd it in, I assume
> that'
Interesting... I just battled lm-sensors last night. :)
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 02:21:15PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
> Two questions:
>
> One:
>
> How are you supposed to install the lm-sensors-source when you compile
> your own kernels. the resulting file from make-kp
Two questions:
One:
How are you supposed to install the lm-sensors-source when you compile
your own kernels. the resulting file from make-kpkg modules_install
depends on kernel-image-2.4.20. I just --force-depends'd it in, I assume
that's not the proper way.
Two:
Is this A
Thakns for the reply, so what I did:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:42:47 -0500
David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| mess-mate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Sorry to post this message twice..
| > I'm unable to get lm-sensors working.
| > MB asus P4T533-R with P4.
| >
mess-mate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry to post this message twice..
> I'm unable to get lm-sensors working.
> MB asus P4T533-R with P4.
> Installed lm-sensors-source, compiled, patched the kernel and reinstalled
> the kernel (2.4.20) inclusif i2c.
Maybe you coul
Hi all,
Sorry to post this message twice..
I'm unable to get lm-sensors working.
MB asus P4T533-R with P4.
Installed lm-sensors-source, compiled, patched the kernel and reinstalled
the kernel (2.4.20) inclusif i2c.
Setted-up the kernel with all in modules.
Sensors-detect detect nothing
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 the mental interface of
Kjetil Kjernsmo told:
> On Monday 16 December 2002 19:58, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
> >
> > make-kpkg modules_image. The Kernel was built also with make-kpkg.
>
> Uh-oh, you're saying that if I've got any modules, then I have to run
> make-kpk
Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
On Monday 16 December 2002 19:58, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Most people lose on step two, it appears. If you built modules
using 'make-kpkg modules-image', did you install the resulting
package? If you're using sid, 'sudo debian/rules modules-nokpkg'
should Just Work if
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
