Non riesco a trovare 'depmod"Dice che non è installatoSergio santambrogio
Le 06/09/2019 à 21:05, Charles Curley a écrit :
Fresh install:
root@jhegaala:~# ll /sbin/depmod /usr/sbin/depmod
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Feb 9 2019 /sbin/depmod -> /bin/kmod*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Feb 9 2019 /usr/sbin/depmod -> /bin/kmod*
Upgraded:
root@hawk:~# ll /sbin/depmo
On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 13:47:19 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> Bear in mind that depmod itself has been a symlink for quite a while.
And still is. However, if the symlink you're expecting isn't there...
Fresh install:
root@jhegaala:~# ll /sbin/depmod /usr/sbin/depmod
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root
On Fri 06 Sep 2019 at 10:48:43 (-0600), Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 19:23:53 +0530
> Tapas Mishra wrote:
>
> > What is the location of the "depmod" program on your
> > machine? Use of uninitialized value $gOption{"default"} in numeric eq
On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 19:23:53 +0530
Tapas Mishra wrote:
> What is the location of the "depmod" program on your
> machine? Use of uninitialized value $gOption{"default"} in numeric eq
> (==) at ./vmware-install.pl line 866, line 1.
The answer is, that depends.
On
Dan Ritter
> What should I do to proceed from here?
>It's in /sbin/depmod, and you will need to be root to do
anything useful with it.
>sudo ./vmware-install.pl
>might work.
Yes that did worked. Thanks for pointing that out.
Erwan David
>It seems to me that vmware on
Le 06/09/2019 à 15:53, Tapas Mishra a écrit :
> I am trying to install Vmware tools in Debian 10 on Vmware workstation.
> The place where I am stuck is following messages.
Alternative answer
apt install open-vm-tools
Regards
--
Jean Louis Mas
smime.p7s
Description: Signature cryptographiq
Le 06/09/2019 à 15:53, Tapas Mishra a écrit :
> Hi,
> I am trying to install Vmware tools in Debian 10 on Vmware workstation.
> The place where I am stuck is following messages.
>
>
It seems to me that vmware on recent linux prefers the open-vm-tools
package.
e-install.pl
> debian@debian:~/vmware_tools/vmware-tools-distrib$ ./vmware-install.pl
> Setup is unable to find the "depmod" program on your machine. Please make sure
> it is installed. Do you want to specify the location of this program by hand?
> [yes] Use of uninitiali
-distrib$ ./vmware-install.pl
Setup is unable to find the "depmod" program on your machine. Please make sure
it is installed. Do you want to specify the location of this program by hand?
[yes] Use of uninitialized value $gOption{"default"} in numeric eq
(==) at ./vmware-install.pl
On 2019-02-24, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 24/02/2019 à 12:39, Fabrizio Mazzoni a écrit :
>> I have run an apt-dist upgrade on my dedicated server that uses a kernel
>> from the provider (OVH) and I am getting the following error:
>
> AFAIK, OVH kernels do not install modules so this error is nor
Le 24/02/2019 à 12:39, Fabrizio Mazzoni a écrit :
I have run an apt-dist upgrade on my dedicated server that uses a kernel
from the provider (OVH) and I am getting the following error:
AFAIK, OVH kernels do not install modules so this error is normal.
: Generating
/boot/initrd.img-4.9.159--std-ipv6-64 WARNING: missing
/lib/modules/4.9.159--std-ipv6-64 Ensure all necessary drivers are
built into the linux image! depmod: ERROR: could not open directory
/lib/modules/4.9.159--std-ipv6-64: No such file or directory depmod:
FATAL: could
Dear all,
When I use Live-CD, I found depmod didn't support compressed module so that
the modules.dep was empty. I search the web, finding there's an "
--enable-zlib" option for module-init-tools. Why Debian didn't enable
this? Or can I build my own version of modu
I might not know what I'm talking about here, but you might take a
look at the postinst scripts of the linux-image-* packages. They run
depmod for you after the kernel package is installed.
Do other distros run depmod at every boot?
I understand. In order to speed up the boot, depm
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> Do other distros run depmod at every boot?
Debian used to, as well.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -
On 4/28/07, Yuwen Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear all,
I found there's no script generating modules.dep in /etc/init.d of Etch.
# cd /etc/init.d
# grep depmod *
modutuils:[ -e /sbin/depmod ] || exit 0
No scripts execute /sbin/depmod. Any idea?
I might not know what I'
Dear all,
I found there's no script generating modules.dep in /etc/init.d of Etch.
# cd /etc/init.d
# grep depmod *
modutuils:[ -e /sbin/depmod ] || exit 0
No scripts execute /sbin/depmod. Any idea?
Best regards,
Yuwen
Yep, that is installed as well
Bill
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 07:19:05PM +0100, kurtz wrote:
> bandito escribe:
> > I installed alsaconf, alsamixer, alsa-base, etc. etc. and met all
> > package dependencies.
>
> What about alsa-modules-2.4.27-1-k7?
> --
> http colon slash slash kurtz dot blogsite
bandito escribe:
> I installed alsaconf, alsamixer, alsa-base, etc. etc. and met all
> package dependencies.
What about alsa-modules-2.4.27-1-k7?
--
http colon slash slash kurtz dot blogsite dot org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
es. I then run alsaconf, which detects the card
no-problemo. When alsaconf finishes up, it writes this to stdout:
Running update-modules...
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.27-1-k7/updates/alsa/snd-azx.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.27-1-k7/updates/alsa/snd-gu
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> depmod: ELF file /lib/modules.2.4.18/misc/[filename] not for this
> architecture
Have up updated the 'module-init=tools' package? If not, do so.
-- Thomas Adam
=
"The Linux Weekend Mechanic" -- http://linuxgazette.net
"TAG
depmod is failing for my sparc based install of debian stable.
I know the modules in question (asterisk drivers for a FXO card) are
compiled correctly and should work, but modprobe says they can't be
found after install and depmod says they contain unresolved symbols;
I don't get it, I
make --version
o binutils 2.12# ld -v
o util-linux 2.10o # fdformat --version
o module-init-tools 0.9.10 # depmod -V
o e2fsprogs 1.29# tune2fs
o jfsutils
> > When custom compiling kernel 2.6.3, I got all these depmod *** notices:
> >
> > depmod: *** Unresolved sybmols in /lib/modules/2.6.3.20040305-orca
> > /kernel/drivers/acpi/thermal.ko
>
> Are you sure you have module-init-tools installed, preferably from deb?
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:18:37PM -0800, Roger Chrisman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When custom compiling kernel 2.6.3, I got all these depmod *** notices:
>
> depmod: *** Unresolved sybmols in /lib/modules/2.6.3.20040305-orca
> /kernel/drivers/acpi/thermal.ko
>
> I rea
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:18:37PM -0800, Roger Chrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When custom compiling kernel 2.6.3, I got all these depmod *** notices:
>
> depmod: *** Unresolved sybmols in /lib/modules/2.6.3.20040305-orca
> /kernel/drivers/acpi/thermal.ko
Are you sure yo
Hi all,
When custom compiling kernel 2.6.3, I got all these depmod *** notices:
depmod: *** Unresolved sybmols in /lib/modules/2.6.3.20040305-orca
/kernel/drivers/acpi/thermal.ko
I read 'man depmod' and don't understand whether all this depmod output
means my kernel install wen
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 05:37:28PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> I just built a custom kernel and modules, and got a bunch of errors
> about unresolved symbols errors from depmod:
>
> # dpkg -i alsa-modules-2.4.24advncdfs_1.0.2c-2+rb.2_i386.deb
> i2c-2.4.24advncdfs_2.8.1-1+rb.2
I just built a custom kernel and modules, and got a bunch of errors
about unresolved symbols errors from depmod:
# dpkg -i alsa-modules-2.4.24advncdfs_1.0.2c-2+rb.2_i386.deb
i2c-2.4.24advncdfs_2.8.1-1+rb.2_i386.deb
lm-sensors-2.4.24advncdfs_2.8.1-2+rb.2_i386.deb
Selecting previously deselected
es gcc from sid.
After compilation I can insert the modules using insmod and have no
problems. However if I install the modules in /lib/modules... and then
run depmod -a it fails with a "floating point exception"
here is an output from the end of strace depmod -a
lseek(3, 3968, SEEK_S
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 03:16:14AM -0500, lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WARNING: Loop detected: /ide-iops.ko needs ide.ko which needs
> ide-iops.ko again!
In the past I could ignore an error like this, but it might be because
I don't needed that module in real.
> WARNING: Module /usb-storag
i'm using debian unstable. i recently installed 2.6.0 kernel from
source. when i run depmod -a, i get a bunch of loop warnings:
WARNING: Loop detected: /ide-iops.ko needs ide.ko which needs
ide-iops.ko again!
WARNING: Module /usb-storage.ko ignored, due to loop
WARNING: Module /ide.ko ig
n I try to install it, I get lots of error
messages on the form:
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.23.2003-12-01.1-pooh/
kernel/net/wanrouter/wanrouter.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.23.2003-12-01.1-pooh/
kernel/net/x25/x25.o
There was a problem running depmod.
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 21:09:49 GMT,
"Alex Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Secondly, I'm having a *lot* of trouble getting my D-Link DWL-520
> >> wirless NIC (Prism 2.5 chipset) to work under Debian.
> >
> > .._sure_? D-Link DWL-520 is a nice pussycat with fu
Secondly, I'm having a *lot* of trouble getting my D-Link DWL-520
wirless NIC (Prism 2.5 chipset) to work under Debian.
.._sure_? D-Link DWL-520 is a nice pussycat with full support for the
Prism 2.5, D-Link DWL-520+ sounds more like your carcassy experience.
Super sure -- I just cracked the box
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 23:46:52 GMT,
"Alex Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Secondly, I'm having a *lot* of trouble getting my D-Link DWL-520
> wirless NIC (Prism 2.5 chipset) to work under Debian.
.._sure_? D-Link DWL-520 is a nice pussycat with full support for
f these issues is the contents of /opt/kernel:
whenever I run depmod, I get a series of errors about
/opt/kernel/modules.dep not being an ELF file, /opt/kernel/build being
empty, and about a zillion unresolved symbols in /opt/kernel/alsa (though I
did just upgrade from 2.4.20-xfs to 2.4.
user function /lib/modules/2.4.20babar2/misc/lirc_serial.o
/lib/modules/2.4.20babar2/misc/lirc_serial.o: ELF file
/lib/modules/2.4.20babar2/misc/lirc_serial.o not a relocatable object
user function /lib/modules/2.4.20babar2/misc/lirc_serial.o
Using /lib/modules/2.4.20babar2/misc/lirc_serial.o
Hello!
I have a question:
When I refresh the kernel from 2.2.19 to 2.4.20
without errors,
in the new kernel the depmod command generate this
error message:
depmod:
QM_MODULES: Function not implemented.
I like to install a wireless lan card.
Please help me!
Thank you
Hello!
When I refresh the kernel from 2.2.19 to 2.4.20
without errors,
in the new kernel the depmod command generate this
error message:
depmod:
QM_MODULES: Function not implemented.
I like to install a wireless lan card.
Please help me!
Thank you!
Gabor Gyuricza
When I refresh the kernel from 2.2.19 to 2.4.20
without errors,
in the new kernel the depmod command generate this
error message:
depmod:
QM_MODULES: Function not implemented.
I like to install a wireless lan card.
Please help me!
Thank you!
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Kevin McKinley wrote:
>What version of gcc are you using?
sol:~# gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-linux/2.95.4/specs
gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)
I have gcc 3.2 installed under /usr/local, but that's not the version
that the root user sees.
/kernel-source-2.4.18/debian/tmp-image/lib/modules/2.4.18; \
> mkdir -p pcmcia; \
> find kernel -path '*/pcmcia/*' -name '*.o' | xargs -i -r ln -sf ../{}
> pcmcia
> if [ -r System.map ]; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F System.map -b
> /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.18/debian/
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 7 13:22:19 2003
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 11:53:41 +0200 (CEST)
From: David List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: depmod error when running make-kpkg
Resent-Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 05:10:22 -0500 (CDT)
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I h
Error when installing kernel files
Setting up drm-trunk-module-2.4.21-pre1 (10.00.Custom+2002.12.05-3) ...
depmod: QM_MODULES: Function not implemented
What does it mean?
--
<+-- -
Random Numbers Ph : +46 920-18569
(Computer Parts and consulting) Mobile : +46
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 06:08:50PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've installed two kernels with modules in /lib/modules/2.2.20-
> flavour1 and /lib/modules/2.2.20-flavour2, altough when I'm booting
> the second kernel I installed, I get a l lot of unresolved symbols
> since it looks
Alan Shutko, 2002-Nov-12 18:05 -0500:
> Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 2) Ext3 on a laptop may not be desireable...the journalling tends to
> >keep the drive from spinning down for power management (noflushd).
>
> OTOH, ext3 on a laptop may be more desirable, since it's more likely a
Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2) Ext3 on a laptop may not be desireable...the journalling tends to
>keep the drive from spinning down for power management (noflushd).
OTOH, ext3 on a laptop may be more desirable, since it's more likely a
laptop will go down, because of power or APM bugs.
Johan Ehnberg, 2002-Nov-12 19:39 +0200:
>
> >And a second question. Is there any arguments for using ext2
> >instead of ext3? Cause I can't find any that would make anyone
> >choose ext2 instead of ext3, and still Debian 3.0 installs on ext2.
>
> I guess ext3 is getting mature in 2.4 kernels. A
Am Die, 2002-11-12 um 18.08 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi
>
> I've installed two kernels with modules in /lib/modules/2.2.20-
> flavour1 and /lib/modules/2.2.20-flavour2, altough when I'm booting
> the second kernel I installed, I get a l lot of unresolved symbols
> since it looks for the modu
And a second question. Is there any arguments for using ext2
instead of ext3? Cause I can't find any that would make anyone
choose ext2 instead of ext3, and still Debian 3.0 installs on ext2.
I guess ext3 is getting mature in 2.4 kernels. Accordingly, ext3 can be
used using the bf2.4 flavor w
Hi
I've installed two kernels with modules in /lib/modules/2.2.20-
flavour1 and /lib/modules/2.2.20-flavour2, altough when I'm booting
the second kernel I installed, I get a l lot of unresolved symbols
since it looks for the modules in /lib/modules/2.2.20-flavour1
instead of /lib/modules/2.2.20
i'm new to linux, so please forgive my ignorance...
while attempting to run a "make install" to setup my graphics driver in the kernel, i receive the following error:
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.20/fs/binfmt_elf.o
make: *** [package-install] Error 1
i get t
On Monday 24 June 2002 18:31, Larry Smith wrote:
> Since building my kernel, when booting a screen or two
> of depmod warnings (or errors?) flash by so fast I
> can't read them. It happens during boot right after
> the message "Checking Dependencies" comes up.
>
>
Since building my kernel, when booting a screen or two
of depmod warnings (or errors?) flash by so fast I
can't read them. It happens during boot right after
the message "Checking Dependencies" comes up.
After booting is complete, dmesg lists no such errors,
or any errors
Having downloaded the driver of NC3121 network adpater of Comaq Deskpro EN
6333/3 from
http://www.compaq.com/support/files/server/us/download/10569.html
, I extracted and compiled the
source according to the instruction.
After 'make install', an error message was shown
; boot loader (lilo) as well it had replace my lilo.conf file. I
> reinstalled the kernel I have been using for sometime, rewrote my
> lilo.conf file and reinstalled my boot loader in the right place
> (/dev/hda) by running lilo. The problem I am having now is that
> whenever depmod -a is
f file. I
reinstalled the kernel I have been using for sometime, rewrote my
lilo.conf file and reinstalled my boot loader in the right place
(/dev/hda) by running lilo. The problem I am having now is that
whenever depmod -a is run (two times at boot) I get the message included
below sent to stder
Mathias wrote:
When I dpkg -i kernel-image242.deb
I got error about depmod : Unresolved symbol
Do you know how to fix that?
Hi Eric! This error means that depmod is not shure whether it can use this
symbol (part of a module like parameters). It can have much causes. I think
you should
> When I dpkg -i kernel-image242.deb
> I got error about depmod : Unresolved symbol
>
> Do you know how to fix that?
Hi Eric! This error means that depmod is not shure whether it can use this
symbol (part of a module like parameters). It can have much causes. I think
you should
Dear Ethan or any experieced debian linux user:
When I dpkg -i kernel-image242.deb
I got error about depmod : Unresolved symbol
Do you know how to fix that?
highly appreciate your tech help
sincere
eric ( I am in 2.2.18)
The message: "depmod: multiply defined" appeared when the machine is
starting... how can I resolve this problem?
should clear up that problem.
Jason Mogavero
Sr. Network Engineer
Inflow, Inc
(303)942-2828
> -Original Message-
> From: Pascal THIVENT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 3:17 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: depmod: *** Unresolv
"Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:30:51PM -0800, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> > Why does 'update-modules' give:
> >
> > depmod: not an ELF file?
> >
> > I've done a dist-upgrade but no j
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:30:51PM -0800, Krzys Majewski wrote:
> Why does 'update-modules' give:
>
> depmod: not an ELF file?
>
> I've done a dist-upgrade but no juice.
I've had this happen when I transferred a module incorrectly. I think I
transferred
I've compiled a brend new kernel.
When I boot with this kernel, those lines are printed on the screen :
...
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.17/misc/isdnloop.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.17/misc/ixj.o
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2
Why does 'update-modules' give:
depmod: not an ELF file?
I've done a dist-upgrade but no juice.
-chris
> > I am getting exactly the same error (depmod: QM_MODULES: Function not
> > implemented) with openafs.
> >
> > Anyrecomendations?
>
> what kernel you using ? (uname -r). if its not 2.0.36 then don't expect
> that package to work. try to recompile the
Vadim Kutsyy wrote:
> I am getting exactly the same error (depmod: QM_MODULES: Function not
> implemented) with openafs.
>
> Anyrecomendations?
what kernel you using ? (uname -r). if its not 2.0.36 then don't expect
that package to work. try to recompile the package from source
debian:/home/kutsyy# apt-get install arla
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
.
Setting up arla-modules-2.0.36 (0.23-1) ...
depmod: QM_MODULES: Function not implemented
dpkg: error processing arla-modules-2.0.36 (--configure):
subprocess post-
Peter Jay Salzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>i *just* downloaded and compiled 2.4.0-12 for the very first time. after
>my very first reboot with this kernel, i'm getting:
>
># depmod -a
>depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
>/lib/modules/2.4.0-test12/kernel/driver
imm.o is actually dependent on another module, but noone told depmod. Try to
find what imm is dependent on.
dar
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> i *just* downloaded and compiled 2.4.0-12 for the very first time. after
> my very first reboot with this kernel, i
Jason
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Jay Salzman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 1:30 PM
> To: Debian user mailing list
> Subject: Re: depmod question
>
>
> On Tue 19 Dec 00, 1:08 PM, Jason Holland said...
> > Peter,
> > wh
>
> i originally compiled imm support as a module because you never
> know when a
> friend will come over with one of these things...
>
> well, i recompiled the kernel and modules without imm support,
> and there are
> no complaints from depmod.
>
> but this kind
ver with one of these things...
well, i recompiled the kernel and modules without imm support, and there are
no complaints from depmod.
but this kind of sucks! it's precisely the reason why i tend to built
monolithic kernels instead of modular kernels. stuff always seems to go
wrong soo
port scsi adapter. Do you have one of those
in your box?? If not, get rid of that in your kernel config and recompile.
Hope this helps!
Jason
>
> i *just* downloaded and compiled 2.4.0-12 for the very first time. after
> my very first reboot with this kernel, i'm getting:
&
i *just* downloaded and compiled 2.4.0-12 for the very first time. after
my very first reboot with this kernel, i'm getting:
# depmod -a
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.0-test12/kernel/drivers/scsi/imm.o
i'm curious - i compiled this kernel by the book. what
dear all,
i'm trying to resolve a "conf.modules is newer than /lib/modules/foo/foo.dep"
problem.
i thought that depmod -a would rewrite /lib/modules/foo/foo.dep. in fact,
that's what i thought the whole point of depmod -a was.
apparently, depmod isn't writing this fi
/etc/init.d/kerneld ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/modutils/aliases ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/modutils/arch/i386 ...
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.17/misc/cipcb.o
hoo boy, here we go...!
% lsmod \*
Module Size Used by
ip_masq_
Hello there,
Yesterday I did an install of potato on a 8Mb Laptop. As there's no
support for low-memory machines anymore in potato, I installed the slink
base system from the 7 floppies and then did apt-get update/apt-get
dist-upgrade.
Seems to have worked out, but when depmod is run I ge
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 10:21:35PM +, Pollywog wrote:
> I am using Potato.
> Does Debian run 'depmod -a' when the machine boots or should I put that in a
> script?
sledgehammer:/tmp# grep -r 'depmod -a' /etc/*
/etc/init.d/modutils:depmod -a > /dev/null
/etc/rc
I am using Potato.
Does Debian run 'depmod -a' when the machine boots or should I put that in a
script?
thanks
--
Andrew
g List
Subject: Depmod Error on installing ALSA modules
Resent-Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 07:11:52 -0500
Resent-From: debian-laptop@lists.debian.org
Yesterday, I sent the following message to debian-user. Still trying to
figure out how to fix this problem. Is it possible that the error is a
result of a
alsa-modules-2.2.15_0.4.1i-5+2.2.15-90_i386.deb) ...
Setting up alsa-modules-2.2.15 (0.4.1i-5+2.2.15-90) ...
depmod: error reading ELF header: No such file or directory
depmod: error reading ELF header: No such file or directory
work:/usr/src#
Any ideas as to what this means? How can I fix this?
T
Hello,
I have installed potato on an old machine. I'm trying to reconfigure
the modules so that the ethernet card will work. When I run depmod,
I get the following message:
depmod: Can't open /lib/modules/2.2.14-5.0/modules.dep for writing
So I do "cd /lib/modules" and &
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 10:36:35PM -0500, Jonathan Markevich wrote:
> > Please tell me I'm a moron and I'm clearly not running *command x*. Please
> > tell me something... It's getting so blowing the thing away and
> > reinstalling takes less time and fru
> > and why depmod makes such weird things ...
> > run "rm /lib/modules/2.0.36/modules.dep" - possibly it's write-protected
> > or such thing.
>
> I did that and it puts back the weird one. Correction: it IS stamped 5
> hours older than whenever it is
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 02:00:52PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > I recompiled a 2.0.36 kernel, of course I had to use gcc 2.72. I copied
> > System.map all over known creation, made modules_install did depmod and
...
>
> just an idea: did you a "make dep clean&qu
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 10:36:35PM -0500, Jonathan Markevich wrote:
> Please tell me I'm a moron and I'm clearly not running *command x*. Please
> tell me something... It's getting so blowing the thing away and
> reinstalling takes less time and frustration.
Hi,
Here is my cheat sheet of steps
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> ..
> Now no matter how much I depmod, it replaces the modules.dep with some old
> version (from where??? It's about 5 and a half hours old -- I was nowhere
> near my machine at that time; and it doesn't correlate to any ki
72. I copied
> System.map all over known creation, made modules_install did depmod and
> update-modules, everything seemed fine, until I reboot. Now I get 7
> BAZILLION unresolved symbol references. I figured it's crufty, right? So I
> blew away the modules directory for 2.0.
> I recompiled a 2.0.36 kernel, of course I had to use gcc 2.72. I copied
> System.map all over known creation, made modules_install did depmod and
> update-modules, everything seemed fine, until I reboot. Now I get 7
> BAZILLION unresolved symbol references. I figured it's cru
l did depmod and
update-modules, everything seemed fine, until I reboot. Now I get 7
BAZILLION unresolved symbol references. I figured it's crufty, right? So I
blew away the modules directory for 2.0.36, redid make modules_install and
reboot.
Now no matter how much I depmod, it replaces the m
Hi,
Even after I upgraded the kernel to 2.2.14 from 2.0.36, bootup process
gives me a slew of depmode errors for the modules in the
/lib/modules/2.0.36 directory.
Where can I make depmod check the /lib/modules/2.2.14 directory instead?
Thanks
rajesh
Hi Mikhail,
Don't know if this helps, but, when I compile a new kernel I always
rm -rf /lib/modules/
before executing make modules_install. (I never use kernel-dpkg)
My guess is you have old modules lying around...
HTH
H.S.
--
Give me Debian or pencil and paper
As driver's
documentation reads its version is lower than 2.2.13 and so I have to recompile
the kernel with CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=Y (Am I right?). After doing so and running
depmod -a (never mind at boot time or from comand line) I get a lot of
messages: ... Unresolved symbols ... No module
Hello,
This is the second time this has happened. I upgrade from slink to potato and
everything works fine. I run apt-get upgrade for the second time, some stuff
gets
downloaded, and all hell breaks loose. Next time I restart I get almost a whole
screen
of this during startup:
depmod: /lib
Hello,
This is the second time this has happened. I upgrade from slink to potato and
everything works fine. I run apt-get upgrade for the second time, some stuff
gets
downloaded, and all hell breaks loose. Next time I restart I get almost a whole
screen
of this during startup:
depmod: /lib
We are running Potato on one of our servers. We did some updating of the
files yesterday (using dselect). We are now having some problems with
depmod putting the wrong time stamp on the /lib/modules/2.2.12/modules.dep
file when the machine is booting up and the /etc/init.d/modutils runs.
It will
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
