Thanks, Henning, and everybody else for helping out on this. I think I
know what I have to do now.
Regards,
Robert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CA
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 17:01:13 +0200
Robert Latest wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Henning Follmann
> wrote:
> > The network design at your place seems like a mess and the best
> > advice I can give you is to clean that up BEFORE you do anything
> > else.
>
> What's the mess? That the Int
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 05:01:13PM +0200, Robert Latest wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Henning Follmann
> wrote:
> > The network design at your place seems like a mess and the best advice
> > I can give you is to clean that up BEFORE you do anything else.
>
> What's the mess? That the I
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:35 PM, lee wrote:
> What if you actually do make your host a bridge that bridges the two
> networks and let the Modbus devices get their addresses from the DHCP
> server?
Can't. My local "modbus" subnet must not be visible from the outside.
Actually there are several pro
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Henning Follmann
wrote:
> The network design at your place seems like a mess and the best advice
> I can give you is to clean that up BEFORE you do anything else.
What's the mess? That the Intranet contains 192.168... addresses?
Anyway, this is a big multinational
Robert Latest writes:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm planning on setting up a small linux PC in an industrial
> environment. The PC will act as a bridge between a string of
> Ethernet/Modbus devices and a database server. It will run a very
> simple application that queries the Modbus devices and relays it
On Oct 2, 2012, at 3:07 PM, Robert Latest wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm planning on setting up a small linux PC in an industrial
> environment. The PC will act as a bridge between a string of
> Ethernet/Modbus devices and a database server. It will run a very
> simple application that queries the
Robert Latest:
>
> What I can't figure out is how to separate the IP address spaces in
> this PC itself. There are plenty of 192.168 addresses in use in our
> intranet, and it is quite possible that addresses will be used both in
> the Intranet and in the Modbus space.
That is a broken network de
Funny, I'm using 2.2.12 in my firewall/router, and I didn't do anything
special to get both NICs recognized.
Mike
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 08:13:01PM -0800, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> I've never seen the errors you describe, but I do run 2.2.17 on a
> firewall/router with two NICs.
I've never seen the errors you describe, but I do run 2.2.17 on a
firewall/router with two NICs. I accomplish this by passing the
arguments
ether=10,0x300,eth0 ether=3,0x280,eth1
to the kernel.
-chris
Steve Doerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello.
> I just rebuilt the 2.2.17 ke
Hello.
I just rebuilt the 2.2.17 kernel for a firewall/router and got the
following errors with my NIC's.
/var/log/debug - eth0 no IPv6 routers present
/var/log/dmesg - IP-Config: No network devices available
lspci -vvb lists both cards and I added the appropriate "append=" line
to lilo.conf.
I
On 2000-03-02 07:35:01, Jason Laster wrote:
> Any suggestions would be helpful. I haven't as of yet taken the old
> card out to eliminate a conflict.
The only thing that I had to do was create an alias per card:
$ grep eth /etc/modutils/aliases
alias eth0 3c59x
alias eth1 3c59x
Then `update-m
Hi !
I don't know, if this will help you ...
I had some problem with two ethernet cards. (100Mbit PCI
and NE2000 ISA, but no tulip ...). Then I compiled the PCI card into the
kernel and the ne2000 as module and everything was O.K.
ciao, Ralf.
I seem to be having trouble getting my second ethernet card to work.
(Linksys that should use the tulip driver in a PCI slot). I have tried
several different configurations of both cards (the other is a generic
ISA NE2000) With the tulip driver listed in the conf.modules as eth0 I
"modprobe eth0".
John Pearson wrote:
...
> Instead of using something like
> # modprobe ne io=0x300 irq=10
> to install the module, use something like
> # modprobe ne io=0x300,0x220 irq=10,11
>
> This is necessary even with drivers that normally autprobe, as they
> stop looking once they've found the first car
At 12:10 PM 11/19/99 +1030, John Pearson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 03:25:00PM +0700, Oki DZ wrote
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering whether it's possible to load ne.o module for a dual
> ethernet machine. Can it be done? I have tried to load the same module
> twice (with
On Fri, Nov 19, 1999 at 09:19:57AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> I did that (append="ether=5,0x300,eth0 ether=10,0x320,eth1"), it
> wouldn't boot.
> I recall that boot options will not work for modules. Is this correct?
I don't really know, since I only use modules for sound in my kernels.
> If it is, t
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 03:25:00PM +0700, Oki DZ wrote
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering whether it's possible to load ne.o module for a dual
> ethernet machine. Can it be done? I have tried to load the same module
> twice (with different iobase's), but it wouldn
Jean-Yves BARBIER wrote:
> add an append line in you /etc/lilo.conf
> read /usr/doc/HOWTO/BootPrompt.HOWTO
I did that (append="ether=5,0x300,eth0 ether=10,0x320,eth1"), it
wouldn't boot.
I recall that boot options will not work for modules. Is this correct?
If it is, the only way is to recompile
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 03:25:00PM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering whether it's possible to load ne.o module for a dual
> ethernet machine. Can it be done? I have tried to load the same module
> twice (with different iobase's), but it wouldn
Hi,
I'm wondering whether it's possible to load ne.o module for a dual
ethernet machine. Can it be done? I have tried to load the same module
twice (with different iobase's), but it wouldn't work. Do I have to
recompile the kernel for including the support for NE2K in it?
TIA,
Oki
21 matches
Mail list logo
