I recently did several new installs that use this video card. I have found
the easiest method (using the new Debian Installer and kernel 2.6.7) is do
the install, and then when X does not come up, reboot using the Knoppix
CDROM, let Knoppix do it's thing and find the settings, then copy the Kno
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 01:21:16AM +0100, Paul Nolan wrote:
> Tomy Alarie wrote:
> >Hi, im trying to install my new video card with a fresh installation of
> >debian. Can anyone give me the steps to do it ?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Tomy
>
> I have the same card ^_^
> All I did was download the binary dr
Tomy Alarie wrote:
Hi, im trying to install my new video card with a fresh installation of
debian. Can anyone give me the steps to do it ?
Thanks,
Tomy
I have the same card ^_^
All I did was download the binary driver from www.nvidia.com, then boot
up into run level 3 (no X11) and run the instal
Hi, im trying to install my new video card with a fresh installation of
debian. Can anyone give me the steps to do it ?
Thanks,
Tomy
-
e6e9fe46b17fa16d9a250d4189e8f0cd
fingerprint
Quadra 650 | Debian 3.0r2 | m68k
_
Profitez d
Thanks to everybody.
(BI was trying to get answer from japanese mailing list.
(BThe result is that I can use vesa driver (1280x1024, 16 bit) for GeForce4 MX
(B440.
(BFor me it is enough to use X-Window (I don't need Open-GL etc.).
(B
(BIf I use backports.org I'm afraid the
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 13:43, askar wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> > > Are the nvidia-kernel-common and nvidia-kernel-source included as a
> > > stable package?
> >
> > They most likely are too old. Get the drivers from Nvidia, or get an
> > XFree backport.
> What does it mean to get XFree backport?
It
Hello
askar (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>>> Are the nvidia-kernel-common and nvidia-kernel-source included as a
>>> stable package?
>>
>> They most likely are too old. Get the drivers from Nvidia, or get an
>> XFree backport.
> What does it mean to get XFree backport?
To install XFree 4.2 or 4
Thank you.
> > Are the nvidia-kernel-common and nvidia-kernel-source included as a
> > stable package?
>
> They most likely are too old. Get the drivers from Nvidia, or get an
> XFree backport.
What does it mean to get XFree backport?
askar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hello
askar (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I use Woody, 2.4.18-bf2.4.
> It is known that xfree4.1 which is stable in Woody doesn't support
> GeForce4 MX 440.
> In mailing list archive I found
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/05/msg01883.html,
> Trying to
Hello!
I use Woody, 2.4.18-bf2.4.
It is known that xfree4.1 which is stable in Woody doesn't support GeForce4
MX 440.
In mailing list archive I found
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/05/msg01883.html,
Trying to install nvidia-kernel-common and nvidia-kernel-source, the system
gives
Hello!
I use Woody, 2.4.18-bf2.4.
It is known that xfree4.1 which is stable in Woody doesn't support GeForce4
MX 440.
In mailing list archive I found
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/05/msg01883.html,
Trying to install nvidia-kernel-common and nvidia-kernel-source, the system
gives
First... What kind of debian you're using ? ( woody,
sid, sarge )
Second...Please supply your kernel version. By typing
uname -a on console...
For an example, this is what I did last time with my
debian sid box on 2.4.25-686 kernel :
- installing nvidia-kernel-2.4.25-1-686 by executing
apt-get i
First... What kind of debian you're using ? ( woody,
sid, sarge )
Second...Please supply your kernel version. By typing
uname -a on console...
For an example, this is what I did last time with my
debian sid box on 2.4.25-686 kernel :
- installing nvidia-kernel-2.4.25-1-686 by executing
- [EMAIL P
I find stories on how to install my graphics card. But they are to difficult for me. I
downloaded the file NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-5336-pkg1.run from the Nvidia web-site. But
when I'm running it, it starts to ask all sorts of difficult questions.
There seems to be a file (or more files) that I hav
Hello,
Nvidia doesn't make monitors. The monitor is the thing that contains
the CRT and looks a bit like a TV. Nvidia chips should work even with
the default open source driver, but you should go to Nvidia's site and
download the latest driver provided by Nvidia. Install that. As far as
your
Hi All,
I am using the above monitor and created the XF86 config file using
the xf86config tool. But it is still not able to start the X windows. The
o/p dispplays the different chipsets available in Nvidia. I am using
2.2.20-idepci stable kernel. Just wanted to know what I am doing wrong
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:29:46PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 03:49:55PM +, Pigeon wrote:
No I didn't, you did :-)
> > > > After I compiled the kernel (again) tonight I had re"make"
> > > > the drivers.
> > > > All I had to do was "make" to get them to load (I c
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 03:49:55PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > > After I compiled the kernel (again) tonight I had re"make"
> > > the drivers.
> > > All I had to do was "make" to get them to load (I couldn't just load
> > > them). They still don't want to load even though they're in
> > > /etc/modul
ma Jane Hogbin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:35 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: *install* the kernel was Re: GeForce4 MX
> > After I compiled the kernel (again) tonight I had re"make"
> > the drivers.
> > Al
: *install* the kernel was Re: GeForce4 MX
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:48:35PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> > Yes. There are a lot of things that don't make sense about
> debian on my
> > laptop. Including why usb, parallel printing and cdburning
> won'
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 07:48:35PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> Yes. There are a lot of things that don't make sense about debian on my
> laptop. Including why usb, parallel printing and cdburning won't work.
D'uh. I'd recompiled the kernel but not pointed lilo to the right bzImage.
Tonight I
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 12:13:10AM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 11:09:01PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:33:46PM -0600, Chris Burns wrote:
> > > I just upgraded from a GeForceDDR to a GeForce4 MX and of course my XWindows
&g
Thus spake Emma Jane Hogbin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:33:46PM -0600, Chris Burns wrote:
> > I just upgraded from a GeForceDDR to a GeForce4 MX and of course my XWindows
> > system stopped working. I checked out the log, and it seems that the nv
> >
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 11:09:01PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:33:46PM -0600, Chris Burns wrote:
> > I just upgraded from a GeForceDDR to a GeForce4 MX and of course my XWindows
> > system stopped working. I checked out the log, and it seems that th
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:33:46PM -0600, Chris Burns wrote:
> I just upgraded from a GeForceDDR to a GeForce4 MX and of course my XWindows
> system stopped working. I checked out the log, and it seems that the nv
> driver i'm using only wants to work on nvidia cards up to th
Hey everyone,
I just upgraded from a GeForceDDR to a GeForce4 MX and of course my XWindows
system stopped working. I checked out the log, and it seems that the nv
driver i'm using only wants to work on nvidia cards up to the GeForce3, at
least taht's what the string listing the suppo
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Andrew R Reid wrote:
> With all due respect Mike, you should look at using the nvidia accelerated
> driver. I've installed it on three machines this week, and it is not only
> fairly simple with Debians excellent package management system, it also
> makes an incredible differ
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Dresser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 21 November 2002 12:42 AM
> To: Edward Guldemond
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: GeForce4 MX 440 & Woody
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Edward Guldemond wrote:
>
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Edward Guldemond wrote:
> nv is the unaccelerated driver...nvidia is the accelerated driver. In
> order to get accelerated GL, you need the nvidia driver.
>
> Read the /usr/share/doc/nvidia-glx/README.gz if you have compiled and
> installed and the accelerated driver kit.
Ok
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:47:47PM -0500, Edward Guldemond wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:37:15PM +0100, Aedificator wrote:
> > After a fresh install of Woody, X crashes with the message "no screens found". I
>attach the relative log file and config file.
> > Section "Device"
> > Identifier
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:25:36PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Edward Guldemond wrote:
>
> > This is wrong. It should read:
> >
> > Section "Device"
> > Identifier "GeForce Card (Accelerated)"
> > Driver "nvidia"
> > EndSection
> >
> > That is, change t
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Edward Guldemond wrote:
> This is wrong. It should read:
>
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "GeForce Card (Accelerated)"
> Driver "nvidia"
> EndSection
>
> That is, change the driver from "nv" to "nvidia", and then remove the
> option with the FBDev.
>
T
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:37:15PM +0100, Aedificator wrote:
> After a fresh install of Woody, X crashes with the message "no screens found". I
>attach the relative log file and config file.
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "Generic Video Card"
> Driver "nv"
> Option "UseFBDev" "true"
> EndSe
After a fresh install of Woody, X crashes with the
message "no screens found". I attach the relative log file and config
file.
Zee
log file:
XFree86 Version 4.1.0.1 / X Window
System(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6510)Release
Date: 21 December 2001If the server is older
"Aedificator" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
> Recently i've installed DEbian 3.0 on my PC (512 mb ram, P4 1.6 GHz, GF4 MX 440).
>
> When trying to run X i get the "no screens found" error. No matter which driver
>(svga, nv) i choose during the installation process the Xserver fails.
>
> My s
* Aedificator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [25-10-2002 22:22]:
> Recently i've installed DEbian 3.0 on my PC (512 mb ram, P4 1.6
> GHz, GF4 MX 440).
>
> When trying to run X i get the "no screens found" error. No matter
> which driver (svga, nv) i choose during the installation process
> the Xserver fails.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:26:30PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> Can you post your XFree86Config-4 file? I've got a GF2 card running just
> fine under debian 3.0.
IIRC, GeForce4's aren't supported by the nv driver in XFree86 4.1, which
is in stable. He needs to either upgrade to X4.2 (I'm sure so
"catore" == catore writes:
catore> When trying to run X i get the "no screens found"
catore> error. No matter which driver (svga, nv) i choose during
catore> the installation process the Xserver fails.
Hmmm...this is usually because your "ServerLayout" section has a
Screen name
Aedificator wrote:
Recently i've installed DEbian 3.0 on my PC (512 mb ram, P4 1.6 GHz, GF4
MX 440).
When trying to run X i get the "no screens found" error. No matter which
driver (svga, nv) i choose during the installation process the Xserver
fails.
My system worked fine under Red Hat 7.3
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 12:33, Aedificator wrote:
> Recently i've installed DEbian 3.0 on my PC (512 mb ram, P4 1.6 GHz, GF4 MX 440).
>
> When trying to run X i get the "no screens found" error. No matter which driver
>(svga, nv) i choose during the installation process the Xserver fails.
Show us
Can you post your XFree86Config-4 file? I've got a GF2 card running just
fine under debian 3.0.
ap
--
Andrew J Perrin - http://www.unc.edu/~aperrin
Assistant Professor of Sociology, U of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
[EMAIL PROTECT
Recently i've installed DEbian 3.0 on my PC (512 mb
ram, P4 1.6 GHz, GF4 MX 440).
When trying to run X i get the "no screens found"
error. No matter which driver (svga, nv) i choose during the installation
process the Xserver fails.
My system worked fine under Red Hat 7.3 so it's a
Debia
42 matches
Mail list logo
