Re: FW: emacs-goodies-el restructuring

2003-09-29 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Nice! dictionary-el looks to be more feature rich than dict.el. > > I should remember to pass all this praise upstream. ;-) Absolutely! > > I suppose I should leave dict.el in the package anyway. T

Re: FW: emacs-goodies-el restructuring

2003-09-29 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nice! dictionary-el looks to be more feature rich than dict.el. I should remember to pass all this praise upstream. ;-) > I suppose I should leave dict.el in the package anyway. They don't > conflict. It needs to be checkdoc cleaned though. Righ

Re: FW: emacs-goodies-el restructuring

2003-09-28 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > There's a package for that? I'd been using a badly done > > home-grown version of it. > > You might also be interested in dictionary-el, which conveniently > buttonizes cross-references. > Nice! dictionary-

Re: FW: emacs-goodies-el restructuring

2003-09-27 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> What aoother dict client ;-)? I'm using dictionary-el. > > Didn't know about that one. Tried it just now and it works well, > so I'm using it now over my homegrown version. Glad to hear it. (It seems I replied too hastily e

Re: FW: emacs-goodies-el restructuring

2003-09-27 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There's a package for that? I'd been using a badly done > home-grown version of it. You might also be interested in dictionary-el, which conveniently buttonizes cross-references. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger

Re: FW: emacs-goodies-el restructuring

2003-09-27 Thread Ben Pfaff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > At Fri, 26 Sep 2003 15:59:00 -0400, > Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > > > Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It might be more easily found if it were named `dict-el'. > > What aoother dict client ;-)? I'm using dictionary-el. Didn't know about that one. Tried

Re: FW: emacs-goodies-el restructuring

2003-09-27 Thread csj
At Fri, 26 Sep 2003 15:59:00 -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > `emacs-goodies-extra-el' currently holds elisp packages > > > that depend on other Debian packages. It only contains: > > > > >

Re: FW: emacs-goodies-el restructuring

2003-09-27 Thread Ben Pfaff
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > It could be argued that `debian-changelog-mode.el' is also useful for > > > Debian users because it highlights bugs and lets users click on them.

Re: FW: emacs-goodies-el restructuring

2003-09-27 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > - `emacs-goodies-extra-el' currently holds elisp packages that depend on > > other Debian packages. It only contains: > > > >dict.el: wrapper around the 'dict' command. > > There's a package for th

Re: FW: emacs-goodies-el restructuring

2003-09-27 Thread Ben Pfaff
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - `emacs-goodies-extra-el' currently holds elisp packages that depend on > other Debian packages. It only contains: > >dict.el: wrapper around the 'dict' command. There's a package for that? I'd been using a badly done home-grown version of

Re: FW: emacs-goodies-el restructuring

2003-09-26 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yes and no. I think a diminished debian-changelog-mode that only has > > read-only features (such a bug fetching) would be less overwhelming for > > users. I don't know maybe not. > > > > Should `debian-