Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-25 Thread csj
On November 20, 2003 at 8:50PM -0800, "Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:49:14AM +, ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:23:48 +0800 > > csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, > > > Karsten M. Se

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-25 Thread csj
On November 21, 2003 at 7:27PM +0800, "David Palmer." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:24:16 + > ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:50:09 -0800 > > "Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:49:14AM +, ben

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-21 Thread David Palmer.
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:24:16 + ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:50:09 -0800 > "Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:49:14AM +, ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:23:48 +0800 > > > csj <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-21 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:24:16AM +, ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:50:09 -0800 "Karsten M. Self" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:49:14AM +, ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > wrote: > yeah, i was one of those to whose addresses you felt yours

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-21 Thread ben
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:50:09 -0800 "Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:49:14AM +, ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:23:48 +0800 > > csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, > > > Karsten M. Sel

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-20 Thread Karsten M. Self
Mr. Folkert has a grudge against me from another forum in which a rather flagrently explosive fest of fabrication of history and rules, failure to stand by prior statements, gross personal abuse, spinelessness in standing up for justice (with few exceptions), and violation of personal confidences,

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-20 Thread Greg Folkert
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 23:50, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:49:14AM +, ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:23:48 +0800 > > csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, > > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > > > > > on Tu

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-20 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:49:14AM +, ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:23:48 +0800 > csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > > > on Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:19:48AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-18 Thread csj
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 04:49:14 +, ben wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:23:48 +0800 > csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > > > on Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:19:48AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > On Mon, 17 Nov

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-18 Thread ben
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:23:48 +0800 csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > on Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:19:48AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:48:14 -0800, > > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > > > [..

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-18 Thread csj
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:27:44 -0500, Wayne Topa wrote: > > csj([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > > > on Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:19:48AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:48:14 -

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-18 Thread Wayne Topa
csj([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > on Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:19:48AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:48:14 -0800, > > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > >

Re: *plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-18 Thread csj
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:54:17 -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > on Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:19:48AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:48:14 -0800, > > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > As several (in or out of the) closet anarchists have replied > > > th

*plonk* Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-17 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:19:48AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:48:14 -0800, > Karsten M. Self wrote: > > [...] > > > As several (in or out of the) closet anarchists have replied > > that self-control is apparently beyond their mein, I'll remind > > them that con

Re: Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-17 Thread csj
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:48:14 -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote: [...] > As several (in or out of the) closet anarchists have replied > that self-control is apparently beyond their mein, I'll remind > them that consequences for actions are also their > responsibility. Including finding themselves igno

Re: [OT] RE: Opium (Proposal?)

2003-11-17 Thread David Palmer.
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:32:09 -0500 Alfredo Valles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 17 November 2003 11:33 am, Colin Watson wrote: > > > > No, the way to avoid the flamewars is for you to be less selfish and > > have them somewhere else where they might actually be approximately > > on-topic.

[OT] RE: Opium (Proposal?)

2003-11-17 Thread Alfredo Valles
On Monday 17 November 2003 11:33 am, Colin Watson wrote: > > No, the way to avoid the flamewars is for you to be less selfish and > have them somewhere else where they might actually be approximately > on-topic. This is *debian-user*, so please keep threads here at least > vaguely related to Debian

References (was Re: *plonk* (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium))

2003-11-17 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 07:11:18PM +0100, Nicos Gollan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:05:33 -0800 > "Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > *plonk* > > Sadly, all that you'll get from plonking a participant of a high-volume > spam thread is dozens of zombie threads

Re: *plonk* (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-17 Thread Nicos Gollan
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:05:33 -0800 "Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > *plonk* Sadly, all that you'll get from plonking a participant of a high-volume spam thread is dozens of zombie threads in your inbox :-/ -- Got Backup? Jabber: Shadowdancer at jabber.fsinf.de pgp0.pgp Desc

*plonk* (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-17 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 05:49:41PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:19:39 -0600, > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Lincoln, Abe - Commander In Chief shot, during war-time, by enemy > > operative. > > ..a merce

Code of Conduct (was Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium)

2003-11-17 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 04:33:01PM +, Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 04:38:15PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > ..bull, the way to avoid the flame wars is use the newsgroup interface > > and a newsreader, and simply weed out those useless threads you don't > >

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-17 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 05:59:14 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 09:16, Pigeon wrote: > I thought places like France didn't like us because they're un- > grateful bastards who still think they're a super-power. ..I think it is f

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-17 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:19:39 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Lincoln, Abe - Commander In Chief shot, during war-time, by enemy > operative. ..a mercenary? -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bea

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-17 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 04:38:15PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > ..bull, the way to avoid the flame wars is use the newsgroup interface > and a newsreader, and simply weed out those useless threads you don't > wanna download. No, the way to avoid the flamewars is for you to be less selfish and have

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-17 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 05:29:12 -0600, "Hoyt Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > - Original Message - > From: "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, November 16, 20

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-17 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 01:04, cr wrote: > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 09:52, Tom wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 06:51:41PM +0800, csj wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 17:32:22 -0600, > > > > > > Hoyt Bailey wrote: > > > > > > [1] For those (particularly non-US citizens) who don't > > > > > > know, back

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-17 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 09:16, Pigeon wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 08:46:11AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:21:00 -0600, > > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 23:44, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > > On S

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-17 Thread Hoyt Bailey
- Original Message - From: "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 17:00 Subject: Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 02:12:48PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > Folks, could you please take this

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-17 Thread Lajos Mester
please. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-17 Thread Rohan Nicholls
I don't even know where to begin with this Basically you are beautifully demonstrating the results of a culture of fear with bad guys around every corner. I haven't been in this mindset since I was less than 5 when there were monsters in the closet and under the bed. Apparently they now hi

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread John
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 02:12:48PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > Folks, could you please take this off-topic thread somewhere else, > perhaps to private e-mail? Let's get back to Debian. > > Thanks, Sigh.. Good try Colin. Not a good way to present Debian/Linux for people subscribing to this

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 04:29:46PM +, Pigeon wrote: > Personally, I think the Queen should have intervened. It was in her > name too, and I don't think she was exactly enthusiastic about it. Yeah, usually she keeps an ear out for stuff that the no

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:21:12AM -0800, Tom wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 12:24:05PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > ..ofcourse, the _next_ bunch will have to learn takeoff and landings, > > simply to avoid suspicion. And, they will look just like

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 01:22:54AM -0800, Tom wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:42:13AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote: > [more horseshit] > > I figured you'd say something like that. Dangling reference. Please http://learn.to/quote/ - -- .''`. Pau

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:47:03PM -0800, Tom wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 02:31:36AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote: > [a bunch of horseshit] > > The terrorists are trying to get into the US via Canada. When was American security ever Canada's problem t

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 14:01:23 -0500, ScruLoose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 01:22:54AM -0800, Tom wrote: > > [Some manure of his own] > > > I think you are not a very nice person. You are *really* hurting my > > feelings. > > Tom, I'm so

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread ScruLoose
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 01:22:54AM -0800, Tom wrote: [Some manure of his own] > I think you are not a very nice person. You are *really* hurting my > feelings. Tom, I'm sorry you chose to take this as a personal attack. That is honestly not how it was intended. I don't condone calling you a re

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Pigeon
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:47:03PM -0800, Tom wrote: > So it is not unlikely that some of the people I saw in Europe are indeed > terrorists, especially when THEY LOOK AND ARE OBVIOUSLY ACTING EXACTLY > LIKE IT. What does a terrorist look and act exactly like then? Do they wear Osama Bin Laden T

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Pigeon
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 08:46:11AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:21:00 -0600, > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 23:44, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:52:00 -0800, > > > Tom <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Pigeon
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 04:44:48AM -0800, Tom Ballard wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 12:48:40PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 03:21:12 -0800, > > Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 12:24:05PM +0100, Arnt Karl

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 04:44:48 -0800, Tom Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 12:48:40PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 03:21:12 -0800, > > Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Colin Watson
Folks, could you please take this off-topic thread somewhere else, perhaps to private e-mail? Let's get back to Debian. Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Tom Ballard
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 12:48:40PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 03:21:12 -0800, > Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 12:24:05PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > ..ofcourse, the _next_ bunch will have to learn takeoff

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread ben
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 23:47:03 -0800 Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 02:31:36AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote: > [a bunch of horseshit] > > The terrorists are trying to get into the US via Canada. > The terrorists are often students living abroad in Germany. > > It would be racis

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 03:21:12 -0800, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 12:24:05PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > ..ofcourse, the _next_ bunch will have to learn takeoff and > > landings, simply to avoid suspicion. And, they will look just lik

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Tom
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 12:24:05PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > ..ofcourse, the _next_ bunch will have to learn takeoff and landings, > simply to avoid suspicion. And, they will look just like you, redneck. > To avoid suspicion. Your call. ;-) Why is it socially acceptable to call me a redneck

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 01:22:54 -0800, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:42:13AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote: > [more horseshit] > > I figured you'd say something like that. > > How do you think Mohammad Attah looked/acted before 911? How do yo

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Tom
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:42:13AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote: [more horseshit] I figured you'd say something like that. How do you think Mohammad Attah looked/acted before 911? How do you think the guys who showed up to get flying lessons but didn't want to looked/acted? Don't you think that peo

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread ScruLoose
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:47:03PM -0800, Tom wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 02:31:36AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote: > [a bunch of horseshit] Hehe! Now, that's funny. I bring you references from your own country's press, reporting that your government is detaining people indefinitely, without chargi

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread ScruLoose
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 01:02:43AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 00:21, ScruLoose wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:49:28PM -0600, Hoyt Bailey wrote: > > > > > > The reason the 2nd is there is so that King xyz or our own goverment will > > > never take our freedom. With a

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Tom
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 02:31:36AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote: [a bunch of horseshit] The terrorists are trying to get into the US via Canada. The terrorists are often students living abroad in Germany. It would be racist if I said "every muslim in Europe is a terrorist". It is not racist to note t

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:21:00 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 23:44, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:52:00 -0800, > > Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > The whole reaso

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread ScruLoose
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 10:42:57PM -0800, Tom wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 01:21:55AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote: > > Great theory. Shame it's such a dismal failure in practice. > > People have been getting "disappeared" lately in The States. Somebody > > whispers "terrorist" and you get the mid

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread cr
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 09:52, Tom wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 06:51:41PM +0800, csj wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 17:32:22 -0600, > > > > Hoyt Bailey wrote: > > > > > [1] For those (particularly non-US citizens) who don't > > > > > know, back in the mid-1990s, 2 white teenagers from a > > > > >

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-16 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 00:21, ScruLoose wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:49:28PM -0600, Hoyt Bailey wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: "Ron Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 04:51, csj wrote: > > > > > > > > I have never owned a gun and I haven't shot anyone

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-15 Thread Tom
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 01:21:55AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote: > Great theory. Shame it's such a dismal failure in practice. > People have been getting "disappeared" lately in The States. Somebody > whispers "terrorist" and you get the midnight arrest, conviction in a > completely secret tribunal, fa

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-15 Thread ScruLoose
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:49:28PM -0600, Hoyt Bailey wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Ron Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 04:51, csj wrote: > > > > > > I have never owned a gun and I haven't shot anyone either. > > > Cultural differences I guess. In most othe

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-15 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 23:44, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:52:00 -0800, > Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > The whole reason nobody likes America is we are all the people in the > > world who told the rest of ya to fuck off, we're leaving :-) >

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-15 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:52:00 -0800, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > The whole reason nobody likes America is we are all the people in the > world who told the rest of ya to fuck off, we're leaving :-) ..uhmmm, you lift off firing all those nice siloed nukes? H

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-15 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 14:56, Paul Johnson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 06:51:41PM +0800, csj wrote: > > I have never owned a gun and I haven't shot anyone either. > > Cultural differences I guess. In most other countries, only war, > > crime

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-15 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 06:51:41PM +0800, csj wrote: > I have never owned a gun and I haven't shot anyone either. > Cultural differences I guess. In most other countries, only war, > crime and drug lords are allowed to own guns. It keeps the world >

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-15 Thread Hoyt Bailey
- Original Message - From: "Ron Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian-User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 10:59 Subject: Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium > On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 04:51, csj wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-15 Thread Tom
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 06:51:41PM +0800, csj wrote: > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 17:32:22 -0600, > Hoyt Bailey wrote: > > > > > > [1] For those (particularly non-US citizens) who don't > > > > know, back in the mid-1990s, 2 white teenagers from a > > > > affluent family walked into their High School arm

Re: [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-15 Thread David Palmer.
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 19:09:20 +0800 csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 23:09:37 +0100, > Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:39:31 -0600, > > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 02:22, Arnt Ka

Re: Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-15 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 04:51, csj wrote: > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 17:32:22 -0600, > Hoyt Bailey wrote: > > > > > > [1] For those (particularly non-US citizens) who don't > > > > know, back in the mid-1990s, 2 white teenagers from a > > > > affluent family walked into their High School armed with > > >

Totally [OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-15 Thread csj
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 17:32:22 -0600, Hoyt Bailey wrote: > > > > [1] For those (particularly non-US citizens) who don't > > > know, back in the mid-1990s, 2 white teenagers from a > > > affluent family walked into their High School armed with > > > rifles and pistols. They proceed- ed to blow away

[OT] Re: Opium

2003-11-15 Thread csj
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 23:09:37 +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:39:31 -0600, > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 02:22, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 22:56:11 -0600, > > > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL P