Le 08/11/2015 01:51, Gilles Mocellin a écrit : > Le 08/11/2015 00:27, Jochen Spieker a écrit : >> Sven Arvidsson: >>> On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 19:21 +0000, Alan Chandler wrote: >>> [...] >>>> How can I find out why dpam is falling over >>> If it's the same dspam that was previously in Debian, it has been >>> removed and is apparently no longer developed, so maybe looking for >>> alternatives would be a better option? >> Oh, crap. Thanks for the hint. I am also using dspam. I have it >> configured as content filter in Postfix. >> >> Does anybody know an alternative to dspam, that I can integrate with >> Postfix and Dovecot? I want to be able to train the filter for >> individual users by doing something like moving mail into/out of a junk >> folder in Dovecot. >> >> J. > Hello, > > I use now rspam : https://rspamd.com/ > > I found a blog in French describing the configuration, for postfix and > dovecot : > http://philpep.org/blog/rspamd-un-antispam-performant > > > >
I had a look at rspam and did not use it : i find it far too much invasive, it practically impose tons of tests that I do not want to be done because of false positives. (and worse when a new version comes with new tests they are enabled by default). I found it also rather difficult to configure. So I stayed with dspam, which despite not being more developped is robust and does its job : bayesian filtering.
