Hi, here is the Ubuntu downstream bugreport :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenetwork-filesharing/+bug/1526623
I believe this bug is no longer "moreinfo", can anyone fix the package
description?
V字龍
Looks like a duplicate of #807902
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: Konsole
Version: 15.08.0
On Sid, Konsole seems to work fine, but when I close that application, happens
a segmentation fault:
==
Application: konsole (konsole), signal: Segmentation fault
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64
Thank you! I learned the syntax years ago, but since I seldom use it,
forgot about it. Thank you!
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015, 18:38 Diederik de Haas wrote:
> forwarded 808001 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356759
> thanks
>
> On Tuesday 15 December 2015 18:21:07 Hörmetjan Yiltiz wrote:
> > forwa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 808001 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356759
Bug #808001 [cantor] cantor: add support for julia (julialang.org
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356759'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pleas
forwarded 808001 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356759
thanks
On Tuesday 15 December 2015 18:21:07 Hörmetjan Yiltiz wrote:
> forwarded 808001 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356759
You forgot to sent it to 'cont...@bugs.debian.org' and you need to close the
commands with 'thanks' (the
forwarded 808001 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356759
>What's the benefice of taking this path? Developpers are now focussed
>on
>digikam 5 and the beta2 is already working fine.
>
>Anyway I do not care as I now have digikam 5.0.0-beta2 working on my
>system...
It would get a working Digikam back, which I think is a great idea.
Hi!
On 15/12/15 04:10, Hormet Yiltiz wrote:
> Package: cantor
> Version: 4:4.14.2-3
> Severity: wishlist
> Dear Maintainer,
> Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for
> technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical
> computing env
On December 15, 2015 7:32:49 AM EST, Eric Valette wrote:
>On 12/15/2015 07:29 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
>> Anyway, despite Eric V's advice to jump to digikam 5, I went ahead
>and did a
>> local rebuild of digikam 4.14 and it seems to run fine.
>
>What's the benefice of taking this path? Deve
Your message dated Tue, 15 Dec 2015 10:14:05 -0300
with message-id <5256762.eFS0TLcUfD@luna>
and subject line Re: Bug#806689: vlc: crashed (SIGSEGV) after gnome-shell crash
has caused the Debian Bug report #806689,
regarding QXcbConnection: XCB error when gnome-shell crashes
to be marked as done.
On 12/15/2015 07:29 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Anyway, despite Eric V's advice to jump to digikam 5, I went ahead and did a
local rebuild of digikam 4.14 and it seems to run fine.
What's the benefice of taking this path? Developpers are now focussed on
digikam 5 and the beta2 is already work
Package: plasma-framework
Version: 5.16.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* W
13 matches
Mail list logo