On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 01:12:17PM +0000, mailinglists.accustom...@aleeas.com wrote: > On Monday, April 28th, to...@tuxteam.de > <tomas_at_tuxteam_de_emhokk...@simplelogin.co> wrote: > > > > > > > That was my guess. By now I think it is irrelevant, since we > > advanced to the mDNS issue. At some point, it'd been interesting > > whether yours were IPv4 zeroconf "link-local" addresses, i.e. > > in the 169.254.0.0/16 range: I'd bet they are :-) > > > > ip -c a does 192.168.x.x, so
I won ;-) > > Note that posting such (local, non-routable) addresses is pretty > > harmless, since they won't be seen beyond your gateway, and many > > of us have some of those at home ;-) > > > > Yeah IP4 was local address but IP6 were global. Indeed: if everything is working as it should, those are more "interesting" (at least the ones not "fe80:..."). Cheers -- t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
