On 28/04/2025 20:40, Stefan Monnier wrote:
That's the kind of solution I was hoping someone has developed enough to
iron out those major security issues (e.g. letting GDM do the chroot
before it changes its UID to that of the user).
See RootDirectory in systemd.exec(5). It can be set for specif
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 12:20 AM tomas wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 11:36:17PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 04:28:48PM -0400, Lee wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 3:33 PM wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > Hope that helps.
> > >
> > > Not particularly.
> > >
> > > Try
On Mon 28 Apr 2025 at 14:04, Mario Marietto wrote:
> ---> Applications started through ssh alone cannot be detached.
>
> Maybe this technique will work ?
>
>
> https://superuser.com/questions/1293298/how-to-detach-ssh-session-without-killing-a-running-process
>
This allows to detach text app
>> Is there some way to setup a machine such that one user can login into it
>> and see a Debian stable system, while another user can log into it (in
>> another vty) and get, say, a Debian sid system?
> When you say "while" you mean "at the same time"?
That's what I meant by "another vty", yes.
> The first way that I can think of is extremely hack-ish.
>
> Install stable normally, then install sid in a chroot using debootstrap.
> Add the desired user accounts to the sid system.
>
> Next, write a little C program that executes a command like
>
> chroot /sid /bin/su - getenv("LOGNAME")
* 2025-04-27 13:32:45-0400, Haines Brown wrote:
> I did a new installation of Debian and installed the locate pachage.
> But when I use it, nothing is retured:
> I know locate can be slow, but I waited a sufficient time. I suspect
> locate has to build a database, but my system has been running a
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 01:12:17PM +, mailinglists.accustom...@aleeas.com
wrote:
> On Monday, April 28th, to...@tuxteam.de
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > That was my guess. By now I think it is irrelevant, since we
> > advanced to the mDNS issue. At some point, it'd been interesting
> > whether y
On Monday, April 28th, to...@tuxteam.de
wrote:
>
>
> That was my guess. By now I think it is irrelevant, since we
> advanced to the mDNS issue. At some point, it'd been interesting
> whether yours were IPv4 zeroconf "link-local" addresses, i.e.
> in the 169.254.0.0/16 range: I'd bet they are :
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 12:40:54PM +, mailinglists.accustom...@aleeas.com
wrote:
> On Monday, April 28th, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > While it is a good idea to have tshark, we already know that
> > the OP's machine
> >
> > - is trying to resolve via mDNS
> > - that part is failing.
On Monday, April 28th, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
>
> While it is a good idea to have tshark, we already know that
> the OP's machine
>
> - is trying to resolve via mDNS
> - that part is failing.
Yeah, Thanks for understanding. There are couple of connection like
0.0.0.0:mdns and [::]:mdns that I
On Monday, April 28th, Anssi Saari - anssi.sa...@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi
wrote:
>
> Do you have a firewall in any computer? mdns uses UDP port 5353 and that
> would need to be allowed for it to work.
Yes, I have enabled firewall on both systems. But So was in the previous
system, and mDNS us
On Saturday, April 26, 2025 3:40:31 PM Central European Summer Time Detlef
Vollmann wrote:
> If mount considers a 'bind' mount a local mount, it could cause exactly
> the circle you're seeing.
>
>Detlef
Oh!! Removing that totally solved the issue!
Thank you so much!
---> Applications started through ssh alone cannot be detached.
Maybe this technique will work ?
https://superuser.com/questions/1293298/how-to-detach-ssh-session-without-killing-a-running-process
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 1:29 PM Loïc Grenié wrote:
> On Mon 28 apr, 2025, at 13:03, Mario Mariet
mailinglists.accustom...@aleeas.com writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I recently installed Debian on my old desktop, before this it was
> running Ubuntu. So my issue is before installing debian I was able to
> ping me other machine using ```ping hostname.local```, but after
> installing debian 12 I am not abl
Mario Marietto (HE12025-04-28):
> This seems to be an interesting alternative to compare to xpra also because
> it works even on FreeBSD (the OS that I use everyday) :
>
> https://winswitch.org/dev/
Please tell us if you find it useful once you have tested it throughly.
--
Nicolas George
Mario Marietto writes:
> This seems to be an interesting alternative to compare to xpra also because
> it works even on FreeBSD (the OS that I use
> everyday) :
>
> https://winswitch.org/dev/
It says in the FAQ it actually bundles xpra, NX and VNC. NX is what x2go
uses. So not an alternative, m
Could you please stop top-posting? Thank you!
--
Please do not CC me for listmail.
👱🏻 Jonathan Dowland
✎j...@debian.org
🔗 https://jmtd.net
This seems to be an interesting alternative to compare to xpra also because
it works even on FreeBSD (the OS that I use everyday) :
https://winswitch.org/dev/
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 11:57 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> Mario Marietto (HE12025-04-28):
> > Usually I check after that someone gave me
Mario Marietto (HE12025-04-28):
> Usually I check after that someone gave me some general idea.
Then I suggest you apply the same rule even more strictly to saying.
--
Nicolas George
Usually I check after that someone gave me some general idea. This helps me
to delimiter a perimeter of knowledge. Some alternatives could be also
useful :
https://alternativeto.net/software/xpra/
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 11:42 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> Mario Marietto (HE12025-04-28):
> > I thi
Mario Marietto (HE12025-04-28):
> I think i can detach an application with ssh and a proper parameter.
Checking is better than thinking without checking.
Be sure to tell us the results of your experiments.
--
Nicolas George
I think i can detach an application with ssh and a proper parameter. I dont
understand what performs better. And whats better for my InterCube Os idea.
Ssh or xpra or x2go.
Il lun 28 apr 2025, 11:29 Nicolas George ha scritto:
> Mario Marietto (HE12025-04-28):
> > whats the advantage of using xpr
Mario Marietto (HE12025-04-28):
> whats the advantage of using xpra over this command : ssh mark "DISPLAY=:0
> nohup firefox"
The ones I mentioned in the very first mail of this thread:
local server, just like forwarded X11 / ssh -X, except it is responsive
even over laggy ADSL links an
whats the advantage of using xpra over this command : ssh mark "DISPLAY=:0
nohup firefox"
Il lun 28 apr 2025, 10:56 Nicolas George ha scritto:
> Mario Marietto (HE12025-04-28):
> > What about wayland ?
>
> This ugly nightmare breaks window managers that were not re-written from
> scratch for it.
Mario Marietto (HE12025-04-28):
> What about wayland ?
This ugly nightmare breaks window managers that were not re-written from
scratch for it.
The only way I will be using Wayland would be if/when real X.org drivers
no longer support my GPU, and it will be with XWayland in root-full
full-screen
What about wayland ? can it attach and detach indivudual remote
applications ?
Il lun 28 apr 2025, 10:07 Nicolas George ha scritto:
> Hi.
>
> Anssi Saari (HE12025-04-27):
> > x2go isn't limited to full desktop, one can set it up to run one app or
> > what it calls "published apps" which basicall
Hi.
Anssi Saari (HE12025-04-27):
> x2go isn't limited to full desktop, one can set it up to run one app or
> what it calls "published apps" which basically means those remote gui
> apps with .desktop files. I haven't used it much recently though.
I am confused by your statement. My qualm about x2
27 matches
Mail list logo
