On Mon, 17 May 2021 09:36:03 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> So I'd look for any non-bullseye holdover packages, and
> particlarly any that depend directly or indirectly on
> libgc1c2, probably via guile 2.2.
Interesting, thank you. I ran
apt-cache rdepends guile-2.2-libs /bullseye
able origin but kept back:
> Debian testing:
> guile-2.2-libs
>
> root@iorich:/etc/apt# apt list --upgradable -a
> Listing... Done
> guile-2.2-libs/testing 2.2.7+1-5.4 amd64 [upgradable from: 2.2.4+1-2+deb10u1]
> guile-2.2-libs/now 2.2.4+1-2+deb10u1 amd64 [installed,upgr
I upgraded a laptop from Buster to Bullseye recently. I had unattended
upgrades running, and have kept it running since. I have gotten the
following in the unattended upgrades report since:
Packages with upgradable origin but kept back:
Debian testing:
guile-2.2-libs
root@iorich:/etc/apt# apt
Squeeze to Wheezy several
>> months ago - I've had no problems with "authentication".
>
> Wheezy has 2.2 not 2.4
As packaged by Debian, yes, though someone (Florian?) 'was' going to
backport it. AFAIK that hasn't happened - yet. It might be possible to
hare how?
>>
>> What else is on it, and how was it setup? Plain Debian Wheezy, or
>> Ubuntu-fied Debian?
> I have a number of web servers updated from Squeeze to Wheezy several
> months ago - I've had no problems with "authentication".
Wheezy has
On 29/12/13 03:52, Dave Woyciesjes wrote:
> On 12/28/2013 11:09 AM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>> My modest-sized web server was recently upgraded. There were problems
>> with access control, fairly well documented and fairly easily fixed.
>>
>> Authentication, on the other hand, acts as if it's not th
On 12/28/2013 11:09 AM, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
My modest-sized web server was recently upgraded. There were problems
with access control, fairly well documented and fairly easily fixed.
Authentication, on the other hand, acts as if it's not there -- anyone
and everyone is let into the few parts
My modest-sized web server was recently upgraded. There were problems
with access control, fairly well documented and fairly easily fixed.
Authentication, on the other hand, acts as if it's not there -- anyone
and everyone is let into the few parts that used to be controlled. So
I have them offl
I an run Debian squeeze and i do use Iceape as Default if i have a
problem with other browser
I have Seamonkey 2.2 install in my home dir it was working before i
upgraded. I run it from the command line i get illegal instruction.
I did download it and ran it from the commmand line i get the
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Carlos Bergero wrote:
> ./tls_sessions.db: Berkeley DB (Btree, version 8, native byte-order)
> ./deliver.db: Berkeley DB (Btree, version 8, native byte-order)
> and there a a couple of cyrus DB files which readme upgrade ask to
> migrate with a cyrus tool which is not working a
Carlos Bergero writes:
--snip--
> Apparently for what i read in list and in web pages/lists/readme it
> might be a compatibility problem in Berkeley DB use by Cyrus.
--snip--
> So far im focused in trying to get this DB to the proper format
> version 9 in the standard Lenny install, and see what
Carlos Bergero wrote:
Apparently for what i read in list and in web pages/lists/readme it
might be a compatibility problem in Berkeley DB use by Cyrus.
Mmm, possible but IME BDB has an unfortunate tendency to create files
that are not cross-version-compatible. Upstream supposedly provides an
El 22/04/10 20:50, Carlos Bergero escribió:
Hi there list, got some trouble running a cyrus server, actually I
have an old setup running in Etch i386 without any trouble, virtual
mail server and all pgsql setup for backend and postfix for MTA, all
sweat. I installed a new server, better hardwar
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:18:31 -0300, Carlos Bergero wrote:
> Sorry forget to copy it
> tlsprune is disable now so it doesnt lock the start up of the cyrus
Next time use an online service (such Pastebin) to put the data and send
a link ;-)
(...)
> Both are mostly standar files.
Yep, I see nothi
After checking the DB files I found out the version im using in the etch
server uses Berkeley DB (Btree, version 8 native byte-order) while the
new lenny server is using Berkeley DB (Btree, version 9, native
byte-order) for at least the deliver.db and th tls_sessions.db, do you
agree this coul
Wojciech Ziniewicz escribió:
2010/4/23 Carlos Bergero :
I copied the old files, but also try to run with the original files of the
install, in both cases i have the same problema and files dont differ much.
did You copy cyrus database between servers too ?
regards
Yup I copied t
Sorry forget to copy it
tlsprune is disable now so it doesnt lock the start up of the cyrus
# Debian defaults for Cyrus IMAP server/cluster implementation
# see cyrus.conf(5) for more information
#
# All the tcp services are tcpd-wrapped. see hosts_access(5)
# $Id: cyrus.conf,v 1.16 2003/11/05 0
2010/4/23 Carlos Bergero :
> I copied the old files, but also try to run with the original files of the
> install, in both cases i have the same problema and files dont differ much.
>
did You copy cyrus database between servers too ?
regards
--
Wojciech Ziniewicz
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/
I copied the old files, but also try to run with the original files of
the install, in both cases i have the same problema and files dont
differ much.
Ezra Taylor escribió:
Did you do a fresh install of Cyrus Imap or copied over the config from your
old machine?
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 7:50
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 20:50:41 -0300, Carlos Bergero wrote:
> Hi there list, got some trouble running a cyrus server, actually I have
> an old setup running in Etch i386 without any trouble, virtual mail
> server and all pgsql setup for backend and postfix for MTA, all sweat. I
> installed a new ser
Hi there list, got some trouble running a cyrus server, actually I have
an old setup running in Etch i386 without any trouble, virtual mail
server and all pgsql setup for backend and postfix for MTA, all sweat. I
installed a new server, better hardware, using AMD64 dist, as Etch is
going to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
c++ -g -O2 -Wall -I./libs -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DBOOST_DISABLE_THREADS -
DLOGDIR=\"/home/oftn/ircd/oomon/logs\" -DETCDIR=\"/home/oftn/ircd/
oomon/etc\" -c adnswrap.cc
In file included from ./libs/boost/config.hpp:35,
from ./libs/boost/
c++ -g -O2 -Wall -I./libs -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DBOOST_DISABLE_THREADS -
DLOGDIR=\"/home/oftn/ircd/oomon/logs\" -DETCDIR=\"/home/oftn/ircd/
oomon/etc\" -c adnswrap.cc
In file included from ./libs/boost/config.hpp:35,
from ./libs/boost/utility/addressof.hpp:19,
from
Adrian Levi a écrit :
> When trying to install the latest virtualbox-2.2 from the virtualbox
> repo I get the following error:
>
> Cloud9:~# aptitude install virtualbox-2.2
> Reading package lists... Done
[...]
> 302 Moved Temporarily
> E: Failed to fetch
> http:/
On Sat, 2 May 2009 22:16:12 +1000
Adrian Levi wrote:
> When trying to install the latest virtualbox-2.2 from the virtualbox
> repo I get the following error:
>
> Cloud9:~# aptitude install virtualbox-2.2
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Re
2009/5/3 Peter Beck :
> On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 09:07 +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
>> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 03:58:19PM +0200, Peter Beck wrote:
>> > I'm also having this issues with my testing (x86) installation as well.
>> > On a german debianforum they said that a few days a go they gave
>> > this st
On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 09:07 +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 03:58:19PM +0200, Peter Beck wrote:
> > I'm also having this issues with my testing (x86) installation as well.
> > On a german debianforum they said that a few days a go they gave
> > this statement on the virtualbox we
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 03:58:19PM +0200, Peter Beck wrote:
> I'm also having this issues with my testing (x86) installation as well.
> On a german debianforum they said that a few days a go they gave
> this statement on the virtualbox website:
>
> "To comply with U.S. export regulations, VirtualB
I'm also having this issues with my testing (x86) installation as well.
On a german debianforum they said that a few days a go they gave
this statement on the virtualbox website:
"To comply with U.S. export regulations, VirtualBox downloads have
temporarily been moved to the Sun Download Center."
When trying to install the latest virtualbox-2.2 from the virtualbox
repo I get the following error:
Cloud9:~# aptitude install virtualbox-2.2
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states
As far as I can see, it should be possible to install Apache 1.3 and
Apache 2.2 together on the same server, but does anyone have
experience with such setup?
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Because it breaks the logical
On 10/14/2007 06:34 AM, Georgi Alexandrov wrote:
> Michael Shuler wrote:
>> The package is libapache-mod-ssl - install that, then run 'a2enmod ssl'
>> to enable the module in your apache configuration.
>
> That's wrong. ssl is included in the apache2 packages for Debian etch.
> You don't need a se
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 02:34:40PM +0300, Georgi Alexandrov wrote:
> > The package is libapache-mod-ssl - install that, then run 'a2enmod ssl'
> > to enable the module in your apache configuration.
> >
>
> That's wrong. ssl is included in the apache2 packages for Debian etch.
> You don't need a s
Michael Shuler wrote:
> On 10/11/2007 02:30 PM, Robert Cates wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> am I wrong - there's no (mod-) ssl package for the etch apache 2.2
>> server? I can I get my apache 2.2 server ssl enabled? Or do I need to
>> install/use the apache 1.3 pac
On 10/11/2007 02:30 PM, Robert Cates wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> am I wrong - there's no (mod-) ssl package for the etch apache 2.2
> server? I can I get my apache 2.2 server ssl enabled? Or do I need to
> install/use the apache 1.3 package for ssl support?
The package is libapac
Hi all,
am I wrong - there's no (mod-) ssl package for the etch apache 2.2
server? I can I get my apache 2.2 server ssl enabled? Or do I need to
install/use the apache 1.3 package for ssl support?
Thanks for your help,
Robert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 07:26 -0500, Sam Leon wrote:
>
> Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I am running lenny, and I would like to install openoffice.org-2.2. The
> > version in lenny is 2.0. In my etch machines, I used the oo-2.2 from
> > backports.o
Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
Hi!
I am running lenny, and I would like to install openoffice.org-2.2. The
version in lenny is 2.0. In my etch machines, I used the oo-2.2 from
backports.org. How can I install openoffice.org-2.2 in lenny?
Thanks in advance
Marcelo
oo2.2 is getting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/02/07 11:38, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am running lenny, and I would like to install openoffice.org-2.2. The
> version in lenny is 2.0. In my etch machines, I used the oo-2.2 from
> backports.org. How can I install
Hello,
accedently I gave a link to the german side of Open Office, but you should
find an english version or other languages there, too.
Greetings, Siraya
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://de.openoffice.org/downloads/quick.html?version=2.2
- Original Message -
From: "Marcelo Chiapparini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "debian-user"
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2007 6:38 PM
Subject: oo 2.2 in lenny?
Hi!
I am running lenny, and I would like to
Hi!
I am running lenny, and I would like to install openoffice.org-2.2. The
version in lenny is 2.0. In my etch machines, I used the oo-2.2 from
backports.org. How can I install openoffice.org-2.2 in lenny?
Thanks in advance
Marcelo
--
Marcelo Chiapparini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 09:25 +0100, Bob Cox wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Jim Seymour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Running Apache 2.2 on Debian testing and having no luck getting a
> > rewrite rule to work. Stra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jim Seymour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Running Apache 2.2 on Debian testing and having no luck getting a
> rewrite rule to work. Straight out of the rewrite guide I am trying the
> following to force the domain nam
Hi All,
Running Apache 2.2 on Debian testing and having no luck getting a
rewrite rule to work. Straight out of the rewrite guide I am trying the
following to force the domain name to always be displayed as
www.domain.com even when it is accessed as domain.com.
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond
Wayne Topa([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> I have a few questions for anyone that has gpsdrive working.
>
>
> 2. Do you have the << >> buttons (Under the Zoom Out button) working?
> They don't work here.
Disable the "Auto Best map" selection. Not only does this enable the
I have a few questions for anyone that has gpsdrive working.
1. If you are using it with kismet, do you have wireless AP's
being added the the gpsdrive map. Is yes, how did you get that to
work? Where did you put the icons (because there are very few in
the .deb package) compared
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 09:13:28AM -0600, Peter Michaux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My new hosting company has standard choices of Fedora Core 5 or 6 or
> Debian Sarge. They suggest Fedora Core because it comes with Apache
> 2.2 which I want. They say that they could install Debian Etch f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 09:13:28AM -0600, Peter Michaux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My new hosting company has standard choices of Fedora Core 5 or 6 or
> Debian Sarge. They suggest Fedora Core because it comes with Apache
> 2.2 which I want. The
Hi,
My new hosting company has standard choices of Fedora Core 5 or 6 or
Debian Sarge. They suggest Fedora Core because it comes with Apache
2.2 which I want. They say that they could install Debian Etch for me
because that has Apache 2.2 but Etch hasn't been officially released
yet so thi
Someone?
2006/11/17, Gunnar Björkdahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello everybody
I am working on a setup of both name-based and ip-based virtualHost:s in
Apache2.2 on a debian server.
Why I am mixing is because i will use SSL for the ip-based virtualHost:s.
Is there any problems mixing?
Could som
Hello everybody
I am working on a setup of both name-based and ip-based virtualHost:s in
Apache2.2 on a debian server.
Why I am mixing is because i will use SSL for the ip-based virtualHost:s.
Is there any problems mixing?
Could someone send me their configuration files from "sites-available" s
I upgraded my apache to version 2.2 and now when I start it, if the
auth_kerb module is enabled I get a Segmentation Fault.
Using the unstable branch. These are the versions:
- libapache2-mod-auth-kerb 5.1-1
- apache2.2-common 2.2.3-2
- libkrb53 1.4.4-3
I did a &quo
Lars Samuelsson wrote:
> With the new unstable update from yesterday (3/10-06) i believe, there was
> apache 2.2.3 included. But no mod_php package for the 2.2 version of
> apache, anyone has any idea when this will be available? J
Tonight's unstable fixes it, dist-upgrade and yo
Hmm, just wondering.
With the new unstable update from yesterday
(3/10-06) i believe, there was apache 2.2.3 included. But no mod_php package
for the 2.2 version of apache, anyone has any idea when this will be available?
J
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On 9/11/06, James Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm still interesting in knowing why people still use GCC-2.95 and the
> older kernels, 2.2 and 2.4. As for the kernels, it used to be that the
> older ones were more stab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/06 13:49, James Stevenson wrote:
>> On 9/11/06, James Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
[snip]
> As far as I know Debian sarge still installs from the net install
> cd with a 2.4.x kernel. It doesn't seem to have any problems that
> On 9/11/06, James Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm still interesting in knowing why people still use GCC-2.95 and the
> > > older kernels, 2.2 and 2.4. As for the kernels, it used to be that the
> > > older ones were m
On 9/11/06, James Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm still interesting in knowing why people still use GCC-2.95 and the
> older kernels, 2.2 and 2.4. As for the kernels, it used to be that the
> older ones were more stable since 2.6 was also a development se
> Hi,
> I'm still interesting in knowing why people still use GCC-2.95 and the
> older kernels, 2.2 and 2.4. As for the kernels, it used to be that the
> older ones were more stable since 2.6 was also a development series,
> but is it still the case.
> The most interestin
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 07:54:07PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm still interesting in knowing why people still use GCC-2.95 and the
> older kernels, 2.2 and 2.4. As for the kernels, it used to be that the
> older ones were more stable since 2.6 was also a d
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 07:54:07PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm still interesting in knowing why people still use GCC-2.95 and the
> older kernels, 2.2 and 2.4. As for the kernels, it used to be that the
> older ones were more stable since 2.6 was also a developm
Hi,
I'm still interesting in knowing why people still use GCC-2.95 and the
older kernels, 2.2 and 2.4. As for the kernels, it used to be that the
older ones were more stable since 2.6 was also a development series,
but is it still the case.
The most interesting issue is the usage of Linux
't realize I was using such an old kernel
> > > until I tried to install the linuxant wifi driver and it told me.
> > >
> > > On 5/17/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 14:07 -0500, Andrew Weaver wrote:
> > &g
nuxant wifi driver and it told me.
>
> On 5/17/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 14:07 -0500, Andrew Weaver wrote:
> > > I'm trying to upgrade my kernel from 2.2 to 2.4 by running:
> >
> > Jeezus, man, how old is your system
o testing. You appear to
be trying to jump at least one if not more releases, and that's not
likely to work very well.
.02
A
>
> On 5/17/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 14:07 -0500, Andrew Weaver wrote:
> >> I'm trying to upgrad
ROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 14:07 -0500, Andrew Weaver wrote:
> > > I'm trying to upgrade my kernel from 2.2 to 2.4 by running:
> >
> > Jeezus, man, how old is your system?
> >
> > By any chance, are you running a non-i386 system?
>
iver and it told me.
On 5/17/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 14:07 -0500, Andrew Weaver wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade my kernel from 2.2 to 2.4 by running:
Jeezus, man, how old is your system?
By any chance, are you running a non-i386 system?
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 14:07 -0500, Andrew Weaver wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade my kernel from 2.2 to 2.4 by running:
Jeezus, man, how old is your system?
By any chance, are you running a non-i386 system?
[snip]
>
> How can I get around this?
Kernel 2.2 is pretty darned ancient.
I'm trying to upgrade my kernel from 2.2 to 2.4 by running:
apt-get -f install kernel-image-2.4.27-2-686
but apt won't upgrade libc6 to version 2.3.6-7 because it's
not compatible with my current 2.2 kernel.
Here's what apt tells me:
Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.5-8 (u
Am 2006-01-23 09:04:42, schrieb Hodgins Family:
> Hey Michelle!
> This site might prove useful:
> http://public.planetmirror.com/pub/debian-cd/images
I know it and currently I am trying to download Potato (r7)...
After this I will try Slink (2.1r4 unfortunatly not r5).
And then there are not al
Hey Michelle!
I am creating a TByte Archive Server of Debian and I am searching for
older Official Debian-CD-Images. Generaly I am looking for 2.2.r7 but
yours 2.2r5 are better ethen nothing.
I am interested in a full copy of it (any architektures) but only
official Debian CD-Images. I
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> I think kernel options is probably the wrong road for you at this
> point. From your initial description of the graphics slanting to
> the right, I suggest that you have an improperly set X configuration.
> check the resolution and sync rates that your monitor/graphic
fglrx-installer.html
> >
> > have a look..
> >
> > ----- Original Message -
> > From: "Patrick Meade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To:
> > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:51 AM
> > Subject: Re: Graphics problems with X on iBook 2.2
&
k Meade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:51 AM
> Subject: Re: Graphics problems with X on iBook 2.2
>
>
>
>>I think it's an ATI Raedon. Do you know a/the command to verify this
>>under Debian?
>>
>>Patrick
&
t;>> - Original Message - From: "Patrick Meade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To:
>>> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:26 AM
>>> Subject: Graphics problems with X on iBook 2.2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/flavio.stanchina/debian/fglrx-installer.html
have a look..
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Meade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: Graphics problems with X on iBook 2.2
>I think it's an
IL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:26 AM
Subject: Graphics problems with X on iBook 2.2
Hopefully this is the right list to ask these questions. If not, gently
refer me to the proper list. :-)
I've just installed Debian 3.1 r1a on my Apple iBook. I bought it
y 23, 2006 11:26 AM
> Subject: Graphics problems with X on iBook 2.2
>
>
>
>>Hopefully this is the right list to ask these questions. If not, gently
>>refer me to the proper list. :-)
>>
>>I've just installed Debian 3.1 r1a on my Apple iBook. I bought it in
what is the type of ur display card?
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Meade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:26 AM
Subject: Graphics problems with X on iBook 2.2
>
> Hopefully this is the right list to ask these questions. If not, ge
Hopefully this is the right list to ask these questions. If not, gently
refer me to the proper list. :-)
I've just installed Debian 3.1 r1a on my Apple iBook. I bought it in
2002, so from what I've been able to gather from online docs, it's an
iBook 2.2; although I'm not sure
Hello Paul,
I am creating a TByte Archive Server of Debian and I am searching for
older Official Debian-CD-Images. Generaly I am looking for 2.2.r7 but
yours 2.2r5 are better ethen nothing.
Do you have the binarys only or with sources?
I am interested in a full copy of it (any architektures
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 22:13 -0700, Paul E Condon wrote:
> > > I need to do an install of Debian 2.2 (potato) to do some maintenance on
> > > an old application. The author claims it will only run on the 2.2
> > > kernel, and I want to eliminate as many variables as po
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 03:38 -0700, Hodgins Family wrote:
> Good morning!
>
>
> J.Moore wrote:
> > I need to do an install of Debian 2.2 (potato) to do some maintenance on
> > an old application. The author claims it will only run on the 2.2
> > kernel, and I want
J.Moore wrote:
I need to do an install of Debian 2.2 (potato) to do some maintenance on
an old application. The author claims it will only run on the 2.2
kernel, and I want to eliminate as many variables as possible.
Potato installs kernel 2.0 by default, Woody might be what you're after
Good morning!
J.Moore wrote:
I need to do an install of Debian 2.2 (potato) to do some maintenance on
an old application. The author claims it will only run on the 2.2
kernel, and I want to eliminate as many variables as possible.
I finally located the 2.2 distro on archives.debian.org, but
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 01:23:51AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> J.Moore wrote:
> > I need to do an install of Debian 2.2 (potato) to do some maintenance on
> > an old application. The author claims it will only run on the 2.2
> > kernel, and I want to eliminate as many
w you to request specific versions.
Good luck
-Steve
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 06:42 pm, J.Moore wrote:
> I need to do an install of Debian 2.2 (potato) to do some maintenance on
> an old application. The author claims it will only run on the 2.2
> kernel, and I want to eliminate as man
J.Moore wrote:
> I need to do an install of Debian 2.2 (potato) to do some maintenance on
> an old application. The author claims it will only run on the 2.2
> kernel, and I want to eliminate as many variables as possible.
You need a 2.2 kernel, not a distribution with that version numbe
I need to do an install of Debian 2.2 (potato) to do some maintenance on
an old application. The author claims it will only run on the 2.2
kernel, and I want to eliminate as many variables as possible.
I finally located the 2.2 distro on archives.debian.org, but have not
been able to find the
I can run X ok and startkde, but I need kdm to provide user logins a
la kde.
A line in /etc/init.d/kdm features the debug level. I uncommented this
and now kdm presents a login fine (irrespective of kernel), but very,
very slowly.
But - wait for it - I re-commented the bebug line and kdm
Andreas Janssen wrote:
Hello
Joe Mc Cool (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
I have just just upgraded from woody to sarge, no problem.
But when I upgrade from the 2.2.20 kernel to 2.4.27-2-686, kdm will
not start.
In /var/log/syslog I get error messages like:
Jun 27 17:47:24 s
Andreas Janssen wrote:
Hello
Joe Mc Cool (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
I have just just upgraded from woody to sarge, no problem.
But when I upgrade from the 2.2.20 kernel to 2.4.27-2-686, kdm will
not start.
In /var/log/syslog I get error messages like:
Jun 27 17:47:24 solaris kdm: :0[6
Hello
Joe Mc Cool (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I have just just upgraded from woody to sarge, no problem.
>
> But when I upgrade from the 2.2.20 kernel to 2.4.27-2-686, kdm will
> not start.
>
> In /var/log/syslog I get error messages like:
>
> Jun 27 17:47:24 solaris kdm: :0[610]: Hung in X
Please, if this is a FAQ, my google searches can't find it.
I have just just upgraded from woody to sarge, no problem.
But when I upgrade from the 2.2.20 kernel to 2.4.27-2-686, kdm will not
start.
In /var/log/syslog I get error messages like:
Jun 27 17:47:24 solaris kdm: :0[610]: Hung in XO
like that), and they should be
installed under /lib/modules/2.2.20/
You should be able to find it with "find /lib/modules | grep ipchains",
or "locate ipchains.o"
But if it is there, as it should be, then a simple "modprobe ipchains"
ought to load it.
I don't hav
nsmod it would
do the trick ?!?
But in which package is it ?
Thanks for your answers so far...
Pierre A.
From: Sam Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org,"Pierre A. Damas"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: no ipchains with 2.2/no network with 2.4
Dat
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 04:53:10PM +0100, Pierre A. Damas wrote:
> Since I installed the woody distribution, I am the happy owner of a
> kernel 2.2.
> I would like to use ipchains, but it is "not supported in this
> Kernel", so I searched everywhere to find an ipchains.o
y old Pentium-MMX 200 65Mb RAM, two network adapters
(ne and 8139too).
Prerequisite: I don't want to compile my kernel myself (insmod
should be sufficient), certainly not on that machine (which is my
only linux).
I understood that ipfwadm is used for kernel 2.0, ipchains for 2.2
and iptabl
Cameron G wrote:
> I'm just wondering, what's the best practice for upgrading a default
> installation 3.0 installation to the latest and greatest? I'd really
> rather avoid rolling my own kernels, it always ends up being a pain to
> maintain, and I have several servers to look after. The reason I
1 - 100 of 1444 matches
Mail list logo
