Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Nice! dictionary-el looks to be more feature rich than dict.el.
>
> I should remember to pass all this praise upstream. ;-)
Absolutely!
> > I suppose I should leave dict.el in the package anyway. T
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nice! dictionary-el looks to be more feature rich than dict.el.
I should remember to pass all this praise upstream. ;-)
> I suppose I should leave dict.el in the package anyway. They don't
> conflict. It needs to be checkdoc cleaned though.
Righ
Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There's a package for that? I'd been using a badly done
> > home-grown version of it.
>
> You might also be interested in dictionary-el, which conveniently
> buttonizes cross-references.
>
Nice! dictionary-
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>> What aoother dict client ;-)? I'm using dictionary-el.
>
> Didn't know about that one. Tried it just now and it works well,
> so I'm using it now over my homegrown version.
Glad to hear it. (It seems I replied too hastily e
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's a package for that? I'd been using a badly done
> home-grown version of it.
You might also be interested in dictionary-el, which conveniently
buttonizes cross-references.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> At Fri, 26 Sep 2003 15:59:00 -0400,
> Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > It might be more easily found if it were named `dict-el'.
>
> What aoother dict client ;-)? I'm using dictionary-el.
Didn't know about that one. Tried
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > > Why? As long as there are comaintainers to maintain those parts of
> > > the package, I see no reason for dropping them.
> >
> > I guess I wasn't clear enough. "leave alone" means "don't touch".
At Fri, 26 Sep 2003 15:59:00 -0400,
Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > `emacs-goodies-extra-el' currently holds elisp packages
> > > that depend on other Debian packages. It only contains:
> > >
> >
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > It could be argued that `debian-changelog-mode.el' is also useful for
> > > Debian users because it highlights bugs and lets users click on them.
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > - `emacs-goodies-extra-el' currently holds elisp packages that depend on
> > other Debian packages. It only contains:
> >
> >dict.el: wrapper around the 'dict' command.
>
> There's a package for th
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - `emacs-goodies-extra-el' currently holds elisp packages that depend on
> other Debian packages. It only contains:
>
>dict.el: wrapper around the 'dict' command.
There's a package for that? I'd been using a badly done
home-grown version of
Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Why? As long as there are comaintainers to maintain those parts of
> > the package, I see no reason for dropping them.
>
> I guess I wasn't clear enough. "leave alone" means "don't touch".
> They won't change.
>
> However, I am considering orp
Hi,
I've seeking comments about the structure of the emacs-goodies-el source
package, which currently produces the following packages:
emacs-goodies-el Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs
emacs-goodies-extra-el Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs -- extra dependencies
devscripts-el Emac
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Yes and no. I think a diminished debian-changelog-mode that only has
> > read-only features (such a bug fetching) would be less overwhelming for
> > users. I don't know maybe not.
> >
> > Should `debian-
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > [I sent this earlier but never saw it appear...]
> > Hi,
>
> ...
>
> > I want to restructure these packages. I intend to leave `devscripts-el'
> > and `gnus-bonus-el' alone, giving control over devs
Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [I sent this earlier but never saw it appear...]
> Hi,
...
> I want to restructure these packages. I intend to leave `devscripts-el'
> and `gnus-bonus-el' alone, giving control over devscripts-el' to its
> upstream author Junichi Uekawa and find
[I sent this earlier but never saw it appear...]
Hi,
I've seeking comments about the structure of the emacs-goodies-el source
package, which currently produces the following packages:
emacs-goodies-el Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs
emacs-goodies-extra-el Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs -
17 matches
Mail list logo
