On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:55:01AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:00:28AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On 09/10/07 10:35, Wayne Topa wrote: > > > Andrew Sackville-West([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:15:19AM +0800, Michael Yang wrote: > > >>> It's annoying me .....why there is so much spams in the list? > > >> please read the archives from today, Sep 9/10 2007, as this issue has > > >> been discussed. > > > > > > I am not seeing this spam so will have to go to the archives. Guess > > > murx/mailfilter works better then whatever the list uses. > > > > As must SA plus whatever my ISP uses. > > I"m baffled as I've got SA running and its definitely picking up a LOT > of stuff, but as I've said previously, the stuff that's getting > through my SA to my local mailboxes is the same stuff that's hitting > me through d-u. And its all got really high spam scores listed in the > d-u headers, so why is it getting through? and what is the threshold > at which murphy dumps it? There are a couple in my d-u inbox right now > with amavis scores of over 30 but they are called "OK". And they're > getting through my SA.... I need to tweak my SA so it always includes > the spam score (doesn't currently) and see what its scoring here. but > it almost seems like someone has figured out how to trick SA into > letting a high score through.
I'm not running SA, but my ISP does. Look what I get for two of those:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on relay1
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=INVALID_TZ_GMT,RCVD_BY_IP
autolearn=disabled version=3.1.1
and the second
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on relay2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE
autolearn=disabled version=3.1.1
My ISPs SA (and not only) is really terrible. For a while I was missing
a lot of posts from the list so I checked the Spam folder via the
webmail (which does not work with anything except Internet Explorer,
though it seems to be Squirrel webmail) and found the missing d-u mail.
I had to disable their filtering, which was also tricky to achieve as I
couldn't delete the default spam filter, so I just made another filter
which was moving all the "spam" to the inbox before the spam filter rule
could see them.
I thought of readjusting my maildrop rules to try to use the SA headers,
but seeing the high false positives and false negatives count I think
it's not worth it.
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstein)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
