Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Nice! dictionary-el looks to be more feature rich than dict.el. > > I should remember to pass all this praise upstream. ;-)
Absolutely! > > I suppose I should leave dict.el in the package anyway. They don't > > conflict. It needs to be checkdoc cleaned though. > > Right, and dict.el has the advantage of being lighter-weight. I also > agree that it makes sense to merge the -extra package in to the main > one, treating individual files' dependencies as recommendations or > suggestions. (devscripts and xmms already work this way.) Thanks, I'll do that. Also, nobody commented on the removal of `debbugs-el' in favour of a more inclusive `debian-el' package. No one objected either, so I'll go ahead with this too. Thanks! Peter
