Hi Dan, That's what I'm confused about, I am thinking, perhaps in error that 2.2.2 is a later version than 2.2.16. Is that wrong?
Daniel E. Baumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Dale L . Morris wrote: > > I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since > > this is evenly numbered does that mean it's a stable kernel? Are there > > any significant improvements over 2.2.16? > > thanks > > > > > > "Know thyself.." > > > > > > Huh? What do you mean 2.2.16 is an upgrade form 2.2.2? High erversion numbers > means newer release. The way the Linux kernel work is that if the middle > number is odd it is unstable (development verison) and if it is even it is > stable. > > Dan > Daniel E. Baumann E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (preferred) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (caution: dynamic DNS > > > service, may bounce) > > Web location: http://www.msoe.edu/~baumannd > http://www.linuxfreak.com/~baumannd > > "Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code." > > > -- "Know thyself.."
