Your message dated Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:05:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#156603: Outdated package description
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2002 01:59:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 13 20:59:18 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bli.melix.com.mx [200.53.250.254]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17enRN-0003qo-00; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:59:18 -0500
Received: by bli.melix.com.mx (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B660D42DCF; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:59:11 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:59:11 -0500
From: Thomas Bliesener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Outdated package description
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc
Version: 3.2
The package description (e.g.
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/gcc-3.2.html) mentions still
the old name "GNU C compiler" instead of "GNU Compiler Collection".
--
bli
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 156603-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2002 05:09:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 14 00:09:09 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17eqP7-0002Wx-00; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:09:09 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA28568;
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:05:04 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g7E554S26805;
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:05:04 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:05:04 +0200
To: Thomas Bliesener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#156603: Outdated package description
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas Bliesener writes:
> Package: gcc
> Version: 3.2
>
> The package description (e.g.
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/gcc-3.2.html) mentions still
> the old name "GNU C compiler" instead of "GNU Compiler Collection".
the package still contains the C compiler only, not the whole
collection.
