, installer isn't fool-proof for me
your advanced technique of booting very old laptop is too complex to me
perhaps trixie is about to become stable, i will install it from scratch
.
> >
> Thank Wright! i have solved it on my own
>
> i am new user of gpt, fatal error is caused by my failure to create efi
> partition
>
Make it simple for yourself. If you are at all unsure when you install,
just take guided partitioning.
That should set up a 512M partit
On Sun 30 Mar 2025 at 11:50:52 (+0800), hlyg wrote:
> i install with debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso
>
> during final stage of installation, it fails to install grub
>
> "Executing 'grub-install dummy' failed."
> "This is a fatal error."
>
&g
On 4/1/25 05:20, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
Make it simple for yourself. If you are at all unsure when you install,
just take guided partitioning.
That should set up a 512M partition for boot, a 1G partition for swap
and the rest of the disk for /
Unless you *really have* to partition things
Thank Nikulin! i read wiki page you mention, it is too technical, as end
user, i am not expected to worry such details
it seems to me that efi isn't very mature
at present it doesn't offer any benefits to me though it is superior to mbr
On Tue 01 Apr 2025 at 04:09:31 (+0800), hlyg wrote:
> On 3/31/25 10:50, David Wright wrote:
> > Presumably that error message was from the screen. Have you looked
> > at /var/log/installer/syslog for more expansive error messages?
> >
> Thank Wright! i have solved it on my own
>
> i am new user o
On 01/04/2025 03:09, hlyg wrote:
in the end i use mbr, as one of my PCs doesn't support gpt
It depends on firmware, but I expect that UEFI spec describes
requirements for ESP in the case of MBR partitions.
btw what is recommended size of efi partition?
default size is 512M
sgdisk(8)
On 3/31/25 10:50, David Wright wrote:
Presumably that error message was from the screen. Have you looked
at /var/log/installer/syslog for more expansive error messages?
Cheers,
David.
Thank Wright! i have solved it on my own
i am new user of gpt, fatal error is caused by my failure to creat
i install with debian-12.10.0-amd64-netinst.iso
during final stage of installation, it fails to install grub
"Executing 'grub-install dummy' failed."
"This is a fatal error."
how to solve it?
i bet it is caused by other bootloader in installation target disk
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:27 AM Xiyue Deng wrote:
>
> Nicolas George writes:
>
> > Barry Newberger (HE12025-03-24):
> >> package: dpkg
> >> version: 1.21.22 (amd64)
> >>
> >> Using Discover update following error occurred:
> >>
> >> Package failed to install:Error while installing package:
> >>
Nicolas George writes:
> Barry Newberger (HE12025-03-24):
>> package: dpkg
>> version: 1.21.22 (amd64)
>>
>> Using Discover update following error occurred:
>>
>> Package failed to install:Error while installing package:
>> installed linux-image-6.1.0-32-amd64 package post-installation script
1.0-31-amd64.
> > /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools:
> > update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-6.1.0-31-amd64
> > cpio: write error: No space left on device
> ...
>
> It's not uncommon that one discovers he has let freespace get too low by
> encou
t; cpio: write error: No space left on device
...
It's not uncommon that one discovers he has let freespace get too low by
encountering a failure to install that leaves the new package's contents on disk
taking up valuable space without completing associated setup tasks. One then
logicall
Barry Newberger (HE12025-03-24):
> package: dpkg
> version: 1.21.22 (amd64)
>
> Using Discover update following error occurred:
>
> Package failed to install:Error while installing package:
> installed linux-image-6.1.0-32-amd64 package post-installation script
> subprocess returned error exit s
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 08:05:32 -0500, Barry Newberger wrote:
> Setting up linux-image-6.1.0-32-amd64 (6.1.129-1) ...
> /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms:
> dkms: running auto installation service for kernel 6.1.0-32-amd64.
> dkms: autoinstall for kernel: 6.1.0-32-amd64.
> /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initram
package: dpkg
version: 1.21.22 (amd64)
Using Discover update following error occurred:
Package failed to install:Error while installing package:
installed linux-image-6.1.0-32-amd64 package post-installation script
subprocess returned error exit status 1
Ran following:
uname -r
6.1.0-31-amd64
Le 3/3/25 à 16:40, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 15:44:11 +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
dpkg won't install missing dependencies.
gdebi will.
So will apt-get and apt. It's just undocumented.
apt install ./filename.deb
apt-get install ./filename.deb
The pathname
On 03/03/2025 11:49, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
Counter Proposal: Ask whomever is providing you the packge, to offer it
as a Debian Repository. That way, your custom application is just a
"extrepo enable " away.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digita
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 15:44:11 +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> Le 3/3/25 à 15:25, Joe a écrit :
> > You can install any random .deb package from any source using dpkg [...]
>
> dpkg won't install missing dependencies.
> gdebi will.
So will apt-get and apt. It&#x
Le 3/3/25 à 15:25, Joe a écrit :
You can also compile software source code[...]> This is not a trivial task.
I find configure, make, sudo make install often very simple.
So I'd say it depends on the software.
Sometimes you're missing header files,
in which case configure kin
On 3/3/25 15:42, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
Le 3/3/25 à 15:25, Joe a écrit :
You can also compile software source code[...]> This is not a trivial
task.
I find configure, make, sudo make install often very simple.
So I'd say it depends on the software.
Sometimes you're missing
Le 3/3/25 à 15:25, Joe a écrit :
You can install any random .deb package from any source using dpkg [...]
dpkg won't install missing dependencies.
gdebi will.
Best,
--
yassine -- sysadm
http://about.me/ychaouche
Looking for side gigs.
configured to
> allow users to use sudo to install packages from configured and trusted
> repositories. If apt can install some random package from a random place
> on the internet, the approach with sudo apt/apt-get is doomed.
> So, please, no.
++. Don't turn Apt into Compose
On 3/3/25 7:10 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 12:49:11PM +0100, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
Since this is just a mailing list of Debian users, no one here is
empowered to do what you ask.
The proper procedure would be to report it as a wishlis
On 3/3/25 5:49 AM, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
Exactly *WHAT* feature??
You supply *NO* context.
Also this list is primarily user-to-user support.
On 3/3/25 6:56 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 06:14:40 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 3/3/25 5:49 AM, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
Exactly *WHAT* feature??
You supply *NO* context.
This is why I advise people NOT to put the de
On 3/3/25 12:49, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
This is a disaster feature from my point of view. Debian packages are
installed with root privileges, however, many systems are configured to
allow users to use sudo to install packages from configured and trusted
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 12:49:11PM +0100, Steven Speek wrote:
> I would like this feature in apt-get.
Since this is just a mailing list of Debian users, no one here is
empowered to do what you ask.
The proper procedure would be to report it as a wishlist bug on apt-get
in the Debian bug trac
Le 3/3/25 à 13:14, Richard Owlett a écrit :
On 3/3/25 5:49 AM, Steven Speek wrote:
I would like this feature in apt-get.
Exactly *WHAT* feature??
You supply *NO* context.
Also this list is primarily user-to-user support.
Happy now?
Look how angry you made Steven Speek now.
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 06:14:40 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 3/3/25 5:49 AM, Steven Speek wrote:
> > I would like this feature in apt-get.
> >
>
> Exactly *WHAT* feature??
> You supply *NO* context.
This is why I advise people NOT to put the details of their request only
in
Steven Speek wrote:
> I would like this feature in apt-get.
Until then, you can use wget to retrieve the URL and apt install
to install from the filename.
In general, this is rather dangerous, and should probably be
avoided. There may be better solutions, depending on the context
of where th
I would like this feature in apt-get.
On Sun 02 Feb 2025 at 12:14:08 (+), Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 10:31:02PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sat 01 Feb 2025 at 15:29:13 (+), Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > I'm not sure this is a bug per se: if what you want is a fully offline
"open", and xdg-open just use some of these options.
> >
> > There's also all the MIME confguration.
>
> Maybe you can see exactly what's going on by examining Epiphany's post install
> script in /var/lib/dpkg/info/.
>
> For firefox-esr, it's
7;s also all the MIME confguration.
Maybe you can see exactly what's going on by examining Epiphany's post install
script in /var/lib/dpkg/info/.
For firefox-esr, it's
#!/bin/sh -e
if [ "$1" = "configure" ] || [ "$1" = "abort-upgrade" ] ; then
On 13/02/2025 09:19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 08:56:47 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
- *browser alternatives
- BROWSER environment
- mailcap for text/html
I have realized that I do not have an example of an application that
determines https: scheme handler from mailcap (it is
Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 13/02/2025 01:26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Now Debian has*two* completely separate
> > ways to specify a default application for a role.
>
> I believed there are at least 4 ways (besides settings specific to
> particular applications)
> - *browser alternatives
> - BROWSER
On Wed 12 Feb 2025 at 16:40:24 (+), Chris Green wrote:
> Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:20 AM Chris Green wrote:
> > >
> > > When I run CUPS 'add printer' with a new (to the network) Laserjet
> > > M15W I see four possible printers to add:-
> > >
> > > HP LaserJet M15w (
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 08:56:47 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 13/02/2025 01:26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Now Debian has*two* completely separate
> > ways to specify a default application for a role.
>
> I believed there are at least 4 ways (besides settings specific to
> particular applications)
On 13/02/2025 01:26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Now Debian has*two* completely separate
ways to specify a default application for a role.
I believed there are at least 4 ways (besides settings specific to
particular applications)
- *browser alternatives
- BROWSER environment
- mailcap for text/html
r-xr-x 1 root root 1290 Jan 14 2023 /usr/bin/sensible-browser*
... it's NOT a symlink to /etc/alternatives/x-www-browser??
hobbit:~$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/sensible-browser
sensible-utils: /usr/bin/sensible-browser
Package: sensible-utils
Status: install ok installed
Priority: important
[...]
Ver
On 2025-02-12, Nicolas George wrote:
> Greg (HE12025-02-12):
>> What is going on? You suggested examining the source code.
>
> No, I suggested reading the documentation. Others have suggested other
> avenues that lead to understanding. These are good answers. The
> suggestions to uninstall and ran
Greg (HE12025-02-12):
> What is going on? You suggested examining the source code.
No, I suggested reading the documentation. Others have suggested other
avenues that lead to understanding. These are good answers. The
suggestions to uninstall and randomly fiddle with the order are
polluting the go
On 2025-02-12, Nicolas George wrote:
>
> The only way to achieve a reliable result is to understand what is going
> on. I am flabbergasted that so many people on this list do not start
What is going on? You suggested examining the source code. For the end
user, this might be arduous task at best.
On 2025-02-12, David Wright wrote:
>> > >
>> > Unfortunately, as Greg Wooledge has already pointed out, there is no
>> > universal standard. If there was, this thread would've stopped ages
>> > ago.
>>
>> I am really surprised that this thread is so long. However I am still
>> curious whether xf
Greg (HE12025-02-12):
> Simply reversing the installation order of the two browsers seems the
> most direct and easiest solution.
It might achieve the result. A solution…
What will the OP do if they install another browser to try something and
it becomes the default one? Uninstall them a
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:20 AM Chris Green wrote:
> >
> > When I run CUPS 'add printer' with a new (to the network) Laserjet
> > M15W I see four possible printers to add:-
> >
> > HP LaserJet M15w (FD27B6) (HP LaserJet M14-M17)
> > HP LaserJet M14-M17 (driverless) (HP L
On Wed 12 Feb 2025 at 22:54:15 (+0700), Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 12/02/2025 22:09, Greg wrote:
> > On 2025-02-12, Max Nikulin wrote:
> > > Certainly, but before delving into source code I would try the standard
> > > (XDG) way to configure media types and applications associations.
> > >
> > Unfort
On 2025-02-12, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:36:46 - (UTC)
> Greg wrote:
>
> Hello Greg,
>
>>What exactly is he after? I was under the impression it was setting the
>>default browser to Vivaldi.
>
> Yes, but as has been explained, there are multiple ways in which a
> browser c
Chris Green wrote:
> Anssi Saari wrote:
> > Chris Green writes:
> >
> > > Installing epiphany just added it as a choice but left vivaldi as the
> > > configured browser, but still epiphany grabbed everything.
> >
> > Have you considered you may get better information if you actually
> > define
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:36:46 - (UTC)
Greg wrote:
Hello Greg,
>What exactly is he after? I was under the impression it was setting the
>default browser to Vivaldi.
Yes, but as has been explained, there are multiple ways in which a
browser can be chosen. Some, most notably, circumventing sys
On 12/02/2025 22:09, Greg wrote:
On 2025-02-12, Max Nikulin wrote:
Certainly, but before delving into source code I would try the standard
(XDG) way to configure media types and applications associations.
Unfortunately, as Greg Wooledge has already pointed out, there is no
universal standard.
Greg wrote:
> On 2025-02-12, Nicolas George wrote:
> > Max Nikulin (HE12025-02-12):
> >> I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented.
> >
> > At worst, the source code is the documentation.
>
> I think Chris had the right idea. Install Epiphan
On 2025-02-12, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:09:38 - (UTC)
> Greg wrote:
>
> Hello Greg,
>
>>Simply reversing the installation order of the two browsers seems the
>>most direct and easiest solution.=20
>
> Still with, of course, no guarantee of successfully achieving exactly
>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 8:20 AM Chris Green wrote:
>
> When I run CUPS 'add printer' with a new (to the network) Laserjet
> M15W I see four possible printers to add:-
>
> HP LaserJet M15w (FD27B6) (HP LaserJet M14-M17)
> HP LaserJet M14-M17 (driverless) (HP LaserJet M14-M17)
> HP LaserJet M14-M
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:09:38 - (UTC)
Greg wrote:
Hello Greg,
>Simply reversing the installation order of the two browsers seems the
>most direct and easiest solution.
Still with, of course, no guarantee of successfully achieving exactly
what Chris is after.
--
Regards _ "Valid si
On 2025-02-12, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 12/02/2025 20:55, Nicolas George wrote:
>> Max Nikulin (HE12025-02-12):
>>> I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented.
>>
>> At worst, the source code is the documentation.
>
> Certainly, but before delving into source code I would try the
On 12/02/2025 20:55, Nicolas George wrote:
Max Nikulin (HE12025-02-12):
I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented.
At worst, the source code is the documentation.
Certainly, but before delving into source code I would try the standard
(XDG) way to configure media types and
On 2025-02-12, Nicolas George wrote:
> Max Nikulin (HE12025-02-12):
>> I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented.
>
> At worst, the source code is the documentation.
I think Chris had the right idea. Install Epiphany first, and then
Vivaldi, instead of the o
On 2025-02-12, Chris Green wrote:
>>
>> If you want a Linux way to solve the issue: first, read the
>> documentation of xfce-terminal to see how it decides which web browser
>> to run; then read the documentation of that mechanism to see how to
>> configure it.
>>
> I have looked in the xfce4-te
Max Nikulin (HE12025-02-12):
> I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented.
At worst, the source code is the documentation.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
On Feb 12, 2025, Chris Green wrote:
> When I run CUPS 'add printer' with a new (to the network) Laserjet
> M15W I see four possible printers to add:-
>
> HP LaserJet M15w (FD27B6) (HP LaserJet M14-M17)
> HP LaserJet M14-M17 (driverless) (HP LaserJet M14-M17)
> HP LaserJet M14-M17 (driverless) (
Nicolas George wrote:
> Chris Green (12025-02-12):
> > I'm just wondering if a way round the issue may be to unistall
> > vivaldi, then install epiphany, then re-install vivaldi. It might be
> > that just doing 'apt reinstall vivaldi' will get me back to whe
When I run CUPS 'add printer' with a new (to the network) Laserjet
M15W I see four possible printers to add:-
HP LaserJet M15w (FD27B6) (HP LaserJet M14-M17)
HP LaserJet M14-M17 (driverless) (HP LaserJet M14-M17)
HP LaserJet M14-M17 (driverless) (HP LaserJet M14-M17)
HP LaserJet M15w (HP Laser
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:02:13 +, Chris Green wrote:
> > debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > > The other user does NOT have the same settings as me. They have
> > > their own set of plugins and settings as Tomas has pointed out. You
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 07:18:23AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:06:53 +, Chris Green wrote:
> > The specific thing that bit me when I installed epiphany was clicking
> > on a web link in a terminal (xfce4-terminal) window. Instead of
> > opening the link in the alrea
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:06:53 +, Chris Green wrote:
> The specific thing that bit me when I installed epiphany was clicking
> on a web link in a terminal (xfce4-terminal) window. Instead of
> opening the link in the already running vivaldi, in another workspace
> (which is the way I like it)
On 12/02/2025 17:23, Nicolas George wrote:
If you want a Linux way to solve the issue: first, read the
documentation of xfce-terminal to see how it decides which web browser
to run;
I would not be surprised if it is not explicitly documented. Perhaps
XFCE has a configuration menu. Most GUI app
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:02:13 +, Chris Green wrote:
> debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > The other user does NOT have the same settings as me. They have
> > their own set of plugins and settings as Tomas has pointed out. You
> > very much can install something for
> terminal and then su - another_user) so I just have to type the
> > > browser name if I want to use it. Or use up-arrow to access the
> > > browser history. For me that seems to be a tolerable level of
> > > effort.
> > How does that help? The other user will have
Chris Green (12025-02-12):
> I'm just wondering if a way round the issue may be to unistall
> vivaldi, then install epiphany, then re-install vivaldi. It might be
> that just doing 'apt reinstall vivaldi' will get me back to where I
> want to be.
That might be
ondering if a way round the issue may be to unistall
vivaldi, then install epiphany, then re-install vivaldi. It might be
that just doing 'apt reinstall vivaldi' will get me back to where I
want to be.
When I get home tomorrow I'll try it, I'm a bit on the move at the
moment.
--
Chris Green
·
Chris Green writes:
> Installing epiphany just added it as a choice but left vivaldi as the
> configured browser, but still epiphany grabbed everything.
Have you considered you may get better information if you actually
define this "everything"? For me it's the small handful of apps I
mentioned
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 07:24:28AM +, Chris Green wrote:
[...]
> Er, but that's the whole problem!!! I installed epiphany (using apt)
> and it **did** force all 'the other users' (including me) to use it.
> You have described the problem in a nutshell! :-)
Then, it seems that it is alternat
nother user to do
> > > this rather defeats the object.
> >
> > I simply have a terminal already running as another user (I start a
> > terminal and then su - another_user) so I just have to type the
> > browser name if I want to use it. Or use up-arrow to access the
; >
> > > I simply have a terminal already running as another user (I start a
> > > terminal and then su - another_user) so I just have to type the browser
> > > name if I want to use it. Or use up-arrow to access the browser
> > > history. For me that seems to
to log out and log in to another user to do this rather defeats
> > > the object.
> >
> > I simply have a terminal already running as another user (I start a
> > terminal and then su - another_user) so I just have to type the browser
> > name if I want to use it. Or
as another user (I start a
> terminal and then su - another_user) so I just have to type the browser
> name if I want to use it. Or use up-arrow to access the browser
> history. For me that seems to be a tolerable level of effort.
>
How does that help? The other user will have all the same default
browser settings that you do. You can't install something for use by
one user and not another user, at least not using apt you can't.
--
Chris Green
·
Or use up-arrow to access the browser
history. For me that seems to be a tolerable level of effort.
> It might also take me down a never ending trail of 'is it the
> environment/settings or is it the program?'. :-)
>
> I guess some sort of chrooted environment to install it (epiphany) in
> might work (though still gives the environment/settings question).
hany",
> having to log out and log in to another user to do this rather defeats
> the object.
>
> It might also take me down a never ending trail of 'is it the
> environment/settings or is it the program?'. :-)
>
> I guess some sort of chrooted environment to inst
efeats
the object.
It might also take me down a never ending trail of 'is it the
environment/settings or is it the program?'. :-)
I guess some sort of chrooted environment to install it (epiphany) in
might work (though still gives the environment/settings question).
--
Chris Green
·
Chris Green wrote:
...
> It would be much easier if I could simply tell epiphany (or another
> browser) **not** to try and become the default for everything, rather
> than having to try and unset all the changes it has made.
Chris, for something like testing i would just set up
another user.
On 10/02/2025 22:25, Chris Green wrote:
It would be much easier if I could simply tell epiphany (or another
browser) **not** to try and become the default for everything, rather
than having to try and unset all the changes it has made.
Installing an application may change order of candidates in
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:45:06 +, Chris Green wrote:
> > I had x-www-browser set to vivaldi but web links still got opened in
> > epiphany, I tried changing just about every setting I could find for a
> > browser to vivaldi but I still got epiphany.
>
> There isn't a
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:45:06 +, Chris Green wrote:
> I had x-www-browser set to vivaldi but web links still got opened in
> epiphany, I tried changing just about every setting I could find for a
> browser to vivaldi but I still got epiphany.
There isn't a single interface for defining what
Anssi Saari wrote:
> Chris Green writes:
>
> > However, when I install epiphany it takes over every single thing that
> > web browsers can do which is very frustrating, I only want to run it
> > explicitly for testing. Is there any way to prevent the install
> >
Chris Green writes:
> However, when I install epiphany it takes over every single thing that
> web browsers can do which is very frustrating, I only want to run it
> explicitly for testing. Is there any way to prevent the install
> changing all the mailcap and mime settings etc.
I use vivaldi as my my web browser and I have it set as the default
application for everything web related. In particular it get's used
to open web links when you use the context menu to open a web link in
a text file.
I want to install another browser (epiphany) as a backup/testing
browser
cdimage/archive/11.11.0/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-11.11.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso
> >
> > I made three attempts to install, as follows:
> >
> > 1. One text mode install, network connected
> >
This fails with the error previously described that an installation step
has failed and a re
gt; >
> > > > This failure occurs during the "Select and install software" stage. The
> > > > root cause is an attempt to install security updates from the security
> > > > network repository *even when the user selects the default "No&
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 11:00:25PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 31 Jan 2025 at 23:30:52 (+), Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 02:55:56PM +0900, Mailing List wrote:
> > >
> > > This failure occurs during the "Select and install softw
> from the menu, or skip it and choose something else. The failing step
> > is: Select and install software
> >
> > This failure occurs during the "Select and install software" stage. The
> > root cause is an attempt to install security updates from th
om the official DVD ISO
> fails with the following error:
>
> Installation step failed
> An installation step failed. You can try to run the failing item again
> from the menu, or skip it and choose something else. The failing step
> is: Select and install software
>
> Thi
om the official DVD ISO
> fails with the following error:
>
> Installation step failed
> An installation step failed. You can try to run the failing item again
> from the menu, or skip it and choose something else. The failing step
> is: Select and install software
>
> Thi
the extra mile and provided a nice
> repository and a /etc/apt/sources.list.d file/ for an automatic update
> experience.
>
> > This should overwrite the previous executable enteauth.
> >
>
> Without knowing what their package actually does and how good they are
> at so
ation step failed. You can try to run the failing item again
from the menu, or skip it and choose something else. The failing step
is: Select and install software
This failure occurs during the "Select and install software" stage. The
root cause is an attempt to install security updates fr
nice
repository and a /etc/apt/sources.list.d file/ for an automatic update
experience.
> This should overwrite the previous executable enteauth.
>
Without knowing what their package actually does and how good they are
at sorting out their own files - that *should* but we don't kno
Thanks Dan,
I disabled Secure Boot and sure enough, the driver was loaded.
I actually decided to make a clean install of Debian on this machine
and left Secure boot disabled.
I tried multiple times and was unable to get the driver to load. This
is strange however because it did work before.
I
On Jan 15, 2025, Anil F Duggirala wrote:
> I am trying to install the Nvidia driver on my Dell XPS 9550 fresh
> Debian 12 machine.
>
> [ 16.905450] Loading of module with unavailable key is rejected
> ...
>
> Can anyone please help me out. Getting Debian to work in this la
I am trying to install the Nvidia driver on my Dell XPS 9550 fresh Debian 12
machine.
I followed all instructions in
https://wiki.debian.org/NvidiaGraphicsDrivers#Debian_12_.22Bookworm.22
including:
apt install linux-headers-amd64
Including the extra instructions given here:
https
1 - 100 of 9517 matches
Mail list logo
