Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nice! dictionary-el looks to be more feature rich than dict.el.
I should remember to pass all this praise upstream. ;-) > I suppose I should leave dict.el in the package anyway. They don't > conflict. It needs to be checkdoc cleaned though. Right, and dict.el has the advantage of being lighter-weight. I also agree that it makes sense to merge the -extra package in to the main one, treating individual files' dependencies as recommendations or suggestions. (devscripts and xmms already work this way.) -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
