On December 15, 2015 7:32:49 AM EST, Eric Valette <eric.vale...@free.fr> wrote: >On 12/15/2015 07:29 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > >> Anyway, despite Eric V's advice to jump to digikam 5, I went ahead >and did a >> local rebuild of digikam 4.14 and it seems to run fine. > >What's the benefice of taking this path? Developpers are now focussed >on >digikam 5 and the beta2 is already working fine. > >Anyway I do not care as I now have digikam 5.0.0-beta2 working on my >system...
It would get a working Digikam back, which I think is a great idea. Scott K
