On 11/23/23 18:18, Curt wrote:
On 2023-11-21, Greg wrote:
Hi there,
I'm using following command to backup:
rdiff-backup backup /home/ 'orfeusz::/mnt/backup/home'
and get the following:
WARNING: this command line interface is deprecated and will disappear,
start using the new one as describe
On 2023-11-21, Greg wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm using following command to backup:
>
> rdiff-backup backup /home/ 'orfeusz::/mnt/backup/home'
>
> and get the following:
>
> WARNING: this command line interface is deprecated and will disappear,
> start using the new one as described with '--new --h
Greg (12023-11-21):
> I'm using following command to backup:
>
> rdiff-backup backup /home/ 'orfeusz::/mnt/backup/home'
>
> and get the following:
>
> WARNING: this command line interface is deprecated and will disappear, start
> using the new one as described with '--new --help'.
>
> Unfortuna
Hi there,
I'm using following command to backup:
rdiff-backup backup /home/ 'orfeusz::/mnt/backup/home'
and get the following:
WARNING: this command line interface is deprecated and will disappear,
start using the new one as described with '--new --help'.
Unfortunately I'm unable to transla
Well, I started down the dependency chain and rolling back libasound2 is
resulting in a deep and dark hole. I think I shall stop while I only
have one non-working package.
It crossed my mind to try and rebuild the audacity package which, in all
my years of using Debian I've never tried before. S
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 07:34:02 -0600
Nate Bargmann wrote:
Hello Nate,
>Can I blame it on not being quite awake enough a couple of hours ago?
Certainly; I would. :-)
>Thanks, Brad.
YW.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately
* On 2018 14 Nov 07:15 -0600, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 06:31:22 -0600
> Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> Hello Nate,
>
> >I'm seeing the same thing, however I've been unable to find the versions
> >of the packages you list, so I am stuck without a working Audacity.
>
> Look for Debian S
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 06:31:22 -0600
Nate Bargmann wrote:
Hello Nate,
>I'm seeing the same thing, however I've been unable to find the versions
>of the packages you list, so I am stuck without a working Audacity.
Look for Debian Snapshot - they'll be on there somewhere.
https://snapshot.debian.o
* On 2018 11 Nov 12:47 -0600, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote:
> After a lot of googling, trial and error I solved the issue
> downgrading libasound2 and related packages to version 1.1.6:
>
> libasound2_1.1.6-1_amd64.deb
> libasound2_1.1.6-1_i386.deb
> libasound2-data_1.1.6-1_all.deb
> libasound2-dev_1.1
a problem with Audacity 2.2.2 and Pulseaudio 12.2-2.
>
> I can't select pulse neither as recording or playback device.
>
> I can select "default" on playing device, and it appears in
> pavucontrol and I can manage it.
>
> But audacity doesn't appear in the rec
Hello.
I upgraded a machine to sid. Everything seems to work just fine but I
noticed a problem with Audacity 2.2.2 and Pulseaudio 12.2-2.
I can't select pulse neither as recording or playback device.
I can select "default" on playing device, and it appears in
pavucontrol and
On March 7, 2004 02:32 pm, Ville Koivisto wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Could anyone gime me instructions how to remove KDE 2.2.2 completely
> from my system? I'd like to install the new 3.2 version of KDE and
> before doing that the old one should be removed. Apt didn't do the
>
Hallo,
>Hi!
>
>Could anyone gime me instructions how to remove KDE 2.2.2 completely from my
>system? I'd like to install the new 3.2 version of KDE and before doing that
>the old one should be removed. Apt didn't do the job with 'apt-get remove
>kde' and I
Hi!
Could anyone gime me instructions how to remove KDE 2.2.2 completely from my
system? I'd like to install the new 3.2 version of KDE and before doing that
the old one should be removed. Apt didn't do the job with 'apt-get remove
kde' and I have no clue what could
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 03:14, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Hi.
>
> After 2.5 months of not updating a sarge-box, I took the plunge
> and made it an up-to-date sarge+sid box.
>
> Most things seem to work, except there's no window manager.
> Gnome fires up, and I can run programs, but only in single-task
>
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 04:14, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Hi.
>
> After 2.5 months of not updating a sarge-box, I took the plunge
> and made it an up-to-date sarge+sid box.
>
> Most things seem to work, except there's no window manager.
> Gnome fires up, and I can run programs, but only in single-task
>
Hi.
After 2.5 months of not updating a sarge-box, I took the plunge
and made it an up-to-date sarge+sid box.
Most things seem to work, except there's no window manager.
Gnome fires up, and I can run programs, but only in single-task
mode.
How can I tell Gnome to use Metacity?
I see instructions
s in the first place? Their
> home directories are NFS mounted from a fileserver (still Mandrake,
> kernel release 2.4.18, glibc version 2.2.2-4mdk), but other than that
> this is a pretty vanilla installation of Woody, so I expect that if
> we're having this problem somebody else mus
.4.18, glibc version 2.2.2-4mdk), but other than that
this is a pretty vanilla installation of Woody, so I expect that if
we're having this problem somebody else must have run across it;
nonetheless, all my attempts to STFW come up empty so far.
I've checked, and they do log out of KDE in an
I am using a current Debian/Sid. With or without "anti-aliasing fonts
"enabled, I cannot change fixed-width fonts from the control center. When I
click "choose" in that category of the control center->look and feel->fonts,
the screen garbles up, and will not allow me to do anything from the con
access the shares.
BTW this system never had the Debian Samba packages installed, so it
can't be a conflict with an existing programs.
Bill
John Griffiths wrote:
tried logging into SWAT as root?
At 01:24 AM 12/5/01 -0400, William Cooper wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to build Samba 2.2
the Debian Samba packages installed, so it
can't be a conflict with an existing programs.
Bill
John Griffiths wrote:
tried logging into SWAT as root?
At 01:24 AM 12/5/01 -0400, William Cooper wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to build Samba 2.2.2 on Potato (I need the pdc functions
fo
tried logging into SWAT as root?
At 01:24 AM 12/5/01 -0400, William Cooper wrote:
>Hello all,
>I'm trying to build Samba 2.2.2 on Potato (I need the pdc functions
>for a demonstration of Linux replacing Win NT/2K), but I keep running
>into a problem. I cannot get SWAT to
Hello all,
I'm trying to build Samba 2.2.2 on Potato (I need the pdc functions
for a demonstration of Linux replacing Win NT/2K), but I keep running
into a problem. I cannot get SWAT to authenticate any users to log in.
I know that there is no problem with the user name and pas
Earlier today I wrote about a broken Fujitsu F95 compiler. I did a bit
more testing:
First I did:
strings libc.so.6 | grep fstat
and got
fstatfs
fstatvfs
__fstatfs64
fstatvfs64
fstatfs64
__fstatfs
__fstatvfs64
fstat failed
I wonder what this means
Then I did a strace on an old an
libc-i686. From the changelog of glibc-2.2.2-3
currently waiting in incoming [1]:
* Disable building of optimized libs for now. I did not forsee the
problems involved with symbol skew between ld-linux.so.2 and the
optmized libc.so.6. As of now, I can see no way around this.
* Make lib
:-> "Romanenko" == Romanenko M A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have several Debian boxes (kernel 2.4.2 custom (kernels differ a little
> on variouse boxes), ldso 1.9.11-15 on all the boxes). I was able to
> successfully upgrade libc6 from 2.2.2-1 to
I have several Debian boxes (kernel 2.4.2 custom (kernels differ a little
on variouse boxes), ldso 1.9.11-15 on all the boxes). I was able to
successfully upgrade libc6 from 2.2.2-1 to 2.2.2-2 on two of the boxes,
but failed to on the third box. Here is the message I got:
[...]
(Reading database
;libc6-i586 or libc6-i686 to fix the problem, or don't upgrade until
>2.2.2-3 is available sometime tomorrow.
>
>Thanks to all those that did send bug reports.
>
>Ben
>
>
--
There is an old saying that if a million monkeys typed on a million
keyboards for a million years,
Ok, it is now a known issue (since I've gotten 5 bug reports over the
past 2 hours). Please refrain from sending more bug reports, and remove
libc6-i586 or libc6-i686 to fix the problem, or don't upgrade until
2.2.2-3 is available sometime tomorrow.
Thanks to all those that did send b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Should there be an urgency to upgrade to 2.2r2 if you just using
> debian 2.2 R0 as a workstation with samba. I am the only Linux
> workstation on the Lan so I am behind a firewall.
So? Do
Should there be an urgency to upgrade to 2.2r2 if you just using debian 2.2 R0
as a workstation with samba. I am the only Linux workstation on the Lan
so I am behind a firewall. I can't program yet execpt for Hello World in Java,
C, and HTML (meaning I am very limited). I mainly use Netscape Gft
, installing all the new
> versions from the stable archives. Does this mean I now have a 2.2.2
> system, or will I need anything extra off the CDs (when they get released)?
> I'm assuming I don't really need the CDs, but I just wanted to check.
--
Stephan Koch
[ IT Coordinator
Hello
This is probably rather obvious and stupid, but I'm going to ask anyway.
I did a nice apt-get upgrade on my potato last night, installing all the new
versions from the stable archives. Does this mean I now have a 2.2.2
system, or will I need anything extra off the CDs (when the
Hellohow do you "upgrade" from 2.2.16 to 2.2.2?! I would really like to
know...
Patrick Cheong
Information Systems Assurance
Measat Broadcast Network Systems
e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit us at: http://www.astro.com.my
> -Original Message-
> From: Dale
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since
> this is evenly numbered does that mean it's a stable kernel? Are there
> any significant improvements over 2.2.16?
As many others have indicated,
pile it as I did with 2.2.16? (After my confusion
> over release numbers I would hate to botch this..)
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> Sven Burgener ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 12:01:12PM -0700, Dale L . Morris wrote:
> > > That's what I'
he /usr/src
> directory and compile it as I did with 2.2.16? (After my confusion
> over release numbers I would hate to botch this..)
>
> thanks
>
> Sven Burgener ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 12:01:12PM -0700, Dale L . Morris wrote:
> > >
e to botch this..)
thanks
Sven Burgener ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 12:01:12PM -0700, Dale L . Morris wrote:
> > That's what I'm confused about, I am thinking, perhaps in error that
> > 2.2.2 is a later version than 2.2.16. Is that wrong?
>
> Ye
Ok, I understand now, guess I was thinking in decimals and
overcomplicating it. Thanks for your replys
> I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since
> this is evenly numbered does that mean it's a stable kernel? Are there
> any significant impro
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 12:01:12PM -0700, Dale L . Morris wrote:
> That's what I'm confused about, I am thinking, perhaps in error that
> 2.2.2 is a later version than 2.2.16. Is that wrong?
Yes, 2 is smaller than 16. It's not ".20" versus ".16".
Regards
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Dale L . Morris wrote:
> I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since
> this is evenly numbered does that mean it's a stable kernel? Are there
> any significant improvements over 2.2.16?
> thanks
> -- d
2.2.16 is still the newest released "Stable" kernel
2.2.2 is more then a year old!
nate
"Dale L . Morris" wrote:
>
> I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since
> this is evenly numbered does that mean it's a stable kernel? Are th
Hi Dan,
That's what I'm confused about, I am thinking, perhaps in error that
2.2.2 is a later version than 2.2.16. Is that wrong?
Daniel E. Baumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Dale L . Morris wrote:
> > I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an up
I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since
this is evenly numbered does that mean it's a stable kernel? Are there
any significant improvements over 2.2.16?
thanks
-- dale
"Know thyself.."
Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:
>
> Oh, you don't want to forget to put:
>
> # enable forwarding
> echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>
> into /etc/init.d/network.
Hi.
The problem was on the forward chain that deny everything.
THANK YOU very much.
Oh, you don't want to forget to put:
# enable forwarding
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
into /etc/init.d/network.
Guido Bozzetto wrote:
> Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:
> >
> > Make sure you have debugging turned on and take a look at /var/log/ppp.log.
> > Messages
> > there should
Jens B. Jorgensen wrote:
>
> Make sure you have debugging turned on and take a look at /var/log/ppp.log.
> Messages
> there should give a better indication of what's going wrong. I use diald
> 0.16.5-3 also
Nothing, on the ppp.log there is nothing :-(
When I fire-up line with:
echo up > /var/
wrote:
> Hi,
> using diald with kernel 2.2.2 connections don't start (while with 'up
> request ' line goes up).
> Everything works correctly using kernel 2.0.36.
>
> Diald .deb version is 0.16.5-3.
> Netbase package is 3.12-2
>
> With the 2.2.2 kernel g
Hi,
using diald with kernel 2.2.2 connections don't start (while with 'up
request ' line goes up).
Everything works correctly using kernel 2.0.36.
Diald .deb version is 0.16.5-3.
Netbase package is 3.12-2
With the 2.2.2 kernel giving a 'route -n' I got:
Kernel IP
Hi,
I am getting some strange kernel messages. I did not happen
before. If I run a dmesg, the following is what I get, anyone know what it
is?? Thx.
bmap of 3a2,block 155 is 6fe6
super 200
bmap 156
result 6fe7
bmap of 3a2,block 156 is 6fe7
super 200
bmap 157
result 6fe8
bmap of 3a2,block 1
tion of it in the documentation.
I just completely reinstalled Debian a few days ago, using the slink
base2_1.tgz files. (Everything is from the "unstable" distribution,
however). Afterwards, I compiled 2.2.2. This makes the second time I've
had 2.2.2 running, and no "bad things" hav
I deleted rvplayer and reinstalled--no change. I wonder if some sites
have upgraded to a newer realaudio server which isn't compatible with
realplayer 5.0?
Bob
On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Jonathan Guthrie wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > Use rvplayer.deb installer. It has the wrappe
On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Joey Hess wrote:
> Use rvplayer.deb installer. It has the wrapper built in. Problem solved,
> painlessly.
...but only if you're using slink. I was already using hamm's installer
and it didn't have that file. I upgraded yesterday and all is as you
describe.
--
Jonathan Guthr
I am running slink with the 2.2.2 kernel and I can't seem to download
more than about 120M of data at once. Downloads just stop and do not
start up again. If I abort and resume then things pick up where I left
off but only for another chunk and it stops again. An example is when
I am tryi
On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Joey Hess wrote:
> Use rvplayer.deb installer. It has the wrapper built in. Problem solved,
> painlessly.
I've had trouble with rvplayer all along (I never got the integration with
netscape working, but could save the *.ram file and then invoke rvplayer
blah.ram and get it to
Bob Nielsen wrote:
>
> I have been running frozen for several months. As an example of a site
> which loads but doesn't play:
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/news/summary.ram
>
This might be problem that isn't related to realaudio, but to
sound i
Paul Nathan Puri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Has anyone else had problems with v2.2.2?
|
| I just downgraded to 2.2.0 because my ppp connections were sluggish, and
| my screen actually froze on me!
|
| I couldn't believe it. So now I'm running 2.2.0 just to see if I keep
| having these problem
I have been running frozen for several months. As an example of a site
which loads but doesn't play:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/news/summary.ram
On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Joey Hess wrote:
> Upgrade to frozen.,
>
> Bob Nielsen wrote:
> > I've been using the rvplayer debian package all along.
On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Jonathan Guthrie wrote:
[ snip ]
: personal Web site. http://www.brokersys.com/~jguthrie/rpopen.tar.gz
Your server is sending a MIME type of [text/plain] for this ...
--
Nathan Norman
MidcoNet 410 South Phillips Avenue Sioux Falls, SD
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] h
Upgrade to frozen.,
Bob Nielsen wrote:
> I've been using the rvplayer debian package all along. As I mentioned,
> since 2.2, it does work some of the time, but some sites just won't play
> at all (they work with 2.0.36 however).
>
> Bob
>
> On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > Use rvplay
I've been using the rvplayer debian package all along. As I mentioned,
since 2.2, it does work some of the time, but some sites just won't play
at all (they work with 2.0.36 however).
Bob
On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Joey Hess wrote:
> Use rvplayer.deb installer. It has the wrapper built in. Problem sol
Use rvplayer.deb installer. It has the wrapper built in. Problem solved,
painlessly.
Jonathan Guthrie wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> > > The problem is that the real player relies upon broken sound system
> > > drivers. There is a library that emulates the broken driver called
On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> > The problem is that the real player relies upon broken sound system
> > drivers. There is a library that emulates the broken driver called
> > rpopen.tar.gz. Have you tried that?
> Do you have a URL for this?
Oh, I have no idea where it came from. IS
On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Jonathan Guthrie wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, Bob Nielsen wrote:
>
> > I've been able to get it to work with some sites (which use video) and not
> > others. Does anyone know if Real is going to have an upgrade soon? G2?
>
> The problem is that the real player relies upon
On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> I've been able to get it to work with some sites (which use video) and not
> others. Does anyone know if Real is going to have an upgrade soon? G2?
The problem is that the real player relies upon broken sound system
drivers. There is a library that em
Has anyone else had problems with v2.2.2?
I just downgraded to 2.2.0 because my ppp connections were sluggish, and
my screen actually froze on me!
I couldn't believe it. So now I'm running 2.2.0 just to see if I keep
having these problems
Any other stories like this?
NatePuri
Certified Law
It's due to a BUG in 2.0.x kernel on which depends RealAudio.
(/usr/src/linux/Documentation/Changes)
On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 05:43:20PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] called Bob Nielsen
wrote a 0.5K and a 15 line message : "realaudio with 2.2.2" To Debian User List
:
> I saw s
Bob Nielsen wrote:
>
> I saw some messages about realaudio not working with 2.2.x.
>
> I've been able to get it to work with some sites (which use video) and not
> others. Does anyone know if Real is going to have an upgrade soon? G2?
I have a good friend who is a sysadmin for my isp (which
I saw some messages about realaudio not working with 2.2.x.
I've been able to get it to work with some sites (which use video) and not
others. Does anyone know if Real is going to have an upgrade soon? G2?
Bob
Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson, AZ
70 matches
Mail list logo
