Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 3.2ds0-0pre4
The Build-Depends in debian/control should have
gnat-3.1 [!arm !hurd-i386 !m68k] | .gnat-3.2 [!arm !hurd-i386 !m68k]
since gcc-3.2 might already be installed.
If possible, I'm going to wait for HJ to spin another release of binutils
before uploading anything post-2.12.92.0.15. It shouldn't be long. Once
he's made another one, I've got the rest of the bits ready to go, so I can
probably do the upload for this within a day.
What's our time frame for st
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 3.2_3.2-0pre4
Severity: grave
On ppc, there will be version requirements, for properly building
and installing gcc-3.2, on the glibc and binutils installed. See
bug report 155606 for a description of this issue. The needed binutils
will likely be version 2.13.90.0.4-1 and
Your message dated Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:05:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#156615: gcc-3.2 - Description improvement
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 08:08, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Package: gcc-3.2
> Version: current
> Severity: minor
>
> - Description: The GNU C compiler
> + Description: GNU Compiler Collection 3.2
>
> It's called "GNU Compiler Collection" since 1999, btw/fyi.
That's indeed the name of the upstream proj
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: current
Severity: minor
- Description: The GNU C compiler
+ Description: GNU Compiler Collection 3.2
It's called "GNU Compiler Collection" since 1999, btw/fyi.
Regards,
Joey
--
Let's call it an accidental feature. --Larry Wall
Please always Cc to me when re
Your message dated Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:05:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#156603: Outdated package description
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
7 matches
Mail list logo
