Kushal Kumaran wrote:
On 5/2/07, Andrew Critchlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone tell me how to, or point me to a good website that tells
you how to recompile/compile a kernel? The normal way? and the debian
way?
I need to be able to add and remove built in modules of the kernel
such
Sorry, I didn't realize I used the wrong hotkeys. sent it privately to Nigel.
My mistake.
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 21:34 +0200, Nigel Henry wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 May 2007 14:05, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> > On 5/2/07, Andrew Critchlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Can anyone tell me how to, or po
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 21:43, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 21:34:40 +0200, Nigel Henry wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 May 2007 14:05, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> > > On 5/2/07, Andrew Critchlow wrote:
> > > > Can anyone tell me how to, or point me to a good website that tells
> > > > y
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 21:34:40 +0200, Nigel Henry wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 May 2007 14:05, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> > On 5/2/07, Andrew Critchlow wrote:
> > > Can anyone tell me how to, or point me to a good website that tells you
> > > how to recompile/compile a kernel? The normal way? and the de
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 14:05, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> On 5/2/07, Andrew Critchlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me how to, or point me to a good website that tells you
> > how to recompile/compile a kernel? The normal way? and the debian way? I
> > need to be able to add and remo
2007/5/2, Andrew Critchlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Can anyone tell me how to, or point me to a good website that tells you
how to recompile/compile a kernel? The normal way? and the debian way?
I suggest you the debian way, debian website offers a straight and easy
command sequence for make-kpk
On 5/2/07, Andrew Critchlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can anyone tell me how to, or point me to a good website that tells you how to
recompile/compile a kernel? The normal way? and the debian way?
I need to be able to add and remove built in modules of the kernel such as
remove network card d
Le mercredi 2 mai 2007 12:40, Andrew Critchlow a écrit :
> Can anyone tell me how to, or point me to a good website that tells you how
> to recompile/compile a kernel? The normal way? and the debian way? I need
> to be able to add and remove built in modules of the kernel such as remove
> network c
Can anyone tell me how to, or point me to a good website that tells you how to
recompile/compile a kernel? The normal way? and the debian way?
I need to be able to add and remove built in modules of the kernel such as
remove network card driver and add wireless card driver etc.
Many thanks.
HiI just compiled 2.6.16 on testing but the /var/log/boot shows eth1 is not up and indead it is not up.Mon Sep 18 16:56:55 2006: DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 3Mon Sep 18 16:56:55 2006: DHCPOFFER from 192.168.1.1
I appreciate the help with my query.
I was able to solve the problem after stumbling upon some earlier
messages from the list.
The problem is that, upon recompiling the kernel, I failed to build in
the first and sixth items under
"network options," I think they were, which are necessary for DHCP t
On Wednesday 22 Dec 2004 17:40, Ted Parks wrote:
> I just recompiled a Debian 2.4.18 kernel in Woody. Before, my Orinoco
> Silver card was working fine. Now, no network connection.
>
> In the recompile, I also built new modules from pcmcia-cs for the
> kernel. Upon bootup, I hear two high-pitched b
Ted Parks wrote:
Ifconfig lists eth0 for the Orinoco card. The first three lines:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr (then the MAC address . . .)
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:18 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
Can
I just recompiled a Debian 2.4.18 kernel in Woody. Before, my Orinoco
Silver card was working fine. Now, no network connection.
In the recompile, I also built new modules from pcmcia-cs for the
kernel. Upon bootup, I hear two high-pitched beeps, just as before.
Running lsmod shows that the proper
Nathanael Hasbrouck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've just been working on compiling a new kernel, and now don't have any
> text on my console. I still have a cursor, but no text is actually
> printed after lilo starts the kernel booting. No text on any of my
> virtual consoles. Buttons 6 &
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 09:10:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:42:37 -0600, "CW Harris"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> >
> > Is this a typo? or are you using kernel 2.6.7 with an append-to-version
> > of 1? I would recommend you use "-" (hyphen) before numeric
e win32
kernel is not that unlike a recompilation from the non-technical
user's point of view. Sure, that's an overly simplistic way of
looking at it, since a kernel recompile is not just about adding
support for new hardware, but...
I dislike MS and W*nd*ws for a number of reasons,
gt; - module-init-tools was installed BEFORE kernel recompile
>
> - A non-initrd kernel image was made
>
> - Documentation/post-halloween-2.6.txt
> does not exist in my kernel source tree
> (downloaded directly from www.kernel.org)
>
> - I upgraded module-init-tools to last
Hi guys, and thanks for all your help so far!
Observations:
- I misspelled moudule-init-tools as modutils-init-tools.
Sorry! Did all file searches by correct name, though.
- module-init-tools was installed BEFORE kernel recompile
- A non-initrd kernel image was made
- Documentation/post
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 08:41:31PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:17:40 -0600, CW Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > [...]
> > >
> > > You normally don't need a modprobe.conf, everything should b
Wim De Smet([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:02:07 -0400, Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Wim De Smet([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:17:40 -0600, CW Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Wed,
le in /lib/modules/uname -r directory? If not,
depmod possibly failed, try a depmod -a and then a modprobe again.
HTH
Awais
- Original Message -
From: "Wim De Smet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 5:17 PM
Subject: Re
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:02:07 -0400, Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Wim De Smet([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:17:40 -0600, CW Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> >
Wim De Smet([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:17:40 -0600, CW Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > [...]
> > >
> > > You normally don't need a modprobe.conf, everything should be in
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:17:40 -0600, CW Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> [...]
> >
> > You normally don't need a modprobe.conf, everything should be in
> > /etc/modprobe.d. modprobe.conf is just an empty file on my system.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> Hi,
>
[...]
>
> You normally don't need a modprobe.conf, everything should be in
> /etc/modprobe.d. modprobe.conf is just an empty file on my system. I'm
Is this true? Mine (a most
Hi,
First of all sorry to the list that I replied directly to the poster.
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:27:21 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:47:28 +0200, "Wim De Smet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:34:52 +0200,
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:47:28 +0200, "Wim De Smet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:34:52 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have recently upgraded my Debian system (running testing)
> > from kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4 to 2.7.1 by following
ompiled in statically.
It sounds like you know what you are doing since you have done kernels with
Gentoo. Why don't you try the 2.4.25 from kernel.org,
take exact notes, and post back here again.
Compiling kernels on Gentoo is exactly the same as doing a standard kernel
recompile, there's no
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:35:16PM +, stdPikachu wrote:
> Hello there, long time lurker, first time poster.
>
> As you may have gathered, I'm having trouble getting a new kernel working
> on my (pretty bog standard) Woody install, which after much trial and
> tribulation got downgraded back
Hello there, long time lurker, first time poster.
As you may have gathered, I'm having trouble getting a new kernel working
on my (pretty bog standard) Woody install, which after much trial and
tribulation got downgraded back to 2.4.18-bf2.4. I'd love to use one of the
stock kernel images, but
Hello,
when I'm compiling a kernel, it is quite common for me to miss a module
at first, or have wrong values in some place or other.
I'm following what I read in the kernel-package docs, with next to no
understanding of what it actually does...
Apparently, compiling will start from scratch each
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 07:43:03AM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> raoul duke wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 03:33:27PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> >> raoul duke wrote:
> > i installed it but when i rebooted, i get a message
> > saying kernel panic, and that i should append the proper ro
raoul duke wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 03:33:27PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
>> raoul duke wrote:
> i installed it but when i rebooted, i get a message
> saying kernel panic, and that i should append the proper root= . this
> doesn't make sense to me 'cause i have root=/dev/hda3 in lilo.co
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, raoul duke wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 03:33:27PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
>
> thanks for the link, i read up on that and the kernel compile went (i
> think) successfully, i installed it but when i rebooted, i get a message
> saying kernel panic, and that i should
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 03:33:27PM +0200, Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
> raoul duke wrote:
>
> > if i just want the kernel and the modules in a debian package do i
> > just do this?
> >
> > make-kpkg kernl_image ?
>
> Hi Raoul,
>
> you should read http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.ht
raoul duke wrote:
> if i just want the kernel and the modules in a debian package do i
> just do this?
>
> make-kpkg kernl_image ?
Hi Raoul,
you should read http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html.en
HTH,
wjl aka Wolfgang Lonien
--
NTV '94 RedSue 24-42Mm running fuel; everythi
raoul duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i need to recompile my kernel (2.4.18-k7) with some minor adjustments to
> the configuration. since i can get the configuration file from /boot, all i
> need is the kernel source. i installed kernel-source-2.4.18, configured it
> and tried to compile it but
hey,
i need to recompile my kernel (2.4.18-k7) with some minor adjustments to
the configuration. since i can get the configuration file from /boot, all i
need is the kernel source. i installed kernel-source-2.4.18, configured it
and tried to compile it but it wouldn't compile. i figure that i need
[If you would be so kind as to word wrap your lines at some good
column such as 72 it would make your messages much easier to read. Or
alternately set format=flowed. Thanks.]
Robert Storey wrote:
> I'm writing an article about Debian which will be published in a few
> days (on a well-known GNU/L
--- Robert Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> I'm writing an article about Debian which will be published in a few days (on
> a well-known GNU/Linux web site). I'm trying to work out the best way to
> recompile a kernel. I don't want to give out an misinformation, so I need to
> be sure ab
On (10/09/03 05:26), Robert Storey wrote:
> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 05:26:28 +0800
> From: Robert Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: kernel recompile - correct syntax
>
>
> I'm writing an article about Debian which will be published in a
I'm writing an article about Debian which will be published in a few days (on a
well-known GNU/Linux web site). I'm trying to work out the best way to recompile a
kernel. I don't want to give out an misinformation, so I need to be sure about the
following...
To compile a kernel, I originally t
==
Download ringtones, logos and picture messages at Ananzi Mobile Fun.
http://www.ananzi.co.za/cgi-bin/goto.pl?mobile
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all, following on from my earlier messages I've
recompiled the kernel, installed the new kernel, ran lilo
and rebooted. On the up side the new 2.4.21 ke
--- Alan Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: >
>
> I really don't know. Never used the --append* switch. If it were me, I would
> put the initrd one first, but am not sure that it makes a difference.
--append-to-version is good if you want to run several slightly tweaked
versions
of the same k
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 23 17:48:03 2003
> > Antony,
> >
> > I think you need something like this:
> >
> > make-kpkg --initrd --revision=3:custom.2.0 kernel_image
> >
> > HTH
> >
>
> That's pretty much what I did.
>
> make-kpkg --append-to-version=.20030723 --initrd k
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 05:04:39PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 23 17:03:33 2003
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just recompiled my kernel to make it a little leaner, and add ACPI and
> > ALSA. Couple of minor points, not really problems.
> >
> > 1. I need to use the bcm5700.
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 23 17:03:33 2003
> Hi all,
>
> Just recompiled my kernel to make it a little leaner, and add ACPI and
> ALSA. Couple of minor points, not really problems.
>
> 1. I need to use the bcm5700.o module. This isn't part of the
> distribution, so I had to reboot the ne
Hi all,
Just recompiled my kernel to make it a little leaner, and add ACPI and
ALSA. Couple of minor points, not really problems.
1. I need to use the bcm5700.o module. This isn't part of the
distribution, so I had to reboot the new kernel, rebuild the
module, and manually copy the file to /lib
On Wed, 02 Apr 2003 10:11:31 +0800
Brian Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Searching through documentation I realized there was no module
> compiled - recompiled but could not find the needed axnet_cs driver in
> the choices revealed by make xconfig, and in
> /lib/modules/2.4.20/pcmcia not a tra
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:11:31AM +0800, Brian Walker wrote:
> Searching through documentation I realized there was no module compiled
> - recompiled but could not find the needed axnet_cs driver in the
> choices revealed by make xconfig, and in /lib/modules/2.4.20/pcmcia not
> a trace of a dri
Greetings all,
after 2 years of Linux I finally gathered my courage to do my first
kernel recompile - and upgrade from 2.2.20 to 2.4.20. The excellent help
from http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html
made it almost easy. Rebooting after sorting out LILO, I could not
connect to
has to entry in modconfig and edit modprobe with values io=0x340 and irq=14
excuse my English
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: Kernel Recompile Issue
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 16:58:42
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 16:58:42 -0600
"Irish, Jon D MEVATEC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just recompiled my kernel to get sound working. I used 2.4.20, and
> sound is now working fine :-) However, my network connection is now
> dead. I selected it when I compiled the kernel (it is a 3com 3c905C),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 21 March 2003 01:58 pm, Irish, Jon D MEVATEC wrote:
> I just recompiled my kernel to get sound working. I used 2.4.20, and
> sound is now working fine :-) However, my network connection is now dead.
> I selected it when I compiled the kernel
I just recompiled my kernel to get sound working. I used 2.4.20, and sound is now
working fine :-) However, my network connection is now dead. I selected it when I
compiled the kernel (it is a 3com 3c905C), and dmesg reveals that it was found and
loaded. ifconfig shows it, but there is not IP a
Hi all,
I just recompiled a 2.4.20 kernel to include the 2.7.0 i2c modules.
It appeared to compile correctly.
However, when I attempt to boot the kernel, I immediately receive the
error message: "EDBA too big."
A search of google doesn't turn up a lot of help. There is one
reference to the
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 12:17:29PM -0600, Irish, Jon D MEVATEC wrote:
> Can anyone tell me if there is a HOW-TO, or paper available that covers
> recompiling the kernel for Debian?
Try /usr/share/doc/kernel-package/README.gz
Generally speaking, you can find any documentation you're looking for
b
"Irish, Jon D MEVATEC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can anyone tell me if there is a HOW-TO, or paper available that covers
> recompiling the kernel for Debian? I found the Kernel HOWTO, but it appears
> to be slanted more toward RedHat, and I am a 'newbie' so I want to make sure
> that I am doin
See http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-kernel.en.html
chapter 7.
_
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
At 2003-01-24T18:17:29Z, "Irish, Jon D MEVATEC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can anyone tell me if there is a HOW-TO, or paper available that covers
> recompiling the kernel for Debian? I found the Kernel HOWTO, but it
> appears to be slanted more toward RedHat, and I am a 'newbie' so I want to
>
On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 18:17, Irish, Jon D MEVATEC wrote:
> Can anyone tell me if there is a HOW-TO, or paper available that covers
> recompiling the kernel for Debian? I found the Kernel HOWTO, but it appears
> to be slanted more toward RedHat, and I am a 'newbie' so I want to make sure
> that I am
Can anyone tell me if there is a HOW-TO, or paper available that covers
recompiling the kernel for Debian? I found the Kernel HOWTO, but it appears
to be slanted more toward RedHat, and I am a 'newbie' so I want to make sure
that I am doing it right.
Sincerely,
Jon D. Irish (Mevatec Contractor)
Lo
Robert Storey wrote:
try setting the cpu type to 386. rebooting before the kernel even
starts doing anything usually means the wrong cpu type was selected.
hmm, but if the kernel name has i386 in it, this might not be the
problem...
Thanks, that was indeed the problem. My processor is an
I would suggest compiling it from source. It would take you a lot less time than
trying to
troubleshoot something that you cannot put your finger on.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
At 2003-01-03T13:12:45Z, Michael Olds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am guessing from the "I could only recover by editing GRUB" that you did
> not rename /lib/modules/version number so that a new modules/version number
> could be built by the new kernel. Repeat the process doing this first.
Ev
> try setting the cpu type to 386. rebooting before the kernel even
> starts doing anything usually means the wrong cpu type was selected.
>
> hmm, but if the kernel name has i386 in it, this might not be the
> problem...
Thanks, that was indeed the problem. My processor is an AMD-K6, but the
d
||In the continuing saga of my kernel recompile, I did this:
||
|| make xconfig
|| make-kpkg clean
|| make-kpkg kernel_image
|| dpkg -i kernel-image-2.4.18_10.00.Custom_i386.deb
||
||Everything seemed to go well. There were no error messages, and I found
||myself with a newly compiled kernel
Jason Pepas wrote:
On Thursday 02 January 2003 11:41 pm, Robert Storey wrote:
Everything seemed to go well. There were no error messages, and I found
myself with a newly compiled kernel named vmlinuz-2.4.18 in my /boot
directory. But on attempting to boot, the kernel would instantly crash
and
On Thursday 02 January 2003 11:41 pm, Robert Storey wrote:
> In the continuing saga of my kernel recompile, I did this:
>
> make xconfig
> make-kpkg clean
> make-kpkg kernel_image
> dpkg -i kernel-image-2.4.18_10.00.Custom_i386.deb
>
> Everything seemed to go w
In the continuing saga of my kernel recompile, I did this:
make xconfig
make-kpkg clean
make-kpkg kernel_image
dpkg -i kernel-image-2.4.18_10.00.Custom_i386.deb
Everything seemed to go well. There were no error messages, and I found
myself with a newly compiled kernel named vmlinuz
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 03:25:27PM -0500, Mark L. Kahnt wrote:
> A tangent on this - which kernel tree does Debian's kernel source track
> - Alan, Marcelo or Linus' work? I know that those have diverged at
> times, and that many of the commercially offered distributions
> reportedly use Alan Cox's
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 02:05, Shawn Lamson wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 11:38:34 +0800
> Robert Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've just recompiled my kernel and it failed at the very last
> > step (installing the kernel). My procedure:
> >
> > 1) Use "make xconfig" to choose my settings
>
At 2003-01-01T03:38:34Z, Robert Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've just recompiled my kernel and it failed at the very last
> step (installing the kernel). My procedure:
>
> 1) Use "make xconfig" to choose my settings
> 2) make dep clean bzImage modules
> 3) make install modules_install
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Florian Struck wrote:
>
> make menuconfig
> make dep
> make modules
> make-kpkg kernel_image
> and dpkg -i "resulting-kernel.deb"
Step two and three are both taken care of in step four. I also wouldn't
leave out 'make-kpkg clean' before your fourth step. I had some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 01 January 2003 04:38, Robert Storey wrote:
> I've just recompiled my kernel and it failed at the very last
> step (installing the kernel). My procedure:
>
> 1) Use "make xconfig" to choose my settings
> 2) make dep clean bzImage modules
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 02:05:05AM -0500, Shawn Lamson spake thus:
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 11:38:34 +0800
> Robert Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've just recompiled my kernel and it failed at the very last
> > step (installing the kernel). My pro
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 11:38:34 +0800
Robert Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just recompiled my kernel and it failed at the very last
> step (installing the kernel). My procedure:
>
> 1) Use "make xconfig" to choose my settings
> 2) make dep clean bzImage modules
> 3) make install modules_in
--- iain d broadfoot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: > apt-get install kernel-package
The FAQ will also help get you started
http://www.au.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-kernel.en.html#s-customkernel
Cheers Geoff
http://movies.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Movies
- What's on at your local cinema?
--
To UNSUBSCRI
apt-get install kernel-package
hth,
iain
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've just recompiled my kernel and it failed at the very last
step (installing the kernel). My procedure:
1) Use "make xconfig" to choose my settings
2) make dep clean bzImage modules
3) make install modules_install
I received no error messages until the very end when make install
tried to write
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Chris Lale wrote:
> Craig Jackson wrote:
> > Just installed woody but I forgot to install UFS driver. Being
> somewhat new
> > to Debian (I have in the past recompiled the kernel on Gentoo and
> Redhat)
> > what is the standard procedure for recompiling the kernel under
This is a response to all here. Thanks for your response.
I downloaded the latest kernel from kernel.org
make xconfig
make dep
make clean vmlinuz-2.4.19 modules modules_install
make install
Then copied the kernel and map to /boot, edited lilo, ran lilo, and presto!
The new kernel works grea
Craig Jackson wrote:
> Just installed woody but I forgot to install UFS driver. Being
somewhat new
> to Debian (I have in the past recompiled the kernel on Gentoo and
Redhat)
> what is the standard procedure for recompiling the kernel under
Debian? I
> need the source kernel. My present kernel i
Craig Jackson wrote:
Just installed woody but I forgot to install UFS driver. Being somewhat new
to Debian (I have in the past recompiled the kernel on Gentoo and Redhat)
what is the standard procedure for recompiling the kernel under Debian? I
need the source kernel. My present kernel is vmlin
heya,
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:18:41PM -0600, Craig Jackson wrote:
> Just installed woody but I forgot to install UFS driver. Being somewhat new
> to Debian (I have in the past recompiled the kernel on Gentoo and Redhat)
> what is the standard procedure for recompiling the kernel under Debian?
Just installed woody but I forgot to install UFS driver. Being somewhat new
to Debian (I have in the past recompiled the kernel on Gentoo and Redhat)
what is the standard procedure for recompiling the kernel under Debian? I
need the source kernel. My present kernel is vmlinuz-2.4.18-bf2.4
BTW,
Hello,
I am having alot of problems with a new machine I am setting up to use
as a firewall and proxy server - ( and new means that it is the first
time I have gotten my hands on it, it is a P150 with 32Megs of RAM) - I
installed with the 2.4.18-bf rescue disk which worked fine, I can set it
up, s
> you sure about that? My install of woody came with dhclient and in fact
> IIRC the install itself uses dhclient.
I'd bet money on it (not a lot though). It's true that the install uses
dhclient, but after several debian installs, the only dhcp client that Debian
has ever installed for me has b
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 12:05, Steve Juranich wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure that I'm using dhclient, that's what gets installed by
> > default, right?
>
> The default DHCP client for Debian is 'pump'. Although I have had several
> recommendations from others to abandon pump in favor of dhclient or dh
> I'm pretty sure that I'm using dhclient, that's what gets installed by
> default, right?
The default DHCP client for Debian is 'pump'. Although I have had several
recommendations from others to abandon pump in favor of dhclient or dhcpcd.
--
Yury Sulsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - When I recompiled, I simply changed all of the modules that I need to be
> built-in, including the tulip driver. Maybe I have to do something extra to
> get this to work?
The tulip driver is known to be broken on some older chipsets. You can
use the de4
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 16:32, Yury Sulsky wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that I'm using dhclient, that's what gets installed by
> default, right?
>
> Actually thanks for you help guys, but recompiling the kernel isn't that
> important... I guess I can keep the default one until I figure out what I'm
> do
I'm pretty sure that I'm using dhclient, that's what gets installed by
default, right?
Actually thanks for you help guys, but recompiling the kernel isn't that
important... I guess I can keep the default one until I figure out what I'm
doing wrong.
Thanks again,
Yury
> On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 08:
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 08:22, Crispin Wellington wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 11:49, Yury Sulsky wrote:
> > Crispin, thanks for replying.
> >
> > I checked "dmesg | grep tulip" and "dmesg | grep eth0", and the returned
> > lines looked the same as what I got with the default kernel. Besides,
> >
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 11:49, Yury Sulsky wrote:
> Crispin, thanks for replying.
>
> I checked "dmesg | grep tulip" and "dmesg | grep eth0", and the returned
> lines looked the same as what I got with the default kernel. Besides,
> wouldn't "ifconfig -a" not find eth0 if the tulip driver wasn't wor
Crispin, thanks for replying.
I checked "dmesg | grep tulip" and "dmesg | grep eth0", and the returned
lines looked the same as what I got with the default kernel. Besides,
wouldn't "ifconfig -a" not find eth0 if the tulip driver wasn't working?
I also installed the dhcping package, which checks
On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 14:14, Yury Sulsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently installed debian, and once I got the hang of it, I tried to
> recompile the kernel. Problem is, the network stops working. This occurs
> both going from a 2.2 kernel to a 2.4 one, and both using "make-kpkg" and
> "make bzlilo". W
Hi,
I recently installed debian, and once I got the hang of it, I tried to
recompile the kernel. Problem is, the network stops working. This occurs
both going from a 2.2 kernel to a 2.4 one, and both using "make-kpkg" and
"make bzlilo". What's weird is that "eth0" is still there, but it can't ping
On Sun, 2002-01-20 at 11:18, Mike Atamas wrote:
> I recompiled my kernel today, and I put in DHCP support. After I
> installed the system DHCP was automatically configured. (I selected it
> during install). However, when I boot up with the new kernel, it does
> automatically autonegotiate eth0, and
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
