Hello *,
for those who are interested in...
Note: I love Debian because I like HOW it is!
Long live Debian!
- Forwarded message from Itamar - IspBrasil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:53:40 -0300
From: Itamar - IspBrasil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:19 AM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>
> I just felt like telling you the above because I have the impression that a
> misunderstanding of the above is the source of 90% of the problems
> encountered by people unfamiliar with Virtual
nk/include/apr_fnmatch.h?view=markup
--
/-\
| "If we couldn't laugh we would all go insane" |
| --Jimmy Buffett, |
| "Changes in Latitudes, Changes in Attitudes" |
\-/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zach Uram wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:54 PM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just a guess :
1) the new entry you have added to /etc/apache2/sites-available (and
sites-enabled) is called e.g. "darcs", which for some reason precedes
"default" in the direct
Please keep the discussion on list.
Did Florian's suggestion help?
- Forwarded message from Anton Liaukevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080509)
From: Anton Liaukevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:32:52 +0300
To
Please keep the discussion on list.
I wasn't the OP by the way. :-)
- Forwarded message from Clemens Haupt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5
From: Clemens Haupt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:24:15 +0200
To: Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECT
Chris Bannister wrote:
- Forwarded message from Ben Okopnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
From: Ben Okopnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 13:03:36 -0400
To: The Answer Gang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [TAG] 2-cent Tip: Poisoni
- Forwarded message from Ben Okopnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
From: Ben Okopnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 13:03:36 -0400
To: The Answer Gang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [TAG] 2-cent Tip: Poisoning the spammers
I saw a
On Monday 28 April 2008 04:15:05 pm Damon L. Chesser wrote:
> Dear Ron,
>
> if you do something sane, like remove that stupid spam wall you have up,
> you will most certainly receive back your confirmation email when you
> send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject
> li
Dear Ron,
if you do something sane, like remove that stupid spam wall you have up,
you will most certainly receive back your confirmation email when you
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject
line of "unsubscribe".
I will bet you your fanatical anti spam measure
Thought debian-user subscribers might be interested.
- Forwarded message from Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11)
From: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 16:46:53 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL P
Hi Johnathan,
I am forwarding your message to the debian-user list which is more
appropriate for a user question. The -devel list is for issue related to
the development of the Debian distribution.
Cheers,
Kev
- Forwarded message from Jonathan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Mon,
You have been unsubscribed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Should you wish to subscribe
again, simply send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 05:46:29PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Just replace "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
macro index , "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
macro pager , "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Thanks for forwarding it here, Chris. I trust this worked
Just replace "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
- Forwarded message from Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
From: Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:28:27 +0530
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/log/messages and syslog both have long lines of [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL
PROTECTED]@ and the
latest time stamp is (messages) Oct 28 23:44:02 and (syslog) Oct 30
03:55:25.
Otherwise the box looks mostly alright (functional), but I just tried
to install logrotate, and it wildly complains about everyt
I am using Debian/Etch 4.0.
I followed the instructions in /usr/share/doc/mailman as well as /etc/
mailman/postfix-to-mailman.py
and I am getting this error - : Relay access denied
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
Hello,
linphone worked fine, but suddenly I can't hear the echo test on
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I definitively use linphone (or linphonec in command line) but I installed
twinkle to
compare and I got the same result with twinkle as linphone.
I use Debian unstable. Kernel: 2.6.22-1-amd64
lspci |
Any suggestions on how to fix this?
I've tried:
pci=nommconf --- resulted in my normal problem, really slow internet/network
speeds
pci=conf1 -- resulted in my normal problem, really slow internet/network
speeds
pci=conf2 -- resulted in a kernel panic
Running either e100 or eepro100 di
Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hallo! Du (Mumia W..) hast geschrieben:
>
> > I'm getting multiple duplicate messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED] . At
>
> Do I understand correctly that this bot sends out this message when
> you post to d-user?
linux.debia
On Sep 30, Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do I understand correctly that this bot sends out this message when
> you post to d-user?
Looks like a debian-user subscriber created a mail loop, I stopped the
gateway while I am investigating.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
ef
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hallo! Du (Mumia W..) hast geschrieben:
> I'm getting multiple duplicate messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED] . At
> first I thought it might be a Thunderbird bug or a local configuration
> problem, but now I'm sure it's robomod's problem.
>
> It seems that messa
thing noisilty back to the posters.
You're not the only one to get them. This evening (around 30-Sep
00:02 UTC), I received 19 of them, with original email dates
stretching back to Wednesday 26-Sep.
Got some in my inbox too.
/KS
[...]
I'm getting multiple duplicate messages from [EMAIL
cts everything noisilty back to the posters.
>
> You're not the only one to get them. This evening (around 30-Sep
> 00:02 UTC), I received 19 of them, with original email dates
> stretching back to Wednesday 26-Sep.
>
Got some in my inbox too.
/KS
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTE
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG/xMIS9HxQb37XmcRAsUzAJ45uWaAZED1l8sr5yZZnvS2BCTWRACgs86T
sp0YKQ+/TBVc4tckwbc3gcY=
=apLX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
This is new. I've been getting these directly to me too after I post.
What can Debian do about this?
It seems that some newsgroup has decided to tie into the list but then
rejects everything noisilty back to the posters.
Doug.
- Forwarded message from Moderation Robot <[EMAIL P
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:46:59PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:55:01AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >
> > I"m baffled as I've got SA running and its definitely picking up a LOT
> > of stuff, but as I've said previously, the stuff that's getting
> > through my
On 9/10/07, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My ISPs SA (and not only) is really terrible. For a while I was missing
> a lot of posts from the list so I checked the Spam folder via the
I've seen a few of those false positives, but not very many, since I
switched over
On 9/10/07, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I"m baffled as I've got SA running and its definitely picking up a LOT
> of stuff, but as I've said previously, the stuff that's getting
> through my SA to my local mailboxes is the same stuff tha
On 09/10/2007 10:35 AM, Wayne Topa wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:15:19AM +0800, Michael Yang wrote:
It's annoying me .why there is so much spams in the list?
please read the archives from today, Sep 9/10 2007, as
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:55:01AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:00:28AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On 09/10/07 10:35, Wayne Topa wrote:
> > > Andrew Sackville-West([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > >> On Mon, Se
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:00:28AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 09/10/07 10:35, Wayne Topa wrote:
> > Andrew Sackville-West([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:15:19AM +0800, Michael Yang wrote:
> >>> It's annoying me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/07 10:35, Wayne Topa wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:15:19AM +0800, Michael Yang wrote:
>>> It's annoying me .why there is so much spams in t
Andrew Sackville-West([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:15:19AM +0800, Michael Yang wrote:
> > It's annoying me .why there is so much spams in the list?
>
> please read the archives from today, Sep 9/10 2007, as this issue has
>
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:15:19AM +0800, Michael Yang wrote:
> It's annoying me .why there is so much spams in the list?
please read the archives from today, Sep 9/10 2007, as this issue has
been discussed.
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
It's annoying me .why there is so much spams in the list?
hread. In both cases, I saw that my
message was accepted by the list, since I got a copy back. It seems
that the list sends it off to the OP, fails, and sends me this.
Is anyone else getting this?
Doug.
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Deliver
at my
> message was accepted by the list, since I got a copy back. It seems
> that the list sends it off to the OP, fails, and sends me this.
>
> Is anyone else getting this?
>
> Doug.
>
>
>
> - Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
>
> Envelope-to: [E
tting this?
Doug.
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:09:37 -0400
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:00:25 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Your message can not be delivered
To: [EMAIL
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 02:17:14PM -0500, Clemente Reyes Ricardo wrote:
> Hi everybody:
>
> I apologize, it was a wrong anti-spam filter in my email server.
> Don't worry about it the problem was fixed.
>
Clemente, thanks for your prompt attention. I was just about to send
turei to the blackhole.
Hi everybody:
I apologize, it was a wrong anti-spam filter in my email server.
Don't worry about it the problem was fixed.
Greetings,
Clemente.
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:38:48 -0500, Bob McGowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
ArcticFox wrote:
Anyone know what this mean
UBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 01:51:38PM +0930, Arthur Marsh wrote:
> Hi, the last bug I successfully submitted via reportbug was #429996.
on June 21...
>
> Since then I have attempted to submit a couple more bugs, but although I
> received my cc: email, there was no acknowlegement from the Debian Bu
can find on bugs.debian.org is #430392:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=430392
Is anyone else having troubles with the Debian Bug Tracking System?
Regards,
Arthur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/1/07, Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt Price([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> hi,
>
> i'm about to take off on a long road trip through the us and am
> planning the technological elements. I'm looking for advice on
> purchasing a gps
- Forwarded message from Gayle Lee Fairless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Gayle Lee Fairless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 23:27:09 -0500
To: Debian User List
Subject: Re: Install which Linux? (or avoiding dirty birds)
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#413933: zorp: policy.boot cannot be found,
which was filed against the zorp package.
It has been closed by Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you ha
Distinguido señor:
Somos un grupo de PROFESIONALES especializados en el POSICIONAMIENTO de
PAGINAS WEB. Si desea estar entre los 10 primeros en GOOGLE, contacte
nos en el Telf. 0033 170906629 (Francia) o en el Telf. 639745404
(España)o en el mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .Creación de
LINKS RECIPROCOS de
This pre-recorded message is being sent in response to your recent
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All routine administrative requests (including subscriptions and
unsubscriptions) concerning this mailing list are handled by an
automated server. Please read this message carefully to find the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Autoresponder
Sehr geehrter Absender,
vielen Dank für Ihre Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wir werden sie schnellstmöglich
an den zuständigen Kollegen weiterleiten.
Sollten Sie jedoch zu einem unserer Produkte technische oder inhaltliche Fragen
haben, wenden Sie
--- Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On (03/02/07 15:34), Gerard Robin wrote:
> > Hello,
> > my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50.
> > dist: etch.
> >
> > deborphan gives:
> >
> > libgmp3c2
> > libpisync0
> > libopal-2
cancel by original author
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 03:55:06AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Hi D-u,
> sorry for the forward from debian-devel-announce but...
sweet!
[... snipped d-i goodness ...]
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
from Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
We now have *lots* of CD and DVD types being built regularly, so maybe
a quick summary is in order:
Daily builds
* "etch" businesscard for each arch *except* s390 (small image, no
packages - just contains d-i)
* &q
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 06:11:40 +0100
"Michael Bonert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On booting my Debian system I get something like:
> -
> [sbin/fsck.ext3 (1) -- /mnt/mdk] fsck.ext3 -a -C0 /dev/hda11
> /dev/hda11: clean, 5765/130048 files, 1425960/2596497 blocks
OK,
2.53GHz
Memory: 512 MB
Install log: http://individual.utoronto.ca/bonert/debian_install.html
--
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have a Kyocera km 2030 printer connected to my local network ( it has
a network card), I am using sarge distro, I used CUPS, but no such
printer avaliable. So I tried to add ppd ( downloaded from linux
printing site). The printer is seen by the cups, the the output is
unreadable. I suppose t
Stephen G wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am running Debian3.1 with kernel 2.6.8-2-386 on a Dell Laptop. I am using
> it as a remotely accessed always-on server. It seems to run quite well, but
> sometimes after a few months, I get a "dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x20"
> error the file system (rei
el modification, or fstab/hdparm command,
or other filesystem that I should use that will prevent the drive going into
read-only mode?
Thank you for any help!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc# cat debian_version
cat: debian_version: Input/output error
from syslog:
Jul 1 13:55:54 localh
- Forwarded message from Jose Parrella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:53:14 -0400
From: Jose Parrella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: XMMS can no longer play CDs]
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:22:28AM +0200, Gilles SICHE wrote :
> Good morning,
>
> would anyone be able to tell me the best way to install a Sagem [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
> 800 modem on a Debian Sarge 3.1?
> I have found contradictory information on the net and I have been told
&
On 5/9/06, Gilles SICHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good morning,
would anyone be able to tell me the best way to install a Sagem [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
800 modem on a Debian Sarge 3.1?
I have found contradictory information on the net and I have been told
that the problems caused by this mod
Good morning,
would anyone be able to tell me the best way to install a Sagem [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
800 modem on a Debian Sarge 3.1?
I have found contradictory information on the net and I have been told
that the problems caused by this modem two or three years ago have
been solved : hence the out
The mail you sent to Wayne Christopher regarding "hello"
was not delivered, because [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses
are no longer being used.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arg... False file.
The previous one is broken!
Attached correct one.
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328
And last not least, the Syntax for the LIST file is easy:
: , , ...
Like for our friend:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which is as default installed. ;-)
If you have any questions, pleas
Paolo Pantaleo wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has an atni spam system that asks you to
"confirm" the sending of the email, to certify that you are a real
person... ok the idea may even be nice, but it is inacceptable on a
mailing list, I think. What if anyone that subscribed the list had
suc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has an atni spam system that asks you to
"confirm" the sending of the email, to certify that you are a real
person... ok the idea may even be nice, but it is inacceptable on a
mailing list, I think. What if anyone that subscribed the list had
such a system?
PAolo
if
On 2/26/06, Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are other people receiving emails like the one I've attached afterposting to debian-user?
I presume we all are. I've filtered _everthing_ from 'uol.com.br'
to go straight to my gmail trash (so if there's anythin
On 2/26/06, Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are other people receiving emails like the one I've attached after
> posting to debian-user?
>
> Is it possible to track down the person who's causing this and tell
> him/her to make sure the spamfilt
er in procmail to
>redirect all incomming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to ALL availlable E-Mails
>of UOL.
>
>I have blown there Mailboxes to the E-Mail-Hell.
>
>It seems, the have stoped to bother me with tonns of BS.
Feel like sharing the procmail recipe?
(I know I can go read the m
Am 2006-02-26 11:31:57, schrieb Magnus Therning:
> Are other people receiving emails like the one I've attached after
> posting to debian-user?
Several 1000' for which I have written an Forwarder in
procmail to redirect all incomming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
to ALL availlable E
Hello *,
this seems to be another instance of bug#208979, so forwarding this
message there.
Cheers,
Flo
- Forwarded message from Cedric BRINER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Cedric BRINER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bug with the mailing list archive
To: debian-user@lists.deb
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:45:12 +0100
"Wim De Smet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/24/06, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> > > Interestingly, there is no two-line instruction on your ma
On 2/24/06, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> > Interestingly, there is no two-line instruction on your mail.
> > I've noticed the same for some other people, too, but haven't chased it
> > dow
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 09:01:52PM -0700, Scott wrote:
> Alex Nordstrom spake thusly on 02/24/2006 10:06 AM:
> >Saturday, 25 February 2006 00:38, Kevin Mark wrote:
> >>Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
> >>It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
> >
>
Sunday, 26 February 2006 19:31, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Are other people receiving emails like the one I've attached after
> posting to debian-user?
Yes. Well, I was, until I spoke to my friendly mail server admins and
had them reject [EMAIL PROTECTED] at SMTP-time.
> Is it pos
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 12:47:50PM -0500, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 11:38:00AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> } Hi spam-killers,
> } Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
> } It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
>
> Sure, no problem.
0xAB4DFBA4)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://therning.org/magnus
Software is not manufactured, it is something you write and publish.
Keep Europe free from software patents, we do not want censorship
by patent law on written works.
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
rela
John Halton spake thusly on 02/24/2006 09:51 AM:
On 2/24/06, Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[1] Bounce as in mutt b. I don't know if and how this can be done in
thunderbird
Apparently the following extension allows bouncing using Thunderbird -
http://mailredirect
Alex Nordstrom spake thusly on 02/24/2006 10:06 AM:
Saturday, 25 February 2006 00:38, Kevin Mark wrote:
Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
Presumably, KMail users should also be able to participate.
And Thu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:40:04 +0200
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:08:17 -0600
> Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
>
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:08:17 -0600
Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:38:00 -0500
> Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi spam-killers,
> > Here is a new test system t
ique Holschuh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 01:06:27 +0800
Alex Nordstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, as a question of policy, are the half-dozen daily "unsubscribe"
> messages from those too illiterate to comprehend a two-line
> instruction added in caps to every message on the list c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:38:00 -0500
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi spam-killers,
> Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
> It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
> Cheers,
>
esn't think *I'm* sending spam.
} Cheers,
} Kev
--Greg
} - Forwarded message from Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
} Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:03:31 -0600
} To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
}
} Hallo! Du (Cord Beermann) hast geschrieben:
}
} >The idea of having a r
adows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> If you get spam via our lists, BOUNCE[1] it to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The way to seemingly achieve the same effect in KMail 1.9.1 is to use
Message->Forward->Redirect (shortcut: E). I believe older versions had
the same feature under Message->Bounce (whic
On 2/24/06, Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [1] Bounce as in mutt b. I don't know if and how this can be done in
> thunderbird
Apparently the following extension allows bouncing using Thunderbird -
http://mailredirect.mozdev.org/
Haven't looked into it any f
Hi spam-killers,
Here is a new test system to improve spam reporting in Debian.
It seems mutt users will be the primary ones to use this.
Cheers,
Kev
- Forwarded message from Cord Beermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:03:31 -0600
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
[]'s
Why do we fall ?
So we can learn to pick ourselves up.
Please do not CC me! Get a proper mailer instead: www.mutt.org
.''`.
: :' :
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Eduardo Rocha Costa
Curriculum e personal page:
http://www.virtualcompu
JFYI,
a blog entry from one of the ftp masters.
Cheers,
Flo
- Forwarded message from Ganneffs little Blog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Ganneffs little Blog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: packages.debian.org
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 22:42:50 -
Message
Read the mailing list signature and save yourself the hassle and us the
meaningless messages.
--
Chris Howie
http://www.chrishowie.com
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS/IT d-(--) s:- a--->? C++(+++)$> UL P$ L+++> E---
W++ N o++ K? w--$ O M- V- PS--(---) PE++ Y+ PGP++ t
Maio de 2006
http://www.ensol.org.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
off)
> IO_support = 0 (default 16-bit)
> unmaskirq= 0 (off)
> using_dma= 1 (on)
> keepsettings = 0 (off)
> readonly = 0 (off)
> readahead= 256 (on)
> geometry = 26548/16/63, sectors = 26760384, start = 0
>
>So I'm running in default 16-bit, I take it. I tried using the -c
> switch to change it to 32-bit, but it just displays
>
>/dev/hdc:
> IO_support = 0 (default 16-bit)
>
>how do I "set" the parameter to 32, rather than just displaying the
>current setting of 16-bit? Sorry, I'm super Linux dumb.
The -c takes an argument to change it, otherwise its just a query
operation. 0 = 16 bit, 1, 2, & 3 set other variations of the 32 bit
transfer modes.
Man hdparm is your friend.
--
Cheers, Gene
People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word
'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's
stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
refers to the partition. Most newbies
probably only have one big partition instead of multiple partitions like
I have above, so you might only see something like "/dev/hda1 on /".
If your system says something other than /dev/hda for most of your
mounts, then your "hdparm" comma
a= 1 (on)
keepsettings = 0 (off)
readonly = 0 (off)
readahead= 256 (on)
geometry = 26548/16/63, sectors = 26760384, start = 0
So I'm running in default 16-bit, I take it. I tried using the -c switch
to change it to 32-bit, but it just displays
/dev/hdc:
IO_support = 0 (default 16-bit)
how do I "set" the parameter to 32, rather than just displaying the
current setting of 16-bit? Sorry, I'm super Linux dumb.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
