On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 02:49:52PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> >oo-d-f is just a 'helper' package that is automatically installed along
> >with
> >openoffice.org, and is not indended to take a part in the 'user experience'
> >- that is the job of the openoffice.org package and all Suggests/Reco
Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2003 14:20:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#190723: openoffice.org-debian-files: should suggest
package "menu"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 25 Apr 2003 09:01, Jaime Cervera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The libc6 lib is an "official" one as
>
> $ dpkg -l libc6
[snip]
> ii libc6 2.3.1-14 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and
Timezone
>
> list of actual apt/sources.
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#190723: openoffice.org-debian-files: should suggest package "menu",
which was filed against the openoffice.org-debian-files package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Chris Halls <[EM
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 10:01:58AM +0200, Jaime Cervera wrote:
> The libc6 lib is an "official" one as
>
> ii libc6 2.3.1-14 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
I wasn't doubting that is was official, but as I suspected it is out of
date. There is a bug in libc 2.3.1 t
Package: openoffice.org-debian-files
Version: 1.0.3-2+1
Severity: normal
I think this package should really at least suggest menu, otherwise it
is far less usefull.
Regards
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0 with bunk-1 packages by Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Kerne
The libc6 lib is an "official" one as
$ dpkg -l libc6
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
uppercase=bad)
||/ Name VersionDescription
7 matches
Mail list logo
