Gilles Mocellin:
> Le 08/11/2015 00:27, Jochen Spieker a écrit :
>>
>> Does anybody know an alternative to dspam, that I can integrate with
>> Postfix and Dovecot? I want to be able to train the filter for
>> individual users by doing something like moving mail into
tests they are enabled by default). I found it also
rather difficult to configure. So I stayed with dspam, which despite
not being more developped is robust and does its job : bayesian
filtering.
I have now removed it from the main mail path, but am still sending
spam and ham retraining
found it also rather
difficult to configure. So I stayed with dspam, which despite not
being more developped is robust and does its job : bayesian filtering.
I have now removed it from the main mail path, but am still sending spam
and ham retraining requests to it. It has now stayed up for a
Le 08/11/2015 01:51, Gilles Mocellin a écrit :
> Le 08/11/2015 00:27, Jochen Spieker a écrit :
>> Sven Arvidsson:
>>> On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 19:21 +, Alan Chandler wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> How can I find out why dpam is falling over
>>> If it's
Le 08/11/2015 00:27, Jochen Spieker a écrit :
Sven Arvidsson:
On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 19:21 +, Alan Chandler wrote:
[...]
How can I find out why dpam is falling over
If it's the same dspam that was previously in Debian, it has been
removed and is apparently no longer developed, so
Sven Arvidsson:
> On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 19:21 +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> [...]
>> How can I find out why dpam is falling over
>
> If it's the same dspam that was previously in Debian, it has been
> removed and is apparently no longer developed, so maybe looking for
On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 19:21 +, Alan Chandler wrote:
[...]
> How can I find out why dpam is falling over
If it's the same dspam that was previously in Debian, it has been
removed and is apparently no longer developed, so maybe looking for
alternatives would be a better option?
--
I run a small raspberry pi as my home mail server.
Over the last couple of days, my wife has reported to me that she hasn't
seen any mail for a while.
After a bit of investigation I found that if I did
service dspam status
It would show its status as active(exited).
In order to sta
Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2014, 21:23:20 schrieb Erwan David:
> >> This does not seem to scale well with different spam/ham token set per
> >> user.>
> > Huh? Just copy the CRM114 folder to another home and empty the spam/ham
> > token files?
>
> In my setup there are no home dir, no users on server.
;>>>>> and having tried once. So I just weed out spam manually which works
>>>>>>> okay
>>>>>>> cause policyd-weight catches most of them on the server already.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am currently in the proces
t; >>>>> okay
> >>>>> cause policyd-weight catches most of them on the server already.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am currently in the process of setting up my Postfix + Dovecot
> >>>>> installation with IMAP additionally t
working so I can edit filter
>>>>> rules on IMAP server with newest KMail.
>>>>>
>>>>> Next step is to install dovecot-antispam and integrate it with CRM114 on
>>>>> the server. Either with a copy of my existing CRM114 installation on the
>&
IMAP additionally to POP3.
> >>>
> >>> I already have IMAP working, route all mail to me to POP3 + IMAP account
> >>> (with different users) and got managesieve working so I can edit filter
> >>> rules on IMAP server with newest KMail.
> >>>
> &
IMAP additionally to POP3.
> >>>
> >>> I already have IMAP working, route all mail to me to POP3 + IMAP account
> >>> (with different users) and got managesieve working so I can edit filter
> >>> rules on IMAP server with newest KMail.
> >>>
> &
Le 18/07/2014 14:52, Chris Bannister a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:56:42PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
>> dspam being removed from debian, I am looking for a replacement, that is :
>> an email content filter, working on server with per user rules and
>> possibly co
ot-antispam and integrate it with CRM114 on
>>> the server. Either with a copy of my existing CRM114 installation on the
>>> laptop or with a new setup.
>>>
>>> I didn´t complete this yet. I think it can work quite well.
>> Did you find the tutorial foir in
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:56:42PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> dspam being removed from debian, I am looking for a replacement, that is :
> an email content filter, working on server with per user rules and
> possibly compatible with dovecot-antispam for training.
What about bogofil
Jonathan Dowland:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:26:56PM +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote:
>
>> Ok, I already fail at the first step: call crm114 from Postfix so that
>> it uses user-specific spam/ham CSS files. My web search suggests nobody
>> has ever done that before. I don't use procmail but Dovecot's
on on the
> > laptop or with a new setup.
> >
> > I didn´t complete this yet. I think it can work quite well.
>
> Did you find the tutorial foir integrating postfix and crm114 ?
>
> On crm114 it is mentioned with a link to the "add-ons" page of postfix
&g
ther with a copy of my existing CRM114 installation on the laptop
> or
> with a new setup.
>
> I didn´t complete this yet. I think it can work quite well.
Did you find the tutorial foir integrating postfix and crm114 ?
On crm114 it is mentioned with a link to the "add-ons" page
Hello!
Am Freitag, 18. Juli 2014, 12:10:44 schrieb Jonathan Dowland:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:26:56PM +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> > Ok, I already fail at the first step: call crm114 from Postfix so that
> > it uses user-specific spam/ham CSS files. My web search suggests nobody
> > has ever
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:26:56PM +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Ok, I already fail at the first step: call crm114 from Postfix so that
> it uses user-specific spam/ham CSS files. My web search suggests nobody
> has ever done that before. I don't use procmail but Dovecot's LDA for
> mail sorting w
Jochen Spieker:
> Erwan David:
>>
>> dspam being removed from debian, I am looking for a replacement, that is :
>> an email content filter, working on server with per user rules and
>> possibly compatible with dovecot-antispam for training.
>
> I am looking a
Erwan David:
>
> dspam being removed from debian, I am looking for a replacement, that is :
> an email content filter, working on server with per user rules and
> possibly compatible with dovecot-antispam for training.
I am looking as well. Dovecot-antispam supports crm114 which I use
dspam being removed from debian, I am looking for a replacement, that is :
an email content filter, working on server with per user rules and
possibly compatible with dovecot-antispam for training.
What do you use for this ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 18:26 -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> where are the template notification files for the debian installation?
Try this:
dpkg -L dspam
You might see something familiar in the listing.
--
greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The technology that is
Stronger, better, faster: Li
where are the template notification files for the debian installation?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think this is a debian package thing, not dspam.
But I have user .pref files and the option to put them into the database.
And they are both there and they both conflict...
How do you I resolve this?
I would prefer to use the database if I could.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
p to include the word SPAM in the subject. And it adds an
> X-DSPAM header to every mail noting if it is innocent or (in theory) spam.
>
> yet just today I have received some 480 pieces of spam marked innocent.
> That doesn't sound like 98.09% accuracy to me!
Hmm...are you sending
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
OK, it believes it's catching spam. Do you have it set to quarantine, or
simply pass the mail with something in the headers indicating Spam?
I have set it up to include the word SPAM in the subject. And it adds an
X-DSPAM header to every
On Thursday 27 July 2006 13:00, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
> > I've implemented dspam on a Debian system. Have you trained dspam yet?
>
> Um I think so...
>
> > It
> > will not filter out of the box, it must be traine
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
I've implemented dspam on a Debian system. Have you trained dspam yet?
Um I think so...
It
will not filter out of the box, it must be trained.
I have used dspam_train (the web frontend does not work out of the box)
with balanced amoun
On Thursday 27 July 2006 08:59, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Has anyone successfully implemented dspam as a postfix content filter?
> I've followed the instructions in README.postfix and while mail is being
> filtered by dspam, 100% of it is marked as innocent. Which kind of
> defea
Has anyone successfully implemented dspam as a postfix content filter?
I've followed the instructions in README.postfix and while mail is being
filtered by dspam, 100% of it is marked as innocent. Which kind of
defeats the purpose of a spam filter don't you think?
I suspect
Hi list
Im just testing me new dspam setup
Would some guys on the list please send a test email
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Much appreciated
Kind Regards
Brent Clark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brent Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Hi
|
| Anyone know if there is any Dspam deb packages somewhere on the net.
|
| Kind Regards
| Brent Clark
|
# Architectures: all, i386
deb http://www.heydon.com.au/debian unstable/
deb-src http://www.heydon.com.au/debian unstable/
de
Hi
Anyone know if there is any Dspam deb packages somewhere on the net.
Kind Regards
Brent Clark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Daniel L. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040519 20:36]:
> Are there any plans to make a Debian package for dspam?
Yes, see http://bugs.debian.org/195948 .
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
PS: A quick view on http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/requested would
have answered your
Are there any plans to make a Debian package for dspam?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there anybody on this list who have successfully compiled dspam on
a Debian machine?
I have had no success so far with the configure script ending in
checking db.h usability... yes
checking db.h presence... yes
checking for db.h... yes
checking for db_strerror in -ldb-4.1... no
configure
40 matches
Mail list logo
