On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 03:24:32AM +0200, lee wrote:
>
> Klensin Standards Track[Page 71]
>
>
> RFC 5321 SMTP October 2008
>
>
>if this address is null ("<>"), the receiver-SMTP MUST NOT send a
>noti
On 10/17/2014 10:06 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:52:32 -0700
Jimmy Johnson wrote:
On 10/17/2014 07:54 AM, Rusi Mody wrote:
On Friday, October 17, 2014 8:00:02 PM UTC+5:30, Rob Owens wrote:
- Original Message -
Now let's see what happens with this!
https://lists.deb
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 23:06:53 -0700
Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 10:12 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 21:59:44 -0700
> > Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/17/2014 08:44 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
> >>> On 10/17/2014 10:22 PM, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> >>>
>
> What's the
On 10/17/2014 10:12 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 21:59:44 -0700
Jimmy Johnson wrote:
On 10/17/2014 08:44 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
On 10/17/2014 10:22 PM, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
What's the hurry, Squeeze is good until 2016, we have plenty of
time to test other init-systems.
You use
My sympathies, I don't think it's an obvious location (ie outside of
/etc/exim4) and I recall feeling similar when I eventually stumbled over it.
> On 18 Oct 2014, at 00:52, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> So, I just insert things the way I want them... and restart exim4?
Yes but I don't think the res
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 01:26:11 -0400
Doug wrote:
> /Snip/
>
> That's not the problem. A few people have recognized the problem(s).
> 1--Putting all your eggs (programs) in one basket. Making almost
> everything have a dependency on systemd. Registry, anyone?
> 2--Forcing the entire Linux communit
On 10/18/2014 12:59 AM, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
>
/snip/
>
> I think that depends on what solution you propose, smart people listen.
AMEN!
>
>
>> I can say that I long ago upgraded to Jessie/systemd so that I could be
>> the first to yell about it. I'm still looking at a 4 monitor/ 2 video
>> car
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 21:59:44 -0700
Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 08:44 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
> > On 10/17/2014 10:22 PM, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> What's the hurry, Squeeze is good until 2016, we have plenty of
> >> time to test other init-systems.
> >
> > You use KDE. Where you th
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:52:32 -0700
Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 07:54 AM, Rusi Mody wrote:
> > On Friday, October 17, 2014 8:00:02 PM UTC+5:30, Rob Owens wrote:
> >> - Original Message -
> >
> >>> Now let's see what happens with this!
> >>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/201
On 10/17/2014 08:44 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
On 10/17/2014 10:22 PM, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
What's the hurry, Squeeze is good until 2016, we have plenty of time to
test other init-systems.
You use KDE. Where you there when KDE3 became KDE4 and broke our hearts?
What a flame fest that was. Yet, you
On 17/10/14 01:01 PM, seeman doy wrote:
hello there,,,i had read Edward is just starting an installation,,,i
had started my installation of debian wheezy using the first CD of
debian stable...I don't have any idea what it looks like after
installing it,,,can u send me a picture or a screenshot
Hi,
I managed to install the sysvinit and purge the systemd, it works.
Just for the records,
Best regards, lina
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 08:58:37PM +0800, lina wrote:
>> I installed the lvm and its dependencies, it shows
>> /local-premount/
Ric Moore wrote:
On 10/17/2014 01:32 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 10/17/2014 1:29 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
I finished the thread right before I posted, and there were only 4
seconds.
Guess I missed some sub threads or something...
Oh well, glad to see it will get a vote...
The fun part will be to
On 18/10/14 12:34, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:15:01 -0700 (MST)
> Buntunub wrote:
>
>> Pierre Frenkiel wrote
>>> hi,
--8<>8---
> My suspicion at this point would be either a
> flaw in his smb.conf (which is easy to test by te
On 10/17/2014 07:54 AM, Rusi Mody wrote:
On Friday, October 17, 2014 8:00:02 PM UTC+5:30, Rob Owens wrote:
- Original Message -
Now let's see what happens with this!
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/10/msg1.html
Very interesting discussion there. Thanks for posting.
Joel Rees writes:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 8:18 AM, lee wrote:
>> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>>
>>> And, in fact, more and more ISPs are just accepting and discarding
>>> emails to non-existent users because rejecting such email helps spammers
>>> (any non-rejected email must be a valid user).
>>
>
Joe writes:
> Yes, although there should still be an audit trail. As I said to Harry
> the other day, if you have a message ID from the receiving server you
> (probably) can chase it up, and no reputable anti-spam software will
> drop a message without keeping a log stating that it has done so. I
Steve Litt writes:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 03:00:26 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>
>> But when it eats files and is 10 years behind, why are people buying
>> it?
>>
>> So how can we safely store large amounts of data?
>
> I thought Postgres was supposed to be powerful, stable, reliable, and
> great for l
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 10:20:25 +0900
Joel Rees wrote:
> According to what I understand as an engineer, everything that systemd
> does beyond the minimum (in other words, beyond being the ultimate
> backstop for signals and dying orphaned processes) should be
> delegated.
I would add that it should
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:15:01 -0700 (MST)
Buntunub wrote:
> Pierre Frenkiel wrote
> > hi,
> > it seems that tha last version of systemd in jessie (215-5+b1)
> > has a big number of bugs, among which the very long time to
> > shutdown, mainly
> > for samba (5 minutes). Trying to kill samba manually
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 17 October 2014 21:09:59 Dan Ritter wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 07:02:12PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> > On Friday 17 October 2014 18:30:31 Andre N Batista wrote:
>> > > I cannot believe some people still
>> > > thinks [snip] tha
Pierre Frenkiel wrote
> hi,
> it seems that tha last version of systemd in jessie (215-5+b1)
> has a big number of bugs, among which the very long time to shutdown,
> mainly
> for samba (5 minutes). Trying to kill samba manually before the shutdown
> did not solve the problem.
If this is the futur
Good work Ian. It is a well framed GR, and thank you to the seconds.
The previous post about the Social Contract is spot-on. I believe the
majority of folks who use Debian, do so because of the freedom of choice it
provides in their computing environment. We should not ever allow for or
accommodat
Radu Cotescu (google him) has packaged the drivers and a script which
installs Canon printers. Unfortunately his most recent script and drivers
are for Squeeze. I've modified his package for Wheezy, including the
latest Canon drivers, and successfully installed my LBP7200Cdn printer on
an i386 sy
Jonathan Dowland writes:
> iirc it's /etc/email-addresses. See also man etc-email-addresses
Oh man don't tell me its that easy... I've been fussing around
with this for a good while. I've read a good bit about it, Been thru
several key documents, but never heard mention of this file,
So, I
On Fri 17 Oct 2014 at 03:20:44 +0200, lee wrote:
> Brian writes:
>
> > Not that I'm suggesting setting up exim to offer an invalid HELO; it
> > will lead to trouble sooner or later. However, as a reason for mail
> > being rejected or not arriving it doesn't come top of the list.
>
> Not accepti
On Fri 17 Oct 2014 at 03:18:14 +0200, lee wrote:
> Brian writes:
>
> > On Mon 13 Oct 2014 at 04:06:27 +0200, lee wrote:
> >
> >> Harry Putnam writes:
> >>
> >> > lee writes:
> >> >
> >> > [...]
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the tips.
> >> >
> >> >>> SMTP>> EHLO 2xd
> >> >
> >> >> That's an inva
On Fri 17 Oct 2014 at 03:15:49 +0200, lee wrote:
> Brian writes:
>
> > On Mon 13 Oct 2014 at 04:12:04 +0200, lee wrote:
> >
> >> Jonathan Dowland writes:
> >>
> >> > On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 02:45:44PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
> >> >> > And if so, is that not acquired from /etc/hosts?
> >> >
maderios writes:
> Hi
> Excellent terminal (oddly not available in Debian) named Terminology
> 0.7 just released
Kinda cool, though rather slow compared to xterm.
Can it substitute tmux? Do you know how to change the foreground colour
through the settings?
--
Again we must be afraid of spe
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 23:51:34 +0300
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> I meant
>
> /etc/init.d/nmbd
> /etc/init.d/smbd
>
> Kind regards,
> Andrei
LOL, same here (in my advice on troubleshooting to Pierre)_.
SteveT
Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training *
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:44:41 +0200 (CEST)
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > are you all sure that the delay *does* happen during the shutdown of
> > Samba? If it turns out not to be Samba, you've just needlessly
> > chased your tail for hours or days.
>
>
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 08:06:11 -0400
Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:08:47PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Marty"
> > >
> > > It seems like free software employment and market share come with
> > > increasing risk to objectivity and tec
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 03:00:26 +0200
lee wrote:
> But when it eats files and is 10 years behind, why are people buying
> it?
>
> So how can we safely store large amounts of data?
I thought Postgres was supposed to be powerful, stable, reliable, and
great for lots of data.
SteveT
Steve Litt
Hello,
Could someone help with this printer?
I tried almost all installation help with Google - but the printer didn't
print anything.
Thanks
Brian writes:
> On Mon 13 Oct 2014 at 04:06:27 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> Harry Putnam writes:
>>
>> > lee writes:
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > Thanks for the tips.
>> >
>> >>> SMTP>> EHLO 2xd
>> >
>> >> That's an invalid helo string.
>> >
>> > Is a valid one made up of just the full fqdn?
>>
>>
John Holland writes:
> I don't see zfs as super fast, lvm based raid would be faster. But
> the snapshots and other features are awesome. I love cloning a vm
> instantly.
And not to forget the checksumming :)
The checksumming is the nicer the more data you store. But seriously
store large amo
Brian writes:
> On Mon 13 Oct 2014 at 04:12:04 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> Jonathan Dowland writes:
>>
>> > On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 02:45:44PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> >> > And if so, is that not acquired from /etc/hosts?
>> > snip
>> >> Egad ... I just noticed that was from a different machin
Jerry Stuckle writes:
> On 10/12/2014 10:24 PM, lee wrote:
>> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>>
>>> Among other things, legitimate MTAs have MX records. Anti-spam routines
>>
>> Who prevents a MUA from having an MX record and sending a HELO that
>> matches the RDNS entry? And what are these "other th
John Holland writes:
> http://zfsonlinux.org/faq.html#WhatKernelVersionsAreSupported
"Debian 7.0 (Wheezy) - x86_64"
Unfortunately, that isn't sufficiently recent.
--
Again we must be afraid of speaking of daemons for fear that daemons
might swallow us. Finally, this fear has become reasonab
Reco writes:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 03:33:15AM +0200, lee wrote:
>> > A correct guess. A recommended minimum is kernel 3.14 - [2].
>>
>> So this is a rather new feature. How reliable and how well does it
>> work?
>
> I wouldn't trust my data to that feature :) It has 'experimental' and
> 'bi
Brian writes:
> Not that I'm suggesting setting up exim to offer an invalid HELO; it
> will lead to trouble sooner or later. However, as a reason for mail
> being rejected or not arriving it doesn't come top of the list.
Not accepting invalid HELOs is pretty high on the list because it's a
very
On Friday 17 October 2014 21:09:59 Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 07:02:12PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Friday 17 October 2014 18:30:31 Andre N Batista wrote:
> > > I cannot believe some people still
> > > thinks [snip] that we should simply stick with
> > > the TC's authority reg
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
how come nmbd and smbd are launched, although the links in all /etc/rcxx
to /etc/init.d/samba have been removed ?
I found the answer: it was obvious but rather unexpected:
the samba packages installs in /etc/init.d
the samba AND nmbd and s
Dan Ritter wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 07:02:12PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2014 18:30:31 Andre N Batista wrote:
I cannot believe some people still
thinks [snip] that we should simply stick with
the TC's authority regardless what.
Surely no-one has ever said that?? Refe
On Vi, 17 oct 14, 22:26:02, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> >On Vi, 17 oct 14, 14:48:19, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> >>
> >> running: systemctl -a -t service | grep samba gives:
> >> samba.serviceloadedinactive deadLSB: ensure Samba
> >> da
Hi.
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:29:11 -0400
Ric Moore wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 03:27 PM, Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 20:20:29 +0200
> > Diogene Laerce wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On this page :
> >> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch10.en.html
> >>
> >
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Steve Litt wrote:
are you all sure that the delay *does* happen during the shutdown of
Samba? If it turns out not to be Samba, you've just needlessly chased
your tail for hours or days.
I'm quite sure, because:
1/ there are a lot of bug reports against samba about thi
On 10/17/2014 03:27 PM, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 20:20:29 +0200
Diogene Laerce wrote:
Hi,
On this page :
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch10.en.html
One says : "10.1.2.1 Manually checking which security updates are available
Debian does have a specifi
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 07:02:12PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 17 October 2014 18:30:31 Andre N Batista wrote:
> > I cannot believe some people still
> > thinks [snip] that we should simply stick with
> > the TC's authority regardless what.
>
> Surely no-one has ever said that?? Referenc
iirc it's /etc/email-addresses. See also man etc-email-addresses
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141017202729.gb16...@chew.redmars.org
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Vi, 17 oct 14, 14:48:19, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
running: systemctl -a -t service | grep samba gives:
samba.serviceloadedinactive deadLSB: ensure Samba daemons
are started (nmbd and smbd)
This still not answers to my questi
On Fri 17 Oct 2014 at 12:50:56 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 17 oct 14, 10:16:45, Mark Carroll wrote:
> > Steve Litt writes:
> > (snip)
> > > I'll also try to find a systemd-free alternative to LibreOffice, and to
> > > Gnumeric (Gnumeric will be tough, it's actually a good program).
> >
On 2014-10-17 21:42 +0200, Ric Moore wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 01:32 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> On 10/17/2014 1:29 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>>> I finished the thread right before I posted, and there were only 4 seconds.
>>
>> Guess I missed some sub threads or something...
>>
>> Oh well, glad to see it wil
On Vi, 17 oct 14, 20:20:29, Diogene Laerce wrote:
>
> Debian does have a specific tool to check if a system needs to be
> updated but many users will just want to manually check if any
> security updates are available for their system. "
...
> So does anyone know what tool he does refer to ?
The
On 10/17/2014 01:32 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 10/17/2014 1:29 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
I finished the thread right before I posted, and there were only 4 seconds.
Guess I missed some sub threads or something...
Oh well, glad to see it will get a vote...
The fun part will be to see who actually s
Hi.
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 20:20:29 +0200
Diogene Laerce wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On this page :
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch10.en.html
>
> One says : "10.1.2.1 Manually checking which security updates are available
>
> Debian does have a specific tool to check if a sys
On 10/16/2014 11:30 PM, Marty wrote:
On 10/16/2014 08:41 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
But, I consider it idiotic to bash Red Hat as ~anyone~ with the guts can
do what Bob Young did. Just gather some talented people together around
a kitchen table and create your own distro. That is perfectly legal and
On Fri 17 Oct 2014 at 13:11:23 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> For those of you using Claws-Mail, you can keep it systemd-free into
> the foreseeable future by disabling dbus, like this:
>
> ./configure --disable-dbus
>
> I've compiled Claws_Mail from source on Debian. It's fairly easy to do,
> it ca
Hi,
On this page :
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch10.en.html
One says : "10.1.2.1 Manually checking which security updates are available
Debian does have a specific tool to check if a system needs to be
updated but many users will just want to manually check if any
se
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Rusi Mody wrote:
> Seconds continue
>
> Bernhard R. Link
> Dimitri John Ledkov
> Arnaud Fontaine
> Thorsten Glaser
>
> And once again loud cheers for Ian Jackson and the seconds
Abso-Lutely!
[snip]
> However the contentiousness of this case clearly
On Friday 17 October 2014 18:30:31 Andre N Batista wrote:
> I cannot believe some people still
> thinks [snip] that we should simply stick with
> the TC's authority regardless what.
Surely no-one has ever said that?? References if someone has?
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Rusi Mody wrote:
> Seconds continue
>
> Bernhard R. Link
> Dimitri John Ledkov
> Arnaud Fontaine
> Thorsten Glaser
>
> And once again loud cheers for Ian Jackson and the seconds
>
> Some like Charles Plessy are distressed that this may be
> de-motivatin
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:56:16 -0700
Patrick Bartek wrote:
> Systemd is a done deal, but this may thwart the potential dependency
> issues:
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/616571/rss
After reading this, I triple my thanks to Ian. What he did took a lot
of guts, even though it was the right thing to
On 10/17/2014 1:29 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> I finished the thread right before I posted, and there were only 4 seconds.
Guess I missed some sub threads or something...
Oh well, glad to see it will get a vote...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 10/17/2014 1:01 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 at 12:38 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
>> On 10/17/2014 12:21 PM, Steve Litt
>> wrote:
>
>>> Thank you Ian, and the seconders, and everyone who is speaking up
>>> for (what I call) sanity.
>>
>> Still only 4 seconds though...
>
> Eh?
>
> I s
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:01:44PM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 at 12:38 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>
> > On 10/17/2014 12:21 PM, Steve Litt
> > wrote:
>
> >> Thank you Ian, and the seconders, and everyone who is speaking up
> >> for (what I call) sanity.
> >
> > Still only 4 seconds th
On Friday, October 17, 2014 10:10:02 PM UTC+5:30, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 12:21 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
> > Rusi Mody wrote:
> >> On Friday, October 17, 2014 8:00:02 PM UTC+5:30, Rob Owens wrote:
> >>> - Original Message -
> Now let
Just now ran thru the ncurses interface you get with dpkg-reconfigure
exim4.config
On question you are asked is if you want to put a different domain on
outgoing email I chose yes and inserted `newsguy.com'
I never saw a way to rewrite the lefthand side of outgoing email.
I need it to be `re
Hi all,
For those of you using Claws-Mail, you can keep it systemd-free into
the foreseeable future by disabling dbus, like this:
./configure --disable-dbus
I've compiled Claws_Mail from source on Debian. It's fairly easy to do,
it can exist in tandem with the existing Claws-Mail (obviously rena
Systemd is a done deal, but this may thwart the potential dependency
issues:
http://lwn.net/Articles/616571/rss
B
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org
- Original Message -
> From: "Tanstaafl"
>
> Still only 4 seconds though...
Not true: https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/10/msg00012.htm
There was an alternate proposal made by the Debian Leader. That may have only
gotten 4 seconds (I didn't count), but apparently it does not
On 10/17/2014 at 12:38 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 12:21 PM, Steve Litt
> wrote:
>> Thank you Ian, and the seconders, and everyone who is speaking up
>> for (what I call) sanity.
>
> Still only 4 seconds though...
Eh?
I see at least 8 seconds so far, even if we ignore one which may n
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 12:38:12 -0400
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 12:21 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
> > Rusi Mody wrote:
> >
> >> On Friday, October 17, 2014 8:00:02 PM UTC+5:30, Rob Owens wrote:
> >>> - Original Message -
> >>
> Now let's
On 10/17/2014 12:03 PM, Joe wrote:
> My point is that a mail server which is accepting mail for a domain
> needs to know the valid recipient list, and to *reject*, not bounce,
> mail for non-existent users during the SMTP transaction. Not
> controversial at all.
Ok, then no, you weren't clear at
On 10/17/2014 12:21 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
> Rusi Mody wrote:
>
>> On Friday, October 17, 2014 8:00:02 PM UTC+5:30, Rob Owens wrote:
>>> - Original Message -
>>
Now let's see what happens with this!
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 09:56:28 +0200 (CEST)
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> > The samba package does not properly clean up it's config files on
> > upgrades. See the RC bug that's filed against samba.
> >
> > Run "update-rc.d samba remove" to fix that.
> >
>
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
Rusi Mody wrote:
> On Friday, October 17, 2014 8:00:02 PM UTC+5:30, Rob Owens wrote:
> > - Original Message -
>
> > > Now let's see what happens with this!
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/10/msg1.html
>
> > Very interesting di
On Vi, 17 oct 14, 14:48:19, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
>
>running: systemctl -a -t service | grep samba gives:
>samba.serviceloadedinactive deadLSB: ensure Samba daemons
> are started (nmbd and smbd)
>This still not answers to my question.
Why are you grepping for 'samba'
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:02:22 -0400
Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 10/13/2014 4:21 AM, Joe wrote:
> > The intention is that the spam emails be accepted by a catch-all
> > domain-wide mail server, then later bounced by the one that holds
> > the mailboxes and knows the addresses are invalid.
>
> And that,
Rusi Mody wrote:
On Friday, October 17, 2014 8:00:02 PM UTC+5:30, Rob Owens wrote:
- Original Message -
Now let's see what happens with this!
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/10/msg1.html
Very interesting discussion there. Thanks for posting.
-Rob
Thank you Ian Jackson a
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Martin Read wrote:
> On 17/10/14 14:10, francis picabia wrote:
>
>> The problem is with finding terminals. I often have over 60
>> open at once. The task bar or whatever it is called
>> in XFCE stacks the open Konsoles, but the listing
>> of them is probably by
On Friday, October 17, 2014 8:00:02 PM UTC+5:30, Rob Owens wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > Now let's see what happens with this!
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/10/msg1.html
> Very interesting discussion there. Thanks for posting.
> -Rob
Thank you Ian Jackson and al
Hello,
On Friday 17 October 2014 15:09:46 Nilesh Kumar wrote:
> Sir,
Some of us are female. It is politer not to address women as "Sir".
> I was trying to install Debian with cinnamon desktop manager, and found
> that the current stable release does not support cinnamon desktop manager.
> so wa
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 07:39:46PM +0530, Nilesh Kumar wrote:
> 1. Can I install cinnamon desktop manager on current stable release of
> wheezy, if yes please provide a link explaining the procedure.
I don't know the answer to 1., I'm answering 2.:
> 2. Can i download the *Jessie* release with to
Sir,
I was trying to install Debian with cinnamon desktop manager, and found
that the current stable release does not support cinnamon desktop manager.
so wanted to download *Jessie *release, but cound't find the torrent file,
so request you to answer 2 questions
1. Can I install cinnamon desktop
- Original Message -
> From: goli...@riseup.net
>
> Now let's see what happens with this!
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/10/msg1.html
Very interesting discussion there. Thanks for posting.
-Rob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On 17/10/14 14:10, francis picabia wrote:
The problem is with finding terminals. I often have over 60
open at once. The task bar or whatever it is called
in XFCE stacks the open Konsoles, but the listing
of them is probably by the order of which they were opened.
I'd rather it was alphabetical,
This might be one of those scenarios where I have not
found the best search terms for google.
I'm running XFCE and Konsole for terminal.
When I ssh into a system, the title for the Konsole
updates to the hostname of the remote system.
Even works for Solaris, so this is good.
The problem is with f
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Peter Viskup wrote:
Hi Pierre,
you can answer your question by yourself by having a look into directory
/lib/systemd/system and read systemctl man
page.
Small hint could be to run 'systemctl -a -t service' command.
Some more information about systemd in Debain can be read o
On 17/10/14 23:06, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:08:47PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Marty"
>>>
>>> It seems like free software employment and market share come
>>> with increasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's
>>> my
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The first task of my project is done. Openbox is systemd-free, and is
> intended to be systemd free. So that will form the GUI foundation. I'll
> come back in the next few days with some systemd-free panels that go
> well with Openbo
On 17/10/14 22:53, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 17 October 2014 11:25:43 Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> Blobs? Your choice with Debian (and at least some derivatives)
>> providing *you* don't choose hardware that requires it. Debian does
>> provide some nonfree kernel blobs.
>
> By default the kernel i
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:08:47PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Marty"
> >
> > It seems like free software employment and market share come with
> > increasing risk to objectivity and technical quality. It's my main
> > concern as a Debian user, as I consider
On Friday 17 October 2014 11:25:43 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> Blobs? Your choice with Debian (and at least some derivatives) providing
> *you* don't choose hardware that requires it. Debian does provide some
> nonfree kernel blobs.
By default the kernel in the Debian installer contains no blobs. You
On 17/10/14 21:45, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
>
> Le 16.10.2014 11:05, Wim Bertels a écrit :
>> Hallo,
>>
>> which distro would u recommend given the following wishes:
>> - debian/debian based
>> - stable
>> - recent (ie debian stable being to old for the desktop in my opinion)
>> - n
b.m wrote:
>
> Le 16.10.2014 11:05, Wim Bertels a écrit:
>> Hallo,
>>
>> which distro would u recommend given the following wishes:
[snip]
>> - no blobs (ie closed firmware for example) in the kernel or
>> default installation
[snip]
>> Is it correct to assume the only derivatives of debian contain
On 10/13/2014 4:21 AM, Joe wrote:
> The intention is that the spam emails be accepted by a catch-all
> domain-wide mail server, then later bounced by the one that holds the
> mailboxes and knows the addresses are invalid.
And that, by definition, is backscatter, which will quickly (and
deservedly
Le 16.10.2014 11:05, Wim Bertels a écrit :
Hallo,
which distro would u recommend given the following wishes:
- debian/debian based
- stable
- recent (ie debian stable being to old for the desktop in my
opinion)
- no blobs (ie closed firmware for example) in the kernel or default
installation
On 17/10/14 10:16, Mark Carroll wrote:
Steve Litt writes:
(snip)
I'll also try to find a systemd-free alternative to LibreOffice, and to
Gnumeric (Gnumeric will be tough, it's actually a good program).
(snip)
LibreOffice is enormously useful for Microsoft Office compatibility. Why
on Earth do
Hi
https://packages.debian.org/sid/terminology
--
Maderios
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5440eba5.20...@gmail.com
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
