And a second question. Is there any arguments for using ext2 instead of ext3? Cause I can't find any that would make anyone choose ext2 instead of ext3, and still Debian 3.0 installs on ext2.I guess ext3 is getting mature in 2.4 kernels. Accordingly, ext3 can be used using the bf2.4 flavor when installing Woody.
I see two reasons to use ext2 instead of ext3:
-Ext2 is more mature
-Ext3 uses up space for its journal
On the other hand
-Ext3's journal kicks butt.
Cheers,
Johan
--
Johan Ehnberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Windows? No... I don't think so."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
