-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:04:21AM -0400, Bret Comstock Waldow wrote:
> Is it a matter of using an earlier version, or just a matter of not
> loading all sorts of things one doesn't need/want for a limited machine?
Look at just window managers and not
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 15:04, Bret Comstock Waldow wrote:
> Is it a matter of using an earlier version, or just a matter of not
> loading all sorts of things one doesn't need/want for a limited machine?
>
> After all, one of the differences between earlier and later distros is
> better security and
01:51, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 03:47:35PM +1000, leslie munchenbotch wrote:
> > Looking into possible Linux distros for old machines (limited HD), does
> > Debian 2.1 have a GUI? Please reply to [EM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 03:47:35PM +1000, leslie munchenbotch wrote:
> Looking into possible Linux distros for old machines (limited HD), does
> Debian 2.1 have a GUI? Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] where possible.
Yes. Look at the v
Looking into possible Linux distros for old machines (limited HD), does
Debian 2.1 have a GUI? Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] where possible.
_
Hot chart ringtones and polyphonics. Go to
http://ninemsn.com.au/share/redir
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:34:55AM -0800, Mike Berrisford wrote:
> Hello list, i recently installed Debian 2.1 and i'm having a problem
> with dselect.
>
> I'm using the access method apt.
>
> It tells me i have the source list
> deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debi
Mike Berrisford said:
> Hello list, i recently installed Debian 2.1 and i'm having a problem with
> dselect.
>
> I'm using the access method apt.
>
> It tells me i have the source list
> deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
most l
Hello list, i recently installed Debian 2.1 and i'm having a problem
with dselect.
I'm using the access method apt.
It tells me i have the source list
deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
However when i run Update, i get the following
Get ftp://ftp.debian.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 01:23:23PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> I've got a machine on my local network that I've installed 2.1 on (I
> tried to install 2.2 from a cd on which I had burned a d/l iso but this
> machine can't read the cd. The machine I burned it on has no problem
> reading it.)
If th
I've got a machine on my local network that I've installed 2.1 on (I
tried to install 2.2 from a cd on which I had burned a d/l iso but this
machine can't read the cd. The machine I burned it on has no problem
reading it.)
Anyway, I installed apt and dpkg from the upgrade directory on the
2.2 cd b
on Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 07:30:11AM -0600, Pete Templin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
> I did a live upgrade (production server, company doesn't have funds for a
> development or transition server) on a box from Debian 2.1 to Debian 2.2,
> and reminded myself why I don't
I did a live upgrade (production server, company doesn't have funds for a
development or transition server) on a box from Debian 2.1 to Debian 2.2,
and reminded myself why I don't like to upgrade boxes. I've got most of
the stuff fixed (finally), but I get these errors in dselec
Helló,
A következÅ
problémára keresek megoldást:
Adott egy
Toshiba Tecra 8000 tÃpusú laptop amire 2.1-es Debiant kell telepÃtsünk. Az a
jelenség, hogy akár Cd-rÅl, akár floppy-ról bútolok a root.bin betültése után a
gép újraindul. Próbálkoztam más disztribúciók te
"Tibor D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Unfortunately, the apt packages in stable and unstable depend on
> > glibc > 2.1.x, resulting in a chicken-and-egg problem.
> > Which is the easiest way to upgrade to unstable under this
> > circumstances? Recompiling apt for glibc 2.0.7? Editing the Pac
Florian Weimer wrote
Unfortunately, the apt packages in stable and unstable depend on
glibc > 2.1.x, resulting in a chicken-and-egg problem.
Which is the easiest way to upgrade to unstable under this
circumstances? Recompiling apt for glibc 2.0.7? Editing the Package
file?
Check out your fa
The direct attempt (editing /etc/apt/sources.list, 'apt-get update')
does not succeed, 'apt-get update' results in the following error
messages:
E: Line 97707 in package file
/var/state/apt/lists/source.rfc822.org_debian_dists_sid_main_binary-i386_Packages
is too long.(2)
E: Line 97707 in packag
another possibility for cd images is this site:
www.linuxiso.org
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Gregory G Baker wrote:
> > But I could not figure out from which site I can download
> > a CD image for Debian 2.1
>
> You might be best off to contact some of the people who sell of
On Wed, 06 Dec 2000, you wrote:
> ...
> You might also check the full list of mirrors
> (http://www.debian.org/mirror/mirrors_full) for those that have the CD
> Images. Some might have the old ones lying around.
Thanks, I found the following three sites on that list
that had the old ones
> But I could not figure out from which site I can download
> a CD image for Debian 2.1
You might be best off to contact some of the people who sell official
CDs (http://www.debian.org/distrib/vendors) and see if they have one
they'd send you for the postage.
You might also check th
Hi,
It's quit easy to make a CD image for Debian 2.2 from files
downloaded from the Internet. The whole procedure for 2.2
is described on www.debian.org.
But I could not figure out from which site I can download
a CD image for Debian 2.1
Does anyone know from where to download or how to
ma
John Griffiths wrote:
> i realise "H.C.Hsiang" is not deliberately at fault. but being bombarded
> by malicsious code is not good for anyone.
Most certainly not good.
> whats the procedure for removing someone from the list?
That I don't know. I have sent a private - and hopefully polite - mess
rote:
>> Does anyone know if helix gnome will work with Debian 2.1 (slink). I've heard
>> that it will work with 2.2 and helixcode's website (www.helixcode.com)
>> states that
>> the debs are designed for 2.3. Anyone tried helix gnome with 2.1?
>
>It's b
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 11:24:32PM -0500, Kimon Ioannides wrote:
> Does anyone know if helix gnome will work with Debian 2.1 (slink). I've heard
> that it will work with 2.2 and helixcode's website (www.helixcode.com) states
> that
> the debs are designed for 2.3. Anyone
Howdy, folks! I realized today that there's a need for PPPoE (PPP over
Ethernet) packages for Debian 2.1 (slink) i386, as I couldn't find any
online.
I built up-to-date pppoe (and ppp, which it needs a newer version
of) packages in a slink chroot, and I've uploaded
- Original Message -
From: "Howard Jow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc:
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 8:45 PM
Subject: Debian 2.1 to Debian 2.2 upgrade.
> Hi, I am a systems administrator at the University of New Mexico. I am
> trying to upgrade approximately 80 De
Hi, I am a systems administrator at the University of New Mexico. I am
trying to upgrade approximately 80 Debian Linux boxxen from 2.1 to 2.2.
We are currently running slink and we want to move to potato. Here is
basically what I am doing:
changing /etc/apt/sources.list to use potato
apt-get upd
Hello!
I for myself have got a debian2.2/2.1 mix on my machine, but it took a bit
of time until I solved all the dependency problems.
So I suggest using a debian 2.1 disk set for base install, then Sven would
have no problems switching dselect to multi_cd mode and installing further
packages
Someone can probably help you with that SCSI problem, but failing that,
there's no need to buy Debian 2.2 (potato). In fact you probably can't
yet anyway since it isn't quite released yet.
What you could do instead is download just the handful of files needed
to install the base potato system from
Hallo Debians,
I just received the Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 distribution. It consists of 5 CDs.
The first one is the install-CD. On this first CD there is the kernel 2.0
and this kernel will be automaticly installed. But then I'll have the
problem that my SCSI-Controller won't be detected. So I ne
I have tried to install Debian 2.1 for Intel Architecture from two CD's I
bought from LinuxMall (the Official release, slink). I am able to install
it, but with many problems when running it using the 2.0.36 kernel that is
automatically installed. I often get messages like: "bash: err
On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 06:23:09PM +0200, Benoit NOSS wrote:
> Hello,
> In the installation process of the Debian 2.1 distribution, I missed an
> important step : I did something wrong and I could not choose an
> installation profile. I have a base system working.
You've actuall
Hello,
In the installation process of the Debian 2.1 distribution, I missed an
important step : I did something wrong and I could not choose an
installation profile. I have a base system working. Can I use dselect
with an option or something equivalent to install with a profile or do I
have to
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 11:24:32PM -0500, Kimon Ioannides wrote:
> Does anyone know if helix gnome will work with Debian 2.1 (slink). I've heard
> that it will work with 2.2 and helixcode's website (www.helixcode.com) states
> that
> the debs are designed for 2.3. Anyone
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 11:24:32PM -0500, Kimon Ioannides wrote:
> Does anyone know if helix gnome will work with Debian 2.1 (slink).
> I've heard that it will work with 2.2 and helixcode's website
> (www.helixcode.com) states that the debs are designed for 2.3. Anyone
> trie
Does anyone know if helix gnome will work with Debian 2.1 (slink). I've heard
that it will work with 2.2 and helixcode's website (www.helixcode.com) states
that
the debs are designed for 2.3. Anyone tried helix gnome with 2.1?
thanks.
kimon
Tim;
This was a problem with the kernel scsi code and was fixed in
newer versions. You need a newer kernel to install.
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 05:25:31PM -0500, Tim Willis wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 11:55:50AM -0500, Tim Willis was only
> >escaped alo
Do you happen to have an athlon??? If you do, yo should try booting with
the tecra-image, they should work fine!
Ron Rademaker
On Wed, 31 May 2000, Tim Willis wrote:
> I'm trying to install Debian Linux and am having a problem that I've never
> seen before.
>
> The install gets to the line
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 11:55:50AM -0500, Tim Willis was only
escaped alone to tell thee:
> The install gets to the line
> "(scsi0) Downloading sequencer code... 419 instructions downloaded"
> ...and hangs, or stops. It never goes any further.
What kind of card?
--
i'm determined to st
I'm trying to install Debian Linux and am having a problem that I've never
seen before.
The install gets to the line
"(scsi0) Downloading sequencer code... 419 instructions downloaded"
...and hangs, or stops. It never goes any further.
Has anyone seen this happen before? If so, what can I d
How do I get the mouse to work on this system? I gather that the device
is adbmouse, but the base system doesn't seem to have gpm (if that's
the program for this architecture). Do I need a kernel module or a
package from another section of the distribution?
Thanks in advance.
Hi all,
I have qmail 1.02 running perfect on Debian 2.1 machine. I compiled the
qmail stuff by downloading the src.deb package and running build-qmail etc.
Anyways, what I want to know is, I have since grabbed the ezmlm source code
from the author, and I am attempting to load this ezmlm on but
I had the same problem installing Debian 2.1 on an Athlon.
The problem is the kernel of the installation CD: 2.0.36
It does not seem to work with this kind of new computers.
I took out the hard disk and installed it on another
computer (pentium II). The installation went fine.
I compiled the
Yep, I had something similar with my athlon 500, just use the tecra-image
and all should work fine!
Ron Rademaker
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Oliver Schoenknecht wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> when I boot the installation CD of Debian 2.1 on my 600 MHz
> Athlon (with Adaptec 2940, 3C905 NIC
Hi there,
when I boot the installation CD of Debian 2.1 on my 600 MHz
Athlon (with Adaptec 2940, 3C905 NIC), my system stops after
having downloaded the instructions for the AHA-2940 - is this any
specific problem one of you have encountered before?
---
Mit freundlichem Gruss
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 10:05:28PM +, Paul J. Keenan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 09:41:55PM -, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > I am trying to install debian 2.1 for the 1st time, I have a D-Link
> > DFE-530TX PCI network card, it's not listed in the list of supported netw
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 09:41:55PM -, Andrew Jones wrote:
> I am trying to install debian 2.1 for the 1st time, I have a D-Link
> DFE-530TX PCI network card, it's not listed in the list of supported network
> cards, can i use this card with debian ?
>
>
> Andrew Jones,
I am trying to install debian 2.1 for the 1st time, I have a D-Link
DFE-530TX PCI network card, it's not listed in the list of supported network
cards, can i use this card with debian ?
Andrew Jones,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone gotten Web Jetadmin running under Debian 2.1?
I downloaded 5.6 from HP. It finds all it's librarys. I had to tweak
the install (it want's to put startup scripts in /etc/rc.d). And it
even starts up, but it doesn't appear to answer http requests.
Ideas?
--
Ri
> i used the potato 2.2.5 boot disks because of a problem of the boot-cd
> within the debian 2.1 package with the initio-SCSI-host
If you only run into trouble when booting from CD, you should use the
Debian 2.1
bootdisks. There is a tool on the first CD to create them (rawrite, AFAIR).
Hello,
i tried to install debian 2.1 the first time ... after i solved my problem
with the initio-SCSI-host with help of the list-archive it's time for me to
ask directly :(((
i used the potato 2.2.5 boot disks because of a problem of the boot-cd
within the debian 2.1 package with the i
Hello,
i tried to install debian 2.1 the first time ... after i solved my problem
with the initio-SCSI-host with help of the list-archive it's time for me to
ask directly :(((
i used the potato 2.2.5 boot disks because of a problem of the boot-cd
within the debian 2.1 package with the i
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Alfred said,
>
> XFree86 Version 3.3.6 / X Window System
> (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6300)
> Release Date: January 8 1999
> If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is newer
> than the above date, look for a newer version befo
XFree86 Version 3.3.6 / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6300)
Release Date: January 8 1999
If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is newer
than the above date, look for a newer version before reporting
problems. (see http
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to comp.os.linux.alpha,comp.windows.x.kde as well.
Thanks to all who sent in help. The fix to the problem was
to delete the character string ",yp" from the file "/etc/svc.conf"
that was installed by the Compaq package.
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to comp.os.linux.alpha,comp.windows.x.kde as well.
I have a problem getting the new Compaq-donated
netscape package to work correctly on my Debian 2.1
(slink) Alpha machine. Here are the facts:
(1) stock Debian 2.1
I've been working at this for a little while now and here's what I've
found out.
I installed debian 2.1r4 over my redhat 5.2 firewall. The installation
worked well, and I was able to install packages via apt, upgrading to
potato, from http://http.us.debian.org and other sources without
difficult
I am trying to connect a terminal to my PC running Debian 2.1.
I added the following line to my /etc/inittab file:
My terminal is in the Adds viewpoint 3a+ personality, set for FDX, set for
9600 baud, connected to the PC using a standard modem cable.
After I added the line in /etc/inittab I
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 05:15:23PM -0800, FM Linux Admin wrote:
> (1) C library incompatibiliy with some distributions of Linux, including
> Red Hat 5.2 and Debian 2.1.
>
> Users will typically see the following message in this case:
>
> ./maker: error in loadin
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Salman Ahmed wrote:
> > "NDR" == Nico De Ranter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> NDR> I have a number of Compaq Deskpro EN's and EP's. Everything
> NDR> works fine except for one major problem: about 1 out of 3 times
> NDR> I boot the keyboard will go completely
gt; Has anyone tried installing Debian-2.1 on a Compaq DeskPro EN Series
> Workstation ? I am trying to get a workstation at the office so that I
> can install Debian on it, and there's an offchance it might be a Compaq
> workstation. This machine might be a PIII 500MHz with an "Int
On 20-Dec-1999, Salman Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Has anyone tried installing Debian-2.1 on a Compaq DeskPro EN Series
> Workstation ? I am trying to get a workstation at the office so that I
> can install Debian on it, and there's an offchance it might be a Com
> In addition to that you need a wrapper that rearranges the library path,
> this is the one I use
i've attached a better one which was posted by someone on bugtraq. it also
solves a couple security issues which are particularly an issue if you're
using wp on a multiuser system.
make sure you s
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Hi everybody,
> I am trying to install Precision Insight's NeoMagic X Server so
> that I can get my IBM Thinkpad 390E up and running with X Windows. At
> this point in time, I do not have internet access on this laptop. On
> anot
Hi everybody,
I am trying to install Precision Insight's NeoMagic X Server so
that I can get my IBM Thinkpad 390E up and running with X Windows. At
this point in time, I do not have internet access on this laptop. On
another computer (Win98), I downloaded the x server onto a floppy with a
Today, Ra?l Ib??ez, spilled the beans:
RlIe> Then I press Return to start, and the system crashes when it appears these
RlIe> lines:
RlIe> hda: ST36421A, 61250 MB W/256 Kb Cache, CHS=784/255/63, UDM
RlIe> hdb: CRD-8480B, ATAPI CDROM drive
RlIe> Now the system stop and doesnt do any.
On my
I have a Pentium II 400 Mhz, with 64 Mbytes Ram, and a S3 SAVAGE 3d graphic
card.
When I try to install the debian from a MULTI-CD distribution, first its
start the boot parameters screen.
Then I press Return to start, and the system crashes when it appears these
lines:
hda: ST36421A, 61250 MB
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, NaNoFlaW wrote:
>I getting a seg fault when I try to run xwp.
>
>this is the debug info
>Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>0x4017026f in strncmp ()
>
>and this is the error message
> 3316 Segmentation fault $Platform/ins/$Exec $Menu $Values $bgcolor
>
NaNoFlaW wrote:
>
> I getting a seg fault when I try to run xwp.
>
> this is the debug info
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x4017026f in strncmp ()
>
> and this is the error message
> 3316 Segmentation fault $Platform/ins/$Exec $Menu $Values $bgcolor
>
> Warning:
I getting a seg fault when I try to run xwp.
this is the debug info
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x4017026f in strncmp ()
and this is the error message
3316 Segmentation fault $Platform/ins/$Exec $Menu $Values $bgcolor
Warning: The graphical install program has fail
I have been using a 2.2.12-3 kernel now with Debian 2.1, but I updated
everything to potato, after installing slink. Other than a few minor
quirks I must say I am very pleased with it.
Todd
On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Aaron Walker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have read the errata conscerning Linux
oesn't seem to work, but I'm
sure I've overlooked something. As far as the differences between Debian 2.1 and
the kernel versions, I'm no expert, but like I said, I've had no problems
running 2.2.10 or 2.3.18 kernels with Debian 2.1. Right now I'm waiting for 2.2
to freez
Hi Salman Ahmed; unless Mutt is confused, you wrote:
> >>>>> "AW" == Aaron Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> AW> Hi, I have read the errata conscerning Linux 2.2.x and Debian 2.1
> AW> (http://www.debian.org/releases/2.1/running-k
On Sun, Oct 10, 1999 at 09:51:41AM -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
> I have read the errata conscerning Linux 2.2.x and Debian 2.1
> (http://www.debian.org/releases/2.1/running-kernel-2.2) and it basically
> said that I would have to mix the stable 2.1 release with unstable
> packages. Ha
Hi,
I have read the errata conscerning Linux 2.2.x and Debian 2.1
(http://www.debian.org/releases/2.1/running-kernel-2.2) and it basically
said that I would have to mix the stable 2.1 release with unstable
packages. Has anyone had any problems doing this? Or is it not
necessary to do? What are
On Fri, 01 Oct 1999, Gary Young wrote:
> I have installed debian 2.1 on an HP Vectra Xu
> platform with the "HP 10/100 Mbps Network Interface".
> When I try to configure the kernel module driver,
> hp100.o, in the installation or later with 'modconf'
> I get &
I have installed debian 2.1 on an HP Vectra Xu
platform with the "HP 10/100 Mbps Network Interface".
When I try to configure the kernel module driver,
hp100.o, in the installation or later with 'modconf'
I get "Device or resource busy".
I temporarily inserted
I was updating my page on installing Debian GNU/Linux on the Dell
Latitude CPi D300XT when it occurred to me that a lot of the material
there might be of interest in general. It's a log of how to install
Debian on this laptop (and maybe installing Debian in general) and
aims to be fairly descriptiv
[Subject was "RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0"]
Thanks to those who have responded, for the help so far.
I am still attempting to install debian 2.1 onto an
HP Vectra Xu box with SCSI disks. The boot from the
resc1440 floppy fails after the "RAMDISK: Compressed
image f
Hi,
On Tue, 14 Sep, 1999 à 12:37:22AM +0200, Eric CHEVALLIER wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm french and i have a problem to installation of Debian 2.1
> the installation stopping after detecting my SCSI card, whit boot CD-ROM
> installion or boot floppy disk using your binary image with
Hi,
I'm french and i have a problem to installation of Debian 2.1
the installation stopping after detecting my SCSI card, whit boot CD-ROM
installion or boot floppy disk using your binary image with rawrite.
I have finding in on the web at my SCSI constructor card some binary
image who de
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 11:00:44 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How easy would it be to upgrade from Debian 2.1 to 2.2?
There is no Debian 2.2 yet; once it's there, upgrading should be fairly easy
(easiest via "apt" probably).
> Are the packages all relatively s
How easy would it be to upgrade from Debian 2.1 to 2.2? Are the packages all
relatively stable?
Regards
Graham
On Sun, 12 Sep 1999, John Miskinis wrote:
> Many thanks to all those who helped. I am now
> up and running 2.1 debian, using full 800x600
> and 256 colors on my Thinkpad 560.
>
> I am using the X that comes with 2.1, and it's fine.
I'm glad you got it working. If possible, you'll want to get 16
On Sun, 12 Sep 1999, John Miskinis wrote:
> Sometime I will resume trying to get either external
> CDROM to work, but for now I have a lot of cool things
> to check out.
I gues, the CDROM must be pressent at boot time. I have made the following
experience with the internal CDROM of my TP 770: If
Hello,
Many thanks to all those who helped. I am now
up and running 2.1 debian, using full 800x600
and 256 colors on my Thinkpad 560.
I am using the X that comes with 2.1, and it's fine.
It took a lot of playing around, but I'm there.
Sometime I will resume trying to get either external
CDROM
Hello,
Yesterday I got the distribution up, after coping the CD #1 over
to my C: in Win95, and copying the files in each "binary-all" that
ral, replacing the 0K ones in "binary-i386" to satisfy install. I
was underway, and did not see the post about the "dselect" overrides,
but my strategy worke
Hi,
I'm having lots of problems installing Debian 2.1, which are related
to the installation program; I use the the "Custom" option in the profile
list and then I select 4 or 5 profiles to use.
The installation begins normally, but after few packages it hangs
due to a failure
Pann McCuaig wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 05:32:17PM -0400, Scott McMillan wrote:
> >
> > I have the following questions:
> >
> > - Has anyone been successful with the LinuxMall CD's? If so, how
> >did you get it to work.
>
> If you select the multi-cd option, you need to start with C
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 05:32:17PM -0400, Scott McMillan wrote:
[snip!]
> know which CD to start with). Each time during the Install step
> it would say 'Skipping deselected package: *' hundreds of times and
> nothing seemed to get installed. It was as if the whole Profile step
> was totally ig
Scott McMillan wrote:
> I have been running a Slackware distribution for over 3 years, and
> recently (with the purchase of a Sony laptop) decided to give Debian
> a try. I ordered the Debian 2.1 2 CD set from Linux Mall and
> received them today.
>
> I got through all the in
I have been running a Slackware distribution for over 3 years, and
recently (with the purchase of a Sony laptop) decided to give Debian
a try. I ordered the Debian 2.1 2 CD set from Linux Mall and
received them today.
I got through all the initial installation stuff with no problem,
and then it
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 09:00:31PM +1200, Darran Provis wrote:
> hi, I'm trying to install 2.1 (i386).
> I have purchased Linux on CD's but I have a sound blaster CD-rom drive so the
> install won't recognise the CD drive. I know I need to make a boot disk with
> the correct drivers on it but, I
hi, I'm trying to install 2.1 (i386).
I have purchased Linux on CD's but I have a sound blaster
CD-rom drive so the install won't recognise the CD drive. I know I need to make
a boot disk with the correct drivers on it but, I need to know where to find the
drivers etc and how to make the flop
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, August 09, 1999 9:32 PM
Subject: XFree86 3.3.3.1 .deb files for Debian 2.1
> I would like to install Xfree86 3.3.3.1 on Debian 2.1 and do not know
which
> .deb files to download. I would appreci
I would like to install Xfree86 3.3.3.1 on Debian 2.1 and do not know which
.deb files to download. I would appreciate any help.
*- On 9 Aug, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about "XFree86 3.3.3.1 on Debian 2.1"
> I am attempting to install Debian 2.1 on a Compaq Presario 1255 laptop
> computer with Neomagic video. I noticed a "News and Announcements" item
> from May 21 on www.debian.org/~branden &l
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 12:36:36PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am attempting to install Debian 2.1 on a Compaq Presario 1255 laptop
> computer with Neomagic video. I noticed a "News and Announcements" item
> from May 21 on www.debian.org/~branden <http://www.debian.
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 12:36:36PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am attempting to install Debian 2.1 on a Compaq Presario 1255 laptop
> computer with Neomagic video. I noticed a "News and Announcements" item
> from May 21 on www.debian.org/~branden <http://www.debian.
I am attempting to install Debian 2.1 on a Compaq Presario 1255 laptop
computer with Neomagic video. I noticed a "News and Announcements" item
from May 21 on www.debian.org/~branden <http://www.debian.org/~branden> ,
that indicates a XFree86 3.3.3.1 package that could be installe
Holy smoke! I didn't know one could get that much into a Subject
header!!!
--
__ _
Mark Wagnon Debian GNU/ -o) / / (_)__ __ __
Chula Vista, CA /\\/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _\_v/_/_//_/\_
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
