Package: kaddressbook
Version: 4:3.3.2-3
Severity: minor
The SYNOPSIS section of the manpage for kabc2mutt (package kaddressbook) has
"kmahjongg" as the name of the command. Possible copy&paste error when
initially creating the manpage.
SYNOPSIS
kmahjongg [Qt-options] [KDE-options] [option
Accepted:
arts_1.4.2-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/arts/arts_1.4.2-4.diff.gz
arts_1.4.2-4.dsc
to pool/main/a/arts/arts_1.4.2-4.dsc
arts_1.4.2-4_all.deb
to pool/main/a/arts/arts_1.4.2-4_all.deb
libarts1-dev_1.4.2-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/arts/libarts1-dev_1.4.2-4_i386.deb
libarts1c2_1.4.2-4_i38
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
arts_1.4.2-4_all.deb: package says section is sound, override says libs.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong p
arts_1.4.2-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
arts_1.4.2-4.dsc
arts_1.4.2-4.diff.gz
arts_1.4.2-4_all.deb
libarts1c2_1.4.2-4_i386.deb
libarts1-dev_1.4.2-4_i386.deb
libartsc0_1.4.2-4_i386.deb
libartsc0-dev_1.4.2-4_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your D
* Nate Bargmann [Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:55:55 -0500]:
> When would be a good time to go to the trouble of resubmitting the bug
> (assuming I don't forget about it)?
Apologies, this bug of yours was closed by mistake. As can be seen in
http://bugs.debian.org/324867, it's open again, and we'll try
* Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005 Aug 24 13:53 -0500]:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #324867: KPPP should direct user to /usr/share/doc/kppp/README.Debian,
> which was filed against the kppp package.
>
> It has been closed by one of the develo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 220282 !
Bug#220282: partconf: should apt-install userspace tools for created filesystems
Changed Bug submitter from Sebastian Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Sebastian Ley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 200529 !
Bug#200529: Partconf should men
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
arts_1.4.2-4.diff.gz
arts_1.4.2-4.dsc
arts_1.4.2-4_all.deb
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 23:29:15, the
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:57:04 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bug due to pre-announced gcc transition (try 2)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 324867
Bug#324867: KPPP should direct user to /usr/share/doc/kppp/README.Debian
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 21:55, Josh Metzler wrote:
> reopen 324867
> thanks
Cheers,
I guess you must be getting fed up with the constant stream of bug reports
from people who don't read any other bug reports first.
Ernest.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
reopen 324867
thanks
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 03:26 pm, Ernest ter Kuile wrote:
> I think the one (Josh) that closed this bug didn't actually read the bug
> at all. From what I read, the bug in question is a wish to have the help
> file to at least point to the document already placed in /usr/s
I think the one (Josh) that closed this bug didn't actually read the bug at
all. From what I read, the bug in question is a wish to have the help file to
at least point to the document already placed in /usr/shared/doc instead of
the unhelpfull "Unable to provide help"
This bug has little to d
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:34:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bugs due to pre-announced gcc transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:34:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing bugs due to pre-announced gcc transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:17:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324893: Many kde packages not installable because of
kdelibs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 01:50 pm, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> Package: kdebase-dev
> Version: 4:3.3.2-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Dunno if you are waiting for c++ transition completion, anyway current
> sid version is not installable. Any reason to not move the experimental
> one in the sid
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 01:48 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Many if not most KDE packages are not installabe in Sid because:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> konqueror: Depends: kdelibs4 (>= 4:3.3.2-1) but it is not installable
...
> and kdelibs4c2 does not satisfy the d
Package: kdelibs4
Version:
Severity: grave
Many if not most KDE packages are not installabe in Sid because:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
konqueror: Depends: kdelibs4 (>= 4:3.3.2-1) but it is not installable
# apt-get install kdelibs4
Reading package lists... Done
Building
Package: kdebase-dev
Version: 4:3.3.2-1
Severity: grave
Dunno if you are waiting for c++ transition completion, anyway current
sid version is not installable. Any reason to not move the experimental
one in the sid pool? That's just for notice.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstab
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:17:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323747: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.4.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:17:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323967: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.4.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:17:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324147: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.4.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:17:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323747: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.4.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:17:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323967: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.4.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:17:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324174: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.4.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
kdelibs_3.4.2-2_all.deb: package says section is kde, override says libs.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong
Accepted:
kdelibs-bin_3.4.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdelibs/kdelibs-bin_3.4.2-2_i386.deb
kdelibs-data_3.4.2-2_all.deb
to pool/main/k/kdelibs/kdelibs-data_3.4.2-2_all.deb
kdelibs4-dev_3.4.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/k/kdelibs/kdelibs4-dev_3.4.2-2_i386.deb
kdelibs4-doc_3.4.2-2_all.deb
to poo
kdelibs_3.4.2-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kdelibs_3.4.2-2.dsc
kdelibs_3.4.2-2.diff.gz
kdelibs_3.4.2-2_all.deb
kdelibs-data_3.4.2-2_all.deb
kdelibs4-doc_3.4.2-2_all.deb
kdelibs-bin_3.4.2-2_i386.deb
kdelibs4c2_3.4.2-2_i386.deb
kdelibs4-dev_3
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:17:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324147: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.4.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:17:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323747: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.4.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:17:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323967: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.4.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:17:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324147: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.4.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: kopete
Version: 4:3.3.2-5
Followup-For: Bug #288688
I can confirm this problem; it makes the yahoo protocol just about unusable.
I notice that it seems to match KDE bug 87708.
It looks like KDE fixed this in their SVN revision 382436.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT pref
Package: kppp
Version: 4:3.3.2-6
Severity: wishlist
In the default configuration of both kppp and pppd, kppp will fail with the
following mysterious output:
Aug 24 09:17:06 localhost pppd[10347]: The remote system is required to
authenticate itself
Aug 24 09:17:06 localhost pppd[10347]: but I c
On Wednesday 24 August 2005 06:10 am, Klaus Huber wrote:
> # apt-get install juk
...
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> juk: Depends: libtunepimp-bin but it is not going to be installed
> E: Broken packages
This is expected. It is due to the gcc 4.0 transition currently taking
Hi qt-kde-devs,
I've packed[1] the kdm-theme-krystal[2] theme for kdm. It was rejected by
ftp-master for the following reason:
cite:
---
Hi Maintainer,
while looking at your package in NEW i decided to reject it.
Please contact debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org for information how
to proceed with
Package: juk
Severity: grave
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:12:12 +0300]:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to install kde-packages on unstable, but dependencies are
> directed to kdelibs4 package which is not available. Instead there is
> kdelibs package where kde-packages should point at.
KDE packages in unstable are undergo
Hi,
I'm trying to install kde-packages on unstable, but dependencies are
directed to kdelibs4 package which is not available. Instead there is
kdelibs package where kde-packages should point at.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
40 matches
Mail list logo
