I'm forwarding the message below that I sent to the amavis-user list
because I haven't gotten even so much as a request for more info about
the problem there.
If anyone has any ideas please let me know.
G
Original Message
Subject: [AMaViS-user] Amavis-ng + exim -- h
euclid bin # ./exim -bd -C ../exim.conf
2002-10-09 10:18:17 spool_directory undefined: cannot proceed
2002-10-09 10:18:17 spool_directory undefined: cannot proceed
exim: could not open panic log - aborting: original error above
Hi, im trying to run exim, but it sends me error!
--
thanks,
loui
on Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 11:38:42AM -0500, Eric Brooks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi.
> I am trying to get Exim to work as my mail transport agent. I
> configured exim using eximconfig. I selected the smarthost option
> since I am running on a laptop connected to an ISP via an ISDN line. I
> ha
Hi. I am trying to get Exim to work as my mail transport agent. I
configured exim using eximconfig. I selected the smarthost option since
I am running on a laptop connected to an ISP via an ISDN line. I have no
trouble with the connection itself in that I can browse using Mozilla
and send/recei
I will like to use the "host_auth_accept_relay" option from exim, but it
doesn work. I am usin exim 3.12-10 from debian 2.2.
Do I need to recompile exim with "AUTH_CRAM_MD5=yes"???
Can anybody give me an example of comfiguration for accept relays to
anywhere form anywhere if the user has a cor
Thanks Carel! This is exactly what I had in mind, but I
didn't know how to pull it off. Much nicer than my
/etc/init.d/tcp-pipes hack, though a bit more overhead
(slow on this 486/33, should be ok on the p3/500).
groetjes,
chris
> So I did it differently using tcp-wrappers/inetd, like this:
>
>
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:58:51PM +0100, Carel Fellinger wrote:
...
> In /etc/services I added lines like "isp-smtp 100025/tcp". Numbers
> above 10 go beyond the specs, but they seam to work here and
> no-one else is likely to use them, so no conflicts expected:)
Stupid me, ofcourse it works
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 03:36:08PM -0800, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote:
>
> >down /etc/init.d/eam tcp nowait carel /usr/bin/ssh /usr/bin/ssh iae
> bin/nc mail.iae.nl eam tcp nowait carel /usr/bin/ssh /usr/bin/ssh ire
> bin/nc uucp.iae.nl uucp-pipes stop
>
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Carel Fellinger wrote:
>down /etc/init.d/eam tcp nowait carel /usr/bin/ssh /usr/bin/ssh iae
bin/nc mail.iae.nl eam tcp nowait carel /usr/bin/ssh /usr/bin/ssh ire
bin/nc uucp.iae.nl uucp-pipes stop
Come again?
> > SSHARGS="${SSHFLAGS} -l ${USER} -L ${LOCALPORT}:${DEST
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 08:17:21PM -0800, Krzys Majewski wrote:
...
> > Just curious, what tricks do you use to create this port forwarding?
> > And is it created on the fly?
>
> I create the pipes in /etc/network/interfaces:
>
> up sleep 3 && /etc/init.d/tcp-pipes start && /usr/local/sbin/
> Add a transport in the Transport section:
>
> tunneled_smtp:
>driver = smtp
>port = 6025
>
> Start the Router section with:
>
> smart_tunnel:
>driver = domainlist
>transport = tunneled_smtp
>self = send
>route_list = "* localhost byna
Hai Krzys,
sorry to bud in so late, and for breaking the thread referencing
but it was only after I deleted the whole thread from within mutt
that I realised that I might offer some help. I picked up your
first request from the muc.list.debian.user netnews copy of debian-user.
> Newsgroups: muc.l
<#/part>
<#part type="application/octet-stream" filename="/etc/hosts.allow"
disposition=attachment description="/etc/hosts.allow">
<#/part>
<#part type="application/octet-stream" filename="/etc/hosts.deny"
disposition=attachment description="/etc/hosts.deny">
<#/part>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:46:54AM -0700, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > no i mean you can use exim, i just like to use what i made.
> >
> > i think you only really need exim for receiving mail.
> > this is how it works i think for most people:
> >
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> no i mean you can use exim, i just like to use what i made.
>
> i think you only really need exim for receiving mail.
> this is how it works i think for most people:
>
> receiving: fetchmail pull from pop3 server -> localhost port 25 (your
> mta)
Yow. You mean I need to write my own daemon just to do this?! If
that's the case I think I'll foresake the idealistic Mutt and go back
to pine..
*sigh*
chris
> mutt will by default pipe its message to /usr/lib/sendmail (?)
> and that will send the mail to the smtp server or whatever.
> I
Moritz Schulte wrote:
>
>
> Oh, I've an idea. Some mail servers (for example GMX's ones) filter
> (yes, they just kick them out) mails, which have some header wrong
> header entries. For example, if you have an "X-Sender:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]" entry, it gets filtered out by GMX,
> IIRC. Try sendin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> mutt will by default pipe its message to /usr/lib/sendmail (?)
from muttrc(5):
[...]
sendmail
Type: path
Default: "/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -oi"
Specifies the program and arguments used to deliver
m
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 01:27:01PM -0700, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> > > Dunno, what's that? I want my mail going to/from my school server.
> >
> > exim calls this a "smarthost". Rerun eximconfig and two of your canned
> > configuration options will be
> >
> > (2) Internet site using smarthost:
Krzys Majewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Though if I can't figure out how to tell exim to telnet to
> localhost:6025 within a week, I will do as you suggest and use my
> ISP's server.
Sorry, why should your exim "telnet" to localhost:6025? Exim should
sent the mails there?
> Except, that sti
Krzys Majewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Choose one of these (probably the first) and, if your school will
> > let you use them as a smarthost, you should be set.
>
> I did this. Mutt claims to send my mail (in other words it does not
> complain), but the mail is never sent.
Are you
Philipp Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > No I get my mail from the school's IMAP server. I want to send it via
> > it's SMTP server, or SMTP relay server, or any server whatsoever at
> > cs.ubc.ca. Surely it can't be that hard! -chris
>
> But why? If you can't reach that server why don
> > Dunno, what's that? I want my mail going to/from my school server.
>
> exim calls this a "smarthost". Rerun eximconfig and two of your canned
> configuration options will be
>
> (2) Internet site using smarthost: You receive Internet mail on this
> machine, either directly by SMTP o
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 09:18:31AM -0700, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> Philipp Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > To me it seems like you are assuming that mails _from_ you have to go
> > the same way like mails _to_ you. That is not the case!
> > An SMTP-Relay-Server may be located somewhere in
Philipp Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To me it seems like you are assuming that mails _from_ you have to go
> the same way like mails _to_ you. That is not the case!
> An SMTP-Relay-Server may be located somewhere in the Internet, you
> just need to be able to relay over it. Exim calls this
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 06:30:37PM -0700, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> > Doesn't your ISP offer you a SMTP-Relay-Server? If you are connected
> > most of the time you don't need one anyway...
>
> Dunno, what's that? I want my mail going to/from my school server.
To me it seems like you are assuming
Philipp Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mine says:
>
> postmaster: root
> root: phil
Aha, so does mine, now. (except for the phil part..)
> Doesn't your ISP offer you a SMTP-Relay-Server? If you are connected
> most of the time you don't need one anyway...
Dunno, what's that? I want my
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 07:21:01PM -0700, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> > Did you look at /etc/aliases?
> Yeah, what should it say?
Mine says:
postmaster: root
root: phil
...
> > > - outgoing mail (e.g. from Mutt) send via localhost:6025 which is port
> > > forwarded to smtp.cs.ubc.ca:25.
> >
>
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 19:10:05 -0700
From: Krzys Majewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Philipp Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: exim help needed
> Did you look at /etc/aliases?
Yeah, what should it say?
> > - remote machines
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 04:22:50PM -0700, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> OK I've given up on sendmail. On to exim now. Here are the features I
> want. Right now, it looks like sending mail fails silently.
> - cron jobs can send mail to root, who forwards them to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Di
Krzys Majewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK I've given up on sendmail. On to exim now. Here are the features I
> want. Right now, it looks like sending mail fails silently.
[...]
> - outgoing mail (e.g. from Mutt) send via localhost:6025 which is port
> forwarded to smtp.cs.ubc.ca:25.
[..
OK I've given up on sendmail. On to exim now. Here are the features I
want. Right now, it looks like sending mail fails silently.
- cron jobs can send mail to root, who forwards them to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- remote machines can't send mail to my machine (ie don't run a daemon
on port
sendmail has a masquerade option, postfix probably does too since its a
drop in replacement.
if you masquerade as say mydomain.com no matter what domain the sender
uses it'll get changed to mydomain.com ..is that what your lookin for ?
nate
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Matthew Dalton wrote:
matthe >I'm
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 05:39:08AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
> Hi !
>
> Is it possibble to masquarade my e-mail to the outside world from
> my LAN ? I'll tell you exactly what I wanted to say. I have a local
> LAN, one e-mail address. I have set up a local DNS and ipchains
> rules but I st
On 02/25/00 05:39AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Is it possibble to masquarade my e-mail to the outside world from
> my LAN ? I'll tell you exactly what I wanted to say. I have a local
> LAN, one e-mail address. I have set up a local DNS and ipchains
> rules but I stopped at sendmail. I
I'm not sure if this is what the original poster wanted, but...
Is is possible to masquerade a single email address in the same way the
IP-Masq masquerades a single internet connection? By this I mean, to
have a debian box receive emails via a single address, and be able to
distribute each one to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Is it possibble to masquarade my e-mail to the outside world from
>my LAN ? I'll tell you exactly what I wanted to say. I have a local
>LAN, one e-mail address. I have set up a local DNS and ipchains
>rules but I stopped at sendmail. I want to relay mail for the local
Hi !
Is it possibble to masquarade my e-mail to the outside world from
my LAN ? I'll tell you exactly what I wanted to say. I have a local
LAN, one e-mail address. I have set up a local DNS and ipchains
rules but I stopped at sendmail. I want to relay mail for the local
machines and put the ma
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Symonds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with Exim, HELP ME !
Is "lorenzo" a bot?!
I already responded to it off-list and specifically as
Why do you send the same emails three times?? Please consider that
debian is a Non-profit organisation, and it costs them money!
While I am willing to help, I cannot understand your question, and that
is why I did not reply your first 2 emails.
You said:
Lorenzo Zampese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 11:40:24AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> NOTE 1: my ISP's user name is different than my Linux's user name,
> so I need to use the exim's DB-rewrite feature,
> that I tested successfully with 'exim -brw '.
> NOTE 2: my ISP connection works fine and it i
Hi to all!
I am not able to send remote e-mails
by 'Exim', but only locally.
I have got a dial-up Linux Box (Debian
2.1), without a local network,
and I wish to deliver e-mails by my
ISP's smart host.
I used 'eximconfig', but it didn't
seem to set a good configuration for my
needings.
I have chan
Hi to all!
I am not able to send remote e-mails by 'Exim', but only locally.
I have got a dial-up Linux Box (Debian 2.1), without a local network,
and I wish to deliver e-mails by my ISP's smart host.
I used 'eximconfig', but it didn't seem to set a good configuration for my
needings.
I have cha
Hi to all!
I am not able to send remote e-mails by 'Exim', but only locally.
I have got a dial-up Linux Box (Debian 2.1), without a local network,
and I wish to deliver e-mails by my ISP's smart host.
I used 'eximconfig', but it didn't seem to set a good configuration for my
needings.
I have cha
Hi to all!
I am not able to send remote e-mails by 'Exim', but only locally.
I have got a dial-up Linux Box (Debian 2.1), without a local network,
and I wish to deliver e-mails by my ISP's smart host.
I used 'eximconfig', but it didn't seem to set a good configuration for my
needings.
I have cha
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999 10:19:27 -0600 (MDT), you wrote:
>Just as a side-note, it is a silly option anyway, isn't it? I've not used
>it for anything useful... yet.
I consider it a good option for a host that is secondary MX for a lot
of domains. Saves its admin from maintaining a list of these domains
Many thanks George.
Dave
> As the final entry in the section under directors:
>
> smart:
> driver = smartuser
> new_address = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
David Warnock
Sundayta Ltd
George and everyone else.
Thanks for the help.
We are now relay free according to all the tests I can do.
I have put exim on the firewall and am currently directly accessing it
via pop3 (qpopper). Now I would like to instead relay from exim on the
firewall to exim inside the firewall. How do I d
Ahh... I stand corrected.
I really should avoid answering mail relaying questions in hte middle of
the night!
Just as a side-note, it is a silly option anyway, isn't it? I've not used
it for anything useful... yet.
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Aug 1999 00:53:15 -0600 (MDT), you wrote:
> >If you have the "relay-domains-include-local-MX = true" in your
> >/etc/exim.conf file, this is true. It WILL relay for anyone who lists
> >your machine as an MX for their domain (real, or not). I thin
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999 00:53:15 -0600 (MDT), you wrote:
>If you have the "relay-domains-include-local-MX = true" in your
>/etc/exim.conf file, this is true. It WILL relay for anyone who lists
>your machine as an MX for their domain (real, or not). I think this was
>the original question.
This is eit
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999 19:15:59 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Marc Haber wrote:
>> Nope. If a spammer puts the host in his DNS, you are going to relay
>> _TO_ him. So he can happily spam himself.
>
>Ok, maybe this has changed but I thought at one point Exim would take mail
>in either dir
If you have the "relay-domains-include-local-MX = true" in your
/etc/exim.conf file, this is true. It WILL relay for anyone who lists
your machine as an MX for their domain (real, or not). I think this was
the original question.
The other gentleman is right about if this setting is NOT on, and
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999 08:22:23 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, David Warnock wrote:
>> relay_domains_include_local_mx = true
>
>You can turn this off because a spammer can simply put you host in his DNS
>makeing you an MX host and you will relay for him.
Nope. If a spammer puts the host
David,
You can check your mail hosts for relaying at
http://maps.vix.com/tsi/ar-test.html.
Ernest Johanson
Web Systems Administrator
Fuller Theological Seminary
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, David Warnock wrote:
> I have turned off all relaying (but don't know how to check that it is
> sucessful). But i
I am using the version that installs with slink which is 2.0.5 (I think)
Thanks
Dave
Pollywog wrote:
>
> On 03-Aug-99 David Warnock wrote:
> > I would like to reject all hosts apart from some named machines at
> > sundayta.co.uk but whenever I try that I stop all incoming mail from
> > other ho
On 03-Aug-99 David Warnock wrote:
> I would like to reject all hosts apart from some named machines at
> sundayta.co.uk but whenever I try that I stop all incoming mail from
> other hosts which is obviously not correct.
>
> Any help much appreciated while I still have some hair left.
>
You did n
Hi,
We have just had out exim router on our server abused by some spammers.
We had thought that we were securely setup, but it appears that our ISP
has recently changed something in their dns setup and it meant that
spammers have been able to use us as a relay.
I have some temporary fixes in whi
I am looking at the EXIM mail transport to handle the UUCP and pop
mail that I have along with filtering mail and local mail. I remember
a person on this list that offered someone a copy of the mail files
that they use. Can I get a copy of them from anyone that is using
t
Did you turn off fetchmail's rewrite option?
Also you can tell exim:
sender_unqualified_hosts = localhost
in it's configuration file (see the fetchmail FAQ)
--
best,
-bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from a 1996 Micro$loth ad campai
At 03:35 PM 3/27/98 -0800, you wrote:
>
>DUH! It looks like Fetchmail is attempting deliver. Configure it to pass
>the mail to SMTP.
>
>
George, Rob, List
Ok I think I have exim now the SMTP host, but now I am getting a message
when I run fetchmail --verbose.
fetchmail: SMTP>rect to
fe
At 02:45 PM 3/27/98 -0800, you wrote:
>On Fri, 27 Mar 1998, Mike Acklin wrote:
>
>> reading message 1 (2580 bytes)
>> fetchmail: found received address 'htuttle'
>> fetchmail: no local matches, forwarding to root
>> fetchmail: SMTP connect to (null) failed
>> fetchmail: POP3>QUIT
>
>It is having tr
Hello again,
I am sorry to be such a pain, but I can not get exim working properly. I
have tried reading all the info pages/man pages/FAQ's/archives/homepages
for the last two days. I guess I am in a special class by myself. All the
above all talk about ethernet/workstations/networked syst
63 matches
Mail list logo
