On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 21:46:05 -0500
John Hasler wrote:
> Celejar writes:
> > ...my point is that even if you sell the hard drive, or any other
> > physical object containing the copy of the software that you own, the
> > purchaser will still not have the legal right to actually use that
> > softwa
Celejar writes:
> ...my point is that even if you sell the hard drive, or any other
> physical object containing the copy of the software that you own, the
> purchaser will still not have the legal right to actually use that
> software, insofar as your license doesn't grant you the right to
> trans
On Sep 23, 2012, at 6:13 AM, David L. Craig wrote:
On 12Sep23:0208-0700, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Sep 22, 2012, at 6:51 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Anyway, no NTP daemon should crash because of skewed time;
one thing is that it refushes to sync (which can be fine,
and should log this fact so the admin
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:04:05 -0500
John Hasler wrote:
> Celejar writes:
> > You, the end user, are granted by the OEM (in accordance with a right
> > Microsoft has granted *it*) the right to use the software, but not to
> > resell it (except as part of the sale of the entire computer).
>
> You,
Celejar writes:
> You, the end user, are granted by the OEM (in accordance with a right
> Microsoft has granted *it*) the right to use the software, but not to
> resell it (except as part of the sale of the entire computer).
You, the owner of a copy of the software, have the right to sell it
throu
On 09/23/2012 03:29 PM, Alex Padoly wrote:
Sir,
I have a server with Debian 6.0, I would like to put a card to have an
USB 2.0 ports.
I would like to know how Squeeze going to manage it at the first boot.
Thanks!
Regards.
Alex PADOLY
I would like to suggest that you get a usb-3 card. If you sh
On Sun 23 Sep 2012 at 15:28:15 -0400, Edward C. Jones wrote:
> I use up-to-date Debian testing, amd64 architecture.
>
> For the last few days, the following message is sometimes displayed,
> for a few seconds: "cannot fetch install sources". Then it says
> something like "ftp.us.debian.org wheezy
[back on list]
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 20:18:56 +0200
Erwan David wrote:
> On 23/09/12 18:42, Celejar wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:57:35 +0300
> > Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> >> On Jo, 20 sep 12, 06:31:52, lee wrote:
> >>> Celejar writes:
> >>>
> If you have an OEM license, it can't be t
Lou writes:
> If I run privoxy with filtering disabled in the webinterface it still
> feels a lot slower compared to surfing without a proxy at all.
I run Privoxy with filtering enabled and don't notice any slowness at
all. What does "feels a lot slower" mean? Can you measure any
differences?
--
I use up-to-date Debian testing, amd64 architecture.
For the last few days, the following message is sometimes displayed, for
a few seconds: "cannot fetch install sources". Then it says something
like "ftp.us.debian.org wheezy inRelease". What does this mean?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Marek Pawinski wrote:
> On 23/09/2012 16:47, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> Short answer: Change "managed=false" to "managed=true" in
>> "/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf" for NM to manage eth0.
>
> Thanks that did the trick.
You're welcome.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Sir,
I have a server with Debian 6.0, I would like to put a card to have an USB
2.0 ports.
I would like to know how Squeeze going to manage it at the first boot.
Thanks!
Regards.
Alex PADOLY
Hi list
If I run privoxy with filtering disabled in the webinterface it still
feels a lot slower compared to surfing without a proxy at all.
Is this to be expected, and can speed improve with config adjustments?
I just use the default actions on debian/squezze, and no tor.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:49:59 +0200
lee wrote:
> Celejar writes:
>
> > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 03:11:59 +0200
> > lee wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> isn't something I would want to do, and I don't understand why websites
> >> which are there to let people watch videos attempt to make watching them
> >
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:57:35 +0300
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Jo, 20 sep 12, 06:31:52, lee wrote:
> > Celejar writes:
> >
> > > If you have an OEM license, it can't be transferred to a different PC:
> > >
> > > http://www.microsoft.com/oem/en/licensing/sblicensing/pages/licensing_for_hobbyists.
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 02:48:38PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Third, I'm a bit puzzled by Jon's remarks quoted above. Martin
> recommends using a single, aka monolothic configuration file. Jon says
> "I disagree" but then suggests doing away with the debian framework.
Martin was replying to me.
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:41:46 +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>>> Why would it have to be taken over by a company? That wouldn't remove
>>> the need for learning.
>>
>> Because companies have the necessary resources to provide the kind of
>> support a newbie requires (e.g., IBM, HP, RedHat,
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:53:38 +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:25:34 +0200, lee wrote:
>>>
>>> Following your argumentation, which OS someone uses is only a matter
>>> of which OS other people someone chooses to surround themselves with
>>> are using when they do
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:20:20 +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
Should that happens, you will have to choose: looking for a proper
replacement of the plugin or simply avoid sites that make use of an
unsupported feature in your system.
>>>
>>> And that isn't a good situation.
>>
- Original Message -
> From: Stan Hoeppner
> Go back and re-read my original reply to the OP. Then explain to the
> list what it was that I said which so compelled you to go to battle.
The problem is that you make some questionable assumptions, hold them as
absolute truth and
then pro
On 23/09/2012 16:47, Tom H wrote:
Short answer: Change "managed=false" to "managed=true" in
"/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf" for NM to manage eth0.
Thanks that did the trick.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Jon Dowland writes:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:58:36PM +0200, lee wrote:
>> Jon Dowland writes:
>>
>> > The installer (in expert mode) supports an ssh client on an alternative
>> > VT, afaik. One can connect to another machine with stuff already
>> > installed via this if necessary. Surely t
Celejar writes:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 03:11:59 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> isn't something I would want to do, and I don't understand why websites
>> which are there to let people watch videos attempt to make watching them
>> so difficult for people that they can't watch the videos in the fi
Meike Stone writes:
>> >From your explanations, I understand that logrotate would create the
>> file if logrotate rotates the file, which requires the file to exist in
>> the first place, so create it manually and let logrotate rotate and
>> create the file in the future. Does that work? (This
Joe writes:
> I have to admit to using the single file, as I haven't yet had the
> enthusiasm to go through my old (sarge?) and heavily-customised one to
> break it into the bite-sized conf.d chunks.
Just stay with your own configuration file. Split configurations are evil.
--
Debian testing
Martin Steigerwald writes:
> Am Sonntag, 16. September 2012 schrieb lee:
>>
>> Adobe says on their website: "Flash Player 11.2 is the last supported
>> Flash Player version for Linux. Adobe will continue to provide security
>> updates."[1]
>>
>> What's that supposed to mean? Will we soon have
Camaleón writes:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:15:31 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> Camaleón writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:52:14 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>>>
And what about the users who *don't* want to learn, they just want to
have and use a working computer?
>>>
>>> (...)
>>>
>>> As I
Celejar writes:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:41:04 +0200
> lee wrote:
>
>> Celejar writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 02:29:18 +0200
>> > lee wrote:
>> >
>> > Not familiar with gimp or x3; sorry.
>>
>> You never used gimp? X3 is a game --- could be really awesome if it
>> wasn't so buggy.
>
>
Camaleón writes:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:25:34 +0200, lee wrote:
>>
>> Following your argumentation, which OS someone uses is only a matter of
>> which OS other people someone chooses to surround themselves with are
>> using when they do not want to learn or to solve problems.
>
> (...)
>
> F
Avi Greenbury writes:
> lee wrote:
>>
>> Besides that, it appears to me that people for reasons that escape me
>> are willing to put up with whatever crap and problems their windoze
>> throws at them while they *never* would put up with them if Linux threw
>> them at them. They even pay a lot o
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Jo, 20 sep 12, 06:31:52, lee wrote:
>> Celejar writes:
>>
>> > If you have an OEM license, it can't be transferred to a different PC:
>> >
>> > http://www.microsoft.com/oem/en/licensing/sblicensing/pages/licensing_for_hobbyists.aspx
>>
>> Why not? I haven't signed
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> I have however seen LCD monitors behave significantly different
> depending on refresh rate. Entire areas were blury, but everything was
> fine when I switched to another refresh rate (60Hz -> 75Hz if I remember
> correctly).
How did you do that? I thought their rate
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Jo, 20 sep 12, 03:11:59, lee wrote:
>>
>> Thank you! It doesn't seem to reasonably lead to anywhere. Maintaining
>> a library of scripts that deal with particular websites which even
>> continue to change how they present the videos to break such scripts
>> isn't so
Camaleón writes:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:27:35 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> Camaleón writes:
>>>
>>> Should that happens, you will have to choose: looking for a proper
>>> replacement of the plugin or simply avoid sites that make use of an
>>> unsupported feature in your system.
>>
>> And that isn't
On 09/23/2012 12:32 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:
On 09/23/2012 12:03 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 09/23/2012 11:56 AM, Wayne Topa wrote:
This is what I got at 11:55 EST
I get the same thing, but I don't see how any of that bears on the problem
I described.
I forgot to mention that I can not use
On 09/23/2012 12:03 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 09/23/2012 11:56 AM, Wayne Topa wrote:
On 09/23/2012 11:11 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
Has the procedure for working with 'dpkg --set-selections' changed at
some
point?
Yes & No. check with 'listbugs dpkg' when in doubt.
wtopa@dj:~$ bugs dpkg
Ret
El 2012-09-22 a las 12:42 -0700, unruh escribió:
(resending to the list)
> In linux.debian.user, you wrote:
(...)
> >> >> It seems not ntp problem but a kernel bug:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://my.opera.com/marcomarongiu/blog/2010/08/18/debugging-ntp-again-part-4-and-last
> >> >
> >> > You can try th
On 09/23/2012 11:56 AM, Wayne Topa wrote:
On 09/23/2012 11:11 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
Has the procedure for working with 'dpkg --set-selections' changed at some
point?
Yes & No. check with 'listbugs dpkg' when in doubt.
wtopa@dj:~$ bugs dpkg
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Parsing Found/Fi
On 09/23/2012 11:11 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
Has the procedure for working with 'dpkg --set-selections' changed at some
point?
Yes & No. check with 'listbugs dpkg' when in doubt.
wtopa@dj:~$ bugs dpkg
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done
serious bugs of dpkg
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 02:08:19 -0700, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2012, at 6:51 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Anyway, no NTP daemon should crash because of skewed time; one thing is
>> that it refushes to sync (which can be fine, and should log this fact
>> so the admin can make the proper measures)
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 10:17:22 +0200, Marek Pawinski wrote:
> Squeeze 6.05 amd64, I had backports enabled and made the mistake of
> updating to the latest back port kernel amongst other updates a few days
> ago.
Check whether along those updates it was also installed the "resolvconf"
package and i
Has the procedure for working with 'dpkg --set-selections' changed at some
point?
According to the dpkg man page, the sequence
dpkg --get-selections > selection_list
[copy selection_list to a remote machine]
dpkg --clear-selections
dpkg --set-selections < selection_list
should
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 02:23:15 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 9/22/2012 7:14 AM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>>> I disagree. This list, as with most others, is not to be used as a
>>> primary technical support resource. People should be making at least
>>> a cursory effort to search for information
On 23.09.2012 15:41, Marek Pawinski wrote:
> On 23/09/2012 13:06, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Marek Pawinski wrote:
>>> Squeeze 6.05 amd64, I had backports enabled and made the mistake of updating
>>> to the latest back port kernel amongst other updates a few days ago.
>>>
>>>
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:33:47PM -0700, Scarletdown wrote:
> On 9/22/2012 12:20 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/yourdrive bs=1M
>
> But does that remove the partitions themselves? I thought the OP
> was wanting to actually delete the MS partitions, which are used to
> resto
2012/9/23 Camaleón :
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:47:55 +0200, Gábor Hársfalvi wrote:
>
>> 2012/9/22 Camaleón :
>
> (...)
>
>>> So run:
>>>
>>> LANG=C dpkg -l | grep -i -e libavcodec52 -e libavformat52 -e libpostproc51
>>> -e libswscale0
>>>
>>> And send the output.
>>>
>>> ¹http://bugs.debian.org/cgi
On Sun 23 Sep 2012 at 15:41:06 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 23/09/12 15:30, Camaleón wrote:
> >
> >> please respond by email only as I do not have reliable email
> >
> > I think you meant "by telephone". If so, you have to be kidding :-)
>
> How did that get changed? The original post
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Marek Pawinski wrote:
> On 23/09/2012 13:06, Tom H wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Marek Pawinski
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Squeeze 6.05 amd64, I had backports enabled and made the mistake of
>>> updating to the latest back port kernel amongst other updates a fe
On 23/09/12 15:30, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> please respond by email only as I do not have reliable email
>
> I think you meant "by telephone". If so, you have to be kidding :-)
How did that get changed? The original post most certainly said
"telephone". I had the same thought as Camaleón
--
Tony
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:31:06 -0400, d d wrote:
> I need advice on removal of the microsoft hidden partition and other
> software from a hard drive
> leaving a completely clean hard drive.
You can use your manufacturer's hard drive disk utilities to perform a
low-level format.
> please respond
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:47:55 +0200, Gábor Hársfalvi wrote:
> 2012/9/22 Camaleón :
(...)
>> So run:
>>
>> LANG=C dpkg -l | grep -i -e libavcodec52 -e libavformat52 -e libpostproc51
>> -e libswscale0
>>
>> And send the output.
>>
>> ¹http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592710#15
> "
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 9/23/2012 3:20 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
>
>> While one could hope you're wanting this off the list because you've
>> finally realized how much you've embarrassed yourself, I know that,
>> sadly, that isn't true.
>
> The only thing in
Jude DaShiell wrote:
Alternatively in /etc/my.cnf comment all socket= lines and uncomment skip
networking line. This will mean no more external access to mysql though
if you do it but is more secure for those that like it that way.
I think that should be /etc/mysql/my.cnf
Hugo
--
To UNSU
On 23/09/2012 13:06, Tom H wrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Marek Pawinski wrote:
Squeeze 6.05 amd64, I had backports enabled and made the mistake of updating
to the latest back port kernel amongst other updates a few days ago.
When I rebooted I had no internet connectivity so I removed
On Fri 21 Sep 2012 at 19:42:03 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 9/21/2012 7:05 PM, T Elcor wrote:
> >
> > If someone deems a question "stupid" and below his level of
> > expertise one can always ignore the question, as there is no
> > obligation for anyone to answer any questions on this list. Pe
On 12Sep23:0208-0700, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Sep 22, 2012, at 6:51 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
> >Anyway, no NTP daemon should crash because of skewed time;
> >one thing is that it refushes to sync (which can be fine,
> >and should log this fact so the admin can make the proper
> >measures) but a di
Am Freitag, 21. September 2012 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 9/21/2012 4:16 PM, Neal Murphy wrote:
> > On Friday, September 21, 2012 04:53:21 PM Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >> It's not writing style but attitude. My attitude is that people
> >> should be self reliant. Only when they search and can't fin
Am Freitag, 21. September 2012 schrieb Neal Murphy:
> On Friday, September 21, 2012 04:53:21 PM Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > It's not writing style but attitude. My attitude is that people
> > should be self reliant. Only when they search and can't find an
> > answer should they ask on a mailing list
Michelle Konzack, 21.09.2012:
> Hello,
>
> I use currently on my PanelPC "xvkbd" which is the last crap on earth
> and the design is for the ass.
>
> Does someone know, whether the virtual keyboard from Android exist as
> source which can be used under Debian GNU/Linux?
>
> Also it would b
Am Freitag, 21. September 2012 schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 9/21/2012 10:06 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> > Stan, just my personal opinion but I think there's no need (and no
> > gain) to say this on the list. We all can think whatever we want
> > -and we can be wrong or right as we don't have all the deta
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, Neal Murphy wrote:
> I must agree that that was a somewhat braindead decision. 'Failure by design'
> is never an valid option.
>
> If a problem is important enough to require an admin's attention, a daemon
> should demand it via the console and the system logs. Nag repeatedl
On Sunday, September 23, 2012 05:08:19 AM Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2012, at 6:51 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> > Anyway, no NTP daemon should crash because of skewed time; one thing
> > is
> > that it refushes to sync (which can be fine, and should log this fact
> > so the admin can make the proper
On 9/23/2012 3:20 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> While one could hope you're wanting this off the list because you've
> finally realized how much you've embarrassed yourself, I know that,
> sadly, that isn't true.
The only thing in this thread that has embarrassed me is the hypocrisy
of those, i
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Marek Pawinski wrote:
>
> Squeeze 6.05 amd64, I had backports enabled and made the mistake of updating
> to the latest back port kernel amongst other updates a few days ago.
>
> When I rebooted I had no internet connectivity so I removed the back port
> kernel thin
On 22.9.2012 18:01, cr...@gtek.biz wrote:
I have the list of book ISBNs in a text file, so scripting this
should be quite easy. The problem is I can't figure out how to submit
the form from the command line.
http://curl.haxx.se/docs/manpage.html
It should be quite easy with curl.
--
To UNSUB
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:48:38 -0700
Ross Boylan wrote:
>
> Anyway, you can choose any of 3 approaches to configuration:
> 1. Use the split config in conjunction with the package management
> tools (debconf) to configure exim.
>
> 2. Like 1, but use the monolithic config file. It's not clear to
On Sep 22, 2012, at 6:51 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Anyway, no NTP daemon should crash because of skewed time; one thing
is
that it refushes to sync (which can be fine, and should log this fact
so the admin can make the proper measures) but a different thing is
completely killing the service.
Hi
Stan,
Calling people names is no way to encourage them to use free software.
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/bb13d31f-28c7-47b1-b34c-3c121e74f.
Hi,
Squeeze 6.05 amd64, I had backports enabled and made the mistake of
updating to the latest back port kernel amongst other updates a few days
ago.
When I rebooted I had no internet connectivity so I removed the back
port kernel thinking it was that.
But now with my original 2.6.32-5-amd
Artifex Maximus, 18.09.2012:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:29 PM, lee wrote:
> > Artifex Maximus writes:
> >
> >> I've changed my processor from E5200 to E8400. Since then my computer
> >> does not shutdown.
> >
> > It's possible that you damaged your board in the process.
>
> Thanks for your answ
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 9/22/2012 7:14 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:53:21 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/21/2012 10:06 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>>
Stan, just my personal opinion but I think there's no need (and no
gain) to say this
On 9/22/2012 7:14 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:53:21 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> On 9/21/2012 10:06 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>> Stan, just my personal opinion but I think there's no need (and no
>>> gain) to say this on the list. We all can think whatever we want -and
>>> we ca
72 matches
Mail list logo
